Clinical outcome of subcentimeter non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection: Single institution experience of 105 patients

Survival outcomes of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage small cell and large cell lung cancer: a novel focus on tumors less than 1 cm

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) remains unclear, particularly for small tumors. This study assesses the survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection with a novel focus on tumors less than 1 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was extracted for patients with SCLC (n = 11,962) and LCNEC (n = 6821) who underwent surgical resection between 2004 and 2020. Exclusion criteria were limited survival (< 30 days), positive lymph nodes, distant metastases, large tumors (> 5 cm), residual microscopic disease, and neoadjuvant therapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) from diagnosis, which was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariate Cox regression analyses. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to compare outcomes in patients with SCLC and tumors ≤ 1 cm who received adjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery alone.

RESULTS

The study involved 4114 SCLC and 3954 LCNEC patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a significant increase median OS in both SCLC (6.26 vs. 4.18 years; p < 0.001) and LCNEC (7.02 years vs. 4.89 years; p < 0.001), while also being an independent predictor of better OS in SCLC (HR: 0.74) and LCNEC (HR: 0.75) (p < 0.001). The benefit was more noticeable in tumors ≤ 1 cm, showing a significant OS increase after PSM (median OS 7.34 vs. 5.02 years; p = 0.0048).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery is associated with improved overall survival in stage I SCLC and LCNEC, particularly in SCLC tumors of 1 cm or less.

Effectiveness and safety of segmentectomy vs. wedge resection for the treatment of patients with operable non‑small cell lung cancer: A meta‑analysis and systematic review

The present study compared the differences in effectiveness and safety between segmentectomy (ST) and wedge resection (WR) in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for papers published from inception until July 2023. The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and study designs. ROBINS-I was selected to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence in the included non-randomised studies. Appropriate effect sizes were selected, and subgroup analyses, heterogeneity tests, sensitivity analyses and publication bias were applied. A total of 18 retrospective studies were included, involving 19,381 patients with operable NSCLC. The 5-year overall survival rate [hazard ratio (HR), 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.04, 0.34; P=0.014; I2=76.3%], lung cancer-specific survival rate (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.21, 0.38; P<0.01; I2=13.8%) and metastasis rate [odds ratio (OR), 1.56; 95% CI, 1.03, 2.38; P=0.037] in patients with operable NSCLC treated with WR were worse than those in patients treated with ST. The incidence of postoperative complications (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23, 0.82) in the WR group was lower than in the ST treatment group. There was no difference in postoperative recurrence (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.97, 4.74; P=0.058) and mortality (risk difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.03, 0.11; P=0.287) between groups. Based on current evidence, patients with NSCLC treated with ST surgery have better postoperative survival but more complications than those patients treated with WT, while the effect of WR and ST on the recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate remains controversial.

Advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of sub‑centimeter lung cancer in the era of precision medicine (Review)

Lung cancer is the malignancy with the highest global mortality rate and imposes a substantial burden on society. The increasing popularity of lung cancer screening has led to increasing number of patients being diagnosed with pulmonary nodules due to their potential for malignancy, causing considerable distress in the affected population. However, the diagnosis and treatment of sub-centimeter grade pulmonary nodules remain controversial. The evolution of genetic detection technology and the development of targeted drugs have positioned the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer in the precision medicine era, leading to a marked improvement in the survival rate of patients with lung cancer. It has been established that lung cancer driver genes serve a key role in the development and progression of sub-centimeter lung cancer. The present review aimed to consolidate the findings on genes associated with sub-centimeter lung cancer, with the intent of serving as a reference for future studies and the personalized management of sub-centimeter lung cancer through genetic testing.

The comparison of Lobe-Specific or Systematic Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection for Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma With Consolidation Tumor Ratio Over 0.5

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. This study will propose a personalized plan for mediastinal lymph node dissection in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma to reduce the risk of surgery and improve the quality of life.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the patients underwent lobectomy and lymph node dissection in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. Clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with solid component ratio (CTR) between 0.5 and 1 were included. Patients were divided into systematic (S-MLND) and lobe-specific (L-MLND) mediastinal lymph node dissection groups. The days of hospitalization, the presence or absence of complications, the recurrence-free survival rate, and the overall survival rate were calculated to evaluate the postoperative quality and operation risk of the patients.

