Prospective study on complications using different techniques for parotidectomy for benign tumors

Safety and Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Superficial Parotid Pleomorphic Adenoma

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with parotidectomy for superficial pleomorphic adenoma (PA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2022 to October 2023, 88 patients diagnosed with superficial parotid PA underwent either RFA (n = 12; mean age, 47.1 years) or parotidectomy (n = 76; mean age, 47.8 years). Patients in the RFA group were matched to those in the surgery group in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores based on age, sex, tumor volume, diameter, location, and comorbidities. Ultrasound characteristics, cosmetic scores (0-4), numerical rating scale scores (0-10), and complications were assessed before the procedures and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Outcomes were compared between baseline and follow-up in the RFA group and between the RFA and surgery groups.

RESULTS

In the RFA group, significant reductions in tumor volume were observed between baseline (median, 2.02 cm³) and the 1-month follow-up (median, 1.21 cm³; P = 0.015), between the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups (median, 0.53 cm³; P = 0.002), and between the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (median, 0.23 cm³; P = 0.003). The volume reduction ratios at 1, 3, and 6 months were 39.7%, 79.9%, and 88.0%, respectively. The cosmetic score was significantly lower at 3- and 6-month follow-up compared to baseline (median 1 and 1 vs. 4, P = 0.04). The numerical rating scale scores did not differ significantly from baseline throughout follow-up. In the propensity score-matched analysis (12 patients per group), RFA was associated with a shorter median procedure time (61.5 vs. 253.3 minutes; P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (0 vs. 4 days; P < 0.001), and lower cost (1859.9 vs. 3512.4 USD; P < 0.001) than parotidectomy, with no significant difference in overall complication rates (33.3% [4/12] vs. 41.7% [5/12]; P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

RFA may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery for superficial parotid PA, offering a shorter median procedure time, shorter hospital stay, and lower costs.

National Trends and Benchmarks for Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay in Parotidectomies

OBJECTIVE

The extent of parotidectomy for benign tumors has de-escalated in the United States. We aim to define modern benchmarks for operative time and hospital length of stay (LOS) in parotidectomy and identify risk factors that may prolong these benchmarks.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of all adults who underwent parotidectomy for a primary parotid neoplasm between January 2011 and December 2021 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

METHODS

The extent of parotidectomy was defined using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Prolonged operative time and LOS were defined as above the 75th percentile (longer than 194 minutes and more than 1 day, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient and surgical risk factors that predict prolonged operative time or LOS.

RESULTS

Benign parotidectomies are mostly performed as outpatient procedures in the United States (average LOS <1 day). Prolonged operative time was independently associated with malignant tumors versus benign tumors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-3.0), total parotidectomy with facial nerve sacrifice versus lesser extent of parotidectomy (aOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.7-3.0), and simultaneous reconstructive procedures versus none (P < .001 for all). These features were similarly independently associated with prolonged LOS (P < .001 for all). Complication rates were universally low.

CONCLUSION

The majority of superficial parotidectomies in this country are performed as outpatient procedures requiring <3 hours of operative time, with low complication rates. Malignant tumors, greater extent of parotidectomy, and simultaneous procedures were independently associated with prolonged operative time and LOS. These national benchmarks can inform operating room and hospital bed resource assignments.

Surgical management of benign tumors of the parotid gland: the advantages of extracapsular dissection compared to traditional surgical techniques

INTRODUCTION

Salivary gland tumors represent only 3%-6% of all head and neck neoplasms, and approximately 70% of these tumors are located in the parotid gland. Most of these tumors are found in the more abundant superficial portion of the parotid gland, lateral to the facial nerve (FN). For many years, the location of the facial nerve between the superficial and deep segments of the parotid gland hindered adequate tumor extirpation. Several surgical options are available for the treatment of benign tumors in the parotid gland, but there remains no universal agreement on what the optimal surgical treatment is. In the early twentieth century, tumor enucleation was the standard treatment for parotid tumors to preserve the facial nerve, but high recurrence rates were the main downside of this procedure. To improve the outcome, superficial parotidectomy (SP) was implemented, which involves excision of the entire lateral segment of the parotid gland, superficial to the facial nerve. However, this surgical procedure may lead to severe postoperative complications, including facial nerve paralysis, in a significant number of patients. In recent years, more gland-preserving techniques were developed to reduce complication rates and improve the safety of procedures and patients' satisfaction, without increasing the risk of recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This study compares our surgical experience with extracapsular dissection gland-sparing surgery (ECD) to traditional superficial parotidectomy in 56 patients who underwent surgery performed by the same surgical team.

RESULTS

The superiority of ECD procedures compared to SP procedures was shown as far as total complication rates are concerned. In this case, Fisher's exact test statistic value was 0.0043 (significant at P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ECD should be applied in properly selected cases and further prospective studies are needed to clarify the optimal indications.

