Impact of the number of lymph nodes sampled on outcome in ypT0N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

Achieving adequate lymph node dissection in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinomas by radical lymphadenectomy: Beyond the scope of numbers of harvested lymph nodes

Previous studies have recommended harvesting a large number of lymph nodes (LNs) to improve the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). These studies or clinical guidelines focus on the total harvested LNs during lymphadenectomy; however, the extent of LN dissection (LND) required in patients with ESCCs remains controversial. The present study proposed a novel individualized adequate LND (ALND) strategy to compliment current guidelines to improve individualized therapeutic efficacy. For N0 cases, ALND was defined as an LN harvest of >55% of the LNs from nodal zones adjacent to the tumor location; and for N⁺ cases, ALND was defined as 8, 8, 8, 8 or 16 LNs dissected from the involved cervical, upper, middle, lower and celiac zones, respectively. Retrospective analysis of the ESCC cohort revealed that the ALND was associated with improved patient survival [hazard ratio (HR)=0.45 and 95% CI=0.30–0.66)]. Stratified analyses revealed that the protective role of ALND was prominent, with the exception of higher pN⁺ staged (pN2-3) cases (HR=0.52, 95% CI=0.23–1.18). Furthermore, ALND was associated with improved survival in local diseases (T1-3/N0-1; HR=0.50, 95% CI=0.30–0.84) and locally advanced diseases (T4/Nany or T1-3/N2-3; HR=0.32, 95% CI=0.15–0.68). These findings suggested that the proposed ALND strategy may effectively improve the survival of patients with ESCC.

Cervical or thoracic anastomosis for patients with cervicothoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

For cervical and higher-level esophageal tumors, the choice of cervical anastomosis or thoracic anastomosis is still controversial. The goal of this study was to explore the optimal surgical approach for cervicothoracic esophageal squamous tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 3,802 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell tumors in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from Jan 2001 to Jan 2017. Twenty-six patients with cervical anastomosis and twenty-eight patients with thoracic anastomosis were evaluated.

Results

The cervical anastomosis group exhibited a greater number of resected lymph nodes (36.5±7.3 vs. 19.9±5.7, P<0.001). In addition, the cervical anastomosis group exhibited a higher recurrence rate (71.4% vs. 41.7%, P=0.047) and increased locoregional recurrence (P=0.040). Overall survival was not significantly different between groups (P=0.331). Moreover, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that postoperative locoregional recurrence is an independent risk factor for survival (P=0.031, 95% CI: 1.114-8.952).

Conclusions

Thoracic anastomosis led to satisfactory results in patients with cervicothoracic esophageal squamous tumors.

Aggressive surgical resection does not improve survival in operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with N2-3 status

AIM: To investigate the influence of nodal status on response and clarify the optimal treatment for operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1490 OSCC patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy between December 1996 and December 2009 at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. The surgical approach and the number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) were considered in the assessment of surgery. Patients were classified according to their nodal statuses (N0 vs N1 vs N2-3). Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of death or final follow-up. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between curves were assessed by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with prognosis. Statistical significance was assumed at a P < 0.05.

RESULTS: With a median time from surgery to the last censoring date for the entire cohort of 72.2 mo, a total of 631 patients were still alive at the last follow-up and the median survival time was 35.5 mo. The surgical approach (left transthoracic vs Ivor-Lewis/tri-incisional) was verified as independent prognostic significance in patients with N0 or N1 status, but not in those with N2-3 status. Similar results were also observed with the number of resected LNs (≤ 14 vs≥ 15). Compared with surgery alone, combined therapy achieved better outcomes in patients with N1 or N2-3 status, but not in those with N0 status. For those with N2-3 status, neither the surgical approach nor the number of resected LNs reached significance by univariate analysis, with unadjusted HRs of 0.826 (95%CI: 0.644-1.058) and 0.849 (95%CI: 0.668-1.078), respectively, and aggressiveness of surgery did not influence the outcome; the longest survival was observed in those patients who received the combined therapy.

