The clinical behavior of well differentiated liposarcoma can be extremely variable: A retrospective cohort study at a major sarcoma center

Variability in recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcomas: A case series exploring histological subtypes

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Retroperitoneal liposarcomas (RPLPS) are rare soft tissue sarcomas that often present asymptomatically, leading to delayed diagnosis and challenging management. This case series highlights the impact of histological subtypes on prognosis and recurrence.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three male patients with recurrent RPLPS were compared. Two cases of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) had favorable outcomes with tumor-free margins, despite recurrence in one. The third case, a dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), presented with a larger, high-grade tumor requiring extensive resection and had a higher recurrence risk.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Histological subtype, tumor size, and grade were key prognostic factors. WDLPS showed better outcomes, while DDLPS was more aggressive despite radical surgery. Recurrence remained a major concern, emphasizing the need for early detection and vigilant long-term surveillance.

CONCLUSION

This case series underscores the variability in RPLPS presentation and outcomes, highlighting the need for individualized surgical strategies and close follow-up to improve long-term prognosis.

Challenges and hope: latest research trends in the clinical treatment and prognosis of liposarcoma

Liposarcoma, as a complex disease, is characterized by intricate interactions between distinct histopathological subtypes and corresponding clinical outcomes, emphasizing the necessity of personalized approaches in diagnosis and treatment strategies. This malignant tumor originating from adipose tissue is classified into different subtypes with specific molecular markers, which not only distinguish them but also guide treatment directions. The main approach for treating liposarcoma is surgical resection, with the aim of complete excision and achieving clean margins (R0 resection) to minimize the risk of recurrence. This surgical principle emphasizes the critical need for precise preoperative planning, and in certain cases, the integration of neoadjuvant therapy may be needed to reduce the tumor to a surgically manageable size. In addition to surgery, systemic therapy plays a key role in the advanced stages of the disease, especially when resistance to traditional treatment arises. The emergence of novel systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, has opened new avenues for treating this challenging malignancy. These systemic therapies are selected on the basis of the specific molecular features of the tumor, highlighting the importance of detailed molecular diagnostics. As our understanding of the molecular basis of liposarcoma deepens, integrating clinical and molecular features is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes. This comprehensive approach, which combines surgical precision with systemic therapy innovations, will change the treatment landscape for patients with liposarcoma, advancing toward more personalized and effective treatment strategies.

Deciphering the roles of non-coding RNAs in liposarcoma development: Challenges and opportunities for translational therapeutic advances

Liposarcoma is one of the most prevalent forms of soft tissue sarcoma, and its prognosis is highly dependent on its molecular subtypes. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) like microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) can bind various cellular targets to regulate carcinogenesis. By affecting the expressions and activities of their downstream targets post-transcriptionally, dysregulations of miRNAs can alter different oncogenic signalling pathways, mediating liposarcoma progression. On the contrary, lncRNAs can sponge miRNAs to spare their downstream targets from translational repression, indirectly affecting miRNA-regulated oncogenic activities. In the past 15 years, multiple fundamental and clinical research has shown that different ncRNAs play essential roles in modulating liposarcoma development. Yet, there is a lack of an effective review report that could summarize the findings from various studies. To narrow this literature gap, this review article aimed to compare the findings from different studies on the tumour-regulatory roles of ncRNAs in liposarcoma and to understand how ncRNAs control liposarcoma progression mechanistically. Additionally, the reported findings were critically reviewed to evaluate the translational potentials of various ncRNAs in clinical applications, including employing these ncRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers or as therapeutic targets in the management of liposarcoma. Overall, over 15 ncRNAs were reported to play essential roles in modulating different cellular pathways, including apoptosis, WNT/β-catenin, TGF-β/SMAD4, EMT, interleukin, and YAP-associated pathways to influence liposarcoma development. 28 ncRNAs were reported to be upregulated in liposarcoma tissues or circulation, whereas 11 were downregulated, making them potential candidates as liposarcoma diagnostic biomarkers. Among these ncRNAs, measuring the tissues or circulating levels of miR-155 and miR-195 was reported to help detect liposarcoma, differentiate liposarcoma subtypes, and predict the survival and treatment response of liposarcoma patients. Overall, except for a few ncRNAs like miR-155 and miR-195, current evidence to support the use of discussed ncRNAs as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in managing liposarcoma is mainly based on a single-center study with relatively small sample sizes or cell-based studies. Hence, more large-scale multi-center studies should be conducted to further confirm the sensitivity, specificity, and safety of ncRNAs as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Instead of furthering investigation to confirm the translational values of all the discussed ncRNAs, which can be time- and cost-consuming, it would be more practical to focus on a few ncRNAs, including miR-155 and miR-195, to evaluate if they are sensitive and safe to be used as liposarcoma biomarkers and therapeutic agents or targets.

