A multi-institutional validation study of prognostic nomograms for retroperitoneal sarcoma

New Sarculator Prognostic Nomograms for Patients With Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Case Volume Does Matter

OBJECTIVE

To update the current Sarculator retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) prognostic nomograms considering the improvement in patient prognosis and the case volume effect.

BACKGROUND

Survival of patients with primary RPS has been increasing over time, and the volume-outcome relationship has been well recognized. Nevertheless, the specific impact on prognostic nomograms is unknown.

METHODS

All consecutive adult patients with primary localized RPS treated at 8 European and North American sarcoma reference centers between 2010 and 2017 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: high-volume centers (HVC, ≥13 cases/year) and low-volume centers (LVC, <13 cases/year). Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariable analyses for OS and DFS were performed. The nomograms were updated by recalibration. Nomograms performance was assessed in terms of discrimination (Harrell C index) and calibration (calibration plot).

RESULTS

The HVC and LVC groups comprised 857 and 244 patients, respectively. The median annual primary RPS case volume (interquartile range) was 24.0 in HVC (15.0-41.3) and 9.0 in LVC (1.8-10.3). Five-year OS was 71.4% (95% CI: 68.3%-74.7%) in the HVC cohort and 63.3% (56.8%-70.5%) in the LVC cohort ( P =0.012). Case volume was associated with both OS (LVC vs. HVC hazard ratio 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08-1.82, P =0.011) and DFS (hazard ratio 1.93, 95% CI: 1.57-2.37, P <0.001) at multivariable analyses. When applied to the study cohorts, the Sarculator nomograms showed good discrimination (Harrell C index between 0.68 and 0.73). The recalibrated nomograms showed good calibration in the HVC group, whereas the original nomograms showed good calibration in the LVC group.

CONCLUSIONS

New nomograms for patients with primary RPS treated with surgery at high-volume versus low-volume sarcoma reference centers are available in the Sarculator app.

Evaluation of AJCC staging system and proposal of a novel stage grouping system in retroperitoneal liposarcoma: the Fudan Zhongshan experience

Background

Overall survival (OS) varies significantly among individuals with heterogeneous retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS), even among those with the same clinical stage. Improved staging of RPLS is a critical unmet need, given the disappointing results of external validations of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system.

Methods

The cohort study included 220 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for primary RPLS at the largest sarcoma centre of Fudan University in China from September 2009 to August 2021, combined with 277 adult patients with RPLS in the SEER database from 1975 to 2020. Data analysis was performed from December 2021 to December 2022. Patients were retrospectively restaged according to the 8th and 7th editions of the TNM staging system as well as the new TNM (nTNM) staging system. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Comparative analysis of postoperative survival was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between subgroups were tested using the log-rank test. The OS prediction nomogram was generated based on baseline variables and tumour characteristics. Harrell's consistency index (C-index), area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), and calibration curves were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram.

Results

A total of 497 patients were enrolled in the study, including 282 (56.7%) male patients. The median follow-up was 51 months (interquartile range, IQR, 23-83), and the OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87.9%, 75.3%, and 64.9%, respectively. According to the staging distribution of the AJCC 7th edition, 6 patients were stage IA (1.2%), 189 patients were stage IB (38%), 12 patients were stage IIA (2.4%), 150 patients were stage IIB (30.1%), 131 patients were stage III (26.3%), and 9 patients were stage IV (1.8%). With the 8th edition staging, this distribution changed: 6 patients (1.2%) were stage IA, 189 patients (38%) were stage IB, 12 patients (2.4%) were stage II, 24 patients (4.8%) were stage IIIA, 257 patients (51.7%) were stage IIIB, and 9 patients (1.8%) were stage IV. 182 patients (36.6%) were reclassified according to the nTNM staging system with the new T stage classification. The C-index and log-rank score improved after implementation of nTNM implementation. The nTNM system was associated with improved identification of high-risk patients compared with the AJCC 7th and 8th TNM. The FNCLCC stage proved to be highly prognostic with significant intergroup differences in OS. The calibration curve shows a high degree of agreement between the actual OS rate and the nomogram estimated OS rate.

