Potential of novel colchicine dosage schedule for the palliative treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Multi-cohort validation study of a four-gene signature for risk stratification and treatment response prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The intricate molecular landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a significant challenge to achieving precise risk stratification through clinical genetic testing. At present, there is a paucity of robust gene signatures that could assist clinicians in making clinical decisions for patients with HCC.

METHODS

We obtained gene expression profiles of patients with HCC from 20 independent cohorts available in public databases. A gene signature was developed by employing two machine learning algorithms. In addition to validating the signature with high-throughput data in public cohorts, we external validated the signature in 64 HCC cases by RT-PCR method. We compared genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic features between different subgroups. We also compared our signature to 130 gene signatures that have already been published.

RESULTS

We developed a novel four-gene signature, designated as HCC4, that demonstrates significant potential for the prediction of survival outcomes in more than 1300 patients with HCC. The HCC4 also has potential for predicting recurrence and tumor volume doubling time, assessing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and immunotherapy responses, and non-invasive detection of HCC. The high HCC4 score group shows a higher frequency of mutations in genes TP53, RB1 and TSC1/2, as well as increased activity of cell-cycle, glycolysis and hypoxia signaling pathways, higher cancer stemness score, and lower lipid metabolism activity. In seven HCC cohorts, HCC4 exhibited a higher average C-index in predicting overall survival compared to the 130 signatures previously published. Drug screening indicated that patients with high HCC4 scores were more sensitive to agents targeting AURKA, TUBB, JMJD6 and KIFC1.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated that HCC4 is a powerful tool for improving risk stratification and for identifying HCC patients who are most likely to benefit from TACE treatment, immunotherapy, and other experimental therapies.

Colchicine inhibits the proliferation and promotes the apoptosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma cells likely due to the inhibitory effect on HDAC1

Although the prognosis for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is generally good, a certain proportion of patients show recurrent or advanced disease, indicating the need for further development of targeted medications. The purpose of this study was to explore the interventional effects of colchicine on PTC and the potential mechanisms or targets. We obtained PTC-related targets from the database and colchicine targets by predicting them. We screened the common targets of colchicine and the PTC-related target histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and verified through molecular docking that colchicine has a good affinity for HDAC1, i.e., colchicine may act on PTC by affecting HDAC1. We then used CCK-8, colony formation, mitochondrial membrane potential and apoptosis assays to confirm that colchicine could inhibit the proliferation and promote the apoptosis of PTC cells and verified by RT‒qPCR, Western blot, and cellular immunofluorescence assays that colchicine could inhibit the expression of HDAC1 in PTC cells. The cytotoxicity and inhibitory effect of colchicine on HDAC1 in PTC cells was stronger than that in normal thyroid cells. We then applied an HDAC1 inhibitor, pyroxamide, to verify that inhibition of HDAC1 inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in PTC cells. Therefore, we conclude that colchicine can inhibit the proliferation and promote the apoptosis of PTC cells likely due to its inhibitory effect on HDAC1. This finding implies that colchicine may be helpful for therapeutic intervention in PTC and that HDAC1 may be a promising clinical therapeutic target.

Dose Consideration of Lenvatinib's Anti-Cancer Effect on Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Potential Benefit of Combined Colchicine Therapy

PURPOSE

The dose-dependent anti-cancer effect of lenvatinib on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells and the potential benefit of combined colchicine therapy were investigated.

METHODS

Four primary cultured HCC (S103, S143, S160, S176) cell lines were investigated by differential expressions of genes (11 lenvatinib target genes and NANOG) and anti-proliferative effect using clinically achievable plasma lenvatinib (250, 350 ng/mL) and colchicine (4 ng/mL) concentrations.

RESULTS

Colchicine showed an anti-proliferative effect on all cell lines. Lenvatinib at 250 ng/mL inhibited proliferation in all cell lines, but 350 ng/mL inhibited only three cell lines. For lenvatinib target genes, colchicine down-regulated more genes and up-regulated less genes than lenvatinib did in three cell lines. Lenvatinib up-regulated NANOG in all cell lines. Colchicine down-regulated NANOG in three cell lines but up-regulated NANOG with less magnitude than lenvatinib did in S103. Overall, combined colchicine and 250 ng/mL lenvatinib had the best anti-cancer effects in S143, with similar effects with combined colchicine and 350 ng/mL lenvatinib in S176 but less effects than combined colchicine and 350 ng/mL lenvatinib in S103 and S160.

CONCLUSIONS

Lenvatinib does not show a dose-dependent anti-cancer effect on HCC. Combined colchicine and lenvatinib can promote the total anti-cancer effects on HCC.