An immunocompetent mouse model of liposarcoma

Liposarcoma (LPS) is the most prevalent soft tissue sarcoma. The most common biological subtypes are well-differentiated (WDLPS), a low-grade disease that can evolve to high-grade dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS), with increased rates of recurrence and metastasis and low response rates to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Preclinical testing of immunotherapeutics for LPS has been held back by the lack of an immunocompetent mouse model. Here, we present a spontaneous immunocompetent LPS mouse model, ACPP, with targeted deletion of Trp53 and Pten in adipocytes to mimic signaling alterations observed in human LPS. Similar to human LPS, tumors arising in ACPP mice produce WDLPS and DDLPS, along with tumors that exhibit both WD and DD components. Murine and human DDLPS tumors possess transcriptional similarities, including increased expression of oncogenes Cdk4 and Hmga2 and reduced expression of the tumor suppressor Cebpa; further, both mouse and human DDLPS exhibit either high or low T cell infiltration. Syngeneic cell lines derived from spontaneous ACPP DDLPS reliably produce tumors following orthotopic injection, each with distinct growth patterns, aggressiveness and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte profiles. These models provide much needed tools to understand the complex immunobiology of LPS and greatly accelerate the pace of preclinical studies to uncover new therapies for patients with this aggressive malignancy.

The Role of Surgery in Oligometastatic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are extremely rare, comprising <15% of primary sarcomas. Distant metastasis occurs in about 20% of cases, with pulmonary and hepatic metastasis as the most common sites of hematogenous spread. Although surgical resection is well established as the main treatment of localized primary disease, there are limited guidelines for the surgical treatment of intra-abdominal and distant metastases. There are inadequate systemic treatment options for patients with metastatic sarcoma, thereby necessitating the consideration of surgical options in carefully selected patients. Key points to consider include tumor biology, patient fitness and co-morbidities, overall prognosis, and goals of care. Multidisciplinary sarcoma tumor board discussion for each case is an essential practice in order to deliver the best care to these patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the published literature on the past and present role of surgery in the treatment of oligometastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma in order to inform the management of this difficult disease.

Evaluation of Efficacy of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma Patients with Positive Surgical Margins: A Population-based Study

Background

The use of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for well-differentiated liposarcoma (WD-LPS) patients with positive surgical margins is unclear. We aim to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of well-differentiated liposarcoma patients with positive surgical margins in an RT group and non-RT group.

Methods

WD-LPS patients with positive margins from 2000 to 2018 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and divided into two groups: RT group and non-RT group. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test was performed to evaluate the difference of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to identify important prognostic factors of OS and CSS. Analyses were adjusted using propensity-score matching.

Results

We identified 2549 patients: 377 (14.79%) with RT and 2172 (85.21%) without RT. The median age was 61 years, and the median follow-up time was 68 months. The log-rank test revealed that there was no significant difference of CSS between RT and non-RT groups (P = 0.81). The 5-year and 10-year CSS were comparable (P = 0.418 and P = 0.987). Additionally, the use of RT was neither an independent prognostic factor for OS nor CSS. Age, sex, tumor site, the use of chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for OS after propensity score matching, while race and the tumor site were independent prognostic factors for CSS.

Conclusion

Adjuvant RT had no significant improvement on OS and CSS of WD-LPS patients with positive surgical margins.

Is preoperative CT-guided biopsy a valuable tool in the diagnostic workup of patients with visceral and retroperitoneal sarcoma?

PURPOSE

We aimed to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative CT-guided biopsy to identify patients that might profit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a specialized high-volume sarcoma center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients with suspected soft tissue tumors of the abdomen cavity including the retroperitoneum, who received CT-guided biopsy followed by surgical tumor resection. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated in all patients with abdominal sarcomas at our hospital. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients with liposarcoma.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients (35 female, 47 male, age: 62.0 ± 14.7) received preoperative CT-guided biopsy followed by surgical resection. Overall accordance of CT-guided biopsy to identify final histology was 77 %. CT-guided biopsy revealed the diagnosis of liposarcoma in 23 patients whereas final analysis of the surgical specimen identified liposarcoma in 29 patients. Here, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was 79.3 %, 100.0 %, 100.0 % and 89.8 % respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed a better accuracy for correctly identifying patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma than patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma (75.0 % vs 62.5 %). In patients with other sarcoma, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy was 87.5 %, 95.5 %, 82.4 % and 96.9 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided biopsy in a specialized high-volume sarcoma center is an accurate and effective method to assess patients with abdominal sarcoma and especially abdominal liposarcoma. Therefore, it is an indispensable tool in the pretherapeutic workup process. Nevertheless, our study underlines the previously reported difficulties in dedifferentiated liposarcoma diagnostics, whereby these patient cohort would profit the most from a neoadjuvant therapy regime.

