Combined antegrade and retrograde esophageal dilation for head and neck cancer-related complete esophageal stenosis

Severe Refractory Post-Radiation Strictures: Lessons Learned from Long-term Follow-up after Combined Antegrade Retrograde Dilation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dysphagia with an identifiable stricture occurs frequently following chemoradiation therapy for head/neck cancer patients, some developing complete obliteration of the esophageal lumen. Combined Antegrade Retrograde Dilation (CARD) is designed to restore luminal patency. This paper reports how experience at one institution shaped a more effective strategy for the long-term management of this difficult patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Twenty patients, mean age 62.6 years, initially undergoing CARD procedure, subsequently required a total of 278 dilation sessions (average 13.9 sessions/patient) performed on average every 8.2 weeks (range 2.7-12.6). All patients achieved luminal patency. Complications occurred in 7 patients (35.0% of patients, 2.5% of all procedures) and included traumatic bleeding, pneumothorax, overt esophageal perforation, microscopic perforation with cervical osteomyelitis, and perforation at the gastrostomy site. Diet and dysphagia scores were ineffective at directing the schedule for maintenance dilation. The CARD procedure is effective at restoring initial esophageal patency, but must be followed closely with long-term maintenance dilation. Over a large number of dilations, complications are infrequent and difficult to predict. Their incidence may be reduced by use of prophylactic antibiotics, prior removal of a tracheoesophageal prosthesis, avoiding dilation of the gastrostomy tract, modest dilation goal, and scheduled "stricture surveillance" with dilations performed under fluoroscopic guidance.

Combined antegrade and retrograde dilation (CARD) for management of complete esophageal obstruction: Multicenter case series

Background and study aims Complete esophageal obstruction (CEO) is a rare complication of radiation therapy for esophageal or head and neck cancers and can be challenging to manage endoscopically. A rendezvous approach by combined anterograde and retrograde endoscopic dilation (CARD) can be used to re-establish luminal integrity in such cases. Our study aimed to review our experience with patients with CEOs managed by CARD. Patients and methods Six patients who had CARD for CEO were reviewed. The primary outcomes were immediate technical and clinical success of CARD. Secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) associated with the procedure and continued dependency on the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-or jejunostomy tube. Results The mean age was 59 years (range 38-83). Five patients had CEO secondary to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer, and one patient had complete obstruction secondary to neck trauma. CARD was technically successful in five patients (86%). Two patients had AEs. One had pneumomediastinum requiring no intervention, while the other had bilateral pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement. The median follow-up duration of repeated dilations to maintain liminal patency was 20 months. Four patients had improvement in dysphagia, tolerating oral intake, and mouth secretions after the procedure, with a mean functional oral intake scale (FOIS) score > 3 and an overall success rate of 83%. Conclusions The CARD approach to re-establish esophageal luminal patency in CEO is a safer alternative to high-risk blind antegrade dilation or an invasive surgical approach. It is usually technically feasible with improved swallowing ability in most patients.

Developing a Tracheal Rendezvous Procedure for Complete High Subglottic Stenosis

Complete subglottic stenosis is often managed with surgical resection. However, involvement of the high subglottis can limit candidacy for open resection, and there are few treatment options for these patients. We refined an endoscopic approach that evolved into a tracheal rendezvous technique with T-tube placement as an alternative to open surgical resection. Here, we present our series, technique, and outcomes. A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent endoscopic management of complete high subglottic stenosis at the University of California San Diego. The surgical technique was initially a two-step staged procedure and was subsequently revised to a single-stage procedure with stenosis ablation, dilation, and insertion of a T-tube, which was completed in one day. Patients were seen at regular follow-up intervals for reassessment. Five patients were identified with complete stenosis not amenable to surgical resection. The average age of the cohort was 44.8 years. The etiology of stenosis in all patients was related to prolonged intubation and tracheostomy, and the average length of stenosis was 19.6 mm. Stenosis resection was accomplished via laser ablation and balloon dilation, and the average T-tube length was 50.3 mm. All patients were discharged on postoperative day one. Two patients developed airway crusting within the T-tube and required emergency department visits. Decannulation was attempted in three patients, although failed in two. Tracheal rendezvous is a safe and effective procedure for patients with grade IV subglottic stenosis. This provides a feasible endoscopic alternative to patients who are not candidates for open surgical resection, ye are motivated to have phonatory capacity.

