Surgical resection of early stage hepatocellular carcinoma improves patient survival at safety net hospitals

A precise prognostic signature in CTNNB1-mutant hepatocellular carcinoma: Prognosis prediction and precision treatment exploration

Background

CTNNB1 mutates in most hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which is the most familiar form of liver cancer with high heterogeneity. It is critical to create a specific prognostication methodology and to investigate additional treatment options for CTNNB1-mutant HCCs.

Methods

A total of 926 samples in five independent cohorts were enrolled in this study, including 127 CTNNB1-mutant samples and 75 estimated CTNNB1-mutant samples. The prognostic signature was constructed by LASSO-Cox regression and evaluated by bioinformatics analyses. The selection of possible drug targets and agents was produced based on the expression profiles and drug sensitivity data of cancer cell lines in two databases.

Results

A prognostic signature based on 15 genes categorized the CTNNB1-mutant HCCs into two groups with different risks. Compared to low-risk patients, high-risk patients had significantly inferior prognoses. ROC curve and multivariate analysis also indicated the superior performance of our signature on the prognosis estimation, particularly in CTNNB1-mutant HCCs. Besides, the nomogram was constructed according to the prognostic signature with excellent predictive performance confirmed by the calibration curve. Subsequently, we suggested that AT-7519 and PHA-793887 might be potential drug agents for high-risk patients.

Conclusion

We established a 15-gene prognostic model, particularly in HCCs with CTNNB1 mutations with good predictive efficiency. Besides, we explored the potential drug targets and agents for patients with high risk. Our findings offered a fresh idea for personalized prognosis management in HCCs with CTNNB1 mutations and threw new insight for precise treatment in HCCs as well.

Surgical Cancer Care in Safety-Net Hospitals: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Tertiary medical centers in the USA provide specialized, high-volume surgical cancer care, contributing standards for quality and outcomes. For the most vulnerable populations, safety-net hospitals (SNHs) remain the predominant provider of both complex and routine healthcare needs. The objective of this study was to evaluate access to and quality of surgical oncology care within SNHs.

METHODS

A comprehensive and systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all studies (January 2000-October 2021) reporting the delivery of surgical cancer care at SNHs in the USA (PROSPERO #CRD42021290092). These studies describe the process and/or outcomes of surgical care for gastrointestinal, hepatopancreatobiliary, or breast cancer patients seeking treatment at SNHs.

RESULTS

Of 3753 records, 37 studies met the inclusion criteria. Surgical care for breast cancer (43%) was the most represented, followed by colorectal (30%) and hepatopancreatobiliary (16%) cancers. Financial constraints, cultural and language barriers, and limitations to insurance coverage were cited as common reasons for disparities in care within SNHs. Advanced disease at presentation was common among cancer patients seeking care at SNHs (range, 24-61% of patients). Though reports comparing cancer survival between SNHs and non-SNHs were few, results were mixed, underscoring the variability in care seen across SNHs.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight barriers in care facing many cancer patients. Continued efforts should address improving both access and quality of care for SNH patients. Future models include a transition away from a two-tiered system of resourced and under-resourced hospitals toward an integrated cancer system.

Care for Vulnerable Populations with Chronic Liver Disease: A Safety-Net Perspective

Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) and facilities are the cornerstone of healthcare services for the medically underserved. The burden of chronic liver disease-including end-stage manifestations of cirrhosis and liver cancer-is high and rising among populations living in poverty who primarily seek and receive care in safety-net settings. For many reasons related to social determinants of health, these individuals often present with delayed diagnoses and disease presentations, resulting in higher liver-related mortality. With recent state-based policy changes such as Medicaid expansion that impact access to insurance and critical health services, an overview of the body of literature on SNH care for chronic liver disease is timely and informative for the liver disease community. In this narrative review, we discuss controversies in the definition of a SNH and summarize the known disparities in the cascade of the care and management of common liver-related conditions: (1) steatotic liver disease, (2) liver cancer, (3) chronic viral hepatitis, and (4) cirrhosis and liver transplantation. In addition, we review the specific impact of Medicaid expansion on safety-net systems and liver disease outcomes and highlight effective provider- and system-level interventions. Lastly, we address remaining gaps and challenges to optimizing care for vulnerable populations with chronic liver disease in safety-net settings.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in HBV-Caused Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the main risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common type of liver cancer, with high incidence and mortality worldwide. Surgery, liver transplantation, and ablation therapies have been used to treat early HBV-caused HCC (HBV-HCC); meanwhile, in the advanced stage, chemoradiotherapy and drug-targeted therapy are regularly considered, but with limited efficacy. Recently, immunotherapies, such as tumor vaccine therapy, adoptive cell transfer therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, have demonstrated promising efficacy in cancer treatment. In particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors can successfully prevent tumors from achieving immune escape and promote an anti-tumor response, thereby boosting the therapeutic effect in HBV-HCC. However, the advantages of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of HBV-HCC remain to be exploited. Here, we describe the basic characteristics and development of HBV-HCC and introduce current treatment strategies for HBV-HCC. Of note, we review the principles of immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) in HBV-HCC, as well as related inhibitors being considered in the clinic. We also discuss the benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of HBV-HCC and the efficacy of those inhibitors in HCC with various etiologies, aiming to provide insights into the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of HBV-HCC.

Impairment of perioperative activities of daily living is associated with poor prognosis following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The number of cancer patients with impairment of activities of daily living (ADLs) has increased. This study aimed to examine associations of perioperative Barthel index score, a validated measure of ADLs, with survival outcomes following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

We analyzed data of 492 consecutive patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC between 2010 and 2018. Pre- and postoperative ADLs were assessed using the Barthel index (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate greater independence). Preoperative Barthel index score ≤85 or postoperative Barthel index score ≤85 was defined as impairment of perioperative ADLs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Among the 492 patients, 26 (5.2%) had a preoperative Barthel index score ≤85 and 95 (19%) had a postoperative Barthel index score ≤85. Impairment of perioperative ADLs was independently associated with shorter overall survival (multivariable HR: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-2.81, p = 0.028). The association of impairment of perioperative ADLs with recurrence-free survival was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Impairment of perioperative ADLs is associated with poor prognosis following hepatectomy for HCC. Maintenance and improvement of perioperative ADLs would be important to provide favorable long-term outcomes in patients with HCC.

An Analysis of Individual and Contextual-Level Disparities in Screening, Treatment, and Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver and affects patients of all genders, races, ethnicities, and socioeconomic status. While the causes of HCC are numerous, the primary etiology is cirrhosis from alcohol and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the United States and from infectious agents such as Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C in the developing world. In patients at-risk for developing HCC, screening is recommended with ultrasound imaging and alpha fetoprotein laboratory tests. In socioeconomically vulnerable patients, however, individual-level barriers (eg, insurance status) and contextual-level disparities (eg, health facilities) may not be readily available, thus limiting screening. Additional challenges faced by racial/ethnic minorities can further challenge the spectrum of HCC care and lead to inadequate screening, delayed diagnosis, and unequal access to treatment. Efforts to improve these multilevel factors that lead to screening and treatment disparities are critical to overcoming challenges. Providing health insurance to those without access, improving societal challenges that confine patients to a lower socioeconomic status, and reducing challenges to seeking healthcare can decrease the morbidity and mortality of these patients. Additionally, engaging with communities and allowing them to collaborate in their own healthcare can also help to attenuate these inequities. Through collaborative multidisciplinary change, we can make progress in tackling disparities in vulnerable populations to achieve health equity