Reduction of thickened flap using fractional carbon dioxide laser

Decision Making in Nasal Reconstruction: When to Use the Forehead Flap?

In this review, the paramedian forehead flap indications and uses are reviewed, specifically examining clinical situations where patient selection is important. In these settings, a preoperative discussion with a patient regarding surgical expectations and goals in the setting of their defect is paramount. The authors review the literature regarding the psychosocial aspects of major nasal reconstruction and review preoperative discussion points that are key to a well-informed patient and improved patient satisfaction through the nasal reconstructive process.

Photobiomodulation combined with adipose-derived stem cells encapsulated in methacrylated gelatin hydrogels enhances in vivo bone regeneration

Reconstruction of bone defects is still a significant challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of application of photobiomodulation (PBM) to enhance in vivo bone regeneration and osteogenic differentiation potential of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) encapsulated in methacrylated gelatin (GEL-MA) hydrogels. Thirty-six Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly separated into 3 experimental groups (n = 12 each). The groups were control/blank defect (I), GEL-MA hydrogel (II), and ADSC-loaded GEL-MA (GEL-MA+ADSC) hydrogel (III). Biparietal critical sized bone defects (6 mm in size) are created in each animal. Half of the animals from each group (n = 6 each) were randomly selected for PBM application using polychromatic light in the near infrared region, 600-1200 nm. PBM was administered from 10 cm distance cranially in 48 h interval. The calvaria were harvested at the 20th week, and macroscopic, microtomographic, and histologic evaluation were performed for further analysis. Microtomographic evaluation demonstrated the highest result for mineralized matrix formation (MMF) in group III. PBM receiving samples of group III showed mean MMF of 79.93±3.41%, whereas the non-PBM receiving samples revealed mean MMF of 60.62±6.34 % (p=0.002). In terms of histologic evaluation of bone defect repair, the higher scores were obtained in the groups II and III when compared to the control group (2.0 for both PBM receiving and non-receiving specimens; p<0.001). ADSC-loaded microwave-induced GEL-MA hydrogels and periodic application of photobiomodulation with polychromatic light appear to have beneficial effect on bone regeneration and can stimulate ADSCs for osteogenic differentiation.

Outcomes and adverse effects of ablative vs nonablative lasers for skin resurfacing: A systematic review of 1093 patients

It is generally believed that ablative laser therapies result in prolonged healing and greater adverse events when compared with nonablative lasers for skin resurfacing. To evaluate the efficacy of ablative laser use for skin resurfacing and adverse events as a consequence of treatment in comparison to other modalities, a PRISMA-compliant systematic review (Systematic Review Registration Number: 204016) of twelve electronic databases was conducted for the terms "ablative laser" and "skin resurfacing" from March 2002 until July 2020. Studies included meta-analyses, randomized control trials, cohort studies, and case reports to facilitate evaluation of the data. All articles were evaluated for bias. The search strategy produced 34 studies. Of 1093 patients included in the studies of interest, adverse events were reported in a total of 106 patients (9.7%). Higher rates of adverse events were described in nonablative therapies (12.2% ± 2.19%, 31 events) when compared with ablative therapy (8.28% ± 2.46%, 81 events). 147 patients (13.4%) reported no side effects, 68 (6.22%) reported expected, transient self-resolving events, and five (0.046%) presented with hypertrophic scarring. Excluding transient events, ablative lasers had fewer complications overall when compared with nonablative lasers (2.56% ± 2.19% vs 7.48% ± 3.29%). This systematic review suggests ablative laser use for skin resurfacing is a safe and effective modality to treat a range of pathologies from photodamage and acne scars to hidradenitis suppurativa and posttraumatic scarring from basal cell carcinoma excision. Further studies are needed, but these results suggest that ablative lasers are a superior, safe, and effective modality to treat damaged skin.

Fractional carbon dioxide laser combined with intradermal injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma versus noncross-linked hyaluronic acid in the treatment of atrophic postacne scars: A split face study

BACKGROUND

Atrophic acne scarring is a common cosmetic problem that may affect 95% of patients with acne.

AIMS

The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of the fractional CO₂ laser combined with intradermal injection of PRP versus intradermal injection of noncross-linked hyaluronic acid in the treatment of different types of atrophic postacne scars.

METHODS

The study included 30 patients with postacne scars. All the patients received 3 treatments of fractional CO₂ laser combined with intradermal injection of PRP at one side of the face compared with intradermal injection of noncross-linked hyaluronic acid at the other side of the face. Efficacy of the treatment was assessed by the physician's clinical assessment using Goodman and Baron's qualitative and quantitative grading systems and histopathological evaluation from six participants.

