Effects of early combinatorial treatment of autologous split-thickness skin grafts in red duroc pig model using pulsed dye laser and fractional CO2 laser

Autologous Meshed Graft Healing Within the Interstice versus Surrounding Adhered Split Thickness Skin Sites: Where Should Tissue Biopsies be Taken to Assess Tissue-Level Histoarchitecture?

INTRODUCTION

Meshed split thickness skin grafts are a common treatment for full thickness wounds because they allow for expansion of skin taken from a relatively small donor site. Meshed wound healing is not homogenous as sites that are in direct contact with the grafts display distinct healing characteristics compared to areas that are not in contact with the grafts, and this may affect study outcomes reliant on tissue biopsies. This study aims to characterize the differences between adhered split thickness skin (aSTS) sites and aSTS-free sites from tissue punch biopsies.

METHODS

Wounds were created in Duroc pigs and were excised down to subcutaneous tissue, split thickness skin graft was harvested, meshed, and was either applied to the prepared wound beds or wounds were left nongrafted. Full thickness punch biopsies (3 mm diameter) from either the aSTS area, aSTS-free, or nongrafted area were taken at each time point, processed, Hematoxylin and Eosin- or Herovici-stained, and imaged. Images were used to quantify histoarchitectural characteristics.

RESULTS

In the grafted wounds, epidermis formation and undulated rete ridge appendages were noticeable early in healing in aSTS sites. Dermal thickness was elevated in the aSTS-free and nongrafted wounds. Cellularity was greater in the aSTS-free compared to the aSTS sites. The aSTS site most closely resembled uninjured skin with respect to collagen types. Collagen fiber orientation was higher in the aSTS-free compared to the nongrafted sites (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that within a single grafted burn wound, healing is a heterogenous process. An improved understanding of the heterogeneity of healing wounds and timing of return to normal skin function in different areas will help researchers to conduct more nuanced histoarchitecture outcome-based translational research in preclinical and clinical trials.

Advancements in Acne Scar Treatment: Exploring Novel Therapies

BACKGROUND

Acne-induced scarring remains a formidable challenge, compelling patients to explore surgical interventions. This study aims to delve into and showcase recent strides in acne scar treatment, with a specific focus on innovative therapies.

METHODS

Conducting a narrative review spanning studies from 2013 to 2023, this paper provides a general overview of interventions. The review included English-language studies with full-text availability. Rigorous data screening and extraction by two independent authors covered diverse facets, including study particulars, participant profiles, measurement tools, intervention durations, outcomes, and key findings. The initial search was performed within PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the gray literature.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 26 studies meeting inclusion criteria were included and reviewed for final analysis.

CONCLUSION

Recognizing the varied nature of acne scars, this narrative review underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies, considering scar type and severity. The study also emphasizes the potential necessity of combining treatments for optimal results. Despite substantial progress, ongoing research and more extensive studies are imperative to continually refine acne scar treatment outcomes, ultimately enhancing the well-being of those affected by this condition.

Defining the Treatment Window: Early Versus Late Pulsed Dye Laser Therapy for Posttraumatic and Surgical Scars in Asian Patients

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study evaluates the effectiveness of pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment in early versus late treatment groups for traumatic or postoperative scars. The study aims to determine the threshold between early and late treatment. Additionally, it investigates factors that may influence wound healing outcomes.

METHODS

The medical records of 147 patients who underwent PDL treatment at our institution between January 2018 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients receiving PDL treatment for traumatic or postoperative scars. Out of these patients, we selected those who were willing to receive telephone interviews or re-visit at a scheduled time. Eventually, 52 participants were included in our study. A standardized questionnaire was administered to all participants during telephone interviews, encompassing inquiries regarding their medical history, treatment experiences, and the patient component of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Among the enrolled patients, 38 were contacted and interviewed via telephone, while the remaining 14 patients attended follow-up visits where photographs of their current skin condition were captured. The pretreatment and latest follow-up photographs obtained from the clinical database were independently scored in a blinded manner by two dermatologist reviewers using both the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Manchester Scar Scale.

RESULTS

Among the 52 patients, 43 (82.7%) were successfully treated with good response. The correlation coefficients between week-to-treatment initiation and posttreatment MSS and VSS among patients with good response were 0.50 (p < 0.001) and 0.46 (p = 0.002), respectively. Given these findings, we established a treatment initiation threshold of 10 weeks, distinguishing patients into early and late treatment groups. The early treatment group showed borderline significantly lower posttreatment MSS and VSS scores than the late treatment group (MSS: 7.5 ± 2.1 vs. 9.3 ± 2.5, p = 0.011; VSS: 2.8 ± 2.0 vs. 4.5 ± 2.3, p = 0.011). Furthermore, both MSS and VSS of posttreatment showed significantly greater improvement in the early treatment group (4.4 ± 1.6 vs. 3.2 ± 1.9; p = 0.03 and 3.8 ± 1.8 vs. 2.8 ± 1.4; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Early intervention using a PDL within 10 weeks post-injury achieved better outcomes in treating traumatic and postoperative scars based on both clinical and patient opinions.

