Validation of combination treatment with surgical spacer placement and subsequent particle radiotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Innovative Combination Treatment to Expand the Indications of Particle Therapy: Spacer Placement Surgery Using Bio-Absorbable Polyglycolic Acid Spacer

BACKGROUND

Particle therapy has favorable dose distribution and high curability. However, radiotherapy for malignant tumors adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract is contraindicated owing to its low tolerance. To overcome this, combination treatment with surgery to make a space between the tumor and adjacent gastrointestinal tract followed by particle therapy has been developed. Several materials have been used for the spacer and recently, we developed the absorbable polyglycolic acid (PGA) spacer, which has been used since 2019. This study is the first report of consecutive case series of spacer placement surgery using the PGA spacer.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifty consecutive patients undergoing spacer placement surgery with the PGA spacer were evaluated. Postoperative laboratory data, morbidity related to the treatment, and spacer volume after treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no treatment-related deaths, and all but 2 patients completed combination treatment. The median ratios of postoperative PGA spacer volume to the pretreatment volume were 96.9%, 87.7%, and 74.6% at weeks 2, 4, and 8, respectively. The spacer volume was maintained at 80% at 7 weeks and was predicted to be 50% at 15 weeks and 20% in 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Spacer placement surgery using the PGA spacer was feasible and tolerable. The PGA spacers maintained sufficient thickness during the duration of subsequent particle therapy. Combination treatment using the PGA spacer is innovative and has the potential to become a new standard curative local treatment.

Ablative and non-surgical therapies for early and very early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

A wide range of ablative and non-surgical therapies are available for treating small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with very early or early-stage disease and preserved liver function.

Objective

To review and compare the effectiveness of all current ablative and non-surgical therapies for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 3 cm).

Design

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources

Nine databases (March 2021), two trial registries (April 2021) and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews.

Review methods

Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of ablative and non-surgical therapies, versus any comparator, for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Randomised controlled trials were quality assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and mapped. The comparative effectiveness of therapies was assessed using network meta-analysis. A threshold analysis was used to identify which comparisons were sensitive to potential changes in the evidence. Where comparisons based on randomised controlled trial evidence were not robust or no randomised controlled trials were identified, a targeted systematic review of non-randomised, prospective comparative studies provided additional data for repeat network meta-analysis and threshold analysis. The feasibility of undertaking economic modelling was explored. A workshop with patients and clinicians was held to discuss the findings and identify key priorities for future research.

Results

Thirty-seven randomised controlled trials (with over 3700 relevant patients) were included in the review. The majority were conducted in China or Japan and most had a high risk of bias or some risk of bias concerns. The results of the network meta-analysis were uncertain for most comparisons. There was evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection is inferior to radiofrequency ablation for overall survival (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% credible interval 1.16 to 1.82), progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% credible interval 1.11 to 1.67), overall recurrence (relative risk 1.19, 95% credible interval 1.02 to 1.39) and local recurrence (relative risk 1.80, 95% credible interval 1.19 to 2.71). Percutaneous acid injection was also inferior to radiofrequency ablation for progression-free survival (hazard ratio 1.63, 95% credible interval 1.05 to 2.51). Threshold analysis showed that further evidence could plausibly change the result for some comparisons. Fourteen eligible non-randomised studies were identified (n ≥ 2316); twelve had a high risk of bias so were not included in updated network meta-analyses. Additional non-randomised data, made available by a clinical advisor, were also included (n = 303). There remained a high level of uncertainty in treatment rankings after the network meta-analyses were updated. However, the updated analyses suggested that microwave ablation and resection are superior to percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection for some outcomes. Further research on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy was recommended at the workshop, although it is only appropriate for certain patient subgroups, limiting opportunities for adequately powered trials.

Limitations

Many studies were small and of poor quality. No comparative studies were found for some therapies.

Conclusions

The existing evidence base has limitations; the uptake of specific ablative therapies in the United Kingdom appears to be based more on technological advancements and ease of use than strong evidence of clinical effectiveness. However, there is evidence that percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection are inferior to radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and resection.

Study registration

PROSPERO CRD42020221357.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131224) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 29. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Clinical impact of spacer placement surgery with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sheet for particle therapy

BACKGROUND

Spacer placement surgery is useful in particle therapy (PT) for patients with abdominopelvic malignant tumors located adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract. This study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of spacer placement surgery using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) spacer.

METHODS

This study included 131 patients who underwent ePTFE spacer placement surgery and subsequent PT between September 2006 and June 2019. The overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Spacer-related complications were classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0).

RESULTS

The median follow-up period after spacer placement surgery was 36.8 months. The 3-year estimated OS and LC rates were 60.5% and 76.5%, respectively. A total of 130 patients (99.2%) were able to complete PT. Spacer-related complications of ≥ grade 3 were observed in four patients (3.1%) in the acute phase and 13 patients (9.9%) in the late phase. Ten patients (7.6%) required removal of the ePTFE spacer.

