Reconstruction of large mandibulofacial defects with the composed double skin paddle fibula free flap: A review of 32 procedures

Division versus de-epithelialization of fibula osteocutaneous flap for composite oromandibular defects: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Different fibula osteocutaneous free flap (FOCFF) configurations have been described with a double-skin paddle (DSP) to address composite through-and-through oromandibular defects: division of the skin paddle using different perforators (div-FOCFF) or a de-epithelialized DSP FOCFF (deEpi-FOCFF). This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes using these two methods (deEpi-FOCFF/div-FOCFF).

METHODS

Patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy and reconstruction with a DSP FOCFF between 2011 and 2014 were included. We compared postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing reconstruction with deEpi-FOCFF versus div-FOCFF implementing propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of the 245 patients, 156 cases (78 pairs) were 1:1 matched. Demographic and oncologic variables were comparable between groups. The average age was 57.68 years. A higher number of perforators per flap was evident in the div-FOCFF group (p < 0.001). The deEpi-FOCFF group exhibited a higher total flap loss rate when compared to the div-FOCFF group (15 % versus 5 % p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, number of perforators per flap (OR 0.31, p = 0.02), using the deEpi-FOCFF (OR 3.88, p = 0.03), and an increased reconstructive time (OR 1.01, p = 0.01) independently affected the likelihood of free flap failure.

CONCLUSION

If the number and location of perforators are optimal, div-FOCFF improves reconstructive outcomes for composite oromandibular defects versus the deEpi-FOCFF.

Management of Through-and-Through Oromandibular Defects after Segmental Mandibulectomy with Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap

BACKGROUND

 Oromandibular defects involving the external skin are a reconstructive challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the fibula osteocutaneous free flap (FOCFF) for through-and-through oromandibular defects by comparing the surgical outcomes and complications of different techniques to close the external skin defect.

METHODS

 A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients who underwent reconstruction of through-and-through oromandibular defects after oncologic segmental mandibulectomy between January 2011 and December 2014. Five groups were analyzed according to the method of external skin coverage: primary closure, locoregional flaps, deepithelialized double-skin paddle FOCFF (deEpi-FOCFF), division of the skin paddle for double-skin paddle FOCFF (div-FOCFF), and a simultaneous second free flap. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes along with complications were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

 A total of 323 patients were included. The mean total defect area requiring a simultaneous second free flap was larger in comparison to other groups (p < 0.001). Reconstructions performed with div-FOCFF had a higher number of perforators per flap when compared with deEpi-FOCFF (p < 0.001). External defects closed with another free flap exhibited higher intraoperative time for the reconstructive segment in comparison to other groups (p < 0.05). The overall rate of complications was comparable between groups (24%, p = 0.129).

CONCLUSION

 The FFOCF is a reliable alternative to harvesting multiple simultaneous free flaps for through-and-through oromandibular defects. The authors recommend appropriate curation of the surgical plan based on individual patient characteristics and reconstructive requirements.

The Amsterdam UMC protocol for computer-assisted mandibular and maxillary reconstruction; A cadaveric study

OBJECTIVES

In this cadaveric study, the accuracy of CAS guided mandibular and maxillary reconstruction including immediate dental implant placement in different Brown defect classes is assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The virtual planning and surgical procedure was conducted according to a newly proposed Amsterdam UMC reconstruction protocol. Postoperative evaluation was performed according to a previously proposed evaluation guideline.

RESULTS

Fourteen mandibular and 6 maxillary reconstructions were performed. Average mandibular angle deviations were 1.52°±1.32, 1.85°±1.58, 1.37°±1.09, 1.78°±1.37, 2.43°±1.52 and 2.83°±2.37, respectively for the left and right axial angles, left and right coronal angles and left and right sagittal angles. A total of 62 dental implants were placed in neomandibles with an average dXYZ values of 3.68 ± 2.21 mm and 16 in neomaxillas with an average dXYZ values of 3.24 ± 1.7 mm.

CONCLUSION

Promising levels of accuracy were achieved for all mandibular angles. Dental implant positions approached the preoperative preferred positions well, within the margin to manufacture prosthetic devices.