Cold atmospheric plasma is bactericidal to wound-relevant pathogens and is compatible with burn wound healing

Burn wound healing can be significantly delayed by infection leading to increased morbidity and hypertrophic scarring. An optimal antimicrobial agent would have the ability to kill bacteria without negatively affecting the host skin cells that are required for healing. Currently available products provide antimicrobial coverage, but may also cause reductions in cell proliferation and migration. Cold atmospheric plasma is a partially ionized gas that can be produced under atmospheric pressure at room temperature. In this study a novel handheld Aceso Plasma Generator was used to produce and test Aceso Cold Plasma (ACP) in vitro and in vivo. ACP showed a potent ability to eliminate bacterial load in vitro for a number of different species. Deep partial-thickness and full-thickness wounds that were treated with ACP after burning, after excision, after autografting, and at days 5, 7, and 9 did not show any negative effects on their wound healing trajectories. On par with in vitro analysis, bioburden was decreased in treated wounds vs. control. In addition, metrics of hypertrophic scar such as dyschromia, elasticity, trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), and epidermal and dermal thickness were the same between the two treatment groups.It is likely that ACP can be used to mitigate the risk of bacterial infection during the phase of acute burn injury while patients await surgery for definitive closure. It may also be useful in treating wounds with delayed re-epithelialization that are at risk for infection and hypertrophic scarring. A handheld cold plasma device will be useful in treating all manner of wounds and surgical sites in order to decrease bacterial burden in an efficient and highly effective manner without compromising wound healing.

Scar Management and Dyschromia: A Summary Report from the 2021 American Burn Association State of the Science Meeting

Burn scars, and in particular, hypertrophic scars, are a challenging yet common outcome for survivors of burn injuries. In 2021, the American Burn Association brought together experts in burn care and research to discuss critical topics related to burns, including burn scars, at its State of the Science conference. Clinicians and researchers with burn scar expertise, as well as burn patients, industry representatives, and other interested stakeholders met to discuss issues related to burn scars and discuss priorities for future burn scar research. The various preventative strategies and treatment modalities currently utilized for burn scars were discussed, including relatively noninvasive therapies such as massage, compression, and silicone sheeting, as well as medical interventions such as corticosteroid injection and laser therapies. A common theme that emerged is that the efficacy of current therapies for specific patient populations is not clear, and further research is needed to improve upon these treatments and develop more effective strategies to suppress scar formation. This will necessitate quantitative analyses of outcomes and would benefit from creation of scar biobanks and shared data resources. In addition, outcomes of importance to patients, such as scar dyschromia, must be given greater attention by clinicians and researchers to improve overall quality of life in burn survivors. Herein we summarize the main topics of discussion from this meeting and offer recommendations for areas where further research and development are needed.

In Vitro, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo Approaches for Investigation of Skin Scarring: Human and Animal Models

Significance: The cutaneous repair process naturally results in different types of scarring that are classified as normal or pathological. Affected individuals are often affected from an esthetic, physical (functional), and psychosocial perspective. The distinct nature of scarring in humans, particularly the formation of pathological scars, makes the study of skin scarring a challenge for researchers in this area. Several established experimental models exist for studying scar formation. However, the increasing development and validation of newly emerging models have made it possible to carry out studies focused on different variables that influence this unique process. Recent Advances: Experimental models such as in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models have obtained different degrees of success in the reproduction of the scar formation in its native milieu and true environment. These models also differ in their ability to elucidate the molecular, cellular, and structural mechanisms involved in scarring, as well as for testing new agents and approaches for therapies. The models reviewed here, including cells derived from human skin and in vivo animal models, have contributed to the advancement of skin scarring research. Critical Issues and Future Directions: The absence of experimental models that faithfully reproduce the typical characteristics of the different types of human skin scars makes the improvement of validated models and the establishment of new ones a critical unmet need. The fields of wound healing research combined with tissue engineering have offered newer alternatives for experimental studies with the potential to provide clinically useful knowledge about scar formation.

Research trends and hotspot analysis of fractional carbon dioxide laser: A bibliometric and visualized analysis via Citespace

INTRODUCTION

There is limited basic research on carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) fractional laser, indicating blind spots in CO₂ fractional laser treatment of certain diseases. This study aimed to organize previous literature, summarize the current research, and speculate on possible future development.

