Complications of Neck Drains in Thyroidectomies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Impact of Drain Placement on Postoperative Complications after Thyroidectomy for Substernal Goiter

Introduction  Despite the evidence against drain placement after thyroidectomy, there is a lack of consensus on drain use in patients with substernal goiter. Objective  To assess the factors that increase the likelihood of drain placement and its impact on postoperative hematoma and other 30-day complications among adult patients undergoing thyroidectomy for substernal goiter. Methods  A retrospective cohort study that used data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) who underwent elective thyroidectomy for substernal goiter from 2016 to 2020 were included. Cases with closed suction neck drains placed upon completion of surgery were included in the drain group, and the remaining cases formed the nondrain group. Results  A total of 1,229 patients were included (46.5% with drain placement). The factors that increased the likelihood of drain placement included body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , score between 3 and 5 on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, sternal split/transthoracic surgical approach, operative time ≥ 90 minutes, and surgery conducted by otolaryngologists. Patients with clean-contaminated or contaminated wound classifications were less likely to be submitted to drain placement. In addition, drain use had no impact on postoperative hematoma formation but was found to independently increase the risk of prolonged length of hospital stay. Conclusion  Thyroidectomy without drain placement might be safe for substernal goiter. However, this decision should be individualized for each patient. Level Of Evidence: 3.

Effect of drainage versus no drainage after thyroid surgery on wound complications, a meta-analysis

A meta-analysis study was used to assess whether not placing a drain after thyroidectomy reduces postoperative wound complications. A critical review of the comprehensive literature up to May 2023 was conducted using four databases: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the web of science. Fourteen interrelated studies were reviewed after passing the inclusion and exclusion criteria established by the study and assessing the quality of the literature.95% confidence intervals (Cl) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated using fixed effects models. The data were meta-analysed using RevMan 5.3 software. The results showed that the use of drains during thyroid surgery did not have a favourable impact on patients. Intraoperative placement of drains did not reduce postoperative wound haematoma formation in patients, (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54, 1.36 p = 0.52). However, the incidence of postoperative wound infection was significantly higher in patients with drains used in intraoperative thyroid surgery, (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10, 0.45 p < 0.0001). As the sample size of the randomised controlled study used for this meta-analysis was limited, it is important to approach the findings with caution when interpreting the results.Conducting additional high-quality research with larger sample sizes is crucial in order to further confirm these results and reduce the likelihood of duplication.

Management of surgical diseases of thyroid gland indications of the United Italian Society of Endocrine Surgery (SIUEC)

A task force of the United Italian society of Endocrine Surgery (SIUEC) was commissioned to review the position statement on diagnostic, therapeutic and health‑care management protocol in thyroid surgery published in 2016, at the light of new technologies, recent oncological concepts, and tailored approaches. The objective of this publication was to support surgeons with modern rational protocols of treatment that can be shared by health-care professionals, taking into account important clinical, healthcare and therapeutic aspects, as well as potential sequelae and complications. The task force consists of 13 members of the SIUEC highly trained and experienced in thyroid surgery. The main topics concern clinical evaluation and preoperative workup, patient preparation for surgery, surgical treatment, non-surgical options, postoperative management, prevention and management of major complications, outpatient care and follow-up.

To drain or not to drain following posttraumatic ear reconstruction with Dieffenbach's postauricular flap in patients with antithrombotic therapy

PURPOSE

To measure the association between drainage use and postoperative complications (POCs) after posttraumatic ear reconstruction (PTER) with Dieffenbach's postauricular flap (DPF) in patients with antithrombotic therapy (ATT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective double-cohort study of patients undergoing posttraumatic DRF with vs. without drainage in 4 maxillofacial units during a 7-year interval. The primary predictor variable was drainage use, and the main outcome was POCs (i.e., auricular haematoma and infection). Descriptive, bi- and multivariate statistics were computed with P ≤ 0.05 defined as statistically significant.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 365 unilateral PTER patients (14% POCs, 15.6% ATT, 34.5% females) aged 58.1 ± 19.7 years (range, 18-101). Among subjects with ATT, drainage use significantly reduced POCs (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.8; P = 0.009; absolute risk reduction [ASR], 34.04%; NNT, 3), especially when delayed surgery > 5 h after trauma was evident (forward stepwise logistic modelling: OR, 20.6; 95% CI, 2 to 215.9; P = 0.012). Drainage placement under DPF in ATT patients with smoking habit, concomitant diseases (e.g. diabetes mellitus), ear cartilage loss, or wound contamination almost halved POC rates (ASR, 34.5 ± 12.1%; range, 22.1% to 49%). Patient's age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, alcohol misuse, ATT and antibiotic type, and international normalised ratio (INR) before surgery had no meaningful effect on POCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Drainage should be placed under DPF in patients with ATT, regardless of age, gender, ATT and antibiotic type, and preoperative INR.

Clinical Usefulness of the Valsalva Manoeuvre to Improve Hemostasis during Thyroidectomy

Bleeding after total thyroidectomy remains a rare event that affects early postoperative morbidity, occurring in 0.3% to 4.2% of cases. Intraoperative bleeding is an unpleasant complication, and it is often easily manageable, although postoperative bleeding may represent a life-threatening condition for the patient. The purpose of our study was to clarify the role of the Valsalva manoeuvre to reduce postoperative bleeding. Between January 2019 to February 2022, 250 consecutive patients were listed for thyroid surgery at our surgical department. The study cohort consisted of 178 patients, divided into two groups based on the execution of the Valsalva manoeuvre. There was no difference in the duration of surgery between groups. Group B had fewer reinterventions for bleeding. Group A had a significantly greater volume of drainage output than Group B. Cervical haematoma can compromise a patient’s life, so bleeding control is crucial. Our results show that using a simple and safe Valsalva manoeuvre can improve the postoperative course with a significant reduction in drainage output, but does not prevent the risk of reoperation for hemorrhage.

Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report

Background

The endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach (ETBAA) improved cosmetic outcomes significantly and is now widely applied. The usage of drainage tubes is controversial in conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), but studies about drainage placement decisions during ETBAA are still limited. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of having no drainage tube applied during ETBAA on patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Methods

The clinical data of patients undergoing ETBAA from July 2018 to May 2021 was retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups based on drain placement: no-drain and drain. The two groups were matched at a ratio of 1:1. Fifty-five patients from each group were finally included. Postoperative complications and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.

Results

No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications, including hemorrhage, surgical site infection, and subcutaneous seroma. Compared with the drain group, the operation time of the no-drain group was significantly shorter [(107.75 ± 24.59) min vs. (119.91 ± 34.05) min, P < 0.05]. The total and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the no-drain group [(2.40 ± 0.71) days vs. (4.78 ± 1.33) days, P < 0.001, (2.04 ± 0.19) days vs. (2.15 ± 0.36) days, P < 0.05], and the costs of surgical consumables were also significantly lower [(6,820.83 ± 164.29) CNY vs. (7,494.13 ± 216.7) CNY, P < 0.05]. The postoperative pain score of the no-drain group was significantly lower than the drain group [(1.58 ± 0.63) vs. (1.89 ± 0.76), P < 0.05].

Conclusions

No drainage applied during ETBAA on papillary thyroid carcinoma is safe and feasible. This practice does not increase the risk of postoperative complications, but it does shorten the operation time and hospital stay, as well as reduce medical costs. Furthermore, it alleviates the suffering of patients.