Conclusion

Compared with 8th AJCC TNM, 7th AJCC TNM staging system showed a more homogeneous staging distribution and a slight improvement in the prognostic accuracy of RPLS. The revised T-stage and nTNM systems showed better risk stratification performance. The FNCLCC stage was found to have high prognostic value, further emphasising histological grade is the least negligible prognostic factor in predicting patient survival. The constructed nomogram model enables individualized prognostic analysis and helps to develop risk-adapted therapy for RPLS patients.

CT and MR Imaging of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Practical Guide for the Radiologist

Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent around 10-16% of all sarcomas, with liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas being the most common subtypes. RPS have some peculiar characteristics, imaging appearances, worse prognosis, and complications compared to other locations of sarcoma. Commonly, RPS primarily present as large masses, progressively encasing adjacent structures, causing mass effect, and complications. RPS diagnosis is often challenging, and these tumors may be overlooked; however, failure to recognize RPS characteristics leads to a worse prognosis for the patients. Surgery is the only recognized curative treatment, but the anatomical constraints of the retroperitoneum limit the ability to achieve wide resection margins; therefore, these tumors have a high rate of recurrence, and require long-term follow-up. The radiologist has an important role in the diagnosis of RPS, the definition of their extent, and their follow-up. Specific knowledge of the main imaging findings is required to reach an early diagnosis, and, ultimately, to guarantee the best patient management. This article provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding cross-sectional imaging features of patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas, presenting tips and tricks to improve imaging diagnosis of RPS.

Surgical Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Surgery should be performed by a surgical oncologist with sub-specialization in this disease and in the context of a multidisciplinary team of sarcoma specialists. For primary RPS, the goal of surgery is to achieve the complete en bloc resection of the tumor along with involved organs and structures to maximize the clearance of the disease. The extent of resection also needs to consider the risk of complications. Unfortunately, the overarching challenge in primary RPS treatment is that even with optimal surgery, tumor recurrence occurs frequently. The pattern of recurrence after surgery (e.g., local versus distant) is strongly associated with the specific histologic type of RPS. Radiation and systemic therapy may improve outcomes in RPS and there is emerging data studying the benefit of non-surgical treatments in primary disease. Topics in need of further investigation include criteria for unresectability and management of locally recurrent disease. Moving forward, global collaboration among RPS specialists will be key for continuing to advance our understanding of this disease and find more effective treatments.

Staging Systems and Nomograms for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Reliable tools for prognosis prediction are crucially needed by oncologists so they can tailor individual treatments. However, the wide spectrum of histologies and prognostic behaviors of sarcomas challenges their development. In this field, nomograms could definitely better account for their granularity compared to the more widely used AJCC/UICC TNM staging system. Nomograms are predictive tools that incorporate multiple risk factors and return a numerical probability of a clinical event. Since the development of the first nomogram in 2002, several other nomograms have been built, either general, site-specific, histology-specific, or both. Recently, some new “dynamic” nomograms and prognostic tools have been developed, allowing doctors to “recalculate” a patient’s prognosis by taking into account the time since primary surgery, the event history, and the potential time-dependent effect of covariates. Due to these new tools, prognosis prediction is no longer limited to the time of the first computation but can be adapted and recalculated based on the occurrence (or not) of any event as time passes from the first computation. In this review, we aimed to give an overview of the available nomograms for STS and to help clinicians in the process of selecting the best tool for each patient.

Giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma measuring 27 × 29 × 36 cm: a case report

Retroperitoneal tumors are rare neoplasms that can reach great dimensions due to a slow growth pattern. Although these tumors rarely metastasize, they have a great risk of recurrence, and majority of times these lesions are a challenge for the surgeon. We report the case of a 63-year-old woman who presented with symptoms of large bowel obstruction and was diagnosed with a large heterogenous mass located in the retroperitoneal space. The fine needle biopsy revealed the histology of liposarcoma. The purpose of this article is to report our approach in management of this kind of tumor. Tumor size (27.1 × 29.1 × 36.1 cm) and involvement to the adjacent organs was a challenge for us in order to reach safe oncological margins. In these cases, the risk of recurrence is high; therefore, the patient should be screened at 6, 12 and 24 months post procedure. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy for this tumor is not yet defined, and if operable, surgery is the treatment of choice.

