Positive airway pressure adherence and mask interface in the setting of sinonasal symptoms

In search of a better CPAP interface: A network meta-analysis comparing nasal masks, nasal pillows and oronasal masks

Until now, no study has directly network meta-analysed the impact of nasal masks, nasal pillows and oronasal masks on continuous positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. This study aimed to meta-analyse the impact of three kinds of nasal interfaces with both network meta-analysis and pairwise comparison. PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched from inception to December 2020 for studies that compared the three types of nasal interfaces for treating obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure. The outcomes were residual apnea-hypopnea index, continuous positive airway pressure, and nightly average usage. The network meta-analysis was conducted using multivariate random-effects in a frequentist framework where three interfaces were ranked with the surface under the cumulative ranking probabilities. The pairwise comparison was conducted using random-effects meta-analysis. Twenty-nine articles comprising 6378 participants were included. The pairwise comparison showed both nasal masks and nasal pillows were associated with lower residual apnea-hypopnea index, lower continuous positive airway pressure, and higher continuous positive airway pressure adherence compared with oronasal masks. The surface under the cumulative ranking confirmed that nasal masks were associated with the lowest residual apnea-hypopnea index and highest adherence, while pillows were associated with the lowest continuous positive airway pressure. The meta-regression identified that lower pretreatment apnea-hypopnea index and continuous positive airway pressure determined during continuous positive airway pressure titration (versus determined during continuous positive airway pressure therapy) was associated with lower continuous positive airway pressure with nasal masks and nasal pillows. In conclusion, compared with oronasal masks, nasal masks and nasal pillows are better interfaces, especially in patients with lower pretreatment apnea-hypopnea index and those with the therapeutic pressure determined during continuous positive airway pressure titration.

Choosing the right mask for your Asian patient with sleep apnoea: A randomized, crossover trial of CPAP interfaces

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A major challenge with the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Mask tolerability is an important determinant of adherence, however evidence to guide selection of mask interfaces is lacking.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized crossover trial of mask interfaces in CPAP therapy for moderate-to-severe OSA to assess adherence and efficacy of CPAP therapy with nasal mask, nasal pillow and oronasal masks. Demographic data, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores and craniofacial measurements were also analysed for associations with adherence with oronasal masks.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients were included in the study (mean ± SD age: 46 ± 12 years; body mass index: 29.9 ± 5.6 kg/m² ; apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI): 53.6 ± 24.0 events/h). Patients had better adherence with nasal masks (average night use: 3.96 ± 2.26 h/night) compared to oronasal masks (3.26 ± 2.18 h/night, P < 0.001) and nasal pillows (3.48 ± 2.20 h/night, P = 0.007). Residual AHI was higher with oronasal masks (7.2 ± 5.2) compared to nasal masks (4.0 ± 4.2, P < 0.001) and nasal pillows (4.1 ± 3.3, P < 0.001). Twenty-two (25.9%) patients had the best adherence with oronasal masks (4.22 ± 2.14 vs 2.93 ± 2.12 h/night, P = 0.016). These patients had lower NOSE scores (15 (0-35) vs 40 (10-55), P = 0.024) and larger menton-labrale inferioris/biocular width ratios (31 ± 3% vs 28 ± 4%, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Nasal masks are the preferred interface during CPAP initiation. Patients with less nasal obstruction and a proportionally increased chin-lower lip distance to mid-face width may have better CPAP adherence with an oronasal mask interface.