Safety and feasibility of early postmastectomy discharge and home drain care in a low resource setting

Global Cancer Surgery: pragmatic solutions to improve cancer surgery outcomes worldwide

The first Lancet Oncology Commission on Global Cancer Surgery was published in 2015 and serves as a landmark paper in the field of cancer surgery. The Commission highlighted the burden of cancer and the importance of cancer surgery, while documenting the many inadequacies in the ability to deliver safe, timely, and affordable cancer surgical care. This Commission builds on the first Commission by focusing on solutions and actions to improve access to cancer surgery globally, developed by drawing upon the expertise from cancer surgery leaders across the world. We present solution frameworks in nine domains that can improve access to cancer surgery. These nine domains were refined to identify solutions specific to the six WHO regions. On the basis of these solutions, we developed eight actions to propel essential improvements in the global capacity for cancer surgery. Our initiatives are broad in scope, pragmatic, affordable, and contextually applicable, and aimed at cancer surgeons as well as leaders, administrators, elected officials, and health policy advocates. We envision that the solutions and actions contained within the Commission will address inequities and promote safe, timely, and affordable cancer surgery for every patient, regardless of their socioeconomic status or geographic location.

Does rapid discharge after breast cancer surgery have an impact on wound healing and complications? COVID-19 pandemic experience

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the health systems worldwide. Because of high volume of COVID-19 patients, all hospitals in our region were re-configured as COVID-19 centres and elective surgery procedures were cancelled. Our clinic was the only active centre in the region and grave increase in our patient volume urged our clinic to modify our discharge protocol. This retrospective study included all breast cancer patients underwent mastectomy and/or axillary dissection, in the Breast Surgery Clinic of Kocaeli State Hospital, a regional pandemic hospital, between December 2020 and January 2021. Patients were mostly discharged the day of surgery with drains because of congestion, while some of the patients had traditional stay, when beds were available. The patients were evaluated postoperatively (the first 30 days) in terms of wound complications, Clavien-Dindo classification grade, satisfaction, presence of pain and nausea, and treatment costs during the follow-up period of the study. Outcomes were compared between early discharged patients and patients who had traditional long stay. Compared with long-stay patients, in the early discharged group, postoperative wound complications was significantly lower (P < .01) with significant cost savings. There were no significant changes in variables such as surgery type, ASA class, satisfaction, need for additional medication and Clavien-Dindo between the groups. Adaptation to an early discharge protocol for breast cancer surgeries may be an efficient way of practicing surgery in a pandemic. Early discharge with drains may be beneficial for patients.

Implementation of a Post-mastectomy Home Recovery Program in a Large, Integrated Health Care Delivery System

BACKGROUND

The number of outpatient mastectomies, with and without reconstruction, has increased nationwide. In well-selected patient populations, same-day surgery for mastectomy is a safe option. A pilot project was initiated within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California healthcare system to facilitate surgical home recovery (SHR) for mastectomy patients, including patients undergoing implant-based reconstruction and bilateral mastectomies.

METHODS

Surgical home recovery for mastectomy patients was implemented in October 2017. Specific measures in this initiative included management of patient expectations at initial consultation, education about postoperative home care, multimodality pain management, and timely post-discharge follow-up. All patients undergoing mastectomy were included, except those undergoing autologous tissue reconstructions. After a 6-month implementation period, rate of same day discharge over 6 months was compared before and after the SHR initiative. We also compared emergency department (ED) visits, reoperations, and readmissions within 7 days.

RESULTS

Twenty-one medical centers participated in this initiative. Before implementing SHR, 164 of the 717 (23%) mastectomies were outpatient procedures, compared with 403 of the 663 (61%) after the implementation period. Although the rate of outpatient mastectomy increased significantly, there were no statistically significant differences in ED visits (5.2% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.98), reoperation (3.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.99), or readmission rates (1.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

By implementing standard expectations and sharing best practices, there was a significant increase in the rate of home recovery for mastectomy without compromising quality of patient care. The success of this pilot program supports SHR for mastectomy.