Timing of disease occurrence and hepatic resection on long-term outcome of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis

A calcitonin-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm treated with distal pancreatectomy a lengthy time after a left trisectionectomy for liver metastases: a case report

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) are extremely rare. There have been no reports of a patient in whom liver metastases were the presenting finding, and a calcitonin-producing PanNEN was subsequently detected after a lengthy period.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53-year-old man had diarrhea for several years. Computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple liver tumors. We performed a left trisectionectomy with a bile duct resection. The histologic examination showed neuroendocrine tumors G1. Immunohistochemistry was positive for calcitonin and the serum calcitonin level was elevated. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of hepatic origin are extremely rare, so a systemic exploration was performed, but no tumor was detected. CT showed a 4-mm calcification in the pancreatic body, but no contrast-enhanced mass was noted. Although the liver tumors were resected, the diarrhea and high serum calcitonin level persisted. Serial examinations were performed for 6 years, but no tumor was identified; however, 6.5 years after the hepatectomy the serum calcitonin level increased. CT showed a 10-mm contrast-enhanced mass in the calcified area of the pancreatic body. A distal pancreatectomy was performed. The histologic examination showed a neuroendocrine tumor G1, which mimicked the liver tumors. Immunohistochemistry was positive for calcitonin. After the distal pancreatectomy, the serum calcitonin level decreased and diarrhea resolved. The calcitonin-producing neuroendocrine neoplasm was considered the pancreatic primary and the hepatic tumors were metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcitonin-producing PanNENs may be initially recognized as liver tumors and may become evident after a lengthy period, thus long-term observation is recommended. Aggressive surgeries may contribute to long-term survival.

[Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors]

Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) are very heterogeneous with respect to the clinical presentation and the prognosis. The treatment of NELMs requires a multidisciplinary approach and patients with NELM should be referred to a specialized center. When possible, the resection of NELMs provides the best long-term results. The general selection criteria for liver resection include an acceptable general physical condition for a large liver operation, tumors with a favorable differentiation grade 1 or 2, a lack of extrahepatic lesions, a sufficient residual liver volume and the possibility to resect at least 70% of the metastases. Supplementary treatment, including simultaneous liver ablation, are generally safe and can increase the number of patients who can be considered for surgery. For patients with resectable NELM, the resection of the primary tumor is recommended either in a 2-stage or combined procedure. In selected patients with nonresectable NELM a liver transplantation can be carried out, which can be associated with excellent long-term results.

Is Long-Term Survival in Metastases from Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Improved by Liver Resection?

Background and Objectives: Although many of the neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) have a typically prolonged natural history compared with other gastrointestinal tract cancers, at least 40% of patients develop liver metastases. This study aims to identify whether liver resection improves the overall survival of patients with liver metastases from NEN. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at “Fundeni” Clinical Institute over a time period of 15 years; we thereby identified a series of 93 patients treated for NEN with liver metastases, which we further divided into 2 groups as follows: A (45 patients) had been subjected to liver resection complemented by systemic therapies, and B (48 patients) underwent systemic therapy alone. To reduce the patient selection bias we performed at first a propensity score matching. This was followed by a bootstrapping selection with Jackknife error correction, with the purpose of getting a statistically illustrative sample. Results: The overall survival of the matched virtual cohort under study was 41 months (95% CI 37–45). Group A virtual matched patients showed a higher survival rate (52 mo., 95% CI: 45–59) than B (31 mo., 95% CI: 27–35), (p < 0.001, Log-Rank test). Upon multivariate analysis, seven independent factors were identified to have an influence on survival: location (midgut) and primary tumor grading (G3), absence of concomitant LM, number (2–4), location (unilobar), grading (G3) of LM, and 25–50% hepatic involvement at the time of the metastatic disease diagnosis. Conclusions: Hepatic resection is nowadays the main treatment providing potential cure and prolonged survival, for patients with NEN when integrated in a multimodal strategy based on systemic therapy.

Microwave ablation combined with hepatectomy for treatment of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is the first choice for treating neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases. However, most patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases are not suitable for hepatectomy. Ablation combined with hepatectomy can be an alternative to liver resection.

