Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 promotes Th2 differentiation by regulating microRNA-135b-5p/GATA-3 axis in children with allergic rhinitis

Advances in noncoding RNA in children allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

A chronic condition that significantly reduces a child's quality of life is allergic rhinitis (AR). The environment and allergens that the body is regularly exposed to can cause inflammatory and immunological reactions, which can change the expression of certain genes Epigenetic changes are closely linked to the onset and severity of allergy disorders according to mounting amounts of data. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are a group of RNA molecules that cannot be converted into polypeptides. The three main categories of ncRNAs include microRNAs (miRNAs), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs). NcRNAs play a crucial role in controlling gene expression and contribute to the development of numerous human diseases.

METHODS

Articles are selected based on Pubmed's literature review and the author's personal knowledge. The largest and highest quality studies were included. The search selection is not standardized.

RESULTS

Recent findings indicate that various categories of ncRNAs play distinct yet interconnected roles and actively contribute to intricate gene regulatory networks.

CONCLUSION

This article demonstrates the significance and progress of ncRNAs in children's AR. The database covers three key areas: miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs. Additionally, potential avenues for future research to facilitate the practical application of ncRNAs as therapeutic targets and biomarkers will be explore.

LINC00998 Modulating M2 Macrophage Activation in Allergic Rhinitis by Stabilizing BOB.1 mRNA

Background

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is globally recognized as a considerable threat to human health with a rising prevalence and a substantial medical and socioeconomic burden. Numerous studies have emphasized the significance of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in allergic responses. Hence, this research dealt with exploring the involvement of the lncRNA LINC00998 in the mechanism of AR.

Methods

LINC00998 expression was assessed by qRT-PCR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells acquired from individuals with AR. Additionally, the potential relationship between LINC00998 and macrophage polarization was observed in vitro. Then we constructed AR mice model and macrophage polarization models using THP-1 cells as well as primary human macrophages to verify the M2 shift in AR and the low expression level of LINC00998 in M2 macrophages. We used gain- and loss-of-function experiments to explore the modification of LINC00998 in macrophage polarization. Furthermore, we explored the underlying mechanism of LINC00998 mediates through qRT-PCR, flow cytometry, and Western blot.

Results

The analysis revealed a significant decrease in LINC00998 expression in the samples obtained from patients with AR. LINC00998 is markedly increased in M1 macrophages whereas decreased in M2 macrophages in vitro. Furthermore, suppression of LINC00998 caused a remarkable enhancement in M2 polarization, whereas its overexpression led to its attenuation. Knockdown of LINC00998 led to a remarkable downregulation of BOB.1 mRNA and protein, while overexpression of LINC00998 upregulated their expression. Moreover, it was found that BOB.1 modulated macrophage polarization through the PU.1/IL-1β axis. Meanwhile, the modulation of LINC00098 overexpression on macrophage polarization and PU.1/ IL-1β can be reversed by BOB.1 siRNA.

Conclusion

This research revealed the lncRNA LINC00998 altered M2 macrophage polarization by regulating the BOB.1/PU.1/IL-1β axis, which open up new avenues for studying the pathogenesis of AR.

Role of LINC00240 on T-helper 9 differentiation in allergic rhinitis through influencing DNMT1-dependent methylation of PU.1

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disease with increasing prevalence globally. However, the molecular mechanism underlying AR pathogenesis remains largely undefined.

METHODS

Peripheral blood and nasal mucosa samples obtained from patients with AR (n = 22), and ovalbumin-induced AR mouse model (n = 8 per group) were prepared for subsequent detection. qRT-PCR and western blot were used to detect the expression of LINC00240, miR-155-5p, PU.1 and other key molecules. ELISA assay and flow cytometry were employed to evaluate the secretion of IL-9 and T-helper 9 (Th9) cell ratio, respectively. Bioinformatics analysis, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and luciferase reporter assays were employed to further elucidate the regulatory network of LINC00240/miR-155-5p/DNMT1. The methylation of PU.1 promoter was assessed by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). This signaling axis was further validated in the mouse model of AR.

RESULTS

LINC00240 was downregulated, while miR-155-5p and PU.1 were upregulated in the peripheral blood and nasal mucosa of AR patients, as well as in AR mice. This was accompanied with the increased ratio of Th9 cells and elevated IL-9 secretion. Mechanistically, LINC00240 served as a miR-155-5p sponge, and DNMT1 was a target of miR-155-5p. In addition, DNMT1 mediated the methylation of PU.1 promoter. In vivo studies verified that LINC00240 mitigated AR progression, possibly via miR-155-5p/DNMT1/PU.1-dependent Th9 differentiation.

CONCLUSION

The involvement of LINC00240 in AR pathogenesis is closely associated with Th9 differentiation through modulating DNMT1-dependent methylation of PU.1 by sponging miR-155-5p.

The role of miRNAs in T helper cell development, activation, fate decisions and tumor immunity

T helper (Th) cells are central members of adaptive immunity and comprise the last line of defense against pathogen infection and malignant cell invasion by secreting specific cytokines. These cytokines then attract or induce the activation and differentiation of other immune cells, including antibody-producing B cells and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Therefore, the bidirectional communication between Th cells and tumor cells and their positioning within the tumor microenvironment (TME), especially the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), sculpt the tumor immune landscape, which affects disease initiation and progression. The type, number, and condition of Th cells in the TME and TIME strongly affect tumor immunity, which is precisely regulated by key effectors, such as granzymes, perforins, cytokines, and chemokines. Moreover, microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as important regulators of Th cells. In this review, we discuss the role of miRNAs in regulating Th cell mediated adaptive immunity, focusing on the development, activation, fate decisions, and tumor immunity.

Dynamic relationship between the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and long noncoding RNA balances cellular and toxicological responses

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a cytosolic transcription factor activated by endogenous ligands and xenobiotic chemicals. Once the AhR is activated, it translocates to the nucleus, dimerizes with the AhR nuclear translator (ARNT) and binds to xenobiotic response elements (XRE) to promote gene transcription, notably the cytochrome P450 CYP1A1. The AhR not only mediates the toxic effects of environmental chemicals, but also has numerous putative physiological functions. This dichotomy in AhR biology may be related to reciprocal regulation of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA). lncRNA are defined as transcripts more than 200 nucleotides in length that do not encode a protein but are implicated in many physiological processes such as cell differentiation, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. lncRNA are also linked to disease pathogenesis, particularly the development of cancer. Recent studies have revealed that AhR activation by environmental chemicals affects the expression and function of lncRNA. In this article, we provide an overview of AhR signaling pathways activated by diverse ligands and highlight key differences in the putative biological versus toxicological response of AhR activation. We also detail the functions of lncRNA and provide current data on their regulation by the AhR. Finally, we outline how overlap in function between AhR and lncRNA may be one way in which AhR can be both a regulator of endogenous functions but also a mediator of toxicological responses to environmental chemicals. Overall, more research is still needed to fully understand the dynamic interplay between the AhR and lncRNA.