Percutaneous and Open Tracheostomy in Patients With COVID-19: The Weill Cornell Experience in New York City

Low Molecular Weight Heparin Dosing in Relation to Postoperative Bleeding After Tracheotomy in Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2-A Descriptive Study

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze whether patients with SARS-CoV-2 who received surgical tracheotomy had a lower incidence of postoperative bleeding if their LMWH was postponed or canceled on the day of surgery.

Methods

Patients with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to the intensive care units who underwent surgical tracheotomy were assessed retrospectively through their medical records. Data on comorbidity, LMWH dose, and timing were collected. Bleedings < 72 h post surgery were noted as stomal or airway bleedings.

Results

All 101 patients included were on LMWH. Twenty-two patients had no change of dose of LMWH, 24 patients had their dose of LMWH postponed to post surgery, and 50 patients had their dose reduced to only the evening dose on the day of surgery. Twenty-six patients had a stomal bleeding, one patient had an airway bleeding, and four patients had both stomal and airway bleedings. No significant difference in the incidence of bleeding was identified between various groups of different LMWH doses or timing, reduced dose versus no change of dose, OR 1.29 (95% CI 0.42-3.92). Postponed dose versus no change of dose of LMWH, OR 1.03 (95% CI 0.28-3.75). Increasing age was correlated to a higher risk of bleeding post-surgery by an OR of 1.64 (95% CI 1.06-2.54, p = 0.026 for every 10 years added). No fatal bleeding related to surgical tracheotomy was observed.

Conclusion

Decreased doses of LMWH on the day of surgery were not associated with a risk reduction for post-surgical bleeding in patients with SARS-CoV-2 who received tracheotomy. Increasing age was a risk factor for post-surgical bleeding.

Level of Evidence

Retrospective, level 3.

Prospective Study of Contamination Spread Produced During Open Surgical vs Conventional Percutaneous vs Novel Percutaneous Tracheostomy During COVID-19 Era in a Pig Model

BACKGROUND

Because of concerns about provider contamination during tracheostomy procedures in a pandemic such as COVID-19, it is essential to objectively evaluate aerosol generation in all tracheostomy approaches, including newly developed tracheostomy procedures. We performed open surgical tracheostomy (OST), conventional percutaneous tracheostomy (CPT), and novel percutaneous tracheostomy (NPT), a modification of CPT designed to reduce contamination spread, in pig models and then compared the degree of contamination with providers using Glo Germ (Glo Germ).

STUDY DESIGN

Six Yorkshire pigs were used for data collection. Either OST, CPT, or NPT was performed on the pigs by the same team including a surgeon, anesthesiologist, and respiratory therapist. A mixture of Glo Germ and water was administered via an atomizer into the oral cavity to the tracheal bifurcation before each procedure, and additionally dispersed via an aersolizer in the trachea and lungs through the endotracheal tube before and throughout the procedure. Before and immediately after each procedure, prespecified body parts of the providers were photographed and 2 independent examiners blindly evaluated the photographs to determine degree of Glo Germ contamination using a 3-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Total contamination among provider team average score (minimum 0, maximum 2), was significantly lower for OST than CPT (0.29 ± 0.59 vs 0.63 ± 0.65; p < 0.01) or NPT (0.29 ± 0.59 vs 0.59 ± 0.66; p < 0.01). No significant difference was seen in overall contamination of any provider between CPT and NPT (0.63 ± 0.65 vs 0.59 ± 0.66; p = 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that OST causes significantly less aerosol contamination to providers than either CPT or NPT.

Bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Assessment of the efficacy and complications associated with performing bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous tracheostomy in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

Prospective observational study conducted between March of 2020 and February of 2022. All adult patients who underwent elective bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous tracheostomy were included. The efficacy of the procedure was evaluated based either on the success rate in the execution or on the need for conversion to open technique. Percutaneous tracheostomy-related complications were registered during the procedure. We performed 6-month follow-up for identifying late complications.

RESULTS

During the study period, 312 bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous tracheostomies were analyzed. One hundred and eighty-three were performed in COVID-19 patients and 129 among non-COVID-19 patients. Overall, 64.1% (200) of patients were male, with a median age of 66 (interquartile range 54-74), and 65% (205) presented at least 1 comorbidity. Overall, oxygen desaturation was the main complication observed (20.8% [65]), being more frequent in the COVID-19 group occurring in 27.3% (50) with a statistically significant difference versus the non-COVID-19 patients' group (11.6% [15]); P < .01). Major complications such as hypotension, arrhythmias, and pneumothorax were more frequently observed among COVID-19 patients as well but with no significant differences. Percutaneous tracheostomy could be executed quickly and satisfactorily in all the patients with no need for conversion to the open technique. Likewise, no suspension of the procedure was required in any case. During 6-month follow-up, we found an incidence of 0.96% (n = 3) late complications, 2 tracheal granulomas, and 1 ostomal infection.