AIM

To explore the clinical effect of microwave ablation combined with hepatectomy for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases.

METHODS

In this study, the data of patients who underwent microwave ablation combined with hepatectomy for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases from June 2015 to January 2018 were reviewed. Before the operation, the patients did not receive any treatment for liver neuroendocrine tumors. After a multidisciplinary expert group discussion, all patients were deemed unsuitable for liver resection. All patients were diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumors by pathology. The overall survival time and progression-free survival time were followed by telephone calls and outpatient visits after surgery.

RESULTS

Eleven patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases were treated by microwave ablation combined with hepatectomy between June 2015 and January 2018. The median number of liver metastatic nodules was 4 (range, 2 to 43). The median number of lesions resected was 1 (range, 1 to 18), and the median number of lesions ablated was 3 (range, 1 to 38). The mean operation time was 405.6 (± 39.4) min. The median intraoperative blood loss was 600 mL (range, 50 to 3000). Ten patients had a fever after surgery. The median duration of fever was 3 d (range, 0 to 21). Elevated bilirubin levels occurred in all patients after surgery. The median bilirubin on the first day after surgery was 28.5 (range, 10.7 to 98.9) µmol/L. One patient developed respiratory failure, renal insufficiency, and pneumonia after the operation. No patient died postoperatively during hospitalization. The mean overall survival time after surgery was 34.1 (± 3.7) mo, and the median progression-free survival time was 8 (range, 2 to 51) mo. One year after surgery, ten patients survived and five patients survived without progression. Three year after surgery, eight patients survived and two patients survived without progression.

CONCLUSION

Microwave ablation combined with hepatectomy not only makes the patients obtain a survival rate similar to that of patients undergoing hepatectomy, but also has a low incidence of postoperative complications.

Recurrence of Non-functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors After Curative Resection: A Tumor Burden-Based Prediction Model

BACKGROUND

Patients can experience recurrence following curative-intent resection of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs). We sought to develop a nomogram to risk stratify patients relative to recurrence following resection of NF-pNETs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for NF-pNETs between 1997 and 2016 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The impact of clinicopathologic factors, including tumor burden score (TBS) (TBS² = (maximum tumor diameter)² + (number of tumors)²), was assessed relative to recurrence-free survival (RFS), and a nomogram was developed and internally validated.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 31.0 months (IQR 11.3-56.6 months), 66 (15.8%) out of 416 patients in the cohort experienced tumor recurrence. Overall, 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS following curative-intent resection was 83.2%, 74.0%, and 44.7%, respectively. Several factors were associated with risk of recurrence including tumor grade (referent G1: G2, HR 4.07, 95% CI 2.29-7.26, p < 0.001; G3, HR 10.83, 95% CI 3.72-31.53, p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (LNM) (HR 4.71, 95% CI 2.69-8.26, p < 0.001), as well as TBS (referent low: medium, HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.06-9.24, p < 0.001; high, HR 6.04, 95% CI 2.96-12.31, p < 0.001). A weighted nomogram including tumor grade (G1 0, G2 54.19, G3 100), LNM (N0 0, N1 42.06), and TBS (low 0, medium 44.07, high 56.48) was developed. The discriminatory power of the nomogram was very good with a C-index of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.79) in the training cohort and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) in the validation cohort. In addition, the nomogram performed better than the current 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging system, which had a C-index of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.60-0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram that incorporated tumor grade, LNM, and TBS was established that had good discrimination and calibration. The nomogram may be an effective tool to stratify patients relative to recurrence risk following resection of NF-pNETs.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases: a contemporary review of treatment strategies

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are globally increasing in prevalence and the liver is the most common site of metastasis. Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) are heterogeneous in clinical presentation and prognosis. Fortunately, recent advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies have improved the multidisciplinary management of this challenging condition. When feasible, surgical resection of NELM offers the best long-term outcomes. General indications for hepatic resection include performance status acceptable for major liver surgery, grade 1 or 2 tumors, absence of extrahepatic disease, adequate size and function of future liver remnant, and feasibility of resecting >90% of metastases. Adjunct therapies including concomitant liver ablation are generally safe when used appropriately and may expand the number of patients eligible for surgery. Among patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. For patients who are not surgical candidates, liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization can provide locoregional control and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options also exist for patients with advanced or progressive disease. Ongoing research efforts are needed to identify novel biomarkers that will define the optimal indications for and sequencing of treatments to be delivered in a personalized fashion.

