Facial nerve repair utilizing intraoperative repair strategies

Polyethylene Glycol-Mediated Axonal Fusion Promotes Early Sensory Recovery after Digital Nerve Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve repair is limited by Wallerian degeneration coupled with the slow and inconsistent rates of nerve regrowth. In more proximal injuries, delayed nerve regeneration can cause debilitating muscle atrophy. Topical application of polyethylene glycol (PEG) during neurorrhaphy facilitates the fusion of severed axonal membranes, immediately restoring action potentials across the coaptation site. In preclinical animal models, PEG fusion resulted in remarkable early functional recovery.

METHODS

This is the first randomized clinical trial comparing functional outcomes between PEG fusion and standard neurorrhaphy. Participants with digital nerve transections were followed up at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was assessed using the Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) rating for sensory recovery at each time point. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and static 2-point discrimination determined MRCC ratings. Postoperative quality of life was measured using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Forty-eight transected digital nerves (25 control and 23 PEG) across 22 patients were analyzed. PEG-fused nerves demonstrated significantly higher MRCC scores at 2 weeks (OR, 16.95; 95% CI, 1.79 to 160.38; P = 0.008) and 1 month (OR, 13.40; 95% CI, 1.64 to 109.77; P = 0.009). Participants in the PEG cohort also had significantly higher average Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores at 2 weeks (Hodge g , 1.28; 95% CI, 0.23 to 2.30; P = 0.0163) and 1 month (Hodge g , 1.02; 95% CI, 0.04 to 1.99; P = 0.049). No participants had adverse events related to the study drug.

CONCLUSION

PEG fusion promotes early sensory recovery and improved patient well-being following peripheral nerve repair of digital nerves.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Facial Paralysis Recovery after Facial Nerve Injury: A Review on Preclinical and Clinical Studies

Various methods have been used to improve function and manage facial nerve injury. Although electrical stimulation therapy is frequently used to treat facial paralysis, its effects have been found to vary and no clear standards have been developed. The current review describes the results of preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy in promoting the recovery of a peripheral facial nerve injury. Evidence is presented showing the efficacy of electrical stimulation in promoting nerve regeneration after peripheral nerve injuries in both animal models and human patients. The ability of electrical stimulation to promote the recovery of facial paralysis was found to depend on the type of injury (compression or transection), the species of animal tested, the type of disease, the frequency and method of electrical stimulation, and the duration of the follow-up. Electrical stimulation, however, can also have potential negative outcomes, such as reinforcing synkinesis, including mistargeted axonal regrowth via inappropriate routes; excessive collateral axonal branching at the lesion site; and multiple innervations at neuromuscular junctions. Because of the inconsistencies among studies and the low quality of evidence, electrical stimulation therapy is not currently regarded as a primary treatment of facial paralysis in patients. However, understanding the effects of electrical stimulation, as determined in preclinical and clinical studies, is important for the potential validity of future research on electrical stimulation.

Effects of Electroactive materials on nerve cell behaviors and applications in peripheral nerve repair

Peripheral nerve damage can lead to loss of function or even complete disability, which bring about a huge burden on both the patient and society. Regulating nerve cell behavior and...