CONCLUSION

Bronchoscopy-guided percutaneous tracheostomy can be considered an effective and safe procedure in COVID-19 patients. Nevertheless, it is highly remarkable that in the series under study, a great number of COVID-19 patients presented oxygen desaturation during the procedure.

Management of COVID-19-related post-intubation tracheal stenosis

Introduction

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has affected Italy since the beginning of 2020. Endotracheal intubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and tracheostomy are frequently required in patients with severe COVID-19. Tracheal stenosis is a potentially severe condition that can occur as a complication after intubation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility and safety of endoscopic and surgical techniques in the treatment of tracheal stenosis related to COVID-19.

Materials and Methods

Between June 2020 and May 2022, consecutive patients with tracheal stenosis who were admitted to our surgical department were considered eligible for participation in the study.

Results

A total of 13 patients were included in the study. They consisted of nine women (69%) and four men (31%) with a median age of 57.2 years. We included seven patients with post-tracheostomy tracheal stenosis. Bronchoscopy was performed to identify the type, location, and severity of the stenosis. All patients underwent bronchoscopic dilation and surveillance bronchoscopy at 7 and 30 days after the procedure. We repeated endoscopic treatment in eight patients. Three patients underwent tracheal resection anastomosis. Final follow-up bronchoscopy demonstrated no residual stenosis.

Conclusions

The incidence of and risk factors associated with tracheal stenosis in critically ill patients with COVID-19 are currently unknown. Our experience confirms the efficacy and safety of endoscopic management followed by surgical procedures in cases of relapsed tracheal stenosis.

Outcomes of Surgical Tracheostomy on Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Patients Admitted to a Private Tertiary Hospital in Tanzania

OBJECTIVES

 The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in an increase in the number of patients necessitating prolonged mechanical ventilation. Data on patients with COVID-19 undergoing tracheostomy indicating timing and outcomes are very limited. Our study illustrates--- outcomes for surgical tracheotomies performed on COVID-19 patients in Tanzania.

METHODS

 This was a retrospective observational study conducted at the Aga Khan Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

RESULTS

 Nineteen patients with COVID-19 underwent surgical tracheotomy between 16^th March and 31^st December 2021. All surgical tracheostomies were performed in the operating theatre. The average duration of intubation prior to tracheotomy and tracheostomy to ventilator liberation was 16 days and 27 days respectively. Only five patients were successfully liberated from the ventilator, decannulated, and discharged successfully.

CONCLUSIONS

 This is the first and largest study describing tracheotomy outcomes in COVID-19 patients in Tanzania. Our results revealed a high mortality rate. Multicenter studies in the private and public sectors are needed in Tanzania to determine optimal timing, identification of patients, and risk factors predictive of improved outcomes.

Tracheostomy Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 at a New York City Hospital

Objective

Tracheostomies have been performed in patients with prolonged intubation due to COVID-19. Understanding outcomes in different populations is crucial to tackle future epidemics.

Study Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary academic medical center in New York City.

Methods

A prospectively collected database of patients with COVID-19 undergoing open tracheostomy between March 2020 and April 2020 was reviewed. Primary endpoints were weaning from the ventilator and from sedation and time to decannulation.

Results

Sixty-six patients underwent tracheostomy. There were 42 males (64%) with an average age of 62 years (range, 23-91). Patients were intubated for a median time of 26 days prior to tracheostomy (interquartile range [IQR], 23-30). The median time to weaning from ventilatory support after tracheostomy was 18 days (IQR, 10-29). Of those sedated at the time of tracheostomy, the median time to discontinuation of sedation was 5 days (IQR, 3-9). Of patients who survived, 39 (69%) were decannulated. Of those decannulated before discharge (n = 39), the median time to decannulation was 36 days (IQR, 27-49) following tracheostomy. The median time from ventilator liberation to decannulation was 14 days (IQR, 8-22). Thirteen patients (20.0%) had minor bleeding requiring packing. Two patients (3%) had bleeding requiring neck exploration. The all-cause mortality rate was 10.6%. No patients died of procedural causes, and no surgeons acquired COVID-19.

Conclusion

Open tracheostomies were successfully and safely performed at our institution in the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of patients were successfully weaned from the ventilator and sedation. Approximately 60% of patients were decannulated prior to hospital discharge.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection, a narrative review

COVID pneumonitis can cause patients to become critically ill. They may require intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a concern. This review aims to discuss the topic of ventilator-associated pneumonia in this group. Several reasons have been proposed to explain the elevated rates of VAP in critically ill COVID patients compared to non-COVID patients. Extrinsic factors include understaffing, lack of PPE and use of immunomodulating agents. Intrinsic factors include severe parenchymal damage, immune dysregulation, along with pulmonary vascular endothelial inflammation and thrombosis. The rate of VAP has been reported at 45.4%, with an ICU mortality rate of 42.7%. Multiple challenges to diagnosis exist. Other conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary oedema and atelectasis can present with similar features. Frequent growth of gram-negative bacteria has been shown in multiple studies, with particularly high rates of pseudomonas aeruginosa. The rate of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis has been reported at 4–30%. We would recommend the use of invasive techniques when possible. This will enable de-escalation of antibiotics as soon as possible, decreasing overuse. It is also important to keep other possible causes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mind, such as COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis, cytomegalovirus, etc. Diagnostic tests such as galactomannan and B-D-glucan should be considered. These patients may face a long treatment course, with risk of re-infection, along with prolonged weaning, which carries its own long-term consequences.