RESULTS

210 patients (138 L-MLND and 72 S-MLND) were included. 2 lymph node metastases appeared in the S-MLND group while none in the L-MLND group (P = .049). No differences were shown in age, tumor site, size, solid component, degree of tumor invasion, and stage. The proportion of patients with severe postoperative cough and the length of hospital stay in the L-MLND group decreased. The 5-year OS of the entire cohort was 98.1%, 98.6% in L-MLND, compared with 97.2% in S-MLND; RFS was 94.8%, 95.7% in L-MLND, compared with 93.0% in S-MLND.

CONCLUSION

For cIA lung adenocarcinoma, according to the Thin-slice CT within 1 month before the operation, if the main lesion was less than 3 cm and CTR over 0.5, L-MLND is as effective as S-MLND.

Outcome of Resected Lung Cancers with Subcentimeter Solid Component on Computed Tomography

Background Although the opportunity to treat subcentimeter lung cancers has increased, the optimal surgical methods remain unclear. We performed a retrospective study to examine the clinical outcome of subcentimeter lung cancers.

Patients and Methods In total, 118 patients who underwent curative resection for subcentimeter lung cancer from January 2005 to December 2013 were analyzed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratio to identify independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results Anatomical resections were performed for 64 patients (59 lobectomies and 5 segmentectomies) and wedge resections for 54 patients. Recurrence developed in six patients who had consolidation-predominant tumors (consolidation/tumor [C/T] ratio of >0.5) and underwent wedge resections. The first recurrence patterns were regional recurrences in three patients, both regional and distant in one, and distant in two. Seventeen patients died of other causes. The multivariate analysis revealed that the C/T ratio was the independent predictor of RFS (p = 0.008) and OS (p = 0.011).

Conclusion Patients with subcentimeter lung cancer rarely developed recurrence. The C/T ratio was the independent prognostic factor, and all relapsed patients received wedge resections. Even for subcentimeter lung cancers, we should select the extent of pulmonary resection after thoroughly considering whether wedge resection (less invasiveness) is a reasonable alternative to anatomical resection (superior oncologic efficacy) considering the C/T ratio of the lesion.

Oncologic outcomes of lobectomy vs. segmentectomy in non-small cell lung cancer with clinical T1N0M0 stage: a literature review and meta-analysis

Background

Lobectomy has long been regarded as the standard treatment for operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies suggested that segmentectomy could achieve a good prognosis for early-stage NSCLC and might be an alternative to lobectomy in this cohort. Until now, on the issue of comparison between lobectomy and segmentectomy, there remains no published randomized controlled trial (RCT), and all existing evidence is low. Recently, a categorization of lower-level evidence has been proposed, namely, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the oncologic outcome between lobectomy and segmentectomy in NSCLC with the clinical T1N0M0 stage according to the GRADE system.

Methods

PubMed, the PMC database, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library were searched prior to May 2019 to identify studies that compared the prognosis between lobectomy and segmentectomy for clinical T1N0M0 NSCLC. The evidence level of the included studies was assessed according to the GRADE system, including level IIA, probably not confounded nonrandomized comparison; level IIB, possibly confounded nonrandomized comparison; and level IIC, probably confounded nonrandomized comparison. The predefined outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

Twelve nonrandomized studies involving 8,072 participants were included. Of these studies, two were classified as IIA level (16.7%), six as IIB level (50.0%), and four as IIC level (33.3%). When crude HRs were included, compared with lobectomy, segmentectomy was associated with shorter OS but comparable DFS in the entire cohort (OS, pooled HR =1.45, 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.67; DFS, pooled HR =1.03, 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.82) and in patients with nodules ≤2 cm (OS, pooled HR =1.55, 95% CI, 1.33 to 1.80; DFS, pooled HR =0.98, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.77). When adjusted HRs were included, the impact of segmentectomy on OS and DFS was comparable to that of lobectomy in the entire cohort (OS, pooled HR =1.39, 95% CI, 0.92 to 2.10; DFS, pooled HR =0.83, 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.03) and in patients with nodules ≤2 cm (OS, pooled HR =1.61, 95% CI, 0.87 to 3.00; DFS, pooled HR =0.90, 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27).