RESULTS

The study included 30 patients ages ranging from 25 to 44 years old. There was a statistically significant reduction in the severity of acne scars on both sides after treatment using qualitative and quantitative Goodman and Baron. Histopathological evaluation showed an increase in the collagen and elastic fiber content in both modalities with a more favorable outcome in the PRP-treated side.

CONCLUSION

Both treatment modalities resulted in a significant clinical and histopathological improvement in atrophic postacne scar with insignificant difference between them.

Photobiomodulation with polychromatic light increases zone 4 survival of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of relatively novel approach of application of polychromatic light waves on flap survival of experimental musculocutaneous flap model and to investigate efficacy of this modality as a delay procedure to increase vascularization of zone 4 of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap.

METHODS

Twenty-one Wistar rats were randomized and divided into 3 experimental groups (n = 7 each). In group 1 (control group), after being raised, the TRAM flap was sutured back to its bed without any further intervention. In group 2 (delay group), photobiomodulation (PBM) was applied for 7 days as a delay procedure, before elevation of the flap. In group 3 (PBM group), the TRAM flap was elevated, and PBM was administered immediately after the flap was sutured back to its bed for therapeutic purpose. PBM was applied in 48 hours interval from 10 cm. distance to the whole abdominal wall both in groups 2 and 3 for one week. After 7 days of postoperative follow-up, as the demarcation of necrosis of the skin paddle was obvious, skin flap survival was further evaluated by macroscopic, histological and microangiographic analysis.

RESULTS

The mean percentage of skin flap necrosis was 56.17 ± 23.68 for group 1, 30.92 ± 17.46 for group 2 and 22.73 ± 12.98 for group 3 PBM receiving groups 2 and 3 revealed less necrosis when compared to control group and this difference was statistically significant. Vascularization in zone 4 of PBM applied groups 2 and 3 was higher compared to group 1 (P = 0.001). Acute inflammation in zone 4 of group 1 was significantly higher compared to groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.025). Similarly, evaluation of zone 1 of the flaps reveled more inflammation and less vascularization among the samples of the control group (P = 0.006 and P = 0.007, respectively). Comparison of PBM receiving two groups did not demonstrate further difference in means of vascularization and inflammation density (P = 0.259).

CONCLUSION

Application of PBM in polychromatic fashion enhances skin flap survival in experimental TRAM flap model both on preoperative basis as a delay procedure or as a therapeutic approach. Lasers Surg. 51:538-549, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Updates in forehead flap reconstruction of facial defects

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The versatile and reliable paramedian forehead flap is the workhorse interpolated flap for nasal reconstruction and its use has been expanded to reconstruct other areas of the face. The goal of this article is to review the recent research describing the modern concepts and techniques in forehead flap reconstruction of facial defects.

RECENT FINDINGS

A variety of forehead flap concepts, techniques, and applications have been described in the recent literature in both nasal and facial reconstruction. Recent concepts include the phenomenon of vascular delay as well as more detailed study of the perfusion of the forehead flap at its various stages. Novel techniques include various approaches in staged reconstruction, adoption of the forehead flap for reconstruction of internal lining defects, and flap thinning.

SUMMARY

Although basic principles of the forehead flap have remained unchanged over the years, specific techniques and applications continue to be refined. The forehead flap continues to be a mainstay in the armamentarium of facial plastic and reconstructive surgeons.

Ablative fractional resurfacing in topical drug delivery: an update and outlook

BACKGROUND

The effective delivery of therapeutic molecules to varied targets in the skin and elsewhere has been an area of ongoing research and development.

OBJECTIVE

To review the structure of the skin with an emphasis on topical drug delivery and to present the rationale for the use of ablative and nonablative fractional resurfacing in assisted drug delivery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Review of the currently available scientific literature on laser-assisted drug delivery.

RESULTS

A number of strategies can be employed to enhance topical drug delivery. Ablative fractional resurfacing (AFR) has been demonstrated to be effective in enhancing drug delivery. Further studies are needed to assess the use of nonablative fractional resurfacing in assisted drug delivery.

CONCLUSION

AFR-assisted drug delivery is a promising tool for the future of dermatology. We expect to see a number of agents to be paired with AFR for enhanced drug delivery. Further investigation is necessary to evaluate appropriate drug specific channel density and depth parameters. Factors that must be considered include the physicochemical properties of the drug, the target tissue, skin wounding, and cost when evaluating the drugs and conditions that will most benefit from this promising new drug delivery system.