Temporal Dynamics of Nasopharyngeal and Tracheal SARS-CoV-2 Cycle Thresholds in COVID-19 Patients with Tracheostomy

In this study of 45 patients with COVID-19 undergoing tracheostomy, nasopharyngeal and tracheal cycle threshold (Ct) values were analyzed. Ct values rose to 37.9 by the time of tracheostomy and remained >35 postoperatively, demonstrating that persistent test positivity may not be associated with persistent transmissible virus in this population.

Post-COVID-19 airway stenosis treated by tracheal resection and anastomosis: a bicentric experience

Objective

The COVID-19 pandemic was an extraordinary challenge for the global healthcare system not only for the number of patients affected by pulmonary disease, but also for the incidence of long-term sequalae. In this regard, laryngo-tracheal stenosis (LTS) represents one of the most common complications of invasive ventilation.

Methods

A case series of patients who underwent tracheal resection and anastomosis (TRA) for post-COVID-19 LTS was collected from June 2020 to September 2021.

Results

Among 14 patients included, 50% had diabetes and 64.3% were obese. During intensive care unit stay, mean duration of orotracheal intubation (OTI) was 15.2 days and 10 patients (71.4%) underwent tracheostomy, which was maintained in 7 for an average of 31 days. According to the European Laryngological Society classification, 13 patients (92.9%) had a grade IIIa LTS and one a grade IIIa+. All patients underwent Type A TRA, according to the authors’ classification. No major perioperative complications were reported and at the last follow-up all patients were asymptomatic.

Conclusions

With the appropriate indications, TRA represents an effective treatment in post-COVID-19 LTS patients. Short OTI times and careful tracheostomy are required in order to reduce the incidence of airway injury.

Incidence and types of laryngotracheal sequelae of prolonged invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 outbreak has led to an increasing number of acute laryngotracheal complications in patients subjected to prolonged mechanical ventilation, but their incidence in the short and mid-term after ICU discharge is still unknown. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of these complications in a COVID-19 group of patients and to compare these aspects with non-COVID-19 matched controls.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we retrospectively selected patients from November 1 to December 31, 2020, according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The follow-up visits were planned after 6 months from discharge. All patients were subjected to an endoscopic evaluation and completed two questionnaires (VHI-10 score and MDADI score).

RESULTS

Thirteen men and three women were enrolled in the COVID-19 group while nine men and seven women were included in the control group. The median age was 60 [56-66] years in the COVID-19 group and 64 [58-69] years in the control group. All the patients of the control group showed no laryngotracheal lesions, while five COVID-19 patients had different types of lesions, two located in the vocal folds and three in the trachea. No difference was identified between the two groups regarding the VHI-10 score, while the control group showed a significantly worse MDADI score.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 patients subjected to prolonged invasive ventilation are more likely to develop a laryngotracheal complication in the short and medium term. A rigorous clinical follow-up to allow early identification and management of these complications should be set up after discharge.

Essential inpatient otolaryngology: what COVID-19 has revealed

Purpose

To identify areas of critical otolaryngology contributions to inpatient care resistant to disruption by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Medical records of 614 otolaryngology consults seen between January and June of 2019 and 602 seen between January and June of 2020 were reviewed. Extracted data included patient demographics, SARS-CoV-2 status, medical comorbidities, consult location, consult category, reason for consult, procedures performed, and overall outcome. Prevalence of data items was compared using t tests and Chi-squared tests.

Results

The number of monthly consults to the otolaryngology service remained approximately stable after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there was a substantial increase in ICU consults and a decrease in ER and floor consults. The proportion of otology, rhinology, and head and neck consults decreased while that of airway consults—most of which were tracheostomy-related—greatly increased. While the top ten reasons for consult remained essentially the same, they dramatically increased as a percentage of consults during COVID-19 (55–92%), whereas there was a dramatic decrease in the proportion of less frequent consults.

Conclusion

The changes in otolaryngology consultation patterns seen after the onset of the pandemic are multifactorial, but may be attributed to novel pathologies, attitudes, and policies. Nonetheless, these patterns reveal that a set of core otolaryngologic issues, including acute airway issues, head and neck lesions, severe sinusitis and epistaxis, are essential and need to be addressed in the inpatient setting, whereas the significant drop in other consults suggests that they may be appropriately managed on an outpatient basis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-021-06963-7.