Endoscopic Repair of Type 1 Laryngeal Clefts and Deep Interarytenoid Notches: Cold Steel Versus Laser

Exploring surgical outcomes in endoscopic repair of type 1 laryngeal clefts (LC-1) and deep interarytenoid notches (DIN)

The authors conducted a retrospective chart review evaluating the predictors of success for endoscopic repair of type 1 laryngeal clefts (LC-1) or deep interarytenoid notches (DIN). Demographics, birth history, medical comorbidities, surgical details, feeding history, and swallow function were collected (n = 52). Repair success was defined as improvement on videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) when initially evaluating the procedure's success (n = 36) and patient-reported symptom improvement when assessing predictive factors (n = 48). McNemar or McNemar-Bowker tests evaluated VFSS-assessed symptom improvement. Patients with post-operative symptom documentation were categorized based on predictors in outcome and assessed for post-operative improvement using the Pearson Chi-square test. Postoperatively, 58 % of patients with VFSS-identified aspiration had resolution. Dysphagia severity decreased (p = 0.009) with no severe cases post-repair. Furthermore, pregnancy complications, preterm birth, NICU stay, prior airway and feeding interventions, and syndromes were not significantly correlated with outcomes. However, trends in data suggest that preterm birth and NICU stay are more common in unsuccessful repairs. Overall, operative intervention significantly reduced aspiration and dysphagia severity.

Strategies for CO2 Laser Use in Laryngeal Microsurgery: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

We aim to systematically review the literature addressing perioperative practices for optimal use of the CO2 laser in laryngeal transoral laser microsurgery (TOLMS), with a focus on safety.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of publications indexed in Medline, Embase, and EBM reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials which evaluated perioperative strategies for the use of CO2 laser in laryngeal TOLMS was conducted.

REVIEW METHODS

Records obtained from the search strategy were assessed for eligibility in a 2-step process by 2 independent researchers using the Covidence software.

RESULTS

Among 2143 identified records, 103 were included in this study. The majority of studies (n = 25) focused on the use of the CO2 laser in oncologic resection, while 20 addressed the treatment of vocal cord paralysis, 16 discussed the treatment of pediatric or congenital pathologies, 11 detailed the management of benign lesions, and 31 studies tackled other surgical indications. Strategies for safe CO2 TOLMS were highly heterogeneous across studies and included preoperative measures (ie, related to the environment, staff preparation, patient protection, and ventilation), intraoperative precautions (ie, protection of nontarget structures, technical considerations, topical and systemic medications), and postoperative strategies (ie, related to airway protection, oral intake, vocal rest, hospitalization duration, drug regimen, and consultant follow-up).

CONCLUSION

The results provided in this study can be used as a framework to guide the creation of laser safety protocols across institutions, guide quality improvement initiatives, the development of simulation training activities, and as a tool to facilitate resident teaching and skill assessment.

Congenital laryngo-tracheo-esophageal clefts: updates from a quaternary care pediatric airway unit

PURPOSE

To review the operative techniques, outcomes, and complications following surgery in pediatric patients with laryngo-tracheo-esophageal clefts (LTEC). We describe a new combined approach to treat long LTECs.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients underwent surgical repair for LTEC from March 2012 to July 2022 at our hospital. Every patient underwent a diagnostic endoscopy under general anesthesia and spontaneous ventilation to assess the LTEC and synchronous aero-digestive comorbidities/malformations. All patients underwent at least one surveillance endoscopy after the repair at our institution.

RESULTS

The patients had multiple other malformations, specifically gastro-intestinal, synchronous airway, and cardiac. The cleft distribution according to the modified Benjamin and Inglis classification was type I (n = 5, 20%), type II (n = 6, 24%), type IIIa (n = 8, 32%), type IIIb (n = 4, 16%), and type IVa (n = 2, 8%). The median follow-up was 44.6 months. Five patients (20%) had undergone previous cleft corrective surgery(s). Seven patients (28%) had partial to complete breakdown of the repair, needing additional intervention(s), and two required a combined-open plus endoscopic repair. Preoperatively, most patients (n = 18, 72%) needed a feeding assistance. At latest follow-up, feeding assistance was weaned off in 13 out of 18 patients, which was a 72% improvement. Ten patients (40%) needed ventilation assistance before the surgery. Post-operatively, ventilatory assistance was weaned off in 6 patients, meaning a 60% improvement.

