1
|
Tessler I, Gecel NA, Glicksberg BS, Shivatzki S, Shapira Y, Zimlichman E, Alon EE, Klang E, Wolfovitz A. A Five-Decade Text Mining Analysis of Cochlear Implant Research: Where We Started and Where We Are Heading. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1891. [PMID: 38003940 PMCID: PMC10673015 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59111891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Since its invention in the 1970s, the cochlear implant (CI) has been substantially developed. We aimed to assess the trends in the published literature to characterize CI. Materials and Methods: We queried PubMed for all CI-related entries published during 1970-2022. The following data were extracted: year of publication, publishing journal, title, keywords, and abstract text. Search terms belonged to the patient's age group, etiology for hearing loss, indications for CI, and surgical methodological advancement. Annual trends of publications were plotted. The slopes of publication trends were calculated by fitting regression lines to the yearly number of publications. Results: Overall, 19,428 CIs articles were identified. Pediatric-related CI was the most dominant sub-population among the age groups, with the highest rate and slope during the years (slope 5.2 ± 0.3, p < 0.001), while elderly-related CIs had significantly fewer publications. Entries concerning hearing preservation showed the sharpest rise among the methods, from no entries in 1980 to 46 entries in 2021 (slope 1.7 ± 0.2, p < 0.001). Entries concerning robotic surgery emerged in 2000, with a sharp increase in recent years (slope 0.5 ± 0.1, p < 0.001). Drug-eluting electrodes and CI under local-anesthesia have been reported only in the past five years, with a gradual rise. Conclusions: Publications regarding CI among pediatrics outnumbered all other indications, supporting the rising, pivotal role of CI in the rehabilitation of children with sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing-preservation publications have recently rapidly risen, identified as the primary trend of the current era, followed by a sharp rise of robotic surgery that is evolving and could define the next revolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Idit Tessler
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
- ARC Innovation Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel; (E.Z.); (E.K.)
| | - Nir A. Gecel
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| | - Benjamin S. Glicksberg
- Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Shaked Shivatzki
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| | - Yisgav Shapira
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| | - Eyal Zimlichman
- ARC Innovation Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel; (E.Z.); (E.K.)
| | - Eran E. Alon
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| | - Eyal Klang
- ARC Innovation Center, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel; (E.Z.); (E.K.)
- Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Amit Wolfovitz
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan 52621, Israel (S.S.); (Y.S.); (E.E.A.); (A.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cullington HE, Jiang D, Broomfield SJ, Chung M, Craddock LC, Driver S, Edwards D, Gallacher JM, Jones LL, Koleva T, Martin J, Meakin H, Nash R, Rocca C, Schramm DR, Willmott NS, Vanat ZH. Cochlear implant services for children, young people and adults. Quality standard. Cochlear Implants Int 2023:1-13. [PMID: 37114384 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2023.2197344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H E Cullington
- University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - D Jiang
- Hearing Implant Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S J Broomfield
- West of England Hearing Implant Programme, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - M Chung
- Auditory Implant Department, Royal National ENT & Eastman Dental Hospitals, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - L C Craddock
- Midlands Hearing Implant Programme (Adult service), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - S Driver
- Hearing Implant Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Edwards
- Emmeline Centre for Hearing Implants, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - J M Gallacher
- Scottish Cochlear Implant Program, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - L Ll Jones
- North Wales Auditory Implant Service, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bodelwyddan, UK
| | - T Koleva
- Emmeline Centre for Hearing Implants, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - J Martin
- Cochlear Implant Programme, Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H Meakin
- Emmeline Centre for Hearing Implants, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - R Nash
- Cochlear Implant Programme, Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Rocca
- Hearing Implant Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D R Schramm
- University of Ottawa Auditory Implant Centre, Ottawa, Canada
| | - N S Willmott
- Auditory Implant Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, UK
| | - Z H Vanat
- Emmeline Centre for Hearing Implants, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Illg A, Lukaschyk J, Kludt E, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Billinger-Finke M. Do Not Go Gentle into That Deaf Night: A Holistic Perspective on Cochlear Implant Use as Part of Healthy Aging. J Pers Med 2022; 12:1658. [PMID: 36294797 PMCID: PMC9605441 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Research suggests that cochlear implant (CI) use in elderly people improves speech perception and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). CI provision could also prevent dementia and other comorbidities and support healthy aging. The aim of this study was (1) to prospectively investigate potential changes in HRQOL and speech perception and (2) to identify clinical action points to improve CI treatment. Participants (n = 45) were CI recipients aged 60-90 with postlingual deafness. They were divided into groups, according to age: Group 1 (n = 20) received a CI between the age of 60-70 years; group 2 (n = 25) between the age of 71-90 years. HRQOL and speech perception were assessed preoperatively, and three and twelve months postoperatively. HRQOL and speech perception increased significantly within one year postoperatively in both groups. No difference between groups was found. We conclude that CI treatment improves speech perception and HRQOL in elderly users. Improvement of the referral process for CI treatment and a holistic approach when discussing CI treatment in the elderly population could prevent auditory deprivation and the deterioration of cognitive abilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelika Illg
- German Hearing Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University Hannover, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Julia Lukaschyk
- German Hearing Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University Hannover, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Eugen Kludt
- German Hearing Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University Hannover, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Anke Lesinski-Schiedat
- German Hearing Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University Hannover, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Mareike Billinger-Finke
- German Hearing Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University Hannover, Karl-Wiechert-Allee 3, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- MED-EL GmbH, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kay-Rivest E, Schlacter J, Waltzman SB. Cochlear implantation outcomes in the older adult: a scoping review. Cochlear Implants Int 2022; 23:280-290. [PMID: 35774034 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2022.2091723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The current study aimed to identify and map the available evidence surrounding cochlear implantation (CI) in older adults. Five outcomes were evaluated: speech perception scores, perioperative complications, neurocognitive outcomes, quality of life outcomes and vestibular dysfunction and fall rates after surgery. METHODS A scoping review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews and included patients over the age of 60. RESULTS Ninety-seven studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 7,182 patients. Mean (SD) speech perception scores in quiet and in noise pre-and postoperatively were 7.9% (6.7) and 52.8% (14.3) and 8.0% (68.1) and 68.1% (15.9) respectively. Postoperative cardiac arrhythmias, urinary retention, and delirium occurred slightly more frequently in older adults. In terms of cognition, most studies noted stability or improvement one year after implantation. A majority of studies indicated better quality of life post-CI. Rates of fall after surgery were rarely reported, and there was a general paucity of data surrounding vestibular function changes after CI. DISCUSSION This scoping review identifies many positive outcomes linked to CI in older adults. No findings suggest a single patient characteristic that would warrant refusal to consider evaluation for cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Kay-Rivest
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamie Schlacter
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan B Waltzman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|