Comparison of facility type outcomes for oral cavity cancer: Analysis of the national cancer database

Development of an augmented reality guidance system for head and neck cancer resection

The use of head-mounted augmented reality (AR) for surgeries has grown rapidly in recent years. AR aids in intraoperative surgical navigation through overlaying three-dimensional (3D) holographic reconstructions of medical data. However, performing AR surgeries on complex areas such as the head and neck region poses challenges in terms of accuracy and speed. This study explores the feasibility of an AR guidance system for resections of positive tumour margins in a cadaveric specimen. The authors present an intraoperative solution that enables surgeons to upload and visualize holographic reconstructions of resected cadaver tissues. The solution involves using a 3D scanner to capture detailed scans of the resected tissue, which are subsequently uploaded into our software. The software converts the scans of resected tissues into specimen holograms that are viewable through a head-mounted AR display. By re-aligning these holograms with cadavers with gestures or voice commands, surgeons can navigate the head and neck tumour site. This workflow can run concurrently with frozen section analysis. On average, the authors achieve an uploading time of 2.98 min, visualization time of 1.05 min, and re-alignment time of 4.39 min, compared to the 20 to 30 min typical for frozen section analysis. The authors achieve a mean re-alignment error of 3.1 mm. The authors' software provides a foundation for new research and product development for using AR to navigate complex 3D anatomy in surgery.

Effect of distance of treatment center on survival for HPV-negative head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND

In rural states, travel burden for complex cancer care required for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) may affect patient survival, but its impact is unknown.

METHODS

Patients with HPV-negative HNSCC were retrospectively identified from a statewide, population-based study. Euclidian distance from the home address to the treatment center was calculated for radiation therapy, surgery, and chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the risk of 5-year mortality with increasing travel quartiles.

RESULTS

There were 936 patients with HPV-negative HNSCC with a mean age of 60. Patients traveled a median distance of 10.2, 11.1, and 10.9 miles to receive radiation therapy, surgery, and chemotherapy, respectively. Patients in the fourth distance quartile were more likely to live in a rural location (p < 0.001) and receive treatment at an academic hospital (p < 0.001). Adjusted overall survival (OS) improved proportionally to distance traveled, with improved OS remaining significant for patients who traveled the furthest for care (third and fourth quartile by distance). Relative to patients in the first quartile, patients in the fourth had a reduced risk of mortality with radiation (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42-0.83; p = 0.002), surgery (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.75; p = 0.001), and chemotherapy (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.91; p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

For patients in this population-based cohort, those traveling greater distances for treatment of HPV-negative HNSCC had improved OS. This analysis suggests that the benefits of coordinated, multidisciplinary care may outweigh the barriers of travel burden for these patients.

Augmented-Reality Surgery to Guide Head and Neck Cancer Re-resection: A Feasibility and Accuracy Study

BACKGROUND

Given the complex three-dimensional (3D) anatomy of head and neck cancer specimens, head and neck surgeons often have difficulty relocating the site of an initial positive margin to perform re-resection. This cadaveric study aimed to determine the feasibility and accuracy of augmented reality surgery to guide head and neck cancer re-resections.

METHODS

This study investigated three cadaveric specimens. The head and neck resection specimen was 3D scanned and exported to the HoloLens augmented reality environment. The surgeon manually aligned the 3D specimen hologram into the resection bed. Accuracy of manual alignment and time intervals throughout the protocol were recorded.

RESULTS

The 20 head and neck cancer resections performed in this study included 13 cutaneous and 7 oral cavity resections. The mean relocation error was 4 mm (range, 1-15 mm) with a standard deviation of 3.9 mm. The mean overall protocol time, from the start of 3D scanning to alignment into the resection bed, was 25.3 ± 8.9 min (range, 13.2-43.2 min). Relocation error did not differ significantly when stratified by greatest dimension of the specimen. The mean relocation error of complex oral cavity composite specimens (maxillectomy and mandibulectomy) differed significantly from that of all the other specimen types (10.7 vs 2.8; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This cadaveric study demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of augmented reality to guide re-resection of initial positive margins in head and neck cancer surgery.

What has the National Cancer Database taught us about oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma?

The wealth of data in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) has allowed numerous studies investigating patient, disease, and treatment-related factors in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC); however, to date, no summation of these studies has been performed. The aim of this study was to provide a concise review of the NCDB studies on OCSCC, with the hopes of providing a framework for future, novel studies aimed at enhancing our understanding of clinical parameters related to OCSCC. Two databases were searched, and 27 studies published between 2002 and 2020 were included. The average sample size was 13,776 patients (range 356-50,896 patients). Four areas of research focus were identified: demographic and socioeconomic status, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This review highlights the impact of age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on the prognosis and management of OCSCC, describes the prognostic factors, and details the modalities and indications for neck dissection and adjuvant therapy in OCSCC. In conclusion, the NCDB is a very valuable resource for clinicians and researchers involved in the management of OCSCC, offering an incomparable perspective on a large dataset of patients. Future developments regarding hospital information management, review of data accuracy and completeness, and wider accessibility will help clinicians to improve the care of patients affected by OCSCC.