Feasibility of Preoperative Dose-Painting Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Borderline-Resectable Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

PURPOSE

The role of radiation therapy (RT) in resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial; however, preoperative RT may play an important role in borderline-resectable (at risk of R2 resection) disease. We evaluated the outcome of such patients treated with preoperative dose-painting IMRT followed by planned resection.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and December 2017, 30 patients with borderline-resectable primary nonmetastatic RPS (after multidisciplinary review) received preoperative dose-painting IMRT in this retrospective cohort study.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for all patients was 32 months. Median dose to the whole tumor/high-risk margin was 50.4 Gy/60.2 Gy. Sixteen patients were female, 24 were >50 years. Median tumor size was 9.2 cm. After RT, 6 did not have surgery. Of the 24 who were explored, 20 underwent complete gross resection. During RT, 7 of 30 patients developed acute grade 2+ toxicities: 5 fatigue, 1 nausea and vomiting, and 1 cystitis. RT was completed in 29 of 30 patients. Postoperatively, 12 of 20 patients developed grade 2+ complications: 2 gastropathy, 5 intraabdominal collections requiring drainage, 1 retroperitoneal bleed, and 3 delayed wound healing. Late grade 2+ toxicity was observed in 3 of 20 patients: 1 lymphedema with recurrent cellulitis, 1 chronic diarrhea, 1 gastrointestinal bleeding from anastomosis requiring transfusions, and 2 renal insufficiency. In those who underwent complete gross resection (n = 20, median follow-up 47 months), the 5-year local control was 57%, and overall survival was 46%.

DISCUSSION

Preoperative dose-painting IMRT given to borderline-resectable RPS rendered 67% of patients resectable, provided a 5-year local control rate of 57%, which is similar to those with resectable disease, and had an acceptable morbidity profile.

Treatment for local control of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas: A review of the literature

Retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas are uncommon tumors for which complete surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment. However, achieving complete gross resection with microscopically negative margins is challenging, and local recurrence rates can be high. Patients often succumb to uncontrolled local disease. Radiation therapy offers a potential means for sterilizing microscopic residual disease, although its use continues to be controversial. Chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiation continues to be investigated as an adjunct to surgery, along with immunotherapy and targeted therapies. In this review, we discuss the current management of retroperitoneal and pelvis sarcomas, focusing on studies of surgery and radiation therapy to maximize local control.

Analysis of the Effect of Tumor-Grade Change on the Prognosis of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Simple Summary

Changes in tumor differentiation have been observed during local recurrence in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), and these changes have been reported to affect prognosis. However, the change in the tumor grade from the primary tumor to the first local recurrence, and the effect of this change on long-term outcomes, are unknown. This study reports the presence of tumor-grade changes and their effect on patient prognosis. While the grade changes did not affect the patient’s prognosis, a high grade of the primary tumor was an important factor. In addition, the risk factor for second local recurrence was a high grade of the recurrent tumor. Although this finding cannot change the treatment plan for recurrent RPS, it can provide the details of nomograms to predict the patient prognosis.

Abstract

In retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), the change in the tumor grade from the primary tumor to the first local recurrence, and the effect of this change on prognosis, are unknown. The aim of this study is to analyze whether these changes affect the prognosis of RPS. Patients who underwent surgery for a first locally recurrent RPS at Samsung Medical Center from January 2001 to February 2020 were included. The pathologic features of primary and recurrent tumors were compared, and the outcomes were measured. A total of 49 patients were investigated. There were 25 patients with different grades of primary and recurrent tumors. The improving, stable, and worsening groups contained 16 (32.7%), 24 (49%), and 9 (18.3%) patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the prognosis between the three groups. In the analyses of the factors that affect the OS, a high grade of the primary tumor (p = 0.023) and the size of the recurrent tumor (p = 0.032) were statistically significant in both univariate and multivariate analyses. In a factor analysis of the second LR, a high-grade recurrent tumor (p = 0.032) was the only significant factor. There were tumor-grade changes between the primary tumor and recurrent tumor in RPS. However, the most important factor in prognosis is a high grade of the primary tumor.