Prophylactic dissection of level V in primary mucosal SCC in the clinically N positive neck: A systematic review

Lymph nodes in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a comprehensive anatomical perspective

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) often exhibits a propensity for metastasis to lymph nodes (LNs), significantly influencing prognosis. Neck dissection (ND) is an important part in the treatment of OSCC. Variations in the preference for and pathways of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in different regions of the oral cavity have been observed. Currently, there is a lack of sufficient emphasis on the anatomical perspectives of LNM and ND. This review elucidates the lymphatic system of the maxillofacial regions from an anatomical standpoint, details the distribution of the sentinel LNs across different subsites, and summarizes the various classifications of the cervical LNs. Additionally, we elaborate on the methods used to study the lymphatic system, particularly imaging techniques. Furthermore, we investigate the pathways of cervical LNM and evaluate the efficacy of ND from an anatomical viewpoint. The overall objective of this review is to provide essential anatomical knowledge for managing LNs in OSCC, in the hope of providing patients with effective treatment modalities to enhance their quality of life.

Anatomic Variability of the Accessory Nerve: Implications for Dissection of Level IIB

OBJECTIVES

During neck dissection, level IIB lymphadenectomy necessitates manipulation of the spinal accessory nerve that might be avoided and might cause postoperative disability. Current literature does not describe the effect of variation in the spinal accessory nerve in the upper neck. We sought to measure the effect of the dimensions of level IIB on nodal yield in level IIB and on patient reported neck symptoms.

METHODS

We measured the boundaries of level IIB of 150 patients undergoing neck dissection. Level II was dissected and separated into levels IIA and IIB intraoperatively. Patient-reported symptoms were assessed in 50 patients using the Neck Dissection Impairment Inventory. We computed descriptive statistics, and sought to identify correlation with the number and proportion of level IIB nodes and the number of metastatic nodes. Level IIB dimensions were analyzed as predictors of postoperative symptoms.

RESULTS

We measured 184 sides, with 37.7% of level II nodes found in level IIB. Mean accessory nerve length across level II was 2.5 cm. Every additional 1 cm in accessory nerve length was associated with two more level IIB nodes. At all accessory nerve lengths, meaningful numbers of nodes were present in level IIB. Accessory nerve length and other factors did not correlate with NDII scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer lengths of accessory nerve across level IIB correlated with greater nodal yield. However, data did not point to an accessory nerve length cutoff below which level IIB dissection could be avoided. In addition, the dimensions of level IIB did not correlate with postoperative neck symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 134:154-159, 2024.

Post-operative progress of arm abduction function and rate of lymph node metastasis around the region of the accessory nerve: a multicentre prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

Although neck dissection is an essential technique in the surgical treatment of head and neck carcinoma, arm abduction disorders occurring after neck dissection reduce the patient's quality of life.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the rate of lymph node metastasis in Levels IIB and V in head and neck cancer patients who underwent neck dissection at eight centres in Japan. In addition, post-operative arm abduction disability was classified according to functional assessment values at 1 month post-operatively, and the rate of maintained function at 6 and 12 months was evaluated.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis occurred in Level IIB in 12 of 242 cases (4.9%) and in Level V in 5 cases (2.1%) during the 12-month post-operative course. In patients with preservation of the ipsilateral accessory nerve, arm abduction function was maintained in 142 of 209 patients (67.9%) at 12 months after surgery. Post-operative radiotherapy and Level V dissection had no statistically significant effect on the recovery of arm abduction function. Level V dissection caused a temporary loss of abduction function post-operatively. A higher arm abduction test score at 1 month post-operatively was associated with a higher rate of subsequent ability to maintain arm abduction function.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients classified as cN0, metastatic rate at Levels IIB and V was low. In this cohort, omitting Level V dissection may be an option in strategies aimed at maintaining arm abduction function.

Factors influencing outcomes in selective neck dissection in 661 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Selective neck dissection (SND) is the surgical treatment of choice in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) with suspected or manifest metastases in the cervical lymph nodes. For SND to be successful, treated lymph node levels should be selected according to anatomic considerations and the extent of the disease. Aim of this study was to identify neck dissection levels that had an impact on individual prognosis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of SND as part of primary treatment of HNSCC. Overall survival (OS) and regional control rates (RCR) were calculated for all patients treated at one academic tertiary referral center.

Results

661 patients with HNSCC were included, 644 underwent ipsilateral and 319 contralateral SND. Average follow-up was 78.9 ± 106.4 months. 67 (10.1%) patients eventually developed nodal recurrence. Tumor sites were oral cavity (135), oropharynx (179), hypopharynx (118) and larynx (229). Tumor categories pT1–pT4a, and all clinical and pathological nodal categories were included. Multivariate analysis indicated improved OS rates for patients undergoing SND in ipsilateral levels I and V as well as level III contralaterally. Analysis for tumor origin showed that SND in ipsilateral level I showed significantly improved OS in HNSCC of the oral cavity.