Conclusions

Based on our results, although shorter OS is observed in patients received segmentectomy, it is necessary to wait for more results from RCT to draw a valid conclusion.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Less is more in solid-dominant lung cancer? Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for solid-dominant stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis study

Although lobectomy is well established as the standard surgical procedure for stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sublobar resection is increasingly preferred, particularly in intentional segmentectomy for radiologically less-invasive small NSCLC. However, the indication for sublobar resection of radiologically pure solid or solid-dominant NSCLC remains controversial, owing to its invasive pathological characteristics. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of sublobar resection with lobectomy for treating solid-dominant stage IA NSCLC. An electronic search was conducted using four online databases from their dates of inception to April 2017. The hazard ratio (HR) was used as a summary statistic for censored outcomes and the odds ratio (OR) was used as the summary statistic for dichotomous variables. A total of nine studies met the selection criteria, including a total of 2,265 patients (1,728 patients underwent lobectomy, 425 segmentectomy and 112 wedge resection). From the available data, patients treated with a sublobar resection had a higher risk of local recurrence compared with patients treated with lobectomy [OR=1.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02–3.50; P=0.04]. However, no obvious difference in local recurrence was found in a subgroup analysis of segmentectomy compared with lobectomy (OR=1.19; 95% CI, 0.68–2.10; P=0.61). Sublobar resection was not associated with a significantly negative impact on distant recurrence (OR=1.09; 95% CI, 0.55–2.16; P=0.796). Patients in the sublobar resection group had no significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS; HR=1.43; 95% CI, 0.76–2.69; P=0.27) and overall survival (OS; HR=0.96; 95% CI, 0.75–1.23; P=0.77) compared with those in the lobectomy group. In the subgroup analysis of anatomic segmentectomy compared with lobectomy, there was no significant difference in RFS, with mild inter-study heterogeneity. The current meta-analysis suggested that segmentectomy had a comparable oncologic efficacy to lobectomy for solid-dominant stage IA NSCLC. Therefore, segmentectomy may be a feasible alternative in selected cases of solid-dominant stage IA NSCLC. However, these findings should be confirmed by prospective randomized controlled trials in the future.

Novel perspective to evaluate the safety of segmentectomy: clinical significance of lobar and segmental lymph node metastasis in cT1N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The regularity of intrapulmonary lobar and segmental lymph node (LSN) metastasis in cT1N0M0 stage lung adenocarcinoma remains unclear. Thus, segmentectomy with uncertain LSN metastatic status remains a potential oncological risk. We aimed to facilitate more accurate determination of N staging and filter more suitable cases for segmentectomy.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed from March 2014 to September 2016. A total of 196 patients diagnosed with cT1N0M0 stage lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled and received lobectomy together with mediastinal lymph node dissection. The intrapulmonary LSNs were dissected and classified as adjacent LSN or isolated LSN. The metastatic status of the LSNs together with the TNM staging were analysed. A comparison of the metastatic probability of isolated LSN was carried out considering the metastatic status of adjacent LSN, imaging features, smoking history, pathological subtypes, size of the lesions and serum level of tumour markers (carcinoembryonic antigen and Cyfra21-1).

RESULTS

Among the 196 cases enrolled, 152 were confirmed as pN0, 36 as pN1, 6 as pN1 + N2 and 2 as skip pN2. When the LSNs had not been dissected, the false-negative rate for N staging was 9.0% (15 of 167). Patients with adjacent LSN metastasis (P < 0.001), solid nodule (P = 0.001), non-lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma (P < 0.001), nodules with maximum diameter larger than 2 cm (P < 0.001) and those with elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (>5 ng/ml) (P = 0.005) had a higher isolated LSN metastasis rate. No significant difference in isolated LSN metastasis rate was found between groups with or without smoking history (P = 0.90) and with different serum Cyfra21-1 levels (P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Dissection of intrapulmonary LSNs reduces the false-negative rate of lymph node metastasis. Solid nodule, non-lepidic predominant invasive adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma larger than 2 cm in maximum diameter or with elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen level (>5 ng/ml) might not be suitable for segmentectomy. The lymph node sampling area during segmentectomy should include adjacent LSNs of the target segment. When metastasis to the adjacent LSNs is confirmed by fast-frozen pathology, segmentectomy would not be suitable.