Management of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but local recurrence is common. Biologic behavior and recurrence patterns differ significantly among histologic types of RPS, with implications for management. The Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published a consensus approach to primary RPS, and to complement this, one for recurrent RPS in 2016. Since then, additional studies have been published, and collaborative discussion is ongoing to address the clinical challenges of local recurrence in RPS.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed, and the previous consensus statements for recurrent RPS were updated after review by TARPSWG members. The search included the most common RPS histologic types: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.

RESULTS

Recurrent RPS management was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up evaluation. For appropriately selected patients, resection is safe. Nomograms currently are available to help predict outcome after resection. These and other new findings have been combined with expert recommendations to provide 36 statements, each of which is attributed a level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In this updated document, more emphasis is placed on histologic type and clarification of the intent for surgical treatment, either curative or palliative. Overall, the fundamental tenet of optimal care for patients with recurrent RPS remains individualized treatment after multidisciplinary discussion by an experienced team with expertise in RPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated consensus recommendations are provided to help guide decision-making for treatment of locally recurrent RPS and better selection of patients who would potentially benefit from surgery.

Liposarcoma subtype recurrence and survival: A UK regional cohort study

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcome data in the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States have yet to facilitate appropriately specific surveillance for liposarcoma histological subtypes, despite being one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas. Therefore, this study aims to demonstrate histologic-specific differences in liposarcoma recurrence, disease progression, and survival and discuss the implications.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This cohort study involves patients from a regional sarcoma service in the UK who have had a primary surgical excision of liposarcoma between October 2002 and September 2019. The median follow-up is five years. Confirmed histopathological diagnoses of liposarcoma (n = 193) are organised according to the World Health Organisation recognised subtypes: atypical lipomatous tumours (ALT), myxoid, pleomorphic, and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. In addition, retroperitoneal variants (n = 34) are included to illustrate the broader spectrum of phenotypes. The primary outcomes were local recurrence, distant disease progression, and disease-specific death, and compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses and tumour variables using Cox proportional hazard analyses. All three primary outcomes significantly differed (P < 0.0001, n = 193). There were no metastases or disease-specific death in patients with ALT (n = 92) and no metastases of their retroperitoneal counterparts (n = 17). Amongst the metastasising cases of rarer subtypes, there were pulmonary spread of pleomorphic (8/9, n = 20), dedifferentiated (4/5, n = 18), and myxoid (2/3, n = 29) liposarcomas.

CONCLUSION

An absence of metastases of ALT should be considered alongside global evidence. Surveillance protocols could better differentiate between these subtypes and, in doing so, save patients a considerable amount of irradiation, time, fear, and anxiety.

Update on genomic and molecular landscapes of well-differentiated liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma

Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) is the most frequent subtype of liposarcoma and may transform into dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) which is a more aggressive subtype. Retroperitoneal lesions of WDLPS/DDLPS tend to recur repeatedly due to incomplete resections, and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy have little effect on patient survival. Consequently, identifying therapeutic targets and developing targeted drugs is critical for improving the outcome of WDLPS/DDLPS patients. In this review, we summarised the mutational landscape of WDLPS/DDLPS from recent studies focusing on potential oncogenic drivers and the development of molecular targeted drugs for DDLPS. Due to the limited number of studies on the molecular networks driving WDLPS to DDLPS development, we looked at other dedifferentiation-related tumours to identify potential parallel mechanisms that could be involved in the dedifferentiation process generating DDLPS.

The degree of sclerosis is associated with prognosis in well-differentiated liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDL) are often partly composed of sclerotic tissue, however, the amount varies widely between tumors, and its prognostic significance is unknown. We hypothesized that tumors with more sclerosis would behave more aggressively.

METHODS

Primary retroperitoneal WDL from 29 patients resected at our institution with follow-up were histologically evaluated by soft tissue pathologists blinded to outcome. Tumors with ≥ 10% sclerosis were designated "sclerotic" while tumors with < 10% sclerosis were designated as "minimally sclerotic". Cellular and dedifferentiated tumors were excluded. Clinical parameters and radiologic assessments on computed tomography (CT) were recorded.

RESULTS

Histological evaluation identified 13 minimally sclerotic WDL and 16 sclerotic WDL. Median follow-up was 9 years (range, 3-20). Median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 6.16 and 13.9 years, respectively. Compared with patients with sclerotic WDL, those with minimally sclerotic WDL had superior RFS (HR = 0.17 [95% CI, 0.06-0.53], P = .002) and OS (log-rank test, P = .002). Sclerotic WDL exhibited higher Houndsfield Units than minimally sclerotic WDL (26 vs 1, P = .040).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally sclerotic WDL were associated with more favorable outcome compared with sclerotic tumors. Assessment of sclerosis in WDL is likely a useful prognostic marker.