Reconstruction of complex oro-mandibular defects by four different modifications of free fibula osteomyocutaneous flap: A prudent alternative to multiple flaps

INTRODUCTION

Resection of advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma results in complex oro-mandibular defects involving external skin, oral mucosa, and bone. Reconstruction of such defects by a single free fibula flap (FFF) is limited by the lack of soft tissue bulk and adequate skin paddle for both intra- and extra-oral coverage. In this study, the reconstruction of large defects was achieved by four modifications of free fibula osteomyocutaneous flap as an alternative to multiple flaps.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 29 patients with complex oro-mandibular defects were reconstructed by FFF from December 2018 to October 2020. Reconstruction was done with any one of the four FFF modifications involving large proximal skin paddle from lateral leg: Strip de-epithelialization (De-Ep), chimeric bipaddle (Ch-Bp), muscle orally and skin extra-orally (Mo-Se), and double microvascular (Db-Mi). Outcome variables assessed were functional and esthetic results, early/late complications, donor site morbidity, and operative time. An algorithm based on Cordeiro's classification is proposed to assist in the selection of appropriate FFF modification.

RESULTS

Among 29 patients, De-Ep was used in 13, Ch-Bp in 8, Mo-Se in 7, and Db-Mi in 1 case. None of the flaps underwent total loss. Two cases required re-exploration. The median operative time was 775 min. Wound dehiscence and oro-cutaneous fistula were common early and late complications, respectively. Partial split skin graft loss (SSG) was the most common donor site morbidity. Functional and facial aesthetics were acceptable at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific FFF modifications can be recommended in selected scenarios. It is reliable for single-stage reconstruction with satisfactory esthetic and functional outcomes. When used for reconstruction in first primary tumors, the second donor site is preserved, which can prove valuable in the event of a recurrence or second primary.

Oromandibular reconstruction with double-skin paddle fibular free flap: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of complex head and neck defects is challenging, especially when more than one soft-tissue subunit is involved. The osteocutaneous fibular flap underwent continual evolution to improve its soft-tissue characteristics, such as including a second skin island. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes regarding oromandibular reconstruction with a double-skin paddle fibular free flap (DSPFFF) using three different techniques: central de-epithelialized skin paddle, distally-based double-skin paddle (DSP), or proximally and distally-based DSP.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in December 2020 using Pubmed and MedLine Ovid databases according to the PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis of functional outcome and complications was performed to estimate single incidence rates.

RESULTS

A total of 449 patients were included, with a follow-up of 1-84 months, where 330 patients underwent reconstruction with the first technique, 23 patients with the second technique, and 96 patients with the third technique. The meta-analysis showed an overall good functional outcome and a low-complication rate for oromandibular reconstruction with DSPFFF. A better functional outcome and a lower complication rate were found when a distally-based DSPFFF was harvested compared to a proximally and distally-based DSPFFF.

CONCLUSION

The DSPFFF was found to be useful and reliable for reconstructing composite and extensive head and neck defects, with an overall good functional outcome and a low-complication rate. The meta-analysis showed a better positive outcome on distally-based DSPFFF rather than proximally and distally-based DSPFFF. In addition, distally-based DSPFFF showed a lower complications rate when compared with proximally and distally-based DSPFFF.

Mega Fibula Free Flap for Reconstruction of an Extensive Mandibulofacial Defect

OBJECTIVE

Extensive mandibulofacial defects can be challenging to reconstruct. We present the case of a complex mandibulofacial defect reconstructed with a mega, chimeric fibula free flap.

METHODS

Ablation of the oral cavity tumor resulted in a large defect involving mandible, floor of mouth, and tongue. Skin of the chin and neck as well as the lower lip were also resected. A fibula free flap was harvested with the skin paddle involving most of the lateral compartment.

RESULTS

The fibula free flap was split into proximal (80 cm²) and distal (120 cm²) skin paddle islands, which were supplied by separate perforators off the peroneal artery. The intraoral soft tissue defect was reconstructed with the proximal skin paddle while the skin was recreated with the distal skin paddle. A Karapandzic flap was used to reconstruct the lower lip.

CONCLUSIONS

The traditional fibula free flap skin paddle often does not provide sufficient soft tissue coverage for large mandibulofacial defects. Some surgeons opt to harvest a second free flap. We describe our technique for using the mega fibula free flap - one of the largest reported in the literature - as a single mode of reconstruction.