METHODS

We searched document data on fractional CO₂ lasers from the Web of Science core collection database and retrieved 928 articles from 2004 to 2021. CiteSpace software was used to analyze the main institutions, authors, subject hotspots, and research frontiers in global CO₂ fractional laser research.

RESULTS

The results revealed that 928 related papers were published in the past 18 years (2004-2021), and the number has increased annually. The publications were written by 3239 authors from 626 institutions in 60 countries/regions. The United States (US) dominates this field (312 documents), followed by Italy (289), and South Korea (88). Lasers in Surgery and Medicine is the journal with the most publications and citations, and Uebelhoer is the central author. The main research hotspots include vulvovaginal atrophy, fractional photothermolysis, keloids, drug delivery, gene expressions, facial acne scarring, resurfacing, vitiligo, and photo damage.

CONCLUSION

Using CiteSpace, this paper draws a map of authors, institutions, and keywords in fractional CO₂ laser from 2004 to 2021; summarizes the main authors, institutions, research hotspots, and cutting-edge topics of global fractional CO₂ laser technology in recent years; and summarizes the current application status of global fractional CO₂ laser in disease treatment. It also provides new ideas for the future application and research of fractional CO₂ lasers.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Small and Large Animals in Burn Research: Proceedings of the 2021 Research Special Interest Group

Multiple animal species and approaches have been used for modeling different aspects of burn care, with some strategies considered more appropriate or translatable than others. On April 15, 2021, the Research Special Interest Group of the American Burn Association held a virtual session as part of the agenda for the annual meeting. The session was set up as a pro/con debate on the use of small versus large animals for application to four important aspects of burn pathophysiology: burn healing/conversion; scarring; inhalation injury; and sepsis. For each of these topics, 2 experienced investigators (one each for small and large animal models) described the advantages and disadvantages of using these preclinical models. The use of swine as a large animal model was a common theme due to anatomic similarities with human skin. The exception to this was a well-defined ovine model of inhalation injury; both of these species have larger airways which allow for incorporation of clinical tools such as bronchoscopes. However, these models are expensive and demanding from labor and resource standpoints. Various strategies have been implemented to make the more inexpensive rodent models appropriate for answering specific questions of interest in burns. Moreover, modelling burn-sepsis in large animals has proven difficult. It was agreed that the use of both small and large animal models have merit for answering basic questions about the responses to burn injury. Expert opinion and the ensuing lively conversations are summarized herein, which we hope will help inform experimental design of future research.

A Systematic Review Comparing Animal and Human Scarring Models

Introduction

A reproducible, standardised model for cutaneous scar tissue to assess therapeutics is crucial to the progress of the field. A systematic review was performed to critically evaluate scarring models in both animal and human research.

Method

All studies in which cutaneous scars are modelling in animals or humans were included. Models that were focused on the wound healing process or those in humans with scars from an existing injury were excluded. Ovid Medline^® was searched on 25 February 2019 to perform two near identical searches; one aimed at animals and the other aimed at humans. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts for study selection. Full texts of potentially suitable studies were then obtained for analysis.

Results

The animal kingdom search yielded 818 results, of which 71 were included in the review. Animals utilised included rabbits, mice, pigs, dogs and primates. Methods used for creating scar tissue included sharp excision, dermatome injury, thermal injury and injection of fibrotic substances. The search for scar assessment in humans yielded 287 results, of which 9 met the inclusion criteria. In all human studies, sharp incision was used to create scar tissue. Some studies focused on patients before or after elective surgery, including bilateral breast reduction, knee replacement or midline sternotomy.

Discussion

The rabbit ear scar model was the most popular tool for scar research, although pigs produce scar tissue which most closely resembles that of humans. Immunodeficient mouse models allow for in vivo engraftment and study of human scar tissue, however, there are limitations relating to the systemic response to these xenografts. Factors that determine the use of animals include cost of housing requirements, genetic traceability, and ethical concerns. In humans, surgical patients are often studied for scarring responses and outcomes, but reproducibility and patient factors that impact healing can limit interpretation. Human tissue use in vitro may serve as a good basis to rapidly screen and assess treatments prior to clinical use, with the advantage of reduced cost and setup requirements.

Molecular Features of Hypertrophic Scars After Thermal Injury: Is There a Biologic Basis for Laser Therapy?

