The effect of increasing motor end-plate innervation on smile activation in acute and early facial palsy

While it has been over half a century since primary cross-facial nerve grafting was first described for facial reanimation, the outcome of this procedure, remains inconsistent and provide lesser smile excursion when compared to the likes of the masseteric nerve. However, the latter itself has limitations in terms of the lack of spontaneity and resting tone. While combinations have been attempted more proximally, we ask the question as to whether more distal nerve transfers with vascularized nerve grafts are a better option. In a retrospective review of clinical practice at our institute, 16 consecutive patients had single, double, and finally triple distal nerve transfers, close to the target facial muscle to reinnervate the motor endplates directly, over a 6-year period (2018-23). All patients had the onset of facial palsy within 18 months. Statistical analysis of the comparison between three sub-cohorts was performed using student's t-test and one-way ANOVA, respectively. Qualitatively, masseteric neurotization of a single facial nerve branch translated into smile improvement in 50% of cases, as opposed to all cases of double- and triple-neurotization of the smile muscles. In terms of upper lip elevation, single neurotization showed improvement in 25% of cases, double-neurotization in 40% of cases and triple-neurotization in 100% of cases. Upper lip elevation was also significantly better in those who had a vascularized cross-facial nerve graft (Student's t-test <0.05). In summary, increasing neural input to the motor endplates of smile muscles can significantly improve smile activation, in acute flaccid facial palsies.

Single-stage cross-facial nerve grafting has a result equivalent to that of two-stage cross-facial nerve grafting

BACKGROUNDS

Cross-face nerve grafting (CFNG) is an important treatment for patients with facial palsy. Currently, two-stage CFNG is frequently performed. CFNG is performed first, followed by coaptation when innervation reaches the grafted nerve ending. The present study compared single-stage CFNG with conventional two-stage CFNG.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 17 patients who underwent CFNG with zygomatic and buccal branch with hypoglossal crossover. Patients with single-stage (group 1) and two-stage (group 2) CFNG were comparatively analyzed 2 years postoperatively. There were nine and eight patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The patient's perioperative status was measured with imaging and animation using the Yanagihara grade, altitude, and angle differences of the oral commissure and eye closure.

RESULTS

Patients in group 1 could recognize their first postoperative spontaneous movement earlier than those in group 2 (268.3 ± 25.1 days vs. 327.5 ± 51.3 days, respectively, p = 0.015). The Yanagihara grade significantly improved for patients in both groups postoperatively (group 1: 12.8 ± 5.5 to 25.3 ± 6.1, p < 0.01; group 2: 12.4 ± 5.6 to 24.3 ± 5.0, p = 0.012). Height and angle difference of the oral commissure showed a significant improvement during resting and smiling in both groups. Eye closure also showed significant improvement in both groups (group 1: 4.1 ± 0.6 to 2.6 ± 0.5, p < 0.01; group 2: 4.0 ± 0.5 to 2.8 ± 0.7, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the postoperative improvement rate between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-stage CFNG shows results equivalent to those of two-stage CFNG. Single-stage CFNG is associated with a shorter treatment period and fewer operations.