Tumor burden score predicts tumor recurrence of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after curative resection

BACKGROUND

To investigate the feasibility of Tumor Burden Score (TBS) to predict tumor recurrence following curative-intent resection of non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs).

METHOD

The TBS cut-off values were determined by a statistical tool, X-tile. The influence of TBS on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was examined.

RESULTS

Among 842 NF-pNETs patients, there was an incremental worsening of RFS as the TBS increased (5-year RFS, low, medium, and high TBS: 92.0%, 73.3%, and 59.3%, respectively; P < 0.001). TBS (AUC 0.74) out-performed both maximum tumor size (AUC 0.65) and number of tumors (AUC 0.5) to predict RFS (TBS vs. maximum tumor size, p = 0.05; TBS vs. number of tumors, p < 0.01). The impact of margin (low TBS: R0 80.4% vs. R1 71.9%, p = 0.01 vs. medium TBS: R0 55.8% vs. R1 37.5%, p = 0.67 vs. high TBS: R0 31.9% vs. R1 12.0%, p = 0.11) and nodal (5-year RFS, low TBS: N0 94.9% vs. N1 68.4%, p < 0.01 vs. medium TBS: N0 81.8% vs. N1 55.4%, p < 0.01 vs. high TBS: N0 58.0% vs. N1 54.2%, p = 0.15) status on 5-year RFS outcomes disappeared among patients who had higher TBS.

CONCLUSIONS

TBS was strongly associated with risk of recurrence and outperformed both tumor size and number alone.

Surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that vary in their clinical presentation, behavior and prognosis. The most common site of metastasis is the liver. Surgical resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is thought to afford the best long-term outcomes when feasible. Initial preoperative workup should include surveillance for carcinoid syndrome, screening for evidence of liver insufficiency, and performance of imaging specific to neuroendocrine tumors such as a somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography scan. Standard surgical principles apply to hepatic surgery for NELM, namely prioritizing low central venous pressure anesthesia, minimizing blood loss, knowledge of liver anatomy, generous use of intraoperative ultrasound, as well as safe parenchymal transection techniques and practices to avoid bile leakage. Knowledge of established prognostic factors may assist with patient selection, which is important for optimizing short- and long-term outcomes of hepatic resection. Adjunct therapies such as concomitant liver ablation are used frequently and are generally safe when used appropriately. For patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. Primary tumor resection in the setting of unresectable metastatic disease is more controversial, however generally recommended if morbidity is acceptable. For patients who are not surgical candidates, due to either patient performance status or burden of liver disease, several liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization are available to assist with locoregional control, extend progression-free survival (PFS), and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options exist for patients with metastatic PNET which are often prioritized for those patients with advanced or progressive disease. A systematic approach in a multi-disciplinary setting is likely to result in the best long-term outcomes for patients with pancreatic NELM. Ongoing research is needed to determine the optimal patient selection for hepatic surgery as well as the ideal treatment sequencing for those patients with NELM.

ALPPS in neuroendocrine liver metastases not amenable for conventional resection - lessons learned from an interim analysis of the International ALPPS Registry

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the most effective treatment option for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM). This study investigated the role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) as a novel strategy in treatment of NELM.

