1
|
de Souza Ferreira Neto G, Baccaro FB, Phillips MJ, Massara RL. The distribution of bushmeat mammals in unflooded forests of the Central Amazon is influenced by poaching proxies. Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e10783. [PMID: 38053788 PMCID: PMC10694382 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Medium to large rainforest mammals are key conservation flagship groups that offer non-redundant ecosystem functions, but anthropic pressures, such as illegal hunting, may strongly affect their occupancy in Amazonia. We combined camera traps and occupancy models to assess the influence of distance from human settlements, the number of families per settlement and the synergetic effect of the average weight of 27 species on the occupancy probability of mammals. Specifically, we classified mammal species according to the game preferences of hunters (i.e. a group of species depleted for bushmeat, a group of species hunted for retaliation and a group of non-hunted species). We also accounted for the influence on the detection probability of each group of both the number of days each camera operated and the body weight of mammals. The occupancy probability of the bushmeat group (i.e. deer, peccaries, agoutis, pacas and armadillos) was lower at locations closer to human settlements. Still, the number of families correlated positively with occupancy, with the occupancy probability of the group being slightly higher at sites with more families. This difference was probably due to larger and more abundant crops and fruiting trees attracting wildlife at such sites. Conversely, the occupancy probability of the retaliation group (i.e. carnivores) and the non-hunted group (i.e. opossums, spiny rats, squirrels and anteaters) were indifferent to anthropogenic stressors. The detection probability of the non-hunted and particularly the most depleted species correlated negatively with body weight. This may suggest that larger species, especially those from the bushmeat group, are rarer or less abundant in the system, possibly because they are the preferable target of hunters. In the long term, locals will likely need to travel long distances to find harvest meat. Poaching also threatens food security since game bushmeat is an essential source of protein for isolated rural Amazonians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabricio Beggiato Baccaro
- Departamento de Biologia, Instituto de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Federal do AmazonasManausBrazil
| | - Matthew J. Phillips
- School of Earth, Environmental and Biological SciencesQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Rodrigo Lima Massara
- Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oliveira MA, Braga-Pereira F, El Bizri HR, Morcatty TQ, Doria CRDC, Messias MR. Hunting practices in southwestern Amazonia: a comparative study of techniques, modalities, and baits among urban and rural hunters. JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE 2023; 19:27. [PMID: 37400859 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-023-00599-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hunting is a vital means of obtaining animal in various human populations. Hunters rely on their knowledge of species ecology and behavior to develop and employ hunting techniques and increase their chances of success. The comparison of the hunting practices of different human societies can shed light on the sustainability of hunting and the impact it has on species' populations. In this study, we examine and compare the techniques, modalities, and baits used by urban and rural hunters in Rondônia, a state in southwestern Amazonia, Brazil. We expected that rural hunters would use these elements and have greater knowledge when compared to urban hunters. We also expect that the use of specific hunting techniques and modalities will have greater selectivity and specificity of capture for rural hunters and that this knowledge will differ between groups. METHODS We conducted 106 semi-structured interviews with rural and urban hunters from October 2018 to February 2020. We analyzed the data using PERMANOVA and Network analyses to compare and contrast the hunting practices of each group. RESULTS We recorded four main hunting techniques divided into ten modalities with three techniques and seven modalities being the preferred choices among hunters. Waiting for at a Fruit Tree was cited as the primary technique employed by hunters living in urban and rural areas indicated. While the techniques and modalities were similar among hunters, the composition of species targeted and baits used differed between groups. Our network approach showed that modularity in urban areas was numerically lower than in rural areas. All species had one to more techniques associated with their capture. CONCLUSIONS Hunters living in urban and rural environments showed high similarity in their practices, probably due to sharing similar environments to hunt containing similar species, as well as targeting preferably the same species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Alvares Oliveira
- Post-graduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology of Legal Amazon (BIONORTE Network), Federal University of Rondônia, Porto Velho, Brazil.
- Post-graduate Program in Conservation and Use of Natural Resources, Federal University of Rondônia, Porto Velho, Brazil.