Neopharyngeal Stricture following Laryngectomy

Stricture formation is a serious complication following pharyngeal reconstruction. These strictures can be life-threatening and can severely impact quality of life. In this article, the existing literature on surgical risk factors linked to neopharyngeal stricture formation is reviewed. Intraoperative preventative measures reconstructive surgeons should consider are also discussed. Finally, this article will describe the evaluation and management of pharyngoesophageal strictures, including the challenges and options when dealing with refractory strictures.

Endoscopic Reconstruction of an Oral Feeding Route Using a Rendezvous Approach

Background

The approach to esophageal obstruction or discontinuity remains challenging and often involves complex reconstructive surgeries. The rendezvous endoscopic technique might be interesting in cases of complete esophageal obstruction.

Case Presentation

Herein we describe a successful case of endoscopic recanalization of the esophageal lumen in a patient with a long-standing esophageal discontinuity resulting from several surgeries and chemoradiation for a squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx, ending in a major cervical amputation, construction of a neopharynx, and definitive surgical closure of the superior esophagus with a PEG placement. With a rendezvous technique (peroral and through the gastrostomy) and under radiographic guidance, puncture from the neopharynx into the distal esophagus was performed, followed by balloon dilation and covered metal stent placement in order to reconstruct a neoesophagus. Five weeks later, the stent was removed (using a stent-in-stent technique). No complications occurred. The patient has been able to eat soft food and is being kept under regular endoscopic surveillance to control/treat a luminal stenosis of the neoesophagus.

Conclusions

This case report illustrates a successful endoscopic treatment of post-surgical complete esophageal obstruction. This approach should be considered in the therapeutic armamentarium of these difficult clinical settings.

Diagnosis and management of pharyngoesophageal stenosis: A comprehensive approach to prophylactic, endoscopic, and reconstructive treatment options

BACKGROUND

Pharyngoesophageal stenosis (PES) is a serious complication that substantially impacts functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL) for up to a third of head and neck cancer patients who undergo radiotherapy. Dysphagia is often multifactorial in nature and is a devastating complication of treatment that impacts patients' QOL, general health and overall wellbeing. The authors detail the clinical presentation, risk factors, imaging characteristics, preventive measures, and multimodality treatment options for PES.

METHODS

The authors present a comprehensive management algorithm for PES, including treatment by dilation, stenting, spray cryotherapy and dilation, and reconstructive treatment options utilizing different pedicled and free flaps.

RESULTS

The authors advocate for a thorough assessment of the extent and degree of pharyngoesophageal involvement of PES to determine the optimal management strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of post treatment dysphagia requires appropriate imaging and biopsy, when indicated, to rule out the presence of persistent/recurrent cancer. Multidisciplinary management by a team of physicians well-versed in the range of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions available for PES is critical to its successful management.

Outcomes of Combined Antegrade-Retrograde Dilations for Radiation-Induced Esophageal Strictures in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

The purpose of this study is to analyze outcomes of combined antegrade-retrograde dilations (CARD). This retrospective study was conducted on 14 patients with a history of head and neck cancer, treated with radiation therapy that was complicated by either complete or near-complete esophageal stenosis. All patients had minimal oral intake and depended on a gastrostomy tube for nutrition. Swallow function before and after CARD was assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale, originally developed for stroke patients and applied to head and neck cancer patients. Patients undergoing CARD demonstrated a quantifiable improvement in swallow function (p = 0.007) that persisted at last known follow-up (p = 0.015) but only a minority (23.1%) achieved oral intake sufficient to obviate the need for tube feeds. Complication rates were 24% per procedure or 36% per patient, almost all complications required procedural intervention, and all complications occurred in patients with complete stenosis. Our study suggests further caution when considering CARD, careful patient selection, and close post-operative monitoring.