Disparities in Laryngeal Cancer Treatment and Outcomes: An Analysis by Hospital Safety-Net Burden

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To analyze the impact of hospital safety-net burden on survival outcomes for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2015, 59,733 LSCC patients treated with curative intent were identified using the National Cancer Database. Low (LBH) <25th, medium (MBH) 25th-75th, and high (HBH) >75th safety-net burden hospitals were defined by the percentage quartiles (%) of uninsured/Medicaid-insured patients treated. Social and clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival (using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis) were evaluated. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using Cox regression modeling.

RESULTS

There were 324, 647, and 323 hospitals that met the criteria as LBH, MBH, and HBH, respectively. The median follow-up was 38.6 months. A total of 27,629 deaths were reported, with a median survival of 75.8 months (a 5-year survival rate of 56.6%). Median survival was 83.2, 77.8, and 69.3 months for patients from LBH, MBH, and HBH, respectively (P < .0001). The median % of uninsured/Medicaid-insured patients treated among LBH, MBH, and HBH were 3.6%, 14.0%, and 27.0%, respectively. Patients treated at HBH were significantly more likely to be young, Black, Hispanic, of low income, and present with more advanced disease compared to LBH and MBH. Survival was comparable for LBH and MBH (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.97-1.07, P = .408) on multivariate analysis. HBH, compared to LBH patients, had inferior survival (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.01-1.13, P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

High burden safety-net hospitals receive disproportionately more patients with advanced-stage and low socioeconomic status, yielding inferior survival compared to low burden hospitals.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 (individual cohort study) Laryngoscope, 131:E1987-E1997, 2021.

Association of Race, Socioeconomic Factors, and Treatment Characteristics With Overall Survival in Patients With Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

IMPORTANCE

It has been established that disparities in race and socioeconomic status are associated with outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer. However, it remains unknown whether this extends to stage I, II, or III small cell lung cancer (SCLC), or limited-stage SCLC (L-SCLC).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the associations of race, socioeconomic factors, and treatment characteristics with survival among patients with L-SCLC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Demographic information for patients with L-SCLC diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 was obtained from the National Cancer Database. The follow-up end point is death or last follow-up (date of last contact). Patients were divided into 5 mutually exclusive cohorts by race. Data analysis was performed in October 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate univariable and multivariable models. Multivariable analyses were conducted to assess the associations of race and socioeconomic factors with risk-adjusted outcomes. Overall survival between groups was depicted by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Of 72 409 patients analyzed (median [range] age, 67.0 [23.0-90.0] years), 40 289 (55.6%) were women. The distribution of disease stage was 10 619 patients (14.7%) with stage I disease, 7689 patients (10.6%) with stage II disease, and 54 101 patients (74.7%) with stage III disease. The median (range) duration of follow-up was 8.2 (2.4-15.8) months. Compared with White patients, the hazard of death decreased to 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95; P < .001) for African American patients and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.91; P < .001) for Asian patients. The difference in median survival among different racial groups was significant only among those with stage III SCLC. Other factors associated with better survival were female sex, high income, high education, private insurance, diagnostic confirmation by positive cytological analysis, increase in number of sampled regional lymph nodes, and earlier stage at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This analysis highlights disparities in race and socioeconomic factors associated with outcomes of L-SCLC. Racial minorities, including African American and Asian patients, have better survival than White patients for L-SCLC after adjustment for sociodemographic factors.

Are academic hospitals better at treating metastatic colorectal cancer?

BACKGROUND

There is a strong association between hospital volume and surgical outcomes in resectable colorectal cancer. The purpose of our study was to investigate the association between hospital facility type and survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Adults from the National Cancer Database (2010-2015) with a primary diagnosis of colorectal metastases were included and stratified by facility type: community cancer program, comprehensive community cancer program, and academic/research program. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Among the 52,958 included patients, 13.72% were treated at a community cancer program, 49.89% at a comprehensive community cancer program, and 36.29% at an academic/research program. A significant increase in the proportion of patients being treated in an academic/research program has been observed from 2010 to 2015. An academic/research program tended to use more chemotherapy with colorectal radical resection and liver or lung resection and immunotherapy with chemotherapy. In adjusted analysis, the academic/research program had decreased risk of mortality in comparison to the community cancer program and the comprehensive community cancer program (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.86-0.94; 0.87, 0.85-0.90; each P < .001; respectively). Similar results were seen after stratifying by metastatic site and treatment type.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis and overall survival of patients with metastatic disease is better in an academic/research program compared with a community cancer program or a comprehensive community cancer program, with this difference persisting across sites of metastatic disease and treatment types. Further studies are required to validate these results and investigate disparities in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Association of Type of Treatment Facility With Overall Survival After a Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer

IMPORTANCE

Patients with head and neck cancer receive care at academic comprehensive cancer programs (ACCPs), integrated network cancer programs (INCPs), comprehensive community cancer programs (CCCPs), and community cancer programs (CCPs). The type of treatment facility may be associated with overall survival.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether type of treatment facility is associated with overall survival after a diagnosis of head and neck cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based retrospective cohort study included patients from the National Cancer Database, a prospectively maintained, hospital-based cancer registry of patients treated at more than 1500 US hospitals. Participants were diagnosed with malignant tumors of the head and neck from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from May 1 through November 30, 2019.

EXPOSURES

Treatment at facilities classified as ACCPs, INCPs, CCCPs, or CCPs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival after diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer was the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the odds of receiving treatment at ACCPs and INCPs vs CCCPs and CCPs. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 525 740 patients (368 821 men [70.2%]; mean [SD] age, 63.3 [14.0] years) were diagnosed with malignant tumors of the head and neck during the study period. Among them, 36 595 patients (7.0%) were treated at CCPs; 174 658 (33.2%), at CCCPs; 232 867 (44.3%), at ACCPs; and 57 857 (11.0%), at INCPs. The median survival for patients with aerodigestive cancers was 69.2 (95% CI, 68.6-69.8) months; salivary gland cancers, 107.2 (95% CI, 103.9-110.2) months; and skin cancers, 113.2 (95% CI, 111.4-114.6) months. Improved overall survival was associated with treatment at ACCPs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.88-0.91), INCPs (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96), and CCCPs (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.95) compared with CCPs. Compared with patients with private insurance, those with government insurance (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.29-1.41), no insurance (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.09-1.16), or Medicaid (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.14-1.20) were more likely to receive treatment at ACCPs and INCPs, whereas patients with Medicare were less likely to receive treatment at ACCPs and INCPs (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97). Compared with white patients, black (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.52-1.59) and Asian (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.49-1.63) patients were more likely to receive care at ACCPs and INCPs. Compared with patients from lower-income areas, patients from high-income areas were more likely to receive treatment at ACCPs and INCPs (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.22-1.28).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that treatment at ACCPs and INCPs was associated with a better overall survival rate in patients with head and neck cancer. Key social determinants of health such as race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and type of insurance were associated with receiving treatment at ACCPs and INCPs.

Trends and Outcomes of Proton Radiation Therapy Use for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose:

To examine national care patterns in proton radiation therapy (PBT) use for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the effect of facility type on survival.

Patients and Methods:

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 506 patients with a diagnosis of NSCLC from 2004-2014 who underwent PBT. Patients were categorized as having received treatment at an academic/research facility (ARF) or a form of community cancer program (CCP). Descriptive analysis was performed, and overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models.

Results:

Treatments at ARFs and CCPs were equally distributed with 253 patients at each facility type. A positive trend in PBT use over time was observed with 2.8% of cases being treated in 2008 compared to 21.5% in 2014 (P = .001). Definitive doses (≥60 Gy) were more commonly given at ARFs than CCPs (72% versus 45%, respectively; P < .001). Five-year overall survival was 31% at ARFs and 18% at CCPs (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, outcomes were worse with treatments at CCPs (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.14-2.27; P = .007). On subanalysis of nonsurgical patients treated with ≥60 Gy, facility type became insignificant and dose escalation was associated with improved outcomes (≥70 Gy HR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25-0.81; P = .008).

Conclusion:

Use of PBT for management of NSCLC is on the rise. Community cancer programs were associated with higher rates of nondefinitive PBT doses and correspondingly worse outcomes. Differences in survival by facility became insignificant when definitive doses were used, warranting further investigation of practice patterns in CCPs at a national level.

Travel distance: Impact on stage of presentation and treatment choices in head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to examine the impact of travel distance on stage of presentation and treatment choices in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the rural setting.

METHODS

6029 cases diagnosed from 2002 to 2011 were obtained from the state cancer registry. Travel time was calculated to the nearest academic medical centers, otolaryngologist, and radiation treatment facilities. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association of travel time with stage of presentation as well as the likelihood of appropriate therapy after adjustment for other demographic variables.

RESULTS

Patients in the highest quartile for travel distance to academic centers were 33% more likely to present with early stage disease (p = 0.02), and 42% more likely to receive appropriate surgical therapy for oral cavity cancer. Patients were 70% more likely to receive appropriate surgery if they were farthest from the nearest radiation center (p = 0.03). Proximity to otolaryngology care was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Increased travel distance to academic medical centers is associated with increased likelihood of proper therapy for surgically treated tumors of the head and neck. Impact on these findings on improvements in access to care is discussed.