A Six-Year Examination of the Influence of Surgical Technique and Intraoperative Intraglandular Clostridium Botulinum Toxin Application in Salivary Gland Tumor Operations

Introduction: Salivary gland tumor operations are associated with complications including facial nerve dysfunction (FND) and salivary fistula. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of extracapsular dissection (ECD) and the application of Clostridium botulinum toxin (CBT) in contrast to partial and lateral parotidectomy on complications. Methods: All salivary gland tumor operations performed within the last 6 years were retrospectively examined. Data were collected from electronic patient files from our otorhinolaryngology clinic. Total parotidectomies and submandibulectomies were not included in the analysis of CBT application. Results: In total, 418 cases were examined, including 84 (20%) malignant tumors. In total, 18 patients underwent ECD, 93 partial parotidectomy, 199 lateral parotidectomy, 76 total parotidectomy, and 32 submandibulectomy. The most common complication was transient FND (49%; n = 205; data available for 415 patients), which was measured at four days. Additional complications included salivary fistula (n = 56), infection (n = 49), bleeding or hematoma (n = 21). Preoperative facial nerve paralysis (p < 0.0001), pain (p < 0.0001), and a history of squamous cell skin carcinoma (SCC) (p < 0.001) were predictive of malignancy. The application of CBT did not reduce the risk of salivary fistula (p-value: 0.0182) and was associated with a higher combined complication rate (p-value: 0.0199). ECD was not associated with a lower likelihood for FND (p = 0.350). Conclusions: Preoperative pain, facial paralysis, or a history of SCC are predictors of malignancy. Use of CBT was not associated with a reduced risk of salivary fistula, but rather a higher complication rate.

Extracapsular Dissection Versus Traditional Parotid Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques and Outcomes

Parotid tumours, encompassing both benign and malignant forms, present significant challenges in surgical management. Traditional parotid surgery, including various forms of parotidectomy, has long been the standard approach, aiming for complete tumour removal while addressing potential complications such as facial nerve injury. However, extracapsular dissection (ECD) has emerged as an alternative technique, focusing on excising the tumour along with a thin layer of surrounding tissue, which may offer benefits in preserving healthy glandular tissue and reducing postoperative complications. This review comprehensively compares ECD and traditional parotid surgery techniques, evaluating their efficacy, outcomes, and associated complications. We analyse clinical studies and evidence to assess differences in tumour recurrence rates, facial nerve function preservation, and overall patient recovery. Additionally, the review explores the indications for each surgical approach, considering tumour characteristics and patient-specific factors. The findings suggest that while ECD may offer advantages in terms of reduced postoperative complications and improved preservation of glandular tissue, traditional parotidectomy remains a robust method for managing complex cases. This review aims to inform clinical decision-making by presenting a detailed comparison of both techniques, ultimately guiding surgeons in selecting the most appropriate approach for individual patients.

Facial nerve function training in patients with peripheral facial paralysis: an expert consensus

Facial nerve training can prevent facial expression muscle atrophy and promote the recovery of facial para-lysis in patients with peripheral facial paralysis. However, there is still a lack of specific and unified technical standards for facial nerve training, which results in a variety of clinical training methods and uneven levels. In order to standardize the application of facial nerve function training technology for nursing staff, the study convened relevant domestic experts, based on evidence-based combination with the disease characteristics of peripheral facial paralysis and expert clinical experience, conducted in-depth interviews with experts, expert correspondence and expert meetings, and finally formulated the expert consensus on facial nerve function training in patients with peripheral facial paralysis. Overall, suggestions for standardizing the timing, training methods, evaluation methods, health education and other aspects were provided for clinical reference.

Assessment of Parotid Gland Tumors by Means of Quantitative Multiparametric Ultrasound (mpUS)

OBJECTIVE

The preoperative diagnostical differentiation of parotid gland tumor (PGT) is not always simple due to several different entities. B-mode-ultrasound (US) remains the imaging modality of choice, while histopathology serves as the gold standard for finalizing the diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the use of multiparametric US (mpUS) in the assessment of PGT.

METHODS

We included 97 PGTs from 96 patients. A standardized mpUS protocol using B-mode-US, shear-wave elastography (SWE), and standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was performed prior to surgical intervention. SWE was assessed by real-time measurement conducting a minimum of five measurements, while quantitative CEUS parameters were assessed with a post-processing perfusion software.

RESULTS

SWE allowed differentiation between benign PGT (Warthin's Tumor (WT) paired with lymph nodes (LN) and pleomorphic adenoma (PA)), and WT and LN were softer compared to PA. WT showed lower velocities than squamous cell carcinoma (SCC): the most common malignant PGT. CEUS parameters showed significant group differences between WT and PA, WT and malignant lesions, WT and SCC, WT paired with LN versus PA, and WT paired with LN versus SCC.