Third Space Endoscopy: Lessons Learnt From a Decade of Submucosal Endoscopy

The field of third space endoscopy (TSE), also called submucosal endoscopy using a mucosal flap valve, allows secure access to the submucosal and deeper layers of the gastrointestinal tract without the risk of a full-thickness perforation. Since the first description of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia cardia 10 years ago, this field has expanded rapidly. Several new procedures, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, gastric-POEM, Zenker POEM, per-rectal endoscopic myotomy, diverticular POEM, and recanalization for complete esophageal obstruction (per-oral endoscopic tunneling for restoration of the esophagus), have been performed. All TSE procedures employ a similar technique-after a mucosal incision, a submucosal tunnel is created, a myotomy is performed, or a subepithelial tumor is resected distal to the site of mucosal incision, after which the mucosal incision is closed. Potential indications for TSE include resection of subepithelial tumors in the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, or stomach; refractory gastroparesis; Zenker diverticulum; Hirschsprung disease or other forms of megacolon; and recanalization for complete esophageal obstruction. Data are currently available for POEM, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection, and gastric-POEM, although mainly in the form of retrospective studies, and randomized trials and long-term follow-up data are limited. Submucosal endoscopy has an excellent safety profile with very few intraoperative adverse events, the majority being related to insufflation, although bleeding, perforation, and sepsis have been reported. TSE procedures require special training and have demonstrated a learning curve.

Retrograde endoscopic dilatation for difficult caustic esophageal strictures: Feasibility and effectiveness

BACKGROUND

Difficult caustic esophageal strictures may need a more sophisticated dilatation technique before referring for esophageal replacement surgery.

PATIENTS & METHOD

Retrospective review of caustic esophageal strictures managed at our center between January 2010 and June 2018 was done. Twenty two patients labeled as undilatable strictures were enrolled. These patients had another trial for endoscopic dilatation using retrograde approach.

RESULTS

Among these 22 patients, 5 patients could be dilated by antegrade approach. Seventeen patients had a trial of retrograde dilatation after failed antegrade endoscopy. Retrograde dilatation was successful in 14 patients (82%). Nasogastric tube was left following dilatation in 4 patients to facilitate next sessions. Collectively, 19 out of the 22 patients could have their esophagus dilated in the first instance (86%). Among retrograde dilated patients; eight patients succeeded to retain their native esophagus (57%), two patients are still on dilatation with marked improvement (14%), and three patients underwent colon interposition owing to refractory stricture despite frequent dilatations.

CONCLUSION

Every attempt should be tried to preserve the native esophagus. Retrograde endoscopic dilatation is a valuable alternative for undilatable stricture before referring the patient for replacement surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a case series with no comparison group (level IV).

Safety and efficacy of combined antegrade and retrograde endoscopic dilation for complete esophageal obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Complete esophageal obstruction (CEO) due to occlusive proximal stricture occurs after chemoradiation for head and neck cancers. A combined antegrade and retrograde endoscopic technique with controlled recanalization and dilation (CARD) has been shown to be an effective and safe method for regaining and maintaining esophageal luminal patency in the short term.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (from inception through November 2018), to identify studies that reported the outcomes of CARD. The primary outcomes were the pooled rates of technical and clinical success, specifically improvement in dysphagia and independence from percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-tube feeds. The secondary outcomes were the need for repeat dilations and the risks of complications, such as pneumomediastinum, perforation, and death.

Results

From a total of 19 studies (229 cases and 251 procedures) the calculated technical success rate was 88.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.9-92.5, I²=0). The rates of improvement in dysphagia and being PEG-tube free were 58.4% (95%CI 50-66.3, I²=12.6) and 43.5% (95%CI 34.1-53.4, I²=30.6), respectively. The pooled rate of repeat dilatations was 78.9% (95%CI 69.7-85.8, I²=15.2). The risks of pneumomediastinum, perforation and death were 9.9% (95%CI 6.2-15.6, I²=0), 8% (95%CI 4.8-13, I²=0), and 6.8% (95%CI 3.4-13.1, I²=0), respectively. Minimal heterogeneity was noted in the analysis.

Conclusions

The CARD procedure for CEO has a high technical success rate, but also a high rate of repeat dilations. Given its complexity and associated adverse events, this procedure should be restricted to centers with a high level of expertise.

Total Pharyngo-esophageal Stenosis: A New Surgical Procedure Using Modified Retrograde Transillumination Approach

We performed a modified combined anterograde-retrograde dilatation in a 60-year-old woman with complete pharyngo-esophageal stricture (PES). With a large endoscopic view from the upper (laryngoscope) and lower (pediatric gastroscope introduced via gastrostomy tube) parts of the PES, the approach consisted of a retrograde puncture of the complete PES by transillumination to take the guide coming from the pediatric endoscope. The guide was pulled through the mouth and the PES dilatation was made using successive boogies of various diameters through the guide. Finally, a salivary bypass was placed to maintain the diameter of the pharyngo-esophageal way. The surgical approach was performed in 25 minutes without short, medium, and long-term complications. The patient started oral alimentation the day after the surgery, and the salivary bypass was removed after 6 months. The subject had no recurrence of the PES at 5 years.

