Pharyngeal Squeeze Maneuver During Endoscopy-What Does it Tell Us?

Voice Meets Swallowing: A Scoping Review of Therapeutic Connections

PURPOSE

This scoping review aimed to explore the use of volitional voice tasks in assessing swallowing-related outcomes and to evaluate their therapeutic impact on swallowing disorders, including their effects on swallowing biomechanics.

METHOD

This scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A literature search was performed across multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus), and additional records were identified through manual searches. After screening and eligibility assessment, 36 studies were included for data extraction and analysis. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was employed to evaluate the quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

The review identified various volitional voice tasks, such as maximum phonation time and pitch glides, as potential assessment tools for predicting swallowing-related outcomes. Additionally, voice tasks targeting pitch modulation, increased vocal loudness, and squeezed voice quality showed promising therapeutic benefits for swallowing disorders across different populations, especially individuals with neurological conditions and head and neck cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

While methodological limitations were found in current literature, volitional voice tasks demonstrate potential as complementary tools for assessing and treating swallowing disorders, leveraging their interconnected neurological and biomechanical mechanisms underlying functions. Further research with more robust methodologies is needed to establish the efficacy of these integrated interventions, facilitate their translation into clinical practice, and test new possibilities.

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Proposed Checklist

PURPOSE

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is not only a well-recognized and ubiquitous tool in dysphagia research but also possesses features that make the assessment vulnerable to shortcomings in transparency and rigor in published literature. Therefore, FEES was considered an important addition to the Framework for RigOr aNd Transparency In REseaRch on Swallowing (FRONTIERS), a multisite collective effort to establish a tool for the critical appraisal of reporting in all forms of dysphagia and swallowing-related research on human subjects.

METHOD

From the FRONTIERS collective, a team of three clinician researchers completed a review of FEES-related literature to determine all components crucial for generalizable and reproducible reporting of FEES research. These components were developed and refined through an iterative process.

RESULTS

This review culminated in a 26-item series of "yes/no" questions, forming the FEES section of FRONTIERS. These questions are grouped into the following five components: (a) Equipment, (b) Rater(s), (c) Rating Process, (d) Outcome Metrics, and (e) Miscellaneous Factors.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review support that FEES possesses unique characteristics to other aspects of dysphagia research and is consequently a crucial addition to FRONTIERS to ensure that clinical researchers have access to critical appraisal of FEES-related research inquiry.

Contribution of Wireless Wi-Fi Intraoral Cameras to the Assessment of Swallowing Safety and Efficiency

BACKGROUND

Clinical evaluation of swallowing provides important clinical information but is limited in detecting penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue in patients with suspected dysphagia. Although this is an old problem, there remains limited access to low-cost methods to evaluate swallowing safety and efficiency.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this technical report is to describe the experience of a single center that recently began using a wireless Wi-Fi intraoral camera for transoral endoscopic procedures as an adjunct to clinical swallowing evaluation. We describe the theoretical structure of this new clinical evaluation proposal. We present descriptive findings on its diagnostic performance in relation to videofluoroscopic swallowing study as the gold standard in a cohort of seven patients with dysphagia following head and neck cancer. We provide quantitative data on intra- and interrater reliability. Furthermore, this report discusses how this technology can be applied in the clinical practice of professionals who treat patients with dysphagia and provides directions for future research.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary retrospective study suggests that intraoral cameras can reveal the accumulated oropharyngeal secretions and postswallow pharyngolaryngeal residue in patients with suspected dysphagia. Future large-scale studies focusing on validating and exploring this contemporary low-cost technology as part of a clinical swallowing evaluation are warranted.