Long-term sinonasal outcomes after endoscopic skull base surgery with nasoseptal flap reconstruction

Reconstruction of the Anterior Skull Base Using the Nasoseptal Flap: A Review

The nasoseptal flap is a workhorse reconstructive option for anterior skull base defects during endonasal surgery. This paper highlights the versatility of the nasoseptal flap. After providing a brief historical perspective, this review will focus on the relevant primary literature published in the last ten years. We will touch upon new applications of the flap, how the flap has been modified to expand its reach and robustness, and some of the current limitations. We will conclude by discussing what the future holds for improving upon the design and use of the nasoseptal flap in anterior skull base reconstruction.

Effects of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Olfactory Function

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the effects of endoscopic sinus surgery and endonasal approaches to the skull base on olfaction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advancements in endonasal endoscopic approaches to the sinuses and skull base allow for direct treatment of a variety of sinonasal and skull base diseases. However, these extended approaches will often require manipulation of normal anatomical structures and the olfactory neuroepithelium. Depending on the planned procedure and extent of disease, the prognosis of olfactory perception can vary significantly among patients. Endoscopic sinonasal surgical procedures may impact olfaction. Optimizing olfactory function requires proper surgical techniques, gentle handling of tissue, and perioperative care. Surgeons must discuss objectives and manage patient expectations. Routine olfactory assessment is crucial in surgical work-up and follow-up. Preserving anatomical structures while addressing the obstruction of the olfactory cleft helps to prevent decreased olfactory threshold. However, smell identification and discrimination do not always correlate with sinonasal anatomy.

The Impact of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery on Quality of Life in Patients with Malignant Tumors of the Anterior Skull Base: A Prospective Study

Objective

To investigate the effects of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) on longitudinal quality of life (QoL) in patients with malignant tumors of the anterior skull base.

Methods

Eligible patients prospectively completed the Anterior Skull Base Surgery Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) questionnaires in referring to 3 different periods throughout their treatment and recovery.

Results

Forty patients were included. The median volume coronal maximum length of the tumor was 3.6 cm (95% CI 2.7-4.1cm). Overall QoL significantly worsened at 1 month postoperatively but returned to baseline after 1 year. Unrelieved symptoms in specific domains prompted further evaluation of individual items. Transient worsening of taste (p=0.011) and olfaction (p=0.004) lasted for 1 month but gradually relieved within the first postoperative year, but vision consistently worsened over the course of the treatment (p=0.126). Age>50 years (p<0.001), comorbidities (p<0.001), tumor necrosis (p<0.001) and recurrence (p=0.001) were associated with worse preoperative QoL. Poor long-term QoL was noted in those undergoing adjuvant therapy (p=0.032). Overall ASBQ scores (p=0.024), subdomain scores in specific symptoms (p=0.016), and vision scores (p=0.009) were worse only in patients with the greater coronal maximum diameter at 1-month postoperatively. Greater coronal maximum diameter was related to worse preoperative subdomain scores regarding specific symptoms (p=0.030) and decreased postoperative long-term decreased vision scores (p=0.014).

Conclusion

Long-term site-specific and sinonasal QoL eventually stabilized after EES. Greater coronal maximum diameter was significantly associated with worsened vision function. Temporarily worse olfactory, vision, and taste function may be tied to decreased short-term QoL.

Postoperative protocols following endoscopic skull base surgery: An evidence-based review with recommendations

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management strategies for endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) vary widely because of limited evidence-based guidance.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from January 1990 through February 2022 to examine 18 postoperative considerations for ESBS. Nonhuman studies, articles written in a language other than English, and case reports were excluded. Studies were assessed for levels of evidence, and each topic's aggregate grade of evidence was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 74 studies reporting on 18 postoperative practices were reviewed. Postoperative pain management, prophylactic antibiotics, and lumbar drain use had the highest grades of evidence (B). The literature currently lacks high quality evidence for a majority of the reviewed ESBS precautions. There were no relevant studies to address postoperative urinary catheter use and medical intracranial pressure reduction.

CONCLUSION

The evidence for postoperative ESBS precautions is heterogeneous, scarce, and generally of low quality. Although this review identified the best evidence available in the literature, it suggests the urgent need for more robust evidence. Therefore, additional high-quality studies are needed in order to devise optimal postoperative ESBS protocols.

