Survival impact of unexpected N2 in stage IIIB/N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We investigated the effect of unexpected N2 on survival in stage IIIB/N2 cases.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 1803 non-small cell lung cancer patients between 2010 and 2016. There were 89 patients (4.9%) with unexpected N2 (pathological (p) IIIB/N2 group), whereas 49 patients (2.7%) with cN2 (clinical (c) IIIB/N2 group). Although pIIIB/N2 group underwent surgery followed by adjuvant therapy, the cIIIB/N2 group of patients had multimodality treatment including induction chemotherapy ± radiotherapy followed by surgery.

RESULTS

The five-year overall survival (OS) for all patients was 36.0% [median survival time (MST) 27.9 months], and disease-free survival (DFS) was 28.9% (MST, 18.2 months). The OS was 39.6% (MST: 34.4 months) and the median DFS time was 31.1% (Median: 23.1 months) in the pIIIB/N2 group, whereas it was 29.2% (MST: 23.0 months) for OS and 22% (median: 12.4 months) for DFS in the cIIIB/N2 group. There were no significant OS and DFS differences between the pIIIB/N2 group and the cIIIB/N2 group (p = 0.124 and p = 0.168, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In stage IIIB/N2 cases, the fact that N2 could not be detected preoperatively with minimally invasive or invasive methods and was detected in the pathological examination after surgery does not provide a survival advantage.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery as the gold standard for lung cancer surgery

Surgical resection remains the only effective means of cure in the vast majority of patients with early-stage lung cancer. It can be performed via a traditional open approach (particularly thoracotomy) or a minimally invasive approach. VATS is 'keyhole' surgery in the chest, and was first used for lung cancer resection in the early 1990s. Since then, a large volume of evolving clinical evidence has confirmed that VATS lung cancer resection offered proven safety and feasibility, better patient-reported post-operative outcomes, less surgical trauma as quantified by objective outcome measures and equivalent or better survival than open surgery. This has firmly established VATS as the surgical approach of choice for early-stage lung cancer today. Although impressive new non-surgical lung cancer therapies have emerged in recent years, VATS is also being constantly rejuvenated by the development of 'next generation' VATS techniques, the refinement of VATS sublobar resection for selected patients, the utilization of bespoke post-operative recovery programmes for VATS and the synthesis of VATS into multi-modality lung cancer therapy. There is little doubt that VATS will remain as the gold standard for lung cancer surgery for the foreseeable future.