CONCLUSION: Combined therapy has a positive role in OSCC with LN metastasis, and aggressive surgical resection does not improve survival in patients with N2-3 status.

Lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: prognostic and therapeutic impact on survival

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the association between total number of resected nodes and survival in patients after esophagectomy with and without nCRT.

BACKGROUND

Most studies concerning the potentially positive effect of extended lymphadenectomy on survival have been performed in patients who underwent surgery alone. As nCRT is known to frequently "sterilize" regional nodes, it is unclear whether extended lymphadenectomy after nCRT is still useful.

METHODS

Patients from the randomized CROSS-trial who completed the entire protocol (ie, surgery alone or chemoradiotherapy + surgery) were included. With Cox regression models, we compared the impact of number of resected nodes as well as resected positive nodes on survival in both groups.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-one patients underwent surgery alone, and 159 patients received multimodality treatment. The median (interquartile range) number of resected nodes was 18 (12-27) and 14 (9-21), with 2 (1-6) and 0 (0-1) resected positive nodes, respectively. Persistent lymph node positivity after nCRT had a greater negative prognostic impact on survival as compared with lymph node positivity after surgery alone. The total number of resected nodes was significantly associated with survival for patients in the surgery-alone arm (hazard ratio per 10 additionally resected nodes, 0.76; P=0.007), but not in the multimodality arm (hazard ratio 1.00; P=0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of resected nodes had a prognostic impact on survival in patients after surgery alone, but its therapeutic value is still controversial. After nCRT, the number of resected nodes was not associated with survival. These data question the indication for maximization of lymphadenectomy after nCRT.

Lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer

The prevalence of lymph node (LN) metastasis in esophageal cancer (EC) is widely spread to all three fields, namely, to the neck region, the mediastinal region and the abdominal region. Furthermore, the status of LN metastasis has been recognized as a key factor that influences the outcome after EC surgery. Therefore, the latest version of the UICC/AJCC TNM classification (7th edition) applied the number of metastatic LNs as an N factor. However, the precise clinical diagnosis of metastatic LNs is still difficult. This is mainly because there are many micrometastases in EC. Therefore, the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer (10th edition) has not incorporated the number of LN metastases into the N factor for its staging system and the accurate preoperative diagnosis of LN status is currently one of the most important issues to be resolved for EC. Given the frequency and extent of LN metastasis and its significance for the survival, controlling LN metastasis is a rational therapeutic strategy, and an extended LN dissection, such as three-field lymph node dissection may be logical, although appropriate patient selection is necessary. On the other hand, recent arguments have supported a reduction of unnecessary LN dissection in esophagectomy. To curtail unnecessary LN dissection, one of the current topics is sentinel lymph node-guided surgery and is being investigated as part of the next generation surgeries for EC. In this article, recent literatures were reviewed and we discuss the current status of lymph node dissection in EC.

Prognostic significance of lymph node characteristics on survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prognostic significance of lymph node characteristics (total number of resected lymph nodes, metastatic lymph node ratio, and metastatic lymph nodes site) on survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophagectomy at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, between October 1, 2003, and December 31, 2008, were reviewed. Survival data and clinicopathological characteristics were collected.

RESULTS

Among 205 patients, the median overall survival time was 48.0 months and the overall 5-year survival rate was 44.7 %. The independent risk factors for disease-free survival were the metastatic lymph node ratio (P < 0.001) and the number of positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001) and not the total number of resected lymph nodes (Χ (2) = 3.063, P = 0.216). There was no difference in survival between patients with extrathoracic and intrathoracic lymph node metastasis (Χ (2) = 0.295, P = 0.587). No significant relation was found between tumor location and the site of metastatic lymph nodes (rs = 0.125, P = 0.245).

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding revealed that the ratio and the number, but not the site, of metastatic lymph nodes were independent prognostic risk factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. We suggest taking these factors into consideration for better estimation of prognosis.