Quality of Life Considerations in Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Anterior Cranial Base Tumors

Considering quality of life (QOL) is critical when discussing treatment options for patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) for cancers at the base of the skull. Several questionnaires have been developed and validated in the last 20 years to explore QOL in this patient population, including the Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire, Skull Base Inventory, EESBS Questionnaire, and the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test for Neurosurgery. The Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test-22 and Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 are other tools that have been used to measure sinonasal QOL in anterior cranial base surgery. In addition to pathology-related perturbations in QOL endoscopic surgical options (transsellar approaches, anterior cranial base surgery, and various reconstructive techniques) all have unique morbidities and QOL implications that should be considered. Finally, we look ahead to new and emerging techniques and tools aimed to help preserve and improve QOL for patients with anterior cranial base malignancies.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

The functional outcome, quality of life, and patient feedback related to a chosen treatment approach in skull base surgery have become a subject of interest and focused research in recent years. The current advances in endoscopic optical imaging technology and surgical precision have radically lowered the perioperative morbidity associated with skull base surgery. This has pushed toward a higher focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). It is now critical to ensure that the offered treatment plan and approach align with the patient's preferences and expectations, in addition to the surgeon's best clinical judgment and experience. PROs represent a view that reflects the patient's own thoughts and perspective on their condition and the management options, without input or interpretations from the surgeon. Having PRO data enables patients the opportunity to learn from the experiences and perspectives of other patients. This input empowers the patient to become an active participant in the decision-making process at different stages of their care. An in-depth PRO evaluation requires specific validated tools and scoring systems, namely the patient-reported outcomes measures (PROM) tools. In this review, we discuss the currently available skull-base-related PROs, the assessment tools used to capture them, and the future trends of this important topic that is in its infancy.

Quality of life after endoscopic skull base surgery with a nasoseptal flap: a systematic review

Background

The past two decades have seen a widespread adoption of endoscopic skull base surgery with the use of nasoseptal flaps. Attention has been diverted in recent times to evaluate the quality of life of these patients.

Objective

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the available literature to compare the quality of life after endoscopic skull base surgery with or without nasoseptal flaps.

Methods

This systemic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases for literature published after 2009.

Results

The majority of studies concluded that there was no statistically significant difference in the quality of life associated with the use of nasoseptal flaps. Post-operatively, more extensive surgery, peri-operative radiotherapy, smoking and younger age were associated with poorer quality of life.

Conclusion

While the use of nasoseptal flaps can have negative effects on patients’ quality of life in terms of sinonasal symptoms, this systematic review found no difference in quality of life associated with the use or non-use of a nasoseptal flap.

Heterogeneity in Outcome Reporting in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Objective  Presently, there are no standards for reporting outcomes of endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction (ESBR). This is problematic as a lack of consistent reporting makes synthesizing findings in systematic reviews and meta-analysis challenging. Thus, the aim of this study was to systematically review and describe the patterns of reporting outcomes in ESBR as a foundation for developing reporting guidelines. Study Design  Present study is a systematic review. Methods  Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for all publications with ≥25 patients and a focus on ESBR. The reporting patterns of each study's variables and outcomes were assessed. Results  A total of 112 studies were included in the review. The most commonly reported demographic variables were the number of included patients ( n  = 112, 100%) and types of pathologies treated ( n  = 104, 92.9%). Meanwhile, the most routinely described preoperative variable was history of prior treatment ( n  = 48, 42.9%). Type of reconstruction was a commonly reported intraoperative variable ( n  = 110, 98.2%), though the rate of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was noted in only 76 studies (67.9%). With regard to postoperative outcomes, postoperative CSF leak rate was routinely provided ( n  = 101, 90.2%), but reporting of other surgical complications was more inconsistent. Ultimately, of the 43 variables and outcomes reviewed, a median of 12 (range: 4-22) was reported in each study. Conclusion  There is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes reported in studies relating to ESBR. This highlights the need for the development of standard reporting guidelines to minimize bias and improve interstudy comparability.