METHODS

The International ALPPS Registry was reviewed to study patients who underwent ALPPS for NELM.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2017, 954 ALPPS procedures from 135 international centers were recorded in the International ALPPS Registry. Of them, 24 (2.5%) were performed for NELM. Twenty-one patients entered the final analysis. Overall grade ≥3b morbidity was 9% after stage 1 and 27% after stage 2. Ninety-day mortality was 5%. R0 resection was achieved in 19 cases (90%) at stage 2. Median follow-up was 28 (19-48) months. Median disease free survival (DFS) was 17.3 (95% CI: 7.1-27.4) months, 1-year and 2-year DFS was 73.2% and 41.8%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. One-year and 2-year OS was 95.2% and 95.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ALPPS appears to be a suitable strategy for inclusion in the multimodal armamentarium of well-selected patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases. In light of the morbidity in this initial series and a high rate of disease-recurrence, the procedure should be taken with caution.

Early recurrence of well-differentiated (G1) neuroendocrine liver metastasis after curative-intent surgery: Risk factors and outcome

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to identify the risk of early vs late recurrence of well-differentiated (G1) neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM) after curative-intent resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for well-differentiated NELM were identified from a multi-institutional database. Clinicopathological details, as well as the long-term overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were obtained and compared. The optimal cutoff value to differentiate early and late recurrence was determined to be 1 year based on trend curve analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 548 patients undergoing curative resection for NELM, 162 patients had a well-differentiated NELM. After a median follow-up of 69 months, 59 (36.4%) patients had tumor recurrence; 23 (39.0%) patients recurred within 1 year (early recurrence) after surgery, while 36 (61.0%) recurred after 1 year (late recurrence). Early recurrence was associated with worse outcome vs late recurrence (5-year OS, 72.4% vs 92.0%; P = 0.020) and no recurrence (5-year OS, 72.4% vs 100.0%; P < 0.001). In addition, postrecurrence survival was worse within 36 months after recurrence among patients who recurred early compared with patients who recurred late (survival after recurrence at 36 months: early recurrence, 71.6% vs late recurrence, 91.4%; P = 0.047), although survival was comparable at 60 months (early recurrence, 71.6% vs late recurrence, 70.0%; P = 0.304). On multivariable analysis, nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 4.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-16.7; P = 0.029) and lymph node metastasis (HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.1; P = 0.028) were independent risk factors for early recurrence, whereas lymph node metastasis (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-7.8; P = 0.020) and R1 resection (HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.4-10.5; P = 0.008) were independently associated with late recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly, one-third of patients with well-differentiated NELM experienced a recurrence following curative-intent surgery. Among patients who recurred, two out of five patients recurred within 1 year after surgery. Early recurrence of well-differentiated NELM was associated with the hormone functional status and lymph node metastasis.

Hepatic Resection for Non-functional Neuroendocrine Liver Metastasis: Does the Presence of Unresected Primary Tumor or Extrahepatic Metastatic Disease Matter?

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of unresected primary tumor, as well as extrahepatic metastasis, on the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing hepatic resection for non-functional neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NF-NELM).

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatic resection for NF-NELM were identified from a multi-institutional database. Data on clinical and pathological details, as well as the long-term overall survival (OS) were obtained and compared. Propensity score matching was performed to generate matched pairs of patients.

RESULTS

Among the 332 patients with NF-NELM, 281 (84.6%) underwent primary tumor resection, while 51 (15.4%) did not. Patients who underwent primary resection were more likely to have a pancreatic primary and metachronous NELM. The long-term OS of patients who did and did not have the primary neuroendocrine tumor (NET) resected was comparable on both unmatched (10-year survival rate 66.8% vs. 54.0%, p = 0.192) and matched (10-year survival rate 75.7% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.271) analyses. In contrast, patients with NF-NELM and extrahepatic metastasis had a worse OS following resection compared with patients who had intrahepatic-only metastasis on unmatched (10-year survival rate 37.5% vs. 69.3%, p = 0.002) and matched (10-year survival rate 37.5% vs. 86.3%, p = 0.011) analyses. On multivariable analysis, while resection of the primary NET was not associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-1.2, p = 0.195), the presence of extrahepatic metastasis was independently associated with long-term risk of death (HR 3.9, 95% CI 1.7-9.2, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

While surgery should be considered for patients with NF-NELM who have an unresectable primary tumor, operative resection of NF-NELM may not be as beneficial in patients with extrahepatic disease.