- Research Network on Diversity, Conservation and Use of Amazonian Fauna (RedeFauna), Manaus, Brazil.
- ComFauna, Comunidad de Manejo de Fauna Silvestre en la Amazonía y en Latinoamérica, Iquitos, Peru.
| | - Franciany Braga-Pereira
- Research Network on Diversity, Conservation and Use of Amazonian Fauna (RedeFauna), Manaus, Brazil
- Department of Ecology and Systematics, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil
| | - Hani Rocha El Bizri
- Research Network on Diversity, Conservation and Use of Amazonian Fauna (RedeFauna), Manaus, Brazil
- ComFauna, Comunidad de Manejo de Fauna Silvestre en la Amazonía y en Latinoamérica, Iquitos, Peru
- School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Salford, UK
- Terrestrial Vertebrate Ecology Research Group, Mamirauá Sustainable Development Institute, Estrada do Bexiga, Tefé, Brazil
| | - Thais Queiroz Morcatty
- Research Network on Diversity, Conservation and Use of Amazonian Fauna (RedeFauna), Manaus, Brazil
- Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Carolina Rodrigues da Costa Doria
- Post-graduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology of Legal Amazon (BIONORTE Network), Federal University of Rondônia, Porto Velho, Brazil
- Post-graduate Program in Conservation and Use of Natural Resources, Federal University of Rondônia, Porto Velho, Brazil
| | - Mariluce Rezende Messias
- Post-graduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology of Legal Amazon (BIONORTE Network), Federal University of Rondônia, Porto Velho, Brazil
- Post-graduate Program in Conservation and Use of Natural Resources, Federal University of Rondônia, Porto Velho, Brazil
- Research Network on Diversity, Conservation and Use of Amazonian Fauna (RedeFauna), Manaus, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walton BJ, Findlay LJ, Hill RA. Camera traps and guard observations as an alternative to researcher observation for studying anthropogenic foraging. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e8808. [PMID: 35432939 PMCID: PMC9006232 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Foraging by wildlife on anthropogenic foods can have negative impacts on both humans and wildlife. Addressing this issue requires reliable data on the patterns of anthropogenic foraging by wild animals, but while direct observation by researchers can be highly accurate, this method is also costly and labor‐intensive, making it impractical in the long‐term or over large spatial areas. Camera traps and observations by guards employed to deter animals from fields could be efficient alternative methods of data collection for understanding patterns of foraging by wildlife in crop fields. Here, we investigated how data on crop‐foraging by chacma baboons and vervet monkeys collected by camera traps and crop guards predicted data collected by researchers, on a commercial farm in South Africa. We found that data from camera traps and field guard observations predicted crop loss and the frequency of crop‐foraging events from researcher observations for crop‐foraging by baboons and to a lesser extent for vervets. The effectiveness of cameras at capturing crop‐foraging events was dependent on their position on the field edge. We believe that these alternatives to direct observation by researchers represent an efficient and low‐cost method for long‐term and large‐scale monitoring of foraging by wildlife on crops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben J. Walton
- Department of Anthropology University of Durham Durham UK
| | | | - Russell A. Hill
- Department of Anthropology University of Durham Durham UK
- Primate & Predator Project Lajuma Research Centre Louis Trichardt South Africa
- Department of Zoology University of Venda Thohoyandou South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cuesta Hermira AA, Michalski F. Crop damage by vertebrates in Latin America: current knowledge and potential future management directions. PeerJ 2022; 10:e13185. [PMID: 35356474 PMCID: PMC8958972 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Crop farming contributes to one of the most extensive land use activities in the world, and cropland areas continue to rise. Many vertebrate species feed on crops, which has caused an increase in human-wildlife conflicts in croplands. Crop-feeding damages the economy of local communities and causes retaliation against the responsible vertebrates in several forms, including lethal practices such as hunting and poisoning. Lethal control may cause the local extirpation of some species, affecting ecological processes and patterns. Therefore, it is necessary to find non-lethal alternatives that can protect both local economies and wildlife. Research has been conducted in Africa and Asia, focusing on elephants and primates, and the effectiveness of some non-lethal alternatives, such as chili-based repellents and beehives, is being investigated. However, there has been very little research on this topic in Central and South America. The goal of this review is to assess the current knowledge on crop damage by vertebrates in Central and South America and indicate future research directions. Survey methodology We reviewed the available scientific literature reporting crop damage by vertebrates in Central and South America, and