1
|
Huang L, Patel AM, Haleem A, Brant JA, Maxwell R, Brody RM, Carey RM. Missed Adjuvant Therapy in Human Papillomavirus Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2025; 135:729-740. [PMID: 39377215 PMCID: PMC11725718 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Revised: 09/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Investigate missed adjuvant therapy and associated disparities in overall survival (OS) for human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS The 2010-2017 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with surgically resected HPV+ OPSCC. Indications for adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) included pT3-4 classification, pN2-3 classification, lymphovascular invasion, pathologic extranodal extension (pENE), and/or positive surgical margins (PSM). Indication(s) for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aCRT) included pENE and/or PSM. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were implemented. RESULTS Of 5297 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 4288 had indication(s) for aRT; 775 did not receive any adjuvant therapy and were considered as missing aRT. A total of 2234 patients had indication(s) for aCRT. Of these, 1383 (61.9%) received aCRT, 555 (24.8%) patients received aRT alone and were considered as having missed aCRT, and 296 (13.2%) did not receive any adjuvant therapy. Missed aRT and missed aCRT were each associated with age, treatment facility type, pN classification, and surgical margin status (p < 0.015). Among patients with indication(s) for aRT alone, OS of those receiving no adjuvant therapy, aRT alone, and aCRT was 90.0%, 94.8%, and 93.4%, respectively (p = 0.080). Among patients with indication(s) for aCRT, those receiving aRT alone and aCRT had similar OS (89.0% vs. 86.6%, p = 0.357) which was superior to receiving no adjuvant therapy (74.9%, p < 0.001). These patterns in OS persisted on multivariable Cox regression. CONCLUSION Among patients with HPV+ OPSCC and indication(s) for aRT, missed aRT was not associated with worse OS. For patients with indication(s) for aCRT, aRT alone was associated with similar OS as aCRT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 135:729-740, 2025.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily Huang
- Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
| | - Aman M. Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryRutgers New Jersey Medical SchoolNewarkNew JerseyU.S.A.
| | - Afash Haleem
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryRutgers New Jersey Medical SchoolNewarkNew JerseyU.S.A.
| | - Jason A. Brant
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryCorporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
| | - Russell Maxwell
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
| | - Robert M. Brody
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryCorporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
| | - Ryan M. Carey
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryCorporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaU.S.A.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marrero-Gonzalez AR, Chernov ES, Nguyen SA, Keith BA, Stevens MN, Kejner AE. Sex and human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104464. [PMID: 39106680 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) is known to affect the outcomes of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), there is a significant gap in research regarding the potential sex-based differences. This systematic review-metanalysis (SR-MA) aims to evaluate if sex is a prognostic factor in HPV-associated OPSCC. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. COCHRANE Library, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for English-language articles from 1966 to October 2023. Studies with multivariable analysis of overall survival (OS) based on sex were included. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) were presented for the reported outcome. A meta-analysis of single means, proportions, and aHRs with a 95 % CI was conducted. RESULTS This SR-MA included 24 studies (n = 101,574). The proportion of female patients was 16.6 % [15.4 %-17.8 %]. A meta-analysis of all included studies with OS showed no significant difference in survival between male and female patients. In US-based studies, no significant difference in OS is observed between male and female patients. International studies reported a better OS for female patients (aHR = 0.68, 95 % CI, 0.48-0.95). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that sex does not represent a significant prognostic factor for patients affected by HPV associated OPSCC. When stratified by geographic location, findings suggests that female patients from the US with HPV OPSCC have similar OS than male patients but in international studies it suggests male patients have worse OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro R Marrero-Gonzalez
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, PR 00921, USA
| | - Evan S Chernov
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; SUNY Upstate Medical University, College of Medicine, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | - Brian A Keith
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Madelyn N Stevens
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Alexandra E Kejner
