Soft palate reconstruction using a combination of a turn-in flap and a radial forearm flap

Management of Palatal Defects after Free-Flap Reconstruction and Radiotherapy

Palatal fistulas have significant effects on quality of life. Traditional prosthetic rehabilitation and surgical reconstruction of palate defects in radiation-naïve tissues are well described. However, palatal fistulas developing after initial tumor extirpation, free-flap reconstruction, and adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation are associated with challenging secondary tissue effects. In this review, we will discuss the management of palatal fistulas after surgical reconstruction and radiotherapy.

Carcinoma de paladar blando. Descripción de una serie de casos

Introducción y objetivo: Describir las características clínicas, anatómicas y el trata-miento quirúrgico, incluyendo las distintas opciones de reconstrucción de los tumo-res de paladar blando. Descripción: Estudio retrospectivo de 6 pacientes diagnosti-cados y tratados en el servicio de Otorrinolaringología del hospital San Pedro de Logroño entre los años 2018 y 2019. Discusión: Exponemos los resultados de nues-tros pacientes y realizamos una revisión de los tumores de orofaringe localizados en el paladar blando, los detalles anatómicos y técnicas quirúrgicas reconstructivas más utilizadas en el tratamiento quirúrgico de los tumores de paladar blando. Conclusio-nes: La prevalencia de los tumores de orofaringe ha aumentado en los últimos años a expensas de la infección por el virus del papiloma humano (VPH). Sin embargo, los carcinomas de paladar blando son mayoritariamente P16 negativos. Estos tumores son poco sintomáticos en fases iniciales y es necesario un alto índice de sospecha para evitar diagnósticos tardíos. El desarrollo de la cirugía transoral ha impulsado el tratamiento quirúrgico de los tumores de paladar blando y puede reducir la necesidad de tratamientos complementarios hasta en un 40% de los casos. La reconstrucción se hace necesaria en resecciones mayores del 50%.

A Review of and Algorithmic Approach to Soft Palate Reconstruction

Importance

The soft palate contributes to deglutition, articulation, and respiration. Current reconstructive techniques focus on restoration of both form and function. The unique challenges of soft palate reconstruction include maintenance of complex upper aerodigestive tract function, with minimal local or donor site morbidity.

Objective

To review the literature on soft palate reconstruction and present an algorithm on how to approach soft palate defects based on this review.

Evidence Review

A review of the literature for articles reporting studies on and that described concepts related to soft palate reconstruction was conducted in March 2017. In all, 1804 candidate titles and abstracts were independently reviewed. English-language articles that discussed acquired soft palate defect reconstruction were included. Non-English language studies without available translations, studies on primary soft palate defect reconstruction (ie, cleft palate repair) and primary cleft palate repair, studies in which the soft palate was not the focus of the article, and studies involving animals were excluded.

Findings

The following observations were made from the review of 92 included articles. Soft palate anatomy is a complex interplay of multiple structures working in a 3-dimensional area. Three of the authors created an initial algorithmic framework based on the selected studies. After this, a round table discussion among 3 authors considered experts was used to refine the algorithm based on their expert opinion. The 4 most important factors were determined to be defect size, defect extension to other subsites, defect thickness, and history of radiotherapy or planned radiotherapy. This algorithm includes both surgical and nonsurgical options. Defects in the soft palate not only affect the size and shape of the organ but, more critically, the function. The reconstructive ladder is used to help maximize the remaining soft palate functional tissue and minimize the effect of nonfunctional implanted tissue. Partial-thickness defects or defects less than one-fourth of the soft palate may not require locoregional tissue transfer. Patients with a history of radiotherapy or defects of up to 75% of the soft palate may require locoregional tissue transfer. Defects greater than 75% of the soft palate, defects that include exposure of the neck vasculature, or defects that include significant portions of the hard palate or adjacent oropharyngeal subsites may require free tissue transfer. Obturation should be considered a second-line option in most cases.

Conclusions and Relevance

Ideal reconstruction of the soft palate relies on a comprehensive understanding of soft palate anatomy, a full consideration of the armamentarium of surgical techniques, consideration for adjacent subsite deficits, and a detailed knowledge of various intrinsic and extrinsic patient factors to optimize speech, swallowing, and airway outcomes. The included algorithm may serve as a useful starting point for the surgeon when considering reconstruction.

Soft palate reconstruction after radionecrosis: Combined anterolateral thigh adipofascial and nasoseptal flaps

Although radiation-based treatment for nasopharyngeal cancer may achieve excellent long term oncologic results, late effects of therapy may lead to soft tissue radionecrosis and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). Repair of these oro- and nasopharyngeal defects presents a complex reconstructive challenge. We present a case of a long-term survivor treated with chemoradiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer who developed progressive dysphagia, velopharyngeal insufficiency, and radionecrosis of the nasopharynx and soft palate, leading to tracheostomy and gastrostomy tube dependence. A staged reconstruction was performed, initially with a tubed nasoseptal flap for a creation of a mucosal-lined nasopharyngeal port. An adipofascial anterolateral thigh free flap was subsequently performed for soft palate reconstruction. Within 2 months, the oropharyngeal reconstruction had remucosalized and she was decannulated, taking an oral diet. Her speech was intelligible and she had good nasal breathing without symptoms of velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Flap necrosis after palatoplasty in irradiated patient and its reconstruction with tunnelized-facial artery myomucosal island flap

Background

Tunneled transposition of the facial artery myomucosal (FAMM) island flap on the lingual side of the mandible has been reported for intraoral as well as oropharyngeal reconstruction. This modified technique overcomes the limitations of short range and dentition and further confirms the flexibility of the flap. This paper presents a case of reconstructing secondary soft palatal defect due to flap necrosis following two-flap palatoplasty in irradiated patient with lingually transposed facial artery myomucosal island flap.

Case presentation

The authors successfully reconstructed secondary soft palatal defect due to flap necrosis following two-flap palatoplasty in an irradiated 59-year-old female patient with tunnelized-facial artery myomucosal island flap (t-FAMMIF).

Conclusions

Islanding and tunneling modification extends the versatility of the FAMM flap in the reconstruction of soft palatal defects post tumor excision and even after radiation, giving a great range of rotation and eliminating the need for revision in a second stage procedure. The authors thus highly recommend this versatile flap for the reconstruction of small and medium-sized oral defects.