Conclusion

The dissection of ipsilateral level I in oral cavity cancer was of particular relevance in our exploratory, retrospective analysis. To clarify the relevance for the determination of the extent of SND, this should be investigated prospectively in a more homogenous patient cohort.

Selective Neck Dissection for Node-Positive Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction  Selective neck dissection in clinically node-negative neck is considered the standard of care for oral squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Controversy still prevails in node-positive disease regarding the extent of neck dissection. In our part of the world, comprehensive neck dissection is mostly considered to be the minimal optimal treatment for palpable neck disease.

Objective  To compare regional control and disease-specific survival between clinically node-positive and node-negative patients undergoing selective neck dissection for oral SCC.

Methods  This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the department of ENT, Head and Neck surgery at a tertiary care hospital. All patients with biopsy-proven oral and lip SCC, with or without nodal disease, who underwent selective neck dissection between April 2006 and July 2015 were included in the study.

Results  During the study period, 111 patients with oral SCC underwent selective neck dissection, of whom 71 (62%) were clinically node-negative and 40 (38%) patients had clinically positive nodes in the neck. The mean follow-up was 16.62 months (standard deviation [SD]: 17.03). The overall regional control rates were 95 versus 96% for clinical negative versus positive nodes, respectively ( p  = 0.589). The disease-specific survival was 84.5% in the node negative group versus 82.5% in the node-positive group ( p  = 0.703).

Conclusion  Selective neck dissection in node-positive neck oral SCC has similar regional control rates when compared with node-negative neck SCC. The difference in disease-specific survival between the two groups is also not significant.

Lymph node yield in treatment naïve cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: en bloc lymphadenectomy versus level-by-level dissection

BACKGROUND

Lymph node yield is an important prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Variability in neck dissection sampling techniques has not been studied as a determinant of lymph node yield.

METHODS

This retrospective study used lymph node yield and average nodes per level to compare level-by-level and en bloc neck dissection sampling methods, in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases operated between March 2017 and February 2020.

RESULTS

From 123 patients, 182 neck dissections were analysed, of which 133 were selective and the rest were comprehensive: 55 had level-by-level sampling and 127 had undergone en bloc dissection. The level-by-level method yielded more nodes in all neck dissections combined (20 vs 17; p = 0.097), but the difference was significant only for the subcohort of selective neck dissection (18.5 vs 15; p = 0.011). However, the gain in average nodes per level achieved by level-by-level sampling was significant in both groups (4.2 vs 3.33 and 4.4 vs 3, respectively; both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Sampling of cervical lymph nodes level-by-level yields more nodes than the en bloc technique. Further studies could verify whether neck dissection sampling technique has any impact on survival rates.

Is the prediction of one or two ipsilateral positive lymph nodes by computerized tomography and ultrasound reliable enough to restrict therapeutic neck dissection in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients?

INTRODUCTION

Proper management of the clinically involved neck in OSCC patients continues to be a matter of debate. Our aim was to analyze the accuracy of computerized tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) in anticipating the exact location of lymph node (LN) metastases of OSCC patients across the AAO-HNS (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery) levels ipsi- and contralaterally. Furthermore, we wanted to assess the suitability of therapeutic selective neck dissection (SND) in patients with one or two ipsilateral positive nodes upon clinical staging (cN1/cN2a and cN2b(2/x) patients).

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed the LN status of patients with primary OSCC using CT and US from 2007 to 2013. LNs were individually assigned to a map containing the AAO-HNS levels; patients bearing a single or just two ipsilateral positive nodes (designated cN1/cN2a or cN2b(2/x) patients either by CT (CT group) or US alone (US group) or in a group combining findings of CT and US (CTUS group)) received an ipsi-ND (I-V) and a contra-ND (I-IV). 78% of the LNs were sent individually for routine histopathological examination; the remaining were dissected and analyzed per neck level.

RESULTS

Upon the analysis of 1.670 LNs of 57 patients, the exact location of pathology proven LN metastases in cN1 patients was more precisely predicted by US compared to CT with confirmed findings only in levels IA, IB und IIA. Clearly decreasing the number of missed lesions, the findings in the CTUS group nearly kept the spatial reliability of the US group. The same analysis for patients with exactly two supposed ipsilateral lesions (cN2b(2/x)) yielded confirmed metastases from levels I to V for both methods individually and in combination and, therefore, render SND insufficient for these cases.

CONCLUSION

Our findings stress the importance of conducting both, CT and US, in patients with primary OSCC. Only the combination of their findings warrants the application of therapeutic SND in patients with a single ipsilateral LN metastasis (cN1/cN2a patients) but not in patients with more than one lesion upon clinical staging (≥ cN2b).