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patel AM, Haleem A, Choudhry HS, Povolotskiy R, Roden DF. Patterns and Trends in Adjuvant Therapy for Major Salivary Gland Cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 171:155-171. [PMID: 38482915 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate adjuvant therapy indications, utilization, and associated survival disparities in major salivary gland cancer (MSGC). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING The 2006 to 2017 National Cancer Database. METHODS Patients with surgically resected MSGC were included (N = 11,398). pT3-4 classification, pN2-3 classification, lymphovascular invasion, pathologic extranodal extension (pENE), and positive surgical margin (PSM) were considered indications for adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT). pENE and PSM were considered possible indications for adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were implemented. RESULTS Among 6694 patients with≥ $\ge $ 1 indication for aRT, 1906 (28.5%) received no further treatment and missed aRT. Age, race, comorbidity status, facility type, and distance to reporting facility were associated with missed aRT (P < .025). Among 4003 patients with ≥1 possible indication for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aCRT), 914 (22.8%) received aCRT. Patients with pENE only (38.5%) and both pENE and PSM (44.0%) received aCRT more frequently than those with PSM only (17.0%) (P < .001). Academic facility was associated with aCRT utilization (P < .05). aCRT utilization increased between 2006 and 2017 in both academic (14.8% vs 23.9%) and nonacademic (8.8% vs 13.5%) facilities (P < .05). Among 2691 patients with ≥1 indication for aRT alone, missed aRT portended poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-2.03, P < .001). Among 4003 patients with ≥1 possible indication for aCRT, aRT alone (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89-1.18, P = .780) and aCRT were associated with similar OS. CONCLUSION Missed aRT in MSGC occurs frequently and portends poorer OS. Further studies clarifying indications for aCRT are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Afash Haleem
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Hassaam S Choudhry
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Roman Povolotskiy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - Dylan F Roden
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carey RM, Prasad A, Wei K, Brant JA, Brody RM, Leibowitz JM, Civantos FJ, Sweeny L. Primary Site Surgery in Distantly Metastatic Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:2243-2251. [PMID: 37947342 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Determine if intensive local therapy (i.e., local surgery or radiation) has a survival benefit for patients presenting with distantly metastatic oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS Retrospective population-based cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database presenting with distantly metastatic OPSCC. Overall survival (OS) was compared for patients receiving systemic therapy alone or in combination with local surgery or curative dose radiation, controlling for various clinicodemographic factors. RESULTS Between 2010 and 2015, 627 patients presented with newly diagnosed, metastatic OPSCC and an initial treatment course including systemic chemotherapy. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that local radiation therapy was independently associated with improved OS (OR 0.64, CI [0.51-0.81]); local surgery was not independently associated with improved OS (OR 0.99, CI [0.65-1.53]). Higher T stages were associated with worse OS (OR 1.69, CI [1.14-2.50] for T3 and OR 1.77, CI [1.22-2.58] for T4 compared to T1). HPV-positive (HPV+) tumors were associated with improved OS compared to HPV- (OR 0.79, CI [0.64-0.97]). Multiagent chemotherapy was associated with improved OS compared to single-agent (OR 0.78, CI [0.62-1.00]). The best survival for the entire cohort and for HPV+ patients was for radiation with systemic therapy and the worst survival for systemic therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS Curative dose local radiotherapy in addition to systemic therapy is associated with improved OS compared to systemic therapy alone in patients presenting with distantly metastatic OPSCC. There is not a significant survival benefit for local surgery in addition to systemic therapy in this patient population, regardless of HPV status. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 134:2243-2251, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M Carey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aman Prasad
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kimberly Wei
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jason A Brant
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert M Brody
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jason M Leibowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Francisco J Civantos
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Larissa Sweeny
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Colson-Fearon D, Stone R, Viswanathan AN. Risk Factors and Survival Impact Associated With Documentation of Radiation Therapy Refusal in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:427-435. [PMID: 37657506 PMCID: PMC10842819 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy (RT) refusal is known to have deleterious effects on survival for multiple cancer types. Factors associated with RT refusal by patients with gynecologic malignancies have not been well described. This study aimed to examine factors associated with and the survival impact of documented RT refusal among patients with gynecologic cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS This study analyzed data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) of patients with gynecologic cancers diagnosed between 2004 and 2020. Patients were included if they had complete survival data and a documented RT recommendation by their treating physician in the NCDB. Patients coded as received RT were compared with those coded as refused RT in the NCDB using a multivariate log binomial regression with robust variance to yield incidence rate ratios (IRR). Overall survival was analyzed using a multivariate (MV) Cox proportional hazards model to yield hazard ratios. RESULTS This study identified 209,976 patients. A total of 5.75% (n = 12,081) patients were coded as refusing RT. Multivariable IRR showed that documentation of RT refusal was positively associated with older age (MV