the Caribbean, published between 1980 and 2020, through systematic searches on Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We analyzed the temporal and geographical distributions of the studies, the crops and vertebrate species these studies considered, the crop protection techniques used, and their effectiveness. Results We retrieved only 113 studies on crop damage by vertebrates in Latin America, but there was an increasing trend in the number of studies published over time. Most of the studies were conducted in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, and Costa Rica. Four orders of mammals (Rodentia, Carnivora, Artiodactyla, and Primates) and four orders of birds (Passeriformes, Columbiformes, Psittaciformes, and Anseriformes) were the most common groups of crop-feeding vertebrates. The most prominent crop was corn, which was featured in 49% of the studies. Other notable crops include rice, sorghum, and sugarcane. The most reported method for protecting crops was lethal control through hunting or poisoning. Non-lethal techniques were found to be less prevalent. Less than half of the studies that mentioned the use of protection techniques indicated their effectiveness, and only 10 studies evaluated it by performing scientific experiments and reporting their results. Conclusions Central and South America is still underrepresented in research on vertebrate crop-feeding. There is a need for experimentation-based robust research to find crop protection techniques that minimize harm to vertebrates while effectively reducing damage to crops. While this is being studied, habitat loss and fragmentation need to be halted to prevent the native vertebrates from turning to crops for food.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrián Alejandro Cuesta Hermira
- Ecology Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil,Ecology and Conservation of Amazonian Vertebrates Research Group, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil,Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Fernanda Michalski
- Ecology and Conservation of Amazonian Vertebrates Research Group, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil,Postgraduate Programme in Tropical Biodiversity, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Amapá, Brazil,Pro-Carnivores Institute, Atibaia, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stachowicz I, Ferrer-Paris JR, Sanchez-Mercado A. Shifting cultivation and hunting across the savanna-forest mosaic in the Gran Sabana, Venezuela: facing changes. PeerJ 2021; 9:e11612. [PMID: 34178472 PMCID: PMC8214850 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human encroachment and overexploitation of natural resources in the Neotropics is constantly increasing. Indigenous communities all across the Amazon, are trapped between a population rise and a hot debate about the sustainability of hunting rates. The Garden Hunting hypothesis states that shifting cultivation schemes (conucos) used by Amazon indigenous communities may generate favorable conditions, increasing abundance of small and medium wildlife species close to the 'gardens' providing game for indigenous hunters. METHODS Here, we combined camera trap surveys and spatially explicit interview dataset on Pemón indigenous hunting scope and occurrence in a mosaic of savanna and forest in the Gran Sabana, Venezuela to evaluate to what extent the wildlife resource use corresponds to Garden Hunting hypothesis. We applied the Royle-Nichols model and binomial regression in order to: (1) assess whether abundance of small and medium wildlife species is higher close to conucos and (2) evaluate whether hunters select hunting localities based on accessibility to wildlife resources (closeness to conuco) more than wildlife abundance. RESULTS We find mixed evidence supporting the Garden Hunting hypothesis predictions. Abundance of small and medium species was high close to conucos but the pattern was not statistically significant for most of them. Pemón seem to hunt in locations dominated by forest, where species abundance was predicted to be higher, than in close vicinity to conucos. Hunting scope was focused on the most abundant species located close to the conuco (Cuniculus paca), but also in less abundant and unavailable species (Crax alector, Tapirus terrestris and Odocoileus virginianus). CONCLUSIONS Our research provided the first attempt of a systematic sampling survey in the Gran Sabana, generating a quantitative dataset that not only describes the current pattern of wildlife abundance, but sets the base-line to monitor temporal and spatial change in this region of highland Amazon. We discuss the applicability of the estimates generated as a baseline as well as, environmental challenges imposed by economic, social and cultural changes such as mining encroachment for wildlife management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabela Stachowicz
- Department of Biodiversity Studies and Bioeducation, University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland
- Laboratorio de Biología de Organismos, Centro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - José R. Ferrer-Paris
- Laboratorio de Ecología Espacial, Centro de Estudios Botánicos y Agroforestales, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas, Maracaibo, Venezuela