Endoscopic Dilation of Pharyngoesophageal Strictures: There Are More Dimensions than a Diameter

Background/Aims

Dysphagia due to benign pharyngoesophageal strictures (PES) often requires repeated dilations; however, a uniform definition for the therapeutic efficacy of this technique has not been yet established. We aimed to assess the overall efficacy of endoscopic dilation of pharyngoesophageal anastomotic or post-radiotherapy (post-RT) strictures.

Methods

The data of 48 patients with post-RT (n = 29) or anastomotic PES (n = 19) submitted to endoscopic dilation during a 3-year period were retrospectively assessed. The Kochman criteria were used to determine refractoriness and recurrence. Patients were asked to answer a questionnaire determining prospectively the dilation program efficacy as (a) dysphagia improvement, (b) dysphagia resolution, (c) need for further dilations, or (d) percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) during the previous 6 months. Need for additional therapy was considered an inefficacy criterion.

Results

The median number of dilations per patient was 4 (total of 296 dilations) with a median follow-up of 29 months. The mean predilation dysphagia Mellow-Pinkas score was 3 and the initial stenosis diameter was 7 mm. Fifteen and 29% of patients presented with the Kochman criteria for refractory and recurrent strictures, respectively. Moreover, 96 and 60% showed dysphagia improvement and resolution, respectively. Seventy-five-percent did not require dilations during 6 months, and 89% did not require PEG. From the patients' perspective, overall efficacy was achieved in 58% of cases. Nine additional therapies were required. Number of dilations (OR 0.7), stricture diameter (OR 2.2), and nonrecurrence criteria (OR 14.2) appeared as significant predictors of overall efficacy, whereas refractory stenosis criteria did not.

Conclusions

Endoscopic dilation seems to be effective for patients with dysphagia after RT or surgery, especially when assessed as patient perception of improvement. Narrow strictures, recurrent ones, and strictures requiring a higher number of dilations may predict worse outcomes.

Key Message

Health professionals should establish well-defined efficacy criteria for dilations and base their decision beyond exclusively objective measurements.

Esophagram findings in cervical esophageal stenosis: A case-controlled quantitative analysis

OBJECTIVE

Cervical esophageal stenosis is often diagnosed with a qualitative evaluation of a barium esophagram. Although the esophagram is frequently the initial screening exam for dysphagia, a clear objective standard for stenosis has not been defined. In this study, we measured esophagram diameters in order to establish a quantitative standard for defining cervical esophageal stenosis that requires surgical intervention.

STUDY DESIGN

Single institution case-control study.

METHODS

Patients with clinically significant cervical esophageal stenosis defined by moderate symptoms of dysphagia (Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale > 2 and Functional Oral Intake Scale < 6) persisting for 6 months and responding to dilation treatment were matched with age, sex, and height controls. Both qualitative and quantitative barium esophagram measurements for the upper, mid-, and lower vertebral bodies of C5 through T1 were analyzed in lateral, oblique, and anterior-posterior views.

RESULTS

Stenotic patients versus nonstenotic controls showed no significant differences in age, sex, height, body mass index, or ethnicity. Stenosis was most commonly at the sixth cervical vertebra (C 6) lower border and C7 upper border. The mean intraesophageal minimum/maximum ratios of controls and stenotic groups in the lateral view were 0.63 ± 0.08 and 0.36 ± 0.12, respectively (P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the minimum/maximum ratios, with a <0.50 ratio delineating stenosis, demonstrated that lateral view measurements had the best diagnostic ability. The sensitivity of the radiologists' qualitative interpretation was 56%. With application of lateral intraesophageal minimum/maximum ratios, we observed improved sensitivity to 94% of the esophagram, detecting clinically significant stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Applying quantitative determinants in esophagram analysis may improve the sensitivity of detecting cervical esophageal stenosis in dysphagic patients who may benefit from surgical therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IIIb. Laryngoscope, 128:2022-2028, 2018.

Endoscopic dilation of complete oesophageal obstructions with a combined antegrade-retrograde rendezvous technique

AIM: To investigate the combined antegrade-retrograde endoscopic rendezvous technique for complete oesophageal obstruction and the swallowing outcome.