IRR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.041-1.045), Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander race (1.72 [1.27-2.32]), and increased morbidity (score = 1: 1.06 [1.02-1.11]; score = 2: 1.20 [1.12-1.29]; score ≥3: 1.26 [1.14-1.38]). Negative associations were seen with Hispanic ethnicity (0.74 [0.67-0.80]), having insurance (0.58 [0.53-0.63]), and annual income >$74,063 (0.85 [0.81-0.90]). During the 16-year period, a statistically significant test for trend (P = .001) for increasing RT refusal was noted. RT refusal was associated with a significantly higher risk of death (MV hazard ratio, 1.59 [1.55-1.63]). CONCLUSIONS For patients with gynecologic malignancies diagnosed from 2004 to 2020, an increase in documented RT refusal is associated with decreased overall survival in all disease types. Targeted interventions aimed at mitigating potential sociodemographic barriers to receipt of RT are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darien Colson-Fearon
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rebecca Stone
- Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Akila N Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mrosk F, Doll C, Scheer J, Neumann F, Hofmann E, Kreutzer K, Voss J, Rubarth K, Beck M, Heiland M, Koerdt S. Oncologic Outcome in Advanced Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Refusal of Recommended Adjuvant Therapy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:1027-1033. [PMID: 37824130 PMCID: PMC10570914 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.3111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Importance Clinicians may be confronted with patients refusing recommended adjuvant therapy (AT) after the primary resection of an advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, for this tumor entity, data are lacking regarding the oncological outcomes and associated factors after refusal of AT. Objective To evaluate the difference in survival and disease recurrence for patients with and without recommended AT after resection of advanced OSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants In this single-center retrospective matched cohort study, patients with advanced OSCC who refused recommended AT between January 2010 and December 2021 were matched 1:1 according to Union for International Cancer Control tumor staging with patients who completed AT. Exposures Patients with advanced OSCC who refused or completed recommended AT between 2010 and 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome of this study was the comparison of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the 2 study groups. Results A total of 82 patients (mean [SD] age at time of surgery, 68.0 [11.3] years; 38 [46.3%] female, 44 [53.7%] male) with and without AT (41 per study group) were included in the analysis. Patients refusing AT developed more frequent disease recurrence than patients who completed AT (61.0% vs 26.8%; difference, 34.2%; odds ratio, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.68-10.84). In addition, patients who refused AT presented with lower 2-year OS (72.7% vs 88.6%; difference, 15.9%; 95% CI, 8.6%-40.6%) and much lower 2-year RFS (39.1% vs 74.2%; difference, 35.1%; 95% CI, 0.2%-70.5%). In the patient cohort who rejected AT, a worse OS was associated with female sex (48.6% vs 90.5%; difference, 41.9%; 95% CI, 0.6%-84.4%), pT1-2 category (57.1% vs 92.3%; difference, 35.2%; 95% CI, 3.3%-73.6%), and pN1 or higher category (61.2% vs 82.6%; difference, 21.4%; 95% CI, 14.1%-56.8%). Lower RFS was associated with female sex (37.9% vs 90.9%; difference, 53.0%; 95% CI, 8.0%-97.9%), advanced T category (pT3-4, 35.3% vs 80.0%; difference, 44.7%; 95% CI, 6.4%-95.3%), lymph node yield of 20 or greater (31.4% vs 80.6%; difference, 49.2%; 95% CI, 4.9%-93.4%), and lymph node ratio of less than 4.6% (36.6% vs 84.4%; difference, 47.8%; 95% CI, 1.8%-93.1%). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients with advanced OSCC, refusal of AT was associated with worse oncological outcomes. The prevalence of disease recurrence during follow-up was 34% higher in patients who refused AT than in patients who completed AT. The results from this study may assist clinicians in guiding patients who are considering refusal of or withdrawal from AT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friedrich Mrosk
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Doll
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Scheer
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Neumann
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena Hofmann
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kilian Kreutzer
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Voss
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rubarth
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Informatics, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Koerdt
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prasad A, Carey RM, Panara K, Rajasekaran K, Cannady SB, Newman JG, Brant JA, Brody RM. Nodal metastasis in surgically treated laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2023; 45:2303-2312. [PMID: 37403903 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of the neck in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is essential to oncologic control and survival. We aim to describe patterns and rates of clinical/pathologic lymph node disease, elective neck dissection (END), and occult lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with surgically-managed LSCC. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) diagnosed with LSCC between January 2004 and December 2016 who underwent primary surgery. RESULTS Seven thousand eight hundred and seventy-six patients met inclusion criteria. For cN0 patients, the rates of END and occult LNM both increased with tumor stage and were highest for supraglottic tumors. Predictors of occult LNM included supraglottic site, pathologic T3 and T4 stage, positive margins, and presence of lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The propensity for cervical LNM in surgically-managed LSCC varies based on primary tumor site and stage, and a variety of disease factors increase risk of occult LNM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman Prasad