Outcome in Patients with Partial and Full-Thickness Cheek Defects following Free Flap Reconstruction-A Multicentric Analysis of 47 Cases

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the extent of tumor resection and free flap reconstruction influences functional outcome and complications in patients with solid malignancies of the cheek. Therefore, we retrospectively assessed recipient site complications and functional outcomes in 47 patients with solid malignancies of the cheek who underwent either partial (n = 30; 63.8%) or full-thickness (n = 17; 36.2%) cheek resection with free flap reconstruction. Complications occurred in 12 (70.6%) patients after full thickness resections with creation of through-and-through defects compared to 14 (70.6%) patients with partial defects (p = 0.138). Among those 26 patients (55.3%), major recipient site complications, like development of salivary fistula or free flap loss, were observed in 10 (21.3%) and 2 (4.3%) cases, respectively, while minor complications, like wound dehiscence and local infections, were found in 14 (29.8%) and 9 (19.1%) patients. Complications were noticed particularly after reconstruction of suborbital defects (69.2%; p = 0.268), of which occurrence of salivary fistulae was the most common (46.2%; p = 0.035). Similarly, functional outcomes including oral incompetence, ectropion, and trismus were not affected by the extent of resection (p = 0.766). However, oral incompetence was higher in patients with tumors originating from the oral cavity (p = 0.020) and after the performance of mandibulectomy (p = 0.003). Overall, there was no difference in functional outcome or recipient site morbidity between tumor resections resulting in full-thickness and partial defects.

Double free flaps in oral cavity and oropharynx reconstruction: Systematic review, indications and limits

The simultaneous use of two different free flaps, harvested from distinct donor sites, has demonstrated a reasonable degree of safety and success rates in head and neck composite defects reconstruction. Unfortunately, their relatively low frequent use, together with the lack of proper statistics on their management strategies, make their indications weak of robust conclusions to better define their role in common practice. The aim of the present study was to review the literature of the last 15 years regarding simultaneous free flap transposition, presenting advantages, disadvantages, and results of this technique, with the final purpose to propose an up-to-date panorama for the use of double free flap for complex head and neck defects reconstruction. Depending on which factors are present, surgeons may choose to select an approach that is theoretically safer, but yields less-than-ideal functional outcomes, such as local flap. Two free flaps may be necessary when the defect contains both a large, complex bony defect, large soft tissue needs, and proper surgical planning and meticulous monitoring continues to be the cornerstone of success.

A Review of and Algorithmic Approach to Soft Palate Reconstruction

Importance

The soft palate contributes to deglutition, articulation, and respiration. Current reconstructive techniques focus on restoration of both form and function. The unique challenges of soft palate reconstruction include maintenance of complex upper aerodigestive tract function, with minimal local or donor site morbidity.

Objective

To review the literature on soft palate reconstruction and present an algorithm on how to approach soft palate defects based on this review.

Evidence Review

A review of the literature for articles reporting studies on and that described concepts related to soft palate reconstruction was conducted in March 2017. In all, 1804 candidate titles and abstracts were independently reviewed. English-language articles that discussed acquired soft palate defect reconstruction were included. Non-English language studies without available translations, studies on primary soft palate defect reconstruction (ie, cleft palate repair) and primary cleft palate repair, studies in which the soft palate was not the focus of the article, and studies involving animals were excluded.

Findings

The following observations were made from the review of 92 included articles. Soft palate anatomy is a complex interplay of multiple structures working in a 3-dimensional area. Three of the authors created an initial algorithmic framework based on the selected studies. After this, a round table discussion among 3 authors considered experts was used to refine the algorithm based on their expert opinion. The 4 most important factors were determined to be defect size, defect extension to other subsites, defect thickness, and history of radiotherapy or planned radiotherapy. This algorithm includes both surgical and nonsurgical options. Defects in the soft palate not only affect the size and shape of the organ but, more critically, the function. The reconstructive ladder is used to help maximize the remaining soft palate functional tissue and minimize the effect of nonfunctional implanted tissue. Partial-thickness defects or defects less than one-fourth of the soft palate may not require locoregional tissue transfer. Patients with a history of radiotherapy or defects of up to 75% of the soft palate may require locoregional tissue transfer. Defects greater than 75% of the soft palate, defects that include exposure of the neck vasculature, or defects that include significant portions of the hard palate or adjacent oropharyngeal subsites may require free tissue transfer. Obturation should be considered a second-line option in most cases.

Conclusions and Relevance

Ideal reconstruction of the soft palate relies on a comprehensive understanding of soft palate anatomy, a full consideration of the armamentarium of surgical techniques, consideration for adjacent subsite deficits, and a detailed knowledge of various intrinsic and extrinsic patient factors to optimize speech, swallowing, and airway outcomes. The included algorithm may serve as a useful starting point for the surgeon when considering reconstruction.

Chimeric vs composite flaps for mandible reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Composite mandibular reconstruction requires multiple tissue components inset in different planes. Intrinsic chimeric flap design provides this, and may be best suited for these reconstructions.

