Evaluation of routine follow-up after surgery for breast carcinoma

Quality of post-treatment surveillance of early stage breast cancer in Texas

BACKGROUND

Only annual mammography and physical examination are recommended for the post-treatment surveillance of early stage breast cancer.

METHODS

We used Texas Cancer Registry-Medicare linked data (2001-2007) to identify physician visits and use of mammography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET) CT in patients ≥ 66 years old with ductal carcinoma in situ and stage I-III ductal carcinoma who underwent curative-intent operations. We also evaluated the trends in use of recommended and nonrecommended tests.

RESULTS

We identified 8,598 patients with resected ductal carcinoma in situ (37.3%) or invasive ductal cancer (62.7%). Breast-conserving therapy was performed in 59%. Only 55% saw a physician twice a year for 2 years and underwent annual mammography for 2 consecutive years in the surveillance period. Mammography use decreased from 81% in 2001 to 75% in 2007 (P < .0001), and breast MRI use rose from 0.5% to 7.0% (P < .0001). For asymptomatic patients, the use of CT/MRI of the abdomen, chest, and head was 27%, 23%, and 22%, and this slightly increased during the study period. There was a significant increase in PET/PET CT use, from 2% in 2001 to 9% in 2007 (P < .0001). There was a concomitant decrease in bone scan use from 21% in 2001 to 13% in 2007 (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to evidence-based guidelines has been substandard and the use of nonrecommended tests has persisted over the study period. The rise in PET use and attendant decrease in bone scan implicates a population receiving PET scan in lieu of bone scan for surveillance of asymptomatic metastatic disease. In an elderly population of breast cancer patients in Texas, these findings imply both underuse and overuse.

A review of breast imaging following mastectomy with or without reconstruction in an outpatient community center

Despite developments in surgical technique, radiation treatment, and chemotherapeutic agents, tumor recurrence and distant disease have remained a major concern in breast cancer management. Breast imaging after mastectomy in the screening arena remains a controversial topic for breast imagers. Many feel the yield of finding a recurrent cancer with imaging in the asymptomatic patient is too low to be beneficial; others believe imaging should be performed on these patients as the risk of recurrence exists. Patients after a mastectomy procedure are considered high risk and, when they present with clinical symptoms, will require evaluation by the radiologist. In this diagnostic/symptomatic scenario, imaging becomes the routine and current imaging tools, such as mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can easily be incorporated to diagnose recurrent cancer. Our facility has a large population of patients that undergo mastectomy after a carcinoma diagnosis as well as a number of patients that have undergone a mastectomy procedure because of their high-risk status (whether family history or genetic predisposition). A certain percentage of these patients have proceeded to reconstructive surgery. We image these patients routinely as part of our screening protocol. Over the years we have become familiar with the appearance of remaining tissue along the chest wall after mastectomy as well as the reconstructed breasts. This familiarity is important as the imaging of these patients with mammography and other modalities available today can be challenging. This manuscript will discuss the benefits and some limitations surrounding imaging these patients, in both the asymptomatic and symptomatic scenarios, as well as what imaging protocols can be integrated within a facility's standard evaluation.

An analysis of the cost of clinical surveillance after primary therapy for women with early stage invasive breast cancer

Routine surveillance for distant metastases in women with early stage breast cancer has limited clinical utility and can result in large medical care costs. In order to estimate breast cancer surveillance costs, we used the results of a survey administered to a random sample of physician members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The survey measured the frequency in which radiographic and laboratory tests are ordered for postmenopausal women with stage I or II breast cancer after the completion of surgery and radiation or adjuvant chemotherapy if indicated. There were 209 completed surveys representing a response rate of 48%. The volume of tests ordered was expressed in terms of Medicare's relative value units (RVUs) and 1993 cost equivalents. The mean total RVUs over 5 years post-diagnosis was 43.8 (interquartile range 30.1-54.2) which represents a cost of $1369 using the 1993 Medicare conversion factor of $31.249. A cumulative logistic regression model categorized RVUs according to intensity of care (minimal, average, and intensive). While medical oncologists compared to surgeons and radiation oncologists, and physicians practicing in the Northeast and Midwest, compared to those practicing in the South and West, were more likely to adopt an intensive practice style, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.1). None of the other provider characteristics evaluated, including gender, prior experience, and practice type, had a significant effect on physician practice in a multivariate model. The data showed a wide variation among providers in surveillance practice patterns that was largely unexplained by physician demographics. These results are consistent with the physician practice style hypothesis which suggests that wide variations in treatment patterns result from uncertainty regarding effectiveness of care.

An evaluation of clinical follow-up in women with early stage breast cancer among physician members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Routine clinical follow-up for distant metastatic disease among women with early stage breast cancer is of uncertain clinical benefit. In order to evaluate current practice patterns, we administered a mailed survey to a stratified random sample of physician members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (N = 435). The survey assessed the frequency and motivation for ordering follow-up medical tests in asymptomatic postmenopausal women with stage I or II breast cancer. The response rate was 55%, distributed as 39% radiation oncologists, 32% medical oncologists, and 29% surgeons. In the first year after treatment, physicians performed, on average, one physical examination every 3 months, one blood panel (CBC, alkaline phosphatase and liver function tests) every 4 months, and one chest radiograph every 9 months. In addition, 38% of the respondents ordered CEA and 21% ordered CA 15-3 levels, 28% ordered bone scans, and less than 4% ordered CT scans, bone surveys, or bone marrow biopsies in the first year after treatment. A logistic regression analysis controlling for physician age, gender, sub-specialty, practice type, years of experience, number of breast cancer patients treated annually, geographic region, and community size, showed that surgeons were less likely to order blood tests (p < 0.001) and tumor markers (p < 0.0029) than medical oncologists in years 3 and 5 of follow-up. Compared to physicians practicing in the northeast, those from the midwest were less likely to order chest radiographs in year 3 of follow-up (p = 0.0028). Other provider characteristics had no significant effect on test ordering behavior. The results of this survey suggest that relatively uniform practice patterns in regard to the follow-up of postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer exist among ASCO physicians.

Staging and follow-up of breast cancer patients

Staging systems for breast cancer, unlike those of neoplasms in distant or recessed sites, allowed for the early development of clinical staging evaluation. It was established that clinical assessment of the breast lesion was often wrong compared with the pathologic examination (benign vs. malignant); clinical measurement of the tumor in centimeters was often larger than histologic size; and clinical assessment of axillary nodes (clear or metastatic) was incorrect in about 30% of cases. Although both clinical and pathologic staging provide effective discriminants for prognosis of treated patients, prognosis is more accurately determined by the pathologic stage. The single most important prognostic indicator is the axillary nodal status, and when positive, the number of positive nodes. The American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union International Contra Cancer have agreed on a TNM staging for breast carcinoma, and this is the preferable staging system. Follow-up of treated patients is of most value in detecting local recurrence on the chest wall (after mastectomy) or in the irradiated breast (after lumpectomy), and also in early detection of contralateral breast cancer. Physical examination and periodic mammography are most useful. There is a tendency to overinvestigate asymptomatic patients (with bone scans, blood tests, etc.), but this has been correctly criticized in recent years.