METHODS: This single-centre case series includes consecutive patients who were unable to swallow due to complete oesophageal obstruction and underwent combined antegrade-retrograde endoscopic dilation (CARD) within the last 10 years. The patients’ demographic characteristics, clinical parameters, endoscopic therapy, adverse events, and outcomes were obtained retrospectively. Technical success was defined as effective restoration of oesophageal patency. Swallowing success was defined as either percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-tube independency and/or relevant improvement of oral food intake, as assessed by the functional oral intake scale (FOIS) (≥ level 3).

RESULTS: The cohort consisted of six patients [five males; mean age 71 years (range, 54-74)]. All but one patient had undergone radiotherapy for head and neck or oesophageal cancer. Technical success was achieved in five out of six patients. After discharge, repeated dilations were performed in all five patients. During follow-up (median 27 mo, range, 2-115), three patients remained PEG-tube dependent. Three of four patients achieved relevant improvement of swallowing (two patients: FOIS 6, one patient: FOIS 7). One patient developed mediastinal emphysema following CARD, without a need for surgery.

CONCLUSION: The CARD technique is safe and a viable alternative to high-risk blind antegrade dilation in patients with complete proximal oesophageal obstruction. Although only half of the patients remained PEG-tube independent, the majority improved their ability to swallow.

Emerging techniques and efficacy of endoscopic esophageal reconstruction and lumen restoration for complete esophageal obstruction

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Complete esophageal obstruction (CEO) is a rare occurrence characterized by progressive esophageal stricture, which eventually causes lumen obliteration. With recent advances in flexible endoscopy, various innovative techniques exist for restoring luminal continuity. The primary aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of patients undergoing combined antegrade-retrograde endoscopic dilation for CEO at our institution. The secondary aim was to review and highlight emerging techniques, outcomes, and adverse events after endoscopic treatment of CEO.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our electronic endoscopy database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent combined antegrade and retrograde endoscopy for CEO. Patient and procedural data collected included gender, age, technical success, pre- and post-dysphagia scores, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Six patients (67 % male, mean age 71.6 years [range 63 - 80]) underwent technically successful esophageal reconstruction with combined antegrade-retrograde endoscopy. All patients noted improvement in dysphagia with mean pre-procedure dysphagia score of 4 reduced to 1.33 (range 0 - 3) post-procedure. There were no adverse events and mean follow-up time was 17.3 months (range 3 - 48).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined antegrade and retrograde endoscopic therapy for CEO is feasible and safe. We present our experience with endoscopic management of complete esophageal obstruction, and highlight emerging techniques, outcomes and adverse events related to this minimally invasive modality.

Poor functional performance following bidirectional dilatation of severe post radiation oesophageal stricture

CONCLUSION

Bidirectional oesophageal dilatation for severe chemoradiation-induced oesophageal strictures is efficacious in improving luminal patency but ineffective in relieving functional dysphagia.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of bidirectional oesophageal dilatation in the severely strictured oesophagus induced by radiation therapy following the treatment of head and neck malignancies.

METHODS

The study design was a case series in the setting of a tertiary cancer centre. We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent bidirectional oesophageal dilatation for oesophageal stricture secondary to radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies over a 5-year period. The parameters of the primary tumour, evaluation of preoperative and postoperative oesophageal dysfunction and complications of the procedure were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were nine episodes of bidirectional oesophageal dilatation among five patients with complete or severe oesophageal obstruction. Mean age was 63 years. The procedure was uneventful in all but one patient who was found to have postoperative mediastinitis, and healed completely. Four patients had persistent dysphagic symptoms despite post dilatation video fluoroscopy failing to reveal any significant narrowing of the oesophageal lumen.

Outcomes of serial dilation for high-grade radiation-related esophageal strictures in head and neck cancer patients

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Dysphagia and esophageal stricture are frequent consequences of treatment for head and neck cancer. This study examines the effectiveness of the anterograde-retrograde rendezvous procedure and serial dilations in reestablishing esophageal patency to allow return to oral diet and gastrostomy tube removal in a cohort of patients with complete or near-complete esophageal stricture following nonsurgical cancer treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of patients treated with radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy presented with complete or near-complete esophageal stricture. Patients underwent serial dilations using combined anterograde-retrograde dilation (rendezvous) techniques.