CONCLUSION

MpUS seems to be beneficial in the assessment of PGT characterization, with benign PGT appearing to be softer in SWE than tumors with malignant tendencies. The quantitative CEUS parameter shows higher perfusion in WT than in PA, and malignant PGTs are less vascularized than WTs.

Tratamiento quirúrgico de la patología tumoral de la glándula parótida. Estudio descriptivo de 263 parotidectomías

Introducción y objetivo: Los tumores salivales representan el 3-10% de los tumores de cabeza y cuello, siendo el 75-80% de origen parotídeo y en su mayoría benignos. La parotidectomía es una técnica quirúrgica que consiste en la exéresis de la glándula parótida. Existen diversos tipos; parotidectomía superficial (PS), parotidectomía superficial parcial (PSP) y parotidectomía total (PT). En esta última, al no respetarse el nervio facial (NF), las complicaciones son más frecuentes. Nuestro objetivo es analizar el resultado (tasa de recidiva y complicaciones) de la parotidectomía como técnica quirúrgica empleada en el manejo de la patología parotídea, así como evaluar qué prueba complementaria es la más eficaz en el diagnostico prequirúrgico de la patología parotídea tumoral. Material y método: Se realiza un estudio retrospectivo incluyendo 263 pacientes tratados mediante PS o PT entre enero de 2004 y diciembre de 2020 en el Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada. Se registraron datos demográficos, tiempo de evolución de la lesión, pruebas complementarias, protocolo quirúrgico y complicaciones postoperatorias. Se analiza principalmente la correlación positiva entre las pruebas realizadas prequirúrgicas (PAAF, ecografía, TC y RMN), con el diagnóstico definitivo anatomopatológico obtenido tras examinar la pieza quirúrgica. También se describe la tasa de paresia y parálisis facial y otras complicaciones habidas. Resultados: Se incluyeron 263 pacientes tratados mediante parotidectomía. El tiempo de evolución medio de las lesiones parotídeas fue de 15 meses (DE 19.88). La sensibilidad de la PAAF en nuestro estudio fue de 68.7%. Se realizó ecografía en un 44.10% de los pacientes, TC en un 77.94% y RMN en un 15.20%, mostrando una sensibilidad de 18.05%, 31.21% y 45%, respectivamente. La cirugía más frecuente fue la PS (43.3%, 114/263), seguida por la PSP (41.1%, 108/263) y, por último, la menos habitual fue la PT (15.58%, 41/263). Los tumores benignos fueron más frecuentes (84.79%, 223/263), siendo el adenoma pleomorfo el más frecuente, 45.73% (102/223). Dentro del grupo de tumores malignos (15.20%, 40/263), el más habitual fue el carcinoma mucoepidermoide (17.5%, 7/40) y las metástasis (17.5%, 7/40). La paresia facial, según la escala de House-Brackmann, fue leve (grado I y II) y transitoria en la mayoría de los casos, apareciendo en un 31.55%. Tras un periodo medio de seguimiento de 6 años no se han encontrado recidivas post parotidectomía por ningún tipo tumoral en nuestro estudio. Conclusión: En nuestra muestra, los tumores benignos representaron la gran mayoría de la patología parotídea. Dentro de este grupo, el adenoma pleomorfo fue el más frecuente. La PAAF fue la prueba complementaria con mejor correlación con el diagnostico anatomopatológico definitivo, seguida por la RMN. La paresia facial leve (grados I y II) y transitoria fue la complicación postquirúrgica mas habitual.

Extracapsular dissection with a transparotid facial nerve dissection approach versus partial superficial parotidectomy for benign tumours in the tail of the parotid gland: a single-centre retrospective study of 89 patients

The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the transparotid facial nerve dissection approach (TFND), in which the intraparotid cervicofacial or temporofacial division is identified first through a superficial lobe incision; and (2) to compare extracapsular dissection with a TFND (ECD-TFND) with partial superficial parotidectomy with a retrograde approach (PSP) for benign tumours in the tail of the parotid gland with respect to surgical outcomes. Eighty-nine patients underwent PSP or ECD-TFND for benign tumours in the tail of the parotid gland: 49 were treated surgically with PSP and 40 with ECD-TFND. The mean ( ± standard deviation) surgical time did not differ significantly between the groups: 64 ± 22.4 min for PSP and 59 ± 19.8 min for ECD-TFND (P = 0.302). There was a significant difference in sialocele: 18 (36.7%) patients in the PSP group and four (10%) in the ECD-TFND group (P = 0.002). There was also a significant difference in facial nerve injuries: temporary paralysis was observed in 13 (26.5%) patients in the PSP group and two (5%) in the ECD-TFND group (P = 0.007). It appears that TFND is a viable and safe approach when performing ECD for benign tumours in the tail of the parotid gland. ECD-TFND should be preferred over PSP for benign tumours in the tail of the parotid gland.