Association Between Insurance Type and Outcomes of Reconstructive Head and Neck Cancer Surgery

A Nationwide Analysis of Head and Neck Fibromatoses

BACKGROUND

Head and neck fibromatoses (HNFs) are a rare, diverse group of soft tissue tumors characterized by an abnormal proliferation of fibroblasts. Available literature on these tumors is limited to case reports and small single-institutional studies.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to provide demographic, socioeconomic, tumor-related, and treatment characteristics of HNFs.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

The NCDB was queried for fibromatosis-related histologic codes located within the head and neck region. Various factors were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2016, 130 patients were included in the analyses. Average age was 57.4 years old with a predominance of White (83.6%) males (61.5%). Non-desmoid HNFs accounted for 60%-70% of the tumors. The salivary gland was the most common location (38.5%) and more than half of the tumors were high grade. The majority were treated surgically (90.8%) and 25% had positive margins. Mean and median overall survival (OS) were 98.9 and 135.4 months, respectively. Surgery is associated with better OS than nonsurgical alternatives. Addition of adjuvant treatments was not associated with differences in survival.

CONCLUSION

In the largest study to date, we describe demographic, socioeconomic, tumor-related, and treatment patterns of patients with this rare disease. These tumors are most frequently present in middle-aged males with high-grade histology. Most are treated surgically and positive surgical margins are common. Surgery has better OS than nonsurgical alternatives. While adjuvant radiation has become more common, we found no difference in survival compared to surgery alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:2228-2235, 2024.

Disparities in postoperative complications and perioperative events based on insurance status following elective spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Increasing evidence demonstrates disparities among patients with differing insurance statuses in the field of spine surgery. However, no pooled analyses have performed a robust review characterizing differences in postoperative outcomes among patients with varying insurance types.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search of the PUBMED, MEDLINE(R), ERIC, and EMBASE was performed for studies comparing postoperative outcomes in patients with private insurance versus government insurance. Pooled incidence rates and odds ratios were calculated for each outcome and meta-analyses were conducted for 3 perioperative events and 2 types of complications. In addition to pooled analysis, sub-analyses were performed for each outcome in specific government payer statuses.

Results

Thirty-eight studies (5,018,165 total patients) were included. Compared with patients with private insurance, patients with government insurance experienced greater risk of 90-day re-admission (OR 1.84, p<.0001), non-routine discharge (OR 4.40, p<.0001), extended LOS (OR 1.82, p<.0001), any postoperative complication (OR 1.61, p<.0001), and any medical complication (OR 1.93, p<.0001). These differences persisted across outcomes in sub-analyses comparing Medicare or Medicaid to private insurance. Similarly, across all examined outcomes, Medicare patients had a higher risk of experiencing an adverse event compared with non-Medicare patients. Compared with Medicaid patients, Medicare patients were only more likely to experience non-routine discharge (OR 2.68, p=.0007).

Conclusions

Patients with government insurance experience greater likelihood of morbidity across several perioperative outcomes. Additionally, Medicare patients fare worse than non-Medicare patients across outcomes, potentially due to age-based discrimination. Based on these results, it is clear that directed measures should be taken to ensure that underinsured patients receive equal access to resources and quality care.