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW, Kensington, Australia
| | - Ada Sanchez-Mercado
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, NSW, Kensington, Australia
- Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil, Samborondón 092301, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gulati S, Karanth KK, Le NA, Noack F. Human casualties are the dominant cost of human-wildlife conflict in India. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e1921338118. [PMID: 33593892 PMCID: PMC7923352 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921338118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Reducing the costs from human-wildlife conflict, mostly borne by marginal rural households, is a priority for conservation. We estimate the mean species-specific cost for households suffering damages from one of 15 major species of wildlife in India. Our data are from a survey of 5,196 households living near 11 wildlife reserves in India, and self-reported annual costs include crop and livestock losses and human casualties (injuries and death). By employing conservative estimates from the literature on the value of a statistical life (VSL), we find that costs from human casualties overwhelm crop and livestock damages for all species associated with fatalities. Farmers experiencing a negative interaction with an elephant over the last year incur damages on average that are 600 and 900 times those incurred by farmers with negative interactions with the next most costly herbivores: the pig and the nilgai. Similarly, farmers experiencing a negative interaction with a tiger over the last year incur damage that is on average 3 times that inflicted by a leopard and 100 times that from a wolf. These cost differences are largely driven by differences in the incidence of human death and casualties. Our estimate of costs fluctuates across reserves, mostly due to a variation of human casualties. Understanding the drivers of human casualties and reducing their incidence are crucial to reducing the costs from human-wildlife conflict.Most of the tales were about animals, for the Jungle was always at their door. The deer and the pig grubbed up their crops, and now and again the tiger carried off a man at twilight, within sight of the village gates. "Tiger! Tiger!" (Rudyard Kipling, The Jungle Book, Collins Classics, 2010).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumeet Gulati
- Wildlife and Conservation Economics Laboratory, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada;
- Food and Resource Economics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Krithi K Karanth
- The Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, Karnataka 560042, India
- The Nicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Nguyet Anh Le
- Wildlife and Conservation Economics Laboratory, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Food and Resource Economics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Frederik Noack
- Wildlife and Conservation Economics Laboratory, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Food and Resource Economics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Movements and behaviour of blue whales satellite tagged in an Australian upwelling system. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21165. [PMID: 33273533 PMCID: PMC7713308 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78143-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge about the movement ecology of endangered species is needed to identify biologically important areas and the spatio-temporal scale of potential human impacts on species. Blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) are endangered due to twentieth century whaling and currently threatened by human activities. In Australia, they feed in the Great Southern Australian Coastal Upwelling System (GSACUS) during the austral summer. We investigate their movements, occupancy, behaviour, and environmental drivers to inform conservation management. Thirteen whales were satellite tagged, biopsy sampled and photo-identified in 2015. All were genetically confirmed to be of the pygmy subspecies (B. m. brevicauda). In the GSACUS, whales spent most of their time over the continental shelf and likely foraging in association with several seascape variables (sea surface temperature variability, depth, wind speed, sea surface height anomaly, and chlorophyll a). When whales left the region, they migrated west and then north along the Australian coast until they reached West Timor and Indonesia, where their movements indicated breeding or foraging behaviour. These results highlight the importance of the GSACUS as a foraging ground for pygmy blue whales inhabiting the eastern Indian Ocean and indicate the whales’ migratory route to proposed breeding grounds off Indonesia. Information about the spatio-temporal scale of potential human impacts can now be used to protect this little-known subspecies of blue whale.
Collapse
|
8
|
van Vliet N, Antunes AP, Constantino PDAL, Gómez J, Santos-Fita D, Sartoretto E. Frameworks Regulating Hunting for Meat in Tropical Countries Leave the Sector in the Limbo. Front Ecol Evol 2019. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|