Nodal yield and topography of nodal metastases from oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma - An audit of 1004 cases undergoing primary surgical resection

OBJECTIVES

Nodal metastasis is an important prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Detailed topographic study of metastasis can guide surgical and adjuvant radiation treatment protocols.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of distribution of nodal spread was done by auditing pathology records of 1004 patients who underwent primary surgical management at our center.

RESULTS

The median nodal yield was 41 (range of 9-166) nodes, per patient. Metastasis was present in 42.9% patients, of which 52.3% demonstrated extranodal extension. Reclassification by AJCC8 criteria resulted in up-staging in 35.6% patients (pN1, pN2a, pN2b, pN2c, pN3a and pN3b in 13.1%, 3.7%, 6.9%, 0.9%, 0%, 18.1% respectively). Ipsilateral levels Ib and IIa were involved in a quarter of patients each, while IIb, IV and V were involved in < 4%, 3% and 1% of patients, respectively. Contralateral nodal metastasis was present in 5.4%. Skip metastases to level IV were 2.2% and 1.2% for tongue and gingivobuccal primaries. Tongue primaries had a lower likelihood of involving level Ib, but higher of level IIa and III, compared to gingivobuccal primaries, and a lower likelihood of extranodal extension. Primary site did not influence nodal metastasis to levels IIb, IV or V, but other factors like lymphovascular invasion, pT stage and margin status had an influence.

CONCLUSION

This large series with high nodal yield, shows low level of metastasis to level IIb, IV and V, which can help modify future guidelines for extent of surgery and avoid targeted adjuvant radiation to specific levels.

Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals

OBJECTIVE

To assess the methodological quality of intervention-focused systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) published in high-impact otolaryngology journals.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed for SR and MA citations from 2012 to 2017 in the 10 highest impact factor otolaryngology journals. Abstracts were screened to identify published manuscripts in which the authors indicated clearly that they were performing an SR or MA. Applying a modified typology of reviews, 4 reviewers characterized the review type as SR, MA, or another review type. A simplified version of the AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2) tool was used to assess the reporting and methodological quality of the SRs and MAs that were focused on interventions.

RESULTS

Search and abstract screening generated 499 manuscripts that identified themselves as performing an SR or MA. A substantial number (85/499, 17%) were review types other than SRs or MAs, including 34 (7%) that were literature reviews. In total, 236 SRs and MAs focused on interventions. Over 50% of these SRs and MAs had weaknesses in at least 3 of the 16 items in the AMSTAR 2, and over 40% had weaknesses in at least 2 of the 7 critical domains. Ninety-nine percent of SRs and MAs provided critically low confidence in the results of the reviews.

CONCLUSION

Intervention-focused SRs and MAs published in high-impact otolaryngology journals have important methodological limitations that diminish confidence in the results of these reviews.

Utility and relevance of modified lateral trapezius myocutaneous flap as a locoregional reconstructive option for medium-sized ablative defects in head and neck cancer-our experience

PURPOSE

Lateral trapezius myocutaneous (LTMC) flap has been used less frequently for defects pertaining to head and neck cancer ablative surgical defects. This study is to assess the utility of LTMC flap with a new modification of the flap design.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study using LTMC flap with modifications as a reconstructive option for intraoral & extraoral skin defects in head and neck cancer patients following ablative surgery, from August 2014 to October 2019 in a tertiary care hospital. The original technique of LTMC flap was modified for better results and outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients underwent lateral trapezius flap reconstruction for ablative defects of oral cavity, laryngopharynx, neck and parotid. Twenty-three patients (65.71%) underwent adjuvant radiation/radiation-chemotherapy while one patient defaulted. Two patients (5.71%) had major flap failure. After the loss of flap in these patients, the operative technique was further modified for better results. However, the disadvantage of using this flap is shoulder disability. Nonetheless in the present study, the disability was reduced after modifying the operating technique by preserving the spinal accessory nerve.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated minimal functional loss, low morbidity with satisfactory results, thus also reducing treatment cost. Thus, LTMC is a reliable reconstructive option in head and neck cancer patients for medium-sized defects.

A Novel Approach to Identifying the Spinal Accessory Nerve in Surgical Neck Dissection

Intraoperative identification of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) is key in reducing nerve injury. This study aims to explore the surgical anatomy of the SAN and 2 landmarks for its identification-the sternocleidomastoid branch of the occipital artery (SBOA) and superior sternocleidomastoid tendon (SST)-to propose a novel method of identifying the SAN during surgical neck dissections. Twelve cadavers underwent bilateral level II-V neck dissection identifying the SAN, SBOA, and SST. Variation was documented and distance between landmarks and the SAN measured. The most common arrangement had the SST most superficially followed by the SBOA and then the SAN. The SAN was 3.63 ± 4.02 mm from the artery and 2.31 ± 1.72 mm from the tendon. A triangle-bordered by the tendon laterally, artery medially, and digastric muscle superiorly-contained the SAN in 95.8% of cases. This relationship translated into a reliable technique to identify the SAN intraoperatively, which has been used successfully in practice.