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ryan M Carey
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Kush Panara
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Steven B Cannady
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jason G Newman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jason A Brant
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert M Brody
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah KV, Carey RM, Prasad A, Panara K, Rajasekaran K, Cannady SB, Brant JA, Brody RM. Postoperative Radiation Therapy Refusal in Major Salivary Gland Cancers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:577-588. [PMID: 36939552 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Major salivary gland cancers (MSGCs) are often treated with primary surgery followed by adjuvant therapy for high-risk pathology. Patients with these cancers may opt out of recommended postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for many reasons and consequently may suffer worse outcomes. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING National Cancer Database. METHODS Patients diagnosed with MSGC from 2004 to 2016 were identified, and overall survival and risk factors for refusal of recommended PORT were analyzed based on demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors. Multivariable logistic regression and a Cox model were used to conduct the analysis. RESULTS 211 out of 4704 qualifying patients (4.5%) refused recommended PORT. Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased PORT refusal for age >74 years (odds ratio OR 4.34, confidence interval [CI] [2.43-7.85]), Asian race (OR 2.25, CI [1.10-4.23]), and certain facility types (comprehensive cancer center, OR 2.39, CI [1.08-6.34]; academic research program, OR 3.29, CI [1.49-8.74]; and integrated network cancer program, OR 2.75, CI [1.14-7.7]). N2 stage was associated with decreased PORT refusal (OR 0.67, CI [0.45-0.98]). The 5-year overall survival for patients who received and refused PORT were significantly different at 65.8% and 53.8%, respectively (p < .001). When controlling for several factors, PORT refusal was independently associated with significantly lower overall survival (HR 1.54, CI [1.21-1.98]). CONCLUSION Patient refusal of recommended PORT in MSGC is rare, associated with various disease and socioeconomic factors, and may decrease overall survival. Our findings can assist clinicians in counseling patients and identifying those who may be more likely to opt out of recommended PORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keshav V Shah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ryan M Carey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Aman Prasad
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kush Panara
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Steven B Cannady
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jason A Brant
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert M Brody
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kshirsagar RS, Eide JG, Prasad A, Carey RM, Rajasekaran K, Brant JA, Newman JG, Palmer J, Adappa N. Determinants of Patient Refusal of Post-Operative Radiation Therapy in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 84:232-239. [PMID: 37187475 PMCID: PMC10171933 DOI: 10.1055/a-1780-4157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives
Although adjuvant radiotherapy may be indicated in patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) following primary surgery, some patients choose to forgo recommended post-operative radiation (PORT). This study aimed to elucidate factors associated with patient refusal of recommended PORT in SNSCC and examine overall survival.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of patients with SNSCC treated with primary surgery from the National Cancer Database diagnosed between 2004 and 2016. A multivariable logistic regression model was created to determine the association between clinical or demographic covariates and likelihood of PORT refusal. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank tests, and a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model were used to assess overall survival.
Results
2231 patients were included in the final analysis, of which 1456 (65.3%) were male and 73 (3.3%) refused recommended PORT. Patients older than 74 years old were more likely to refuse PORT than those younger than 54 (OR 3.43, 95% CI: 1.84-6.62). Median survival among the entire cohort, those that received recommended PORT, and those that refused PORT was 83.0 months (95% CI: 74.6-97.1), 83.0 months (95% CI: 74.9-98.2), and 63.6 months (95% CI: 37.3-101.4). Refusal of PORT was not associated with overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.69-1.42).
Conclusions
PORT refusal in patients with SNSCC is rare and was found to be associated with several patient factors. The decision to forgo PORT is not independently associated with overall survival in this cohort. Further study is required to determine the clinical implications of these findings as the treatment decisions are complex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rijul Sudhir Kshirsagar
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Jacob G Eide
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Aman Prasad
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Ryan M. Carey
- Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Jason A. Brant
- Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, United States
- Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Jason G. Newman
- Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - James Palmer
- Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Nithin Adappa
- Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| |
Collapse
|