Age and Comorbidities Impact Medical Complications and Mortality Following Free Flap Reconstruction

Reconstructive flap surgery in head and neck cancer patients: an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in postoperative radiotherapy

Background

Major advances have been made in reconstructive surgery in the last decades to reduce morbidity in head and neck cancer. Flaps are now present in 80% of patients with oral cavity cancer to cover anatomic, functional, and cosmetic needs. However, gaps in interdisciplinary innovation transfer from surgery to postoperative radiotherapy (poRT) remain challenging. We aimed to provide an interdisciplinary view of the challenges encountered by radiation oncologists in planning head and neck postoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

A systematic and critical review was conducted to address areas of optimization in surgery and radiology that may be relevant to poRT.

Results

Despite extensive surgical literature on flap techniques and salvage surgery, 13 retrospective series were identified, where flap outcomes were indirectly compared between surgery alone or poRT. These low-evidence studies suggest that radiotherapy accelerates flap atrophy, fibrosis, and osteoradionecrosis and deteriorates functional outcomes. Preliminary evidence suggests that tumor spread occurs at the flap-tissue junction rather than in the flaps. One prospective 15-patient study showed 31.3% vs. 39.2% flap volume reduction without or with poRT. In an international consensus, experts recognized the needs for optimized flap-sparing poRT against flap-related functional deterioration and bone damage. CT, MRI, and PET-CT modalities show potential for the delineation of the junction area between native tissues and flap for flap segmentation and to characterize flap-specific changes quantitatively and correlate them with patterns of relapse or complications.

Conclusion

Flap management in poRT is insufficiently documented, but poRT seems to damage flaps. Current gaps in knowledge underscore the need for prospective flap assessment and interdisciplinary trials investigating flap morbidity minimization by flap-sparing poRT planning.

Impact of comorbidities on immediate post-operative complications in oral cavity free flap patients

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between comorbidities and the development of immediate post-operative complications in patients undergoing oral cavity composite resection (OCCR) with free flap (FF) reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis was completed on all consecutive OCCRs with FF reconstruction performed at a single quaternary care facility between 1999 and 2020. Comorbidities, immediate post-operative complications, patient demographics, and tumor characteristics were collected. Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated for associations between comorbidities and immediate post-operative complications.

RESULTS

320 patients who underwent OCCR with FF reconstruction were included. One hundred twenty-one (37.8 %) patients developed a post-operative complication during their initial hospital admission. The most common complications were non-pneumonia cardiopulmonary events (14.1 %), pneumonia (9.4 %), and wound infection (8.4 %). Other complications included flap compromise, bleeding, and fistula. On multivariate analysis, patients without comorbid conditions were less likely to develop a post-operative complication (OR 0.64; 0.41-0.98). Atrial fibrillation (OR 2.94; 1.17-7.39) and cerebrovascular disease (OR 2.28; 1.08-4.84) were associated with increased odds of developing any complications. Furthermore, cerebrovascular disease (OR: 2.33; 1.04-5.39) and peripheral vascular disease (OR: 2.7; 1.2-6.08) were independently associated with pneumonia.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective review of patients undergoing OCCR with FF reconstruction for oral cavity SCC, lack of identifiable comorbidities appeared to be protective for post-operative complications while atrial fibrillation and cerebrovascular disease were associated with increased odds of any complication. Pre-existing vascular disease was also associated with an increased risk of pneumonia.

Factors Impacting Discharge Destination Following Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Determine which variables impact postoperative discharge destination following head and neck microvascular free flap reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected databases.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing head and neck microvascular free flap reconstruction between January 2010 and December 2019 (n = 1972) were included. Preoperative, operative and postoperative variables were correlated with discharge destination (home, skilled nursing facility [SNF], rehabilitation facility, death).

RESULTS

The mean age of patients discharged home was lower (60 SD ± 13, n = 1450) compared to those discharged to an SNF (68 SD ± 14, n = 168) or a rehabilitation facility (71 SD ± 14, n = 200; p < 0.0001). Operative duration greater than 10 h correlated with a higher percentage of patients being discharged to a rehabilitation or SNF (25% vs. 15%; p < 0.001). Patients were less likely to be discharged home if they had a known history of cardiac disease (71% vs. 82%; p < 0.0001). Patients were less likely to be discharged home if they experienced alcohol withdrawal (67% vs. 80%; p = 0.006), thromboembolism (59% vs. 80%; p = 0.001), a pulmonary complication (46% vs. 81%; p < 0.0001), a cardiac complication (46% vs. 80%; p < 0.0001), or a cerebral vascular event (25% vs. 80%; p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between discharge destination and occurrence of postoperative wound infection, salivary fistula, partial tissue necrosis or free flap failure. Thirty-day readmission rates were similar when stratified by discharge destination.

CONCLUSION

There was no correlation with the anatomic site, free flap donor selection, or free flap survival and discharge destination. Patient age, operative duration and occurrence of a medical complication postoperatively did correlate with discharge destination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:95-104, 2023.

Predictors of Health Care Utilization Following Major Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery in Older Patients

OBJECTIVE

To identify patient factors in older patients associated with making posttreatment visits in the first year after major head and neck oncologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Academic institution.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥60 years who underwent a neck dissection with or without a free flap reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, social variables, perioperative course, and clinical visits.

RESULTS

Within a 1-year postoperative period, the 181 patients in our cohort had a mean ± SD 6.37 ± 3.6 postoperative clinic visits; 70% attended at least 4 visits. Multivariable regression analysis showed a significant association with distance closer to the hospital (P = .013): for every 10-mile increase in distance, the number of visits decreased by 0.15 (SE = 0.06). Additionally, receiving adjuvant radiation therapy (P = .0096) demonstrated significant associations: when compared with no adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy had on average 1.5 (SE = 0.56) more visits, and chemoradiation had 0.04 (SE = 0.73) more visits.

CONCLUSION

Older patients who undergo major head and neck oncology surgery are more likely to attend posttreatment visits in the 1 year following surgery if they are discharged home rather than to a skilled nursing facility, live closer to the hospital, and undergo adjuvant radiation therapy.