Reducing Surgical Site Infections During Otolaryngology Surgical Missions

Outcomes of Short-Term Surgical Trips in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aims to explore the current body of literature to characterize how short-term surgical trips (STSTs) in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OtoHNS) contribute to surgical, educational, and sustainability-based outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aim to use these data to synthesize aspects of STSTs that are successful with the hopes of shaping future global efforts.

DATA SOURCES

Data sources included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus.

REVIEW METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on several databases from inception to October 14, 2021. We included primary studies exploring any surgical or educational outcomes of global short-term surgical endeavors within LMICs. Data were then extracted to evaluate the heterogenous body of literature that exists, characterizing the surgical, educational, and sustainability-based outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-Seven studies were included in the final analysis. Most publications were focused on surgical interventions (39 of 47; 82.9%); 13 (27.7%) studies included education as the primary aim and 12 (25.5%) considered sustainability a significant aim. Of the 94 first and last authors, there were zero first authors and only one last author with an LMIC affiliation. Twenty-six studies (55%) mentioned that any patients were seen in follow-up, ranging from one day to five years.

CONCLUSION

Our scoping review demonstrates that most STSTs have focused primarily on surgical procedures with a lack of appropriate long-term follow-up. However, the available outcome-based information presented helps identify factors that characterize a strong short-term global surgical program.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 134:32-39, 2024.

Humanitarian Maxillofacial Mission's Success Requires Experienced Surgeons, Careful Planning, and Meeting With the Local's Care Needs

PURPOSE

Meeting with local needs of low- and middle-income countries during maxillofacial humanitarian mission is not easy. This article aimed to report on 5 years of experience in humanitarian maxillofacial surgery missions. In addition, several key points for best practices and meeting the medical needs of local populations are discussed.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, all medical charts of patients managed during humanitarian maxillofacial surgery missions organized within the department of maxillofacial surgery of Le Dantec Hospital (Senegal) were analyzed. Disease characteristics, treatments modality, and outcomes were reviewed. Moreover, missions planning and costs were studied.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2018, 5 humanitarian missions were organized totalizing 177 patients, one-third of which were treated surgically. Tumors (35%) and sequelae from previous surgeries, cancrum oris or trauma (24%) were the most frequently treated disorders. Most patients were treated with free flap reconstructions (35%). Postoperative complications were observed for only 3 patients (5%). With a median follow-up of 13 months, no sequelae requiring specific treatment were observed. The estimated total cost for each mission was $39,000.

CONCLUSION

In order to benefit both the locals and the volunteers, humanitarian maxillofacial missions should be carefully planned and volunteers appropriately prepared. Other keys to the success of such missions are setting up training and support programs, reflecting upon ethical considerations, understanding local cultural customs and ensuring mutual respect with the locals. Frequent self-evaluation and long-term mission sustainability are critical. Finally, mission costs should be evaluated.

The humanitarian and outreach ethics charter in ENT. Ethics at the heart of missions

Humanitarian action, in the broad sense, including global outreach missions by ENT physicians, has been effective for many years. These volunteer missions have not had any specific regulatory framework, be it medical, social or above all ethical. The testimony of ENT physicians in certain "recipient" countries, in particular during the 2017 Paris Congress of the International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies (IFOS), revealed the importance of adequate coordination between "provider" and "recipient" teams. Several ethical reports have been made, but few specifically focused on ENT outreach. The present review is based on feedback from several missions given to the French Society of OtoRhinoLaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL) and IFOS, and on a review of the literature. A specific charter of global outreach and humanitarian missions in ENT has been drawn up. This review is essential for optimizing the sharing of knowledge and training in otorhinolaryngology across the world while respecting mandatory sociocultural and ethical rules.