Endoscopic extrasellar skull base reconstruction using bioabsorbable plates

BACKGROUND

Many techniques have been utilized for reconstruction of the anterior skull base. Each method has advantages and disadvantages with respect to effectiveness, morbidity, strength, and cost. Rigid reconstruction may provide advantages in certain patients.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated all patients who had placement of rigid absorbable reconstruction plates in the anterior skull base in a variety of extrasellar locations and describe results and complications compared with other published techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients at a tertiary referral institution who underwent endoscopic extrasellar skull base reconstruction, 2012-2019, using resorbable poly (D,L) lactic acid plates (Resorb-X Sellar Wall Plate; KLS Martin; Jacksonville, FL). Data reviewed included demographic information, indication for surgery, location and size of defect, pathology, peri-operative use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion, postoperative complications, post-operative CSF leak, adjuvant therapy, and length of follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-four subjects and 25 operative procedures met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 53 years (range 11-77). Average BMI was 34 kg/m². Mean follow-up time was 30 months (range 1-78). Indications for surgery were CSF rhinorrhea (spontaneous, post-traumatic, or iatrogenic) or reconstruction after tumor resection. Four cases were revision procedures. Twenty patients had lumbar drains placed intraoperatively. Only two nasoseptal flaps and two free mucosal grafts were used. None of the patients had a postoperative CSF leak. There was no mortality or morbidity related to the skull base reconstruction or implanted material.

CONCLUSION

The Resorb-X resorbable rigid plate provides an effective, customizable, bioabsorbable option that is easily manipulated for skull base reconstruction of defects of a variety of sizes in diverse locations. Reconstruction incorporating this plate provides an effective alternative to other previously described techniques.

Vascular pedicled flaps for skull base defect reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Techniques for reconstruction of skull base defects have advanced greatly since the introduction of the vascular pedicled nasoseptal flap in 2006. The objective of this review is to assess the current state of the field by examining both intranasal and extranasal techniques of vascular pedicled skull base defect repair, their indications and success rates, and novel techniques that are currently under investigation.

METHODS

A review of the literature describing the use of vascular pedicled flaps in skull base defect reconstruction was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

The nasoseptal flap remains the most widely used vascular pedicled flap for endoscopic repair of skull base defects. Its ease of harvest, wide arch of rotation, and high success rates make it a popular choice among surgeons. Several variations including a "rescue" nasopseptal flap have been developed. Other less commonly used pedicled intranasal flaps include the middle turbinate flap and the posterior pedicled inferior turbinate flap. Additionally, several novel vascular pedicled flaps have been developed and tested in small cohorts of patients. Extranasal flaps such as the pericranial flap and the temporoparietal fascia flap are used less frequently than intranasal flaps. However, they remain valuable options for reconstruction in certain situations.

CONCLUSION

Advancements continue to be made in the field of skull base defect reconstruction using vascular pedicled flaps. Though the nasoseptal flap remains the most widely utilized option, additional intranasal techniques continue to be developed and tested to optimize surgical outcomes and patient care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

Quality-of-life evaluation for patients submitted to nasal endoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary tumours

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the pre- and post-operative quality-of-life of patients submitted to the resection of pituitary adenoma via endoscopic transsphenoidal.

METHODS

This was a prospective study on patients submitted to endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery with the harvest of a nasoseptal flap who responded to the questionnaires FV-36 and SNOT-22 in the pre-operative and in months 1, 3 and 6 following the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients submitted to pituitary adenoma resection surgery via endoscopic transsphenoidal with a nasoseptal flap were recruited. In all of the physical and mental domains (SF-36) evaluated, there was an improvement in the long-term evaluation (6 months), compared to the pre-operative, as well as in the site-specific evaluation (SNOT-22).

CONCLUSION

The global and site-specific questionnaires in the 6th post-operative month follow-up presented an important improvement in all the physical and mental domains evaluated, as well as in nasal function in the perception of the patients submitted to pituitary adenoma resection via endoscopic transsphenoidal, demonstrating the safety and efficiency of the procedure.

Spontaneous Nasal Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak Repaired With Single-Layer Mucoperichondrial Graft: Long-term Results

Background

Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak (sCSFL) has been historically related to obesity and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), with a lower rate of success of endoscopic repair reported in the literature. Moreover, defects related to this condition have been largely repaired with multilayer reconstructions and pedicled flaps. Long-term postoperative results have not been appropriately discussed yet.