METHODS

A retrospective review of mandible reconstructions with composite, intrinsic chimeric, or 2 free flaps was performed. Patient and flap characteristics and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were reviewed. Defects reconstructed with intrinsic chimeric flaps had significantly more soft tissue needs than composite reconstructions. However, intrinsic chimeric bony defects were less complex. Despite significantly longer operative times for intrinsic chimeric flaps, there were no differences in complications or hospital stays. Intrinsic chimeric reconstruction resulted in significantly lower complication rates requiring an additional flap. This benefit was pronounced in through-and-through defects.

CONCLUSION

Intrinsic chimeric flaps are a better option than composite flaps for reconstruction of mandibular defects with large soft tissue needs with no increased complication risk despite longer operative time.

Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma on right mandible and its respective surgical reconstruction: a case report

Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor (CCOT) is defined as an odontogenic cyst-like benign neoplasm that characteristically contains several ghost cells, ameloblastoma-like epithelium, and occasional calcification. Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC), a malignant form of CCOT, is an exceptionally rare malignant tumor. In this report, we present a case of a 53-year-old man whose chief complaint was a solitary mass on the right mandible area. The mass was completely removed through an extraoral surgical approach and reconstructive surgery was performed in two phases.

Reconstruction of the Three-Dimensional Mandibulofacial Defects Using a Single Cutaneous Perforator-Based Fibula Osteocutaneous Flap

The reconstruction of the mandibulofacial defects is a difficult task when there are full-thickness cheek defects involving mandible, inner mucosa and outer skin. There are several reconstructive options for the coverage of large defects, but most of the methods are complicated, and time- and effort-consuming. We hereby present a case of fibula osteocutaneous flap based on a single peroneal artery perforator in the reconstruction of a three-dimensional mandibulofacial defects.

Mandibular reconstruction after cancer: an in-house approach to manufacturing cutting guides

The restoration of mandibular bone defects after cancer can be facilitated by computer-assisted preoperative planning. The aim of this study was to assess an in-house manufacturing approach to customized cutting guides for use in the reconstruction of the mandible with osteocutaneous free flaps. A retrospective cohort study was performed, involving 18 patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction with a fibula free flap at three institutions during the period July 2012 to March 2015. A single surgeon designed and manufactured fibula and mandible cutting guides using a computer-aided design process and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. The oncological outcomes, production parameters, and quality of the reconstructions performed for each patient were recorded. Computed tomography scans were acquired after surgery, and these were compared with the preoperative 3D models. Eighteen consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma underwent surgery and then reconstruction using this customized in-house surgical approach. The lengths of the fibula bone segments and the angle measurements in the simulations were similar to those of the postoperative volume rendering (P=0.61). The ease of access to 3D printing technology has enabled the computer-aided design and manufacturing of customized cutting guides for oral cancer treatment without the need for input from external laboratories.

Mandibular Reconstruction Using the Free Vascularized Fibula Graft: An Overview of Different Modifications

The reconstruction of the mandible is a complex procedure because various cosmetic as well as functional challenges must be addressed, including mastication and oral competence. Many surgical techniques have been described to address these challenges, including non-vascularized bone grafts, vascularized bone grafts, and approaches related to tissue engineering. This review summarizes different modifications of the free vascularized fibula graft, which, since its introduction by Hidalgo in 1989, has become the first option for mandibular reconstruction. The fibula free flap can undergo various modifications according to the individual requirements of a particular reconstruction. Osteocutaneous flaps can be harvested for reconstruction of composite defects. 'Double-barreling' of the fibula can, for instance, enable enhanced aesthetic and functional results, as well as immediate one-stage osseointegrated dental implantation. Recently described preoperative virtual surgery planning to facilitate neomandible remodeling could guarantee good results. To conclude, the free fibula bone graft can currently be regarded as the "gold standard" for mandibular reconstruction in case of composite (inside and outside) oral cavity defects as well as a way of enabling the performance of one-stage dental implantation.

[Harvesting technique of chimeric multiple paddles fibular flap for wide oromandibular defects]

Carcinological head and neck reconstruction still remains a challenge due to the volume and varied tissues needed. Large and wide oromandibular defects require, not just the bone but also soft tissues for the pelvilingual reconstruction and therefore, a second free flap may become necessary in addition to a fibular flap. The option of an unique chimeric flap based on the fibular artery and its branches is less known whereas it offers the advantage of a unique flap with bone, muscle and multiple skin paddles, independent of each other. The aim of this technical note is to present step by step the surgical procedure of this chimeric flap and share this method that avoids a second free flap.