METHODS

Medical records of patients having undergone treatment between 2006 and 2012 were reviewed, and semistructured interviews were also conducted to determine current swallowing function and actual patient experience. The primary outcome was swallowing improvement that allowed for return to oral diet and/or gastrostomy tube removal. Outcomes were compared between patients with complete and near-complete (<5 mm in diameter) strictures and univariate analysis performed to identify associations between patient, cancer, and treatment characteristics on odds of gastrostomy tube removal.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (median age 59.5 years, 63% male, 91% Caucasian) underwent treatment. Fifty percent of patients had complete occlusion of the esophageal lumen. The majority of patients (92%) underwent either anterograde (54%) or combined antero-retrograde (38%) approach. Following a median (interquartile range) of 9 (6-20) dilation sessions, 42% of patients were able to return to an oral diet and/or had their gastrostomy tube removed. This outcome was independent of whether the stricture was complete or near complete (P = .67). Of patients who had their gastrostomy tubes removed, only 33.3% had ever smoked, compared to 92.3% of those whose tubes were not discharged (P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

Recannulation is possible even in cases of complete or near-complete stricture. Several factors appear to impact the likelihood of successful outcome, but in this study, only patients with a history of smoking had a significantly lower likelihood of return to full oral diet.

Utility of the transnasal esophagoscope in the management of chemoradiation-induced esophageal stenosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe management of esophageal stenosis after chemoradiation therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), with particular emphasis on techniques and outcomes with the use of the transnasal esophagoscope (TNE) in the office as well as operating room settings.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal stenosis following head and neck cancer radiation, with or without chemotherapy, and managed with TNE-assisted esophageal dilation over a 5-year period. Preoperative and postoperative swallowing function were assessed objectively with the Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS; ranging from score 0, a normal diet, to score 5, complete dependence on nonoral nutrition).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. The mean pretreatment FOSS score was 4.4, whereas the mean posttreatment FOSS score was 2.7 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P<.001). Prior to dilation, 16 patients were completely gastrostomy-tube dependent (FOSS 5), of whom 12 (75%) were able to tolerate oral nutrition for a majority of their diet following treatment according to our protocol. No complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

Dysphagia following chemoradiation therapy for HNSCC is often related to esophageal stenosis. With the aid of TNE, we have developed a successful treatment strategy for esophageal stenosis with improved success rates.

Prevention and management of treatment-induced pharyngo-oesophageal stricture

Pharyngo-oesophageal stricture (PES) is a serious complication that occurs in up to a third of patients treated with external beam radiotherapy or combined chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. This entity is under-reported and as a result, our understanding of the pathophysiology and prevention of this complication is restricted. This Review presents the knowledge so far on radiation-related and non-radiation-related risk factors for PES, including tumour stage and subsite, patient age, and comorbidities. The interventions to decrease this toxicity are discussed, including early detection of PES, initiation of an oral diet, and protection of swallowing structures from high-dose radiation. We discuss various treatment options, including swallowing exercises and manoeuvres, endoscopic dilatations, and for advanced cases, oesophageal reconstruction. Study of the subset of patients who develop this toxicity and early recognition and intervention of this pathological change in future trials will help to optimise treatment of these patients.

Success of endoscopic pharyngoesophageal dilation after head and neck cancer treatment

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To assess clinical success and safety of endoscopic pharyngoesophageal dilation after chemoradiation or radiation for head and neck cancer and to identify variables associated with dilation failure.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with chart review.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2008, a total of 111 patients treated with chemoradiation or radiation for head and neck cancer with subsequent pharyngoesophageal stenosis requiring endoscopic dilation were identified. Patients were evaluated for endoscopic dilation technique, severity of stenosis, technical and clinical success, and intra- and postoperative complications. The Diet/GT score (range, 1-5) was utilized to measure swallow success. Variables associated with dilation failure were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 271 dilations analyzed, with 42 combined antegrade retrograde dilations, 208 dilations over a guidewire, and 21 dilations without guidewire. Intraoperative patency and successful dilation of the stenotic segment was achieved in 95% of patients. A Diet/GT score of 5 (gastrostomy tube removed and soft/regular diet) was attained in 84 of 111 (76%) patients. Safety analysis showed complications occurred in 9% of all dilations. Perforations were noted in 4% of all procedures, with only two esophageal perforations requiring significant intervention. Multiple dilations were associated with an increased risk for perforations. Further logistic regression analyses revealed that the number of dilations was indicating a poor outcome and low Diet/GT score.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharyngoesophageal stenosis, occurring after chemoradiation and radiation treatment, can be successfully and safely treated with endoscopic dilation techniques. Patients with restenosis, requiring multiple dilations, have a higher risk of persistent dysphagia.