Optimal delivery of follow-up care following pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer

Introduction

The rationale for oncologic surveillance following pulmonary lobectomy is to detect recurrent disease or a second primary lung cancer early enough so that an intervention can increase survival and/or improve quality of life. Therefore, we reviewed literature for international guidelines and reorganized these useful factors associated with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurrence as remedies in postoperative follow-up.

Method

The population of interest for this review was patients who had been treated with complete resection for primary NSCLC and were in follow-up.

Result

Guidelines on follow-up care for NSCLC vary internationally. Because of the production of progressive medical modalities, the current follow-up care should be corrected.

Conclusion

The specific follow-up schedule for computed tomography imaging may be more or less frequent, depending upon risk factors for recurrence. Many different predictors of postoperative recurrence may help to optimize the patient selection for specified surveillance guidelines and personalized adjuvant therapies to prevent possibly occult micrometastases and to get a better outcome.

Clinical Significance of Positron Emission Tomography in Subcentimeter Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the clinical significance of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with subcentimeter non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2014, 189 patients were investigated preoperatively by PET for c-N0 subcentimeter NSCLC, and SUVmax was reviewed. Pathologic invasiveness (PI) was defined as having at least one of the following factors: lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, pleural invasion, or nodal metastasis. Survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimation methods using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Mean SUVmax was 1.7 ± 1.8 (range, 0.6 to 13.0), and the median was 1.0. PI was found in 28 (15%) patients with subcentimeter NSCLC. Multivariate analysis revealed that SUVmax was an independent significant clinical predictor of PI (p = 0.0251) and a prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0485). A receiver operating characteristics curve elucidated the predictive cutoff value of PI as SUVmax = 2.0. The high-SUVmax group (SUVmax >2.0; n = 42) had significantly more radiologically pure-solid lesions (91% vs 14%; p < 0.0001) and postoperative nodal involvement (12% vs 0%; p < 0.0001) than the low-SUVmax group (SUVmax ≤2.0; n = 147). The 5-year lung cancer-specific OS (LCS-OS) elucidated significant difference between the high-SUVmax and low-SUVmax arms of the study (LCS-OS: 92.3% vs 96.9%, respectively; p = 0.0054), and cancer recurrence was found exclusively in pure-solid subcentimeter NSCLC on thin-section computed tomography. In the high-SUVmax arm of the study, lobectomy was associated with better 3-year recurrence-free survival compared with sublobar resection despite the subcentimeter disease (88.3% vs 50.0%; p = 0.0453).

CONCLUSIONS

SUVmax on PET reflected tumor invasiveness and had a great impact on the prognosis of subcentimeter NSCLC, especially when a tumor showed a pure-solid appearance on a thin-section computed tomography scan.

Choice of Surgical Procedure for Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer ≤ 1 cm or > 1 to 2 cm Among Lobectomy, Segmentectomy, and Wedge Resection: A Population-Based Study

Purpose

According to the lung cancer staging project, T1a (≤ 2 cm) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should be additionally classified into ≤ 1 cm and > 1 to 2 cm groups. This study aimed to investigate the surgical procedure for NSCLC ≤ 1 cm and > 1 to 2 cm.

Methods

We identified 15,760 patients with T1aN0M0 NSCLC after surgery from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer–specific survival (LCSS) were compared among patients after lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection. The proportional hazards model was applied to evaluate multiple prognostic factors.

Results

OS and LCSS favored lobectomy compared with segmentectomy or wedge resection in patients with NSCLC ≤ 1 cm and > 1 to 2 cm. Multivariable analysis showed that segmentectomy and wedge resection were independently associated with poorer OS and LCSS than lobectomy for NSCLC ≤ 1 cm and > 1 to 2 cm. With sublobar resection, lower OS and LCSS emerged for NSCLC > 1 to 2 cm after wedge resection, whereas similar survivals were observed for NSCLC ≤ 1 cm. Multivariable analyses showed that wedge resection is an independent risk factor of survival for NSCLC > 1 to 2 cm but not for NSCLC ≤ 1 cm.

Conclusion

Lobectomy showed better survival than sublobar resection for patients with NSCLC ≤ 1 cm and > 1 to 2 cm. For patients in whom lobectomy is unsuitable, segmentectomy should be recommended for NSCLC > 1 to 2 cm, whereas surgeons could rely on surgical skills and the patient profile to decide between segmentectomy and wedge resection for NSCLC ≤ 1 cm.