The pathogenesis of liver cancer and the therapeutic potential of bioactive substances

Liver cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the world and has become an urgent problem for global public health. Bioactive substances are widely used for the treatment of liver cancer due to their widespread availability and reduced side effects. This review summarizes the main pathogenic factors involved in the development of liver cancer, including metabolic fatty liver disease, viral infection, and alcoholic cirrhosis, and focuses on the mechanism of action of bioactive components such as polysaccharides, alkaloids, phenols, peptides, and active bacteria/fungi. In addition, we also summarize transformation methods, combined therapy and modification of bioactive substances to improve the treatment efficiency against liver cancer, highlighting new ideas in this field.

Advantage of clinical colchicine concentration to promote sorafenib or regorafenib anti-cancer effects on hepatocellular carcinoma

The advantage of colchicine to promote sorafenib or regorafenib anti-cancer effects on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was investigated. Four primary cultured HCC cell lines (S103, S143, S160, S176) were studied by clinically achievable plasma sorafenib (5, 10 μg/mL), regorafenib (2, 4 μg/mL) and colchicine (4 ng/mL) concentrations. Sorafenib and regorafenib target genes and cancer stem cell markers (NANOG, POU5F1) were selected for experiments. Colchicine inhibited proliferation in all cell lines. Sorafenib inhibited proliferation only in S143 (5 μg/mL). Combined colchicine with sorafenib reversed the sorafenib effect on cellular proliferation from promotive to inhibitory in S103, and demonstrated anti-proliferative effects on other cell lines. Regorafenib inhibited proliferation in S103 (2 μg/mL), S176 (2 μg/mL) and S160 (4 μg/mL). Combined colchicine with regorafenib demonstrated equal or stronger anti-proliferative effects than regorafenib alone in all cell lines except S160. Combined colchicine obliterated or reduced the number of up-regulated target genes induced by sorafenib, and demonstrated equal or increased number of down-regulated target genes as compared with regorafenib alone. However, combined colchicine with regorafenib increased one up-regulated target gene in three cell lines. Colchicine obliterated or decreased the magnitude of up-regulated NANOG induced by sorafenib (S103, S143, S176) or regorafenib (S143), and combined with regorafenib could down-regulate NANOG (S160, S176). Adding colchicine to sorafenib or regorafenib showed inconsistent influence on POU5F1 expression as compared with sorafenib or regorafenib alone. The above results suggest that the anti-cancer effects of combined sorafenib with colchicine may be better than sorafenib alone. Colchicine may be added to regorafenib non-responders.

Effects of colchicine use on ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke risk in diabetic patients with and without gout

This study aimed to determine the effect of colchicine use on the risk of stroke among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). We retrospectively enrolled patients with DM between 2000 and 2013 from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database and divided them into a colchicine cohort (n = 8761) and noncolchicine cohort (n = 8761) by using propensity score matching (PSM). The event of interest was a stroke, including ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. The incidence of stroke was analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models between the colchicine cohort and the comparison cohort after adjustment for several confounding factors. The subdistribution hazard model was also performed for examination of the competing risk. The colchicine cohort had a significantly lower incidence of stroke [adjusted hazard ratios (aHR), 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)] (aHR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.55–0.67), ischemic stroke (aHR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.53–0.66), and hemorrhagic stroke (aHR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.53–0.82) compared with the noncolchicine cohort. Drug analysis indicated that patients in the colchicine cohort who received colchicine of cumulative daily defined dose (cDDD) > 14 and duration > 28 days had a lower risk of stroke and ischemic stroke compared with nonusers. The colchicine cohort (cDDD > 150, duration > 360 days) also had a lower risk of stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. The cumulative incidence of stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke in the colchicine cohort was significantly lower than that in the noncolchicine cohort (log-rank P < 0.001). However, the subdistribution hazard model reveal the colchicine was not associated with the hemorrhagic stroke in DM patients without gout (aHR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.47–1.00). Colchicine use with cDDD > 14 and duration > 28 days was associated with lower risk of stroke and ischemic stroke, and colchicine use with cDDD > 150 and duration > 360 days played an auxiliary role in the prevention of stroke, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke in patients with DM. The colchicine for the hemorrhagic stroke in DM patients without gout seem to be null effect.

Anticancer potential of alkaloids: a key emphasis to colchicine, vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine, vinorelbine and vincamine

Cancer, one of the leading illnesses, accounts for about 10 million deaths worldwide. The treatment of cancer includes surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and drug therapy, along with others, which not only put a tremendous economic effect on patients but also develop drug resistance in patients with time. A significant number of cancer cases can be prevented/treated by implementing evidence-based preventive strategies. Plant-based drugs have evolved as promising preventive chemo options both in developing and developed nations. The secondary plant metabolites such as alkaloids have proven efficacy and acceptability for cancer treatment. Apropos, this review deals with a spectrum of promising alkaloids such as colchicine, vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine, vinorelbine, and vincamine within different domains of comprehensive information on these molecules such as their medical applications (contemporary/traditional), mechanism of antitumor action, and potential scale-up biotechnological studies on an in-vitro scale. The comprehensive information provided in the review will be a valuable resource to develop an effective, affordable, and cost effective cancer management program using these alkaloids.