CONCLUSION

LTEC are rare malformations, and their management needs precise diagnosis, appropriate surgical planning, and execution, and dedicated post-operative care. Primary and revision repair of long clefts with tracheal extension may require a combined approach.

Does the History of Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair Alter Outcomes of Laryngeal Cleft Repair?

OBJECTIVE

Tracheoesophageal fistula and esophageal atresia (TEA) and laryngeal cleft (LC) can coexist in some patients. The surgery-specific success rate of LC repair in children with associated TEA has not been well described. The aim of the study is to determine if the history of TEA alters the LC repair outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with chart review.

SETTING

Single-institution academic medical center.

METHOD

A retrospective review was conducted of patients with LC with and without TEA repair between January 2001 and November 2020. Data collected and analyzed included demographics and clinical characteristics, LC type, and LC with TEA timing of repairs.

RESULTS

An overall 282 patients met the inclusion criteria of LC repair: LC (n = 242, 85.8%) and LC + TEA (n = 40, 14.2%). Revision repair was required in 43 patients (15.2%) with 8 (2.8%) needing a second revision repair. The first LC revision rate in the LC group was 36/242 (14.9%) as compared with 7/40 (17.5%) in the LC + TEA group (P = .67). The second LC revision rate in the LC and LC + TEA groups was 7 (2.9%) and 1 (2.4%), respectively. The median time to revision was 5.1 months (interquartile range, 3.45-10.6) in the LC group as compared with 29.2 months (interquartile range, 4.8-44.2) in the LC + TEA group (P = .06).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of TEA and LC was 14.2% in our study. Based on our findings, history of TEA repair is not associated with a higher revision rate vs LC alone. The history of TEA repair did not alter the outcomes of LC repair.

Pediatric laryngeal cleft repair with coblation: Functional comparison of a novel technique with traditional methods

OBJECTIVES

The traditional endoscopic techniques for surgical management of laryngeal clefts are carbon dioxide (CO2) laser or microlaryngeal instruments (cold steel). This study compares the functional efficacy and safety of coblation, or "cold" radiofrequency ablation, to traditional approaches for endoscopic laryngeal cleft repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic laryngeal cleft repair with CO2 laser, cold steel, or coblator at two tertiary academic centers from 2015 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome studied was swallowing function: pre- and postoperative swallow studies were scored according to the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative with higher scores indicating worse swallow function. Secondary outcomes included surgical complications and rates of dehiscence.

RESULTS

Of the 53 patients included, 14 underwent repair with CO2 laser, 23 with cold steel, and 16 with the coblator. Mean age at surgery was 2.2 ± 1.1 years for the laser group, 4.3 ± 4.0 years for cold steel, and 1.9 ± 1.4 years for the coblator group. In the laser group, 100% of clefts were type I; for the cold steel group, 82.6% of clefts were type I and 17.4% were type II; for the coblator group, 93.8% of clefts were type I and 6.3% were type II. Pre- and postoperative swallow study scores were 6.3 ± 2.8 and 4.3 ± 3.2, respectively, (p = 0.001) for the laser group, 6.9 ± 2.8 and 5.3 ± 3.1 (p = 0.071) for the cold steel group, and 7.5 ± 1.5 and 4.0 ± 2.9 (p < 0.001) for the coblator group. Mean change in swallow study scores were similar across the three groups (p = 0.212). No patients experienced postoperative dehiscence at the surgical site or complications; no revisions were required.

CONCLUSIONS

Cleft repair with the novel coblation technique showed significant improvements in swallow study scores without any occurrences of postoperative dehiscence or revisions. Coblation is a safe and efficacious approach for laryngeal cleft repair.