Treatment of hypopharyngeal carcinoma with primary chemoradiotherapy: functional morbidity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims at unravelling the medical literature which has reported on the treatment of 'larynx preserving' chemoradiotherapy strategies and separating the treatment sites, larynx and hypopharynx, from each other and reporting on the adverse effects and functional outcomes of patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

The literature reports on the treatment of advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer with chemoradiotherapy together as a 'common cancer site'. Although the chemotherapeutic drugs affect the tumour and the normal tissues similarly in both the larynx and hypopharynx, their effects on the patient groups are different, mainly affecting swallow, airway protection mechanisms and voice/speech to a greater or lesser extent. Pretreatment symptoms and function should be documented subjectively and objectively prior to commencing nonsurgical treatment. Hypopharyngeal cancer should be reported separately, and preferably stratified into the three subsites, according to the T stage of disease rather than TNM stage. Equipment for such testing and the process for such documentation are available in most clinical areas, worldwide.

SUMMARY

Future analysis relies on the conscientious monitoring of adverse effects of all treatment modalities and an assessment of function as well as quality of life impact on the patient. Thus, the specialty can make informed decisions on the most appropriate and most suitable mode of treatment for individual patients based upon their tumour, their preoperative organ function, their likely future organ function and the likelihood of cure.

Endoscopic lumen restoration for obstructive aphagia: outcomes of a 25-year experience

BACKGROUND

After chemoradiation therapy for head/neck cancer, some patients develop strictures that progress to complete pharyngoesophageal occlusion. Total lumen occlusion is less often due to other conditions. Enteral access (enterostomy tube) and good nutritional status tend to minimize the significance of dysphagia and therefore may mask recognition of impending complete lumen occlusion.

OBJECTIVE

Review outcomes of a 25-year experience with endoscopic lumen restoration (ELR) in 30 patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case review study.

SETTING

Two tertiary-care referral centers.

PATIENTS

This study involved 30 consecutive patients referred for obstructive aphagia due to complete lumen occlusion, primarily after chemoradiation therapy for head/neck cancer.

INTERVENTION

Antegrade and retrograde endoscopy with tri-plane fluoroscopy for penetrating the occluded segment, serial retrograde and antegrade dilations, plus swallowing rehabilitation therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Restoration of lumen patency, swallowing function, and removal of enteral feeding tube.

RESULTS

ELR was successful in 30 patients in 31 of 33 attempts (93%). Return to soft to regular diet was achieved in 15 of 30 patients (50%), and fluids to pureed food with partial percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy nutrition was achieved in 5 of 30 patients (17%). Ten of 30 patients (33%) were considered unsafe for oral feeding because of oropharyngeal neuromotor deficits. Complications occurred in 5 of 30 patients (17%), with no prolonged sequelae, deaths, or surgery, but two stents were placed for anastomotic fistulas. The median duration of follow-up was 22.75 months.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective, case review study.

CONCLUSION

ELR by using tri-plane fluoroscopic guidance with antegrade and retrograde endoscopy and serial dilations allows lumen restoration and swallowing to some degree in a majority of patients. Engagement of a core team of specialists can provide optimal restoration of swallowing function.

Management of complete esophageal stricture after treatment of head and neck cancer using combined anterograde retrograde esophageal dilation

BACKGROUND

Complete esophageal stricture is a difficult problem to manage. There is limited literature to support clinical decision-making. To evaluate outcomes and efficacy, we performed a retrospective medical chart review of patients who received combined anterograde retrograde esophageal dilation (CARD) between 2002 and 2009 at our institution.

METHODS

Fifteen patients were identified who developed a stricture requiring CARD after treatment for head and neck cancers. Outcomes were pretreatment and posttreatment diet, gastrostomy tube status, and operative complications.

RESULTS

Six of 15 patients were gastrostomy tube-free at last follow-up and 11 of 15 patients were taking oral nutrition. There were 4 complications. One patient died. Two gastrostomy tube site complications occurred. One patient sustained a dental injury.

CONCLUSION

CARD offers benefit to most patients. Despite risks associated with the procedure, CARD should be considered by the clinician and patient in management of complete esophageal stricture.