CONCLUSIONS

Spacer placement surgery using an ePTFE spacer for abdominopelvic malignant tumors is technically feasible and acceptable for subsequent PT. However, severe spacer-related late complications were observed in some patients. Since long-term placement of a non-absorbable ePTFE spacer is associated with risks for morbidity and infection, careful long-term follow-up and prompt therapeutic intervention are essential when complications associated with the ePTFE spacer occur.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

retrospectively registered.

Long-Term Results of Proton Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Planning without Fiducial Markers

We report here the long-term results of marker-less respiratory-gated proton therapy (PT), without fiducial markers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which was planned using a four-dimensional computed tomography technique. Local tumor control (LTC) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was graded per CTCAE v5.0. Patients (n = 105; median age 73 years, range 38-90 years) with 128 lesions were treated. The median radiation dose was 66 gray relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE) (range, 52.8-82.5 GyRBE) delivered in 2.0 to 6.6 GyRBE fractions, depending on lesion volume, the involved liver, and the patient's condition. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 63 months (range, 1-126 months), and the 5-year LTC and OS rates were 93.2% and 40.4%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified tumors near the gastrointestinal tract as an independent risk factor for local recurrence and revealed that hepatic reserve, tumor stage, performance status, operability, sex, and portal vein thrombosis were independent risk factors for OS. Acute and late treatment-related grade 3 toxicities were experienced by eight patients (7.6%). Adverse events ≥ grade 4 were not evident. Marker-less respiratory-gated PT for HCC is a safe and effective treatment without severe complications.

Dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost photon or proton therapy in pancreatic cancer in an in-silico study: Gastrointestinal organs remain critical

•

Robustly optimized proton plans (rMFO-IMPT) with simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) were clinically applicable.

•

Gastrointestinal organs reached critical dose values in rMFO-IMPT, VMAT and Tomotherapy techniques.

•

rMFO-IMPT significantly reduced the low and intermediate dose to organs at risk.

•

No clinically significant differences on results depending on tumor location or surgical status were observed.

Purpose

To compare the dosimetric results of an in-silico study among intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) treatment techniques using a dose-escalated simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) approach in locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

Material and methods

For each of 15 locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients, a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a Tomotherapy (TOMO), and an IMPT treatment plan was optimized on free-breathing treatment planning computed tomography (CT) images. For the photon treatment plans, doses of 66 Gy and 51 Gy, both as SIB in 30 fractions, were prescribed to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and to the planning target volume (PTV), respectively. For the proton plans, a dose prescription of 66 Gy(RBE) to the GTV and of 51 Gy(RBE) to the clinical target volume (CTV) was planned. For each SIB-treatment plan, doses to the targets and OARs were evaluated and statistically compared.

Results

All treatment techniques reached the prescribed doses to the GTV and CTV or PTV. The stomach and the bowel, in particular the duodenum and the small bowel, were found to be frequently exposed to doses exceeding 50 Gy, irrespective of the treatment technique. For doses below 50 Gy, the IMPT technique was statistically significant superior to both IMRT techniques regarding decreasing dose to the OARs, e.g. volume of the bowel receiving 15 Gy (V_15Gy) was reduced for IMPT compared to VMAT (p = 0.003) and TOMO (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

With all photon and proton techniques investigated, the radiation dose to gastrointestinal OARs remained critical when treating patients with unresectable locally recurrent or advanced pancreatic cancer using a dose-escalated SIB approach.

Space-making particle therapy for sarcomas derived from the abdominopelvic region

BACKGROUND

The primary definitive treatment for abdominopelvic sarcomas (APSs) is resection, although incomplete resection has a negative prognostic impact. Although the effectiveness of particle therapy (PT) as a treatment for APS has already been demonstrated, its application for tumors adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract is frequently restricted, due to extremely low tolerance. Space-making PT, consisting of surgical spacer placement and subsequent PT, has been developed to overcome this limitation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2006 and June 2018, a total of 75 patients with 12 types of APS underwent space-making PT.

RESULTS

The 3-year local control rate of all patients was 90.3%. Fourteen surgery-related complications were observed in 12 patients (16%), and complications of Grade 3b or higher were observed in 3 patients. Ninety-five PT-related complications were seen in 66 patients (88.0%), and 13 patients (17.3%) had complications of Grade 3 or higher. The median V95% (volume irradiated with 95% of the treatment planning dose) of the gross tumor volume and clinical target volume were 99.9% and 99.5%, respectively. The median D95% (dose intensity covering 95% of the target volume) of the gross tumor volume/planned dose and clinical target volume/planned dose were 99.4%, and 99.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility and effectiveness of space-making PT have been demonstrated via dosimetric evaluation, and our results indicate that this new strategy may potentially provide an effective and innovative treatment option for advanced APS.