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the outcome of a cohort of patients treated with single-layer mucoperichondrial graft.

Methods

A retrospective review of clinical records of a consecutive series of patients who underwent endonasal endoscopic surgery for sCSFL was carried out at a tertiary care referral center for skull base pathologies. All patients underwent reconstruction with single-layer mucoperichondrial free graft. Local flap failures and postoperative outcomes, in terms of recurrence of sCSFL or brain herniation, were registered.

Results

Neither intraoperative nor perioperative complications were reported. Definitive closure was achieved in 27 of 29 (93%) patients after the first attempt, while in 2 cases, a revision surgery was required. In both of these, an inadequate position of the graft was detected and was repaired likewise with the same mucoperichondrial graft. None of the patients required postoperative lumbar drain placement. After a median follow-up period of 57 months, only 1 patient developed a meningocele without CSFL about 2 years after surgery at the contralateral lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus. None of the patients reported symptoms referable to elevated ICP nor underwent ventricular derivation.

Conclusions

Single-layered mucoperichondrial free graft was safe and effective in the majority of the examined patients. In 7% of the study population, a surgical revision was necessary due to local failure of the graft. However, during long-term follow-up, only 1 case of recurrent meningocele without CSFL was reported in a patient who presented borderline ICP.

Utility of the Nasoseptal “Rescue” Flap Approach: Analysis of 125 Consecutive Patients and Implications for Routine Transsphenoidal Surgery

Introduction

The nasoseptal flap (NSF) is the reconstructive workhorse for endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS). However, there is morbidity associated with its use and it is not always required for reconstruction. The bilateral nasoseptal “rescue” flap (NSRF) technique offers a quicker alternative to upfront NSF harvest, yet permits the use of a tailored NSF if needed after the defect has been created. The utility and implications of this strategy have not been well studied.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 125 consecutive transsphenoidal cases where an NSRF approach was used from January 2015 to October 2017 at the Cleveland Clinic. Records were analyzed for conversion to NSF, outcomes, and reconstruction-related complications.

Results

The mean age of patients included in the study was 51 years, with 51% females. NSRF was converted to full NSF in only 16% of cases. Rationale for conversion included an unanticipated high-flow (7) or low-flow (12) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and an exposed internal carotid artery (1). NSRF was utilized and converted to formal NSF in 3 patients who had previous remote transsphenoidal surgery. One patient who had an NSRF without a full NSF raised had a postoperative CSF leak; however, no CSF leaks or flap ischemia was noted for those who had full NSFs raised, even in revision surgery.

Conclusion

NSRF approach provides the reliability and flexibility of vascularized reconstruction, without the perioperative disadvantages of an upfront NSF harvest. The low and successful conversion rate to NSF demonstrates the utility of this strategy which should be incorporated into the standard approach for routine transsphenoidal surgery.

Sinonasal quality-of-life outcomes after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

BACKGROUND

There are substantial gaps in our understanding of the influence of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for endoscopic skull base surgery on sinonasal-specific quality of life (QOL) as well as the instruments available for assessment. Our primary objective in this study was to characterize postoperative changes in sinonasal QOL, specifically using the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), with a secondary objective of delineating weaknesses in our current understanding of patient symptomatology after EEA for skull base surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS for studies reporting SNOT-22 data pre- and postoperatively in patients who underwent EEA for skull base pathologies. Studies were limited to patients ≥18 years of age and excluded patients diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

RESULTS

Nineteen unique studies with 27 separate data sets and a total of 1025 patients were used in this meta-analysis. Overall SNOT-22 scores statistically improved at the 6-month (p = 0.0009) and 1-year (p = 0.002) time-points. Patients with preoperative SNOT-22 scores ≥20 achieved postoperative improvements at 12-week (p < 0.00001), 6-month (p < 0.0001), 1-year (p < 0.00001), and long-term follow-up (p < 0.0001). Patients with preoperative SNOT-22 scores <20 remained stable and did not worsen postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing EEA for skull base pathologies who have impaired sinonasal QOL preoperatively demonstrated significant postoperative QOL improvements. Those patients with relatively normal preoperative sinonasal QOL remained asymptomatic postoperatively. This study supports the need for development of a contemporary disease- and approach-specific, validated QOL instrument for skull base pathologies.