Significance: Hypertrophic scars (HTS) and keloids are common after thermal injuries and other trauma to deep regions of dermis of the skin. These abnormal scars can cause contractures and the thick masses of scar tissue that result in functional and cosmetic impairment. Management of these dermal fibrotic conditions includes a wide range of medical and surgical treatments, which can be time consuming, only partially effective, and often uncomfortable for patients. Recent Advances: The molecular pathophysiology of HTS has become more understood over the past two decades, where thermal injury to the reticular dermis results in an inflammatory response, fibrogenic growth factor release, and the formation of a dermal scar with increased collagen and proteoglycan composition in an abnormal morphology. Lasers are becoming a widely used form of treatment for these types of scars; however, the evidence for the beneficial effects of laser treatments and the understanding of their mechanism of action are still evolving. Critical Issues: Paradoxically, laser delivery of thermal energy to the skin is suggested to improve scar remodeling and wound healing, yet HTS is a well-recognized complication of excessive thermal energy delivered by laser treatments. This review aims to examine the current evidence for the use of lasers for HTS, and to investigate the molecular mechanisms where re-injury of a burn scar from laser treatment could result in overall improvements in scar quality. Future Directions: Improved design of clinical trials for the treatment of scarring in the future will evolve from new methodology and models of HTS in animals and humans.

Early Laser for Burn Scars (ELABS): protocol for a multi-centre randomised, controlled trial of both the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the treatment of hypertrophic burn scars with Pulsed Dye Laser and standard care compared to standard care alone [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

This paper outlines the protocol for a study that is being carried out at multiple centres across the UK in the next three years. It is a Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) study funded by the National Institute for Healthcare Research (NIHR). The aim is to assess the effectiveness of treating hypertrophic burns scars with pulsed dye laser (PDL) at an early stage of scar formation. The objective is to improve Quality of Life for the patient by improving both the appearance and quality of burn scarring, as well as reducing its psychological impact. This is a parallel-arm randomised, controlled trial to compare PDL and standard care against standard care alone. The difference is measured between baseline and six-month follow-up. Recruits are within three months of healing from a burn injury; with wounds showing a defined potential for hypertrophic scarring. A total of 120 patients are recruited in a multi-centre study; with randomisation in a 1:1 allocation to each arm. The treatment arm receives 3 PDL treatments at six-week intervals in addition to standard care, whereas the control arm receives standard care alone. The primary outcome is the patient-rated part of the Patient and Observer Scar Scale (POSAS). Psychological and psycho-social impact is evaluated using the CARe burn scale (UWE, Bristol) and Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) is determined using the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). The study evaluates both the cost-effectiveness through an economic analysis and the patient-reported experience of the treatment by phone interviews.

A Pilot Study of Negative Pressure Therapy with Autologous Skin Cell Suspensions in a Porcine Model

BACKGROUND

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an option for securing meshed split thickness skin grafts (mSTSGs) after burn excision to optimize skin graft adherence. Recently, the use of autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) has been approved for use in the treatment of burn injuries in conjunction with mSTSGs.To date, limited data exists regarding the impact of NPWT on healing outcomes when the cellular suspension is utilized. It was hypothesized that NPWT would not negatively impact wound healing of ASCS+mSTSG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A burn, excision, mSTSG, ASCS ± NPWT model was used. Two Duroc pigs were utilized in this experiment, each with 2 sets of paired burns. Four wounds received mSTSG+ASCS+NPWT through post-operative day 3, and 4 wounds received mSTSG+ACSC+ traditional ASCS dressings. Cellular viability was characterized prior to spraying. Percent re-epithelialization, graft-adherence, pigmentation, elasticity, and blood perfusion and blood vessel density were assessed at multiple time points through 2 weeks.

RESULTS

All wounds healed within 14 days with minimal scar pathology and no significant differences in percent re-epithelialization between NPWT, and non-NPWT wounds were observed. Additionally, no differences were detected for pigmentation, perfusion, or blood vessel density. NPWT treated wounds had less graft loss and improved elasticity, with elasticity being statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest the positive attributes of the cellular suspension delivered are retained following the application of negative pressure. Re-epithelialization, revascularization, and repigmentation are not adversely impacted. The use of NPWT may be considered as an option when using ASCS with mSTSGs for the treatment of full-thickness burns.

Recent Advances in Experimental Burn Models

Experimental burn models are essential tools for simulating human burn injuries and exploring the consequences of burns or new treatment strategies. Unlike clinical studies, experimental models allow a direct comparison of different aspects of burns under controlled conditions and thereby provide relevant information on the molecular mechanisms of tissue damage and wound healing, as well as potential therapeutic targets. While most comparative burn studies are performed in animal models, a few human or humanized models have been successfully employed to study local events at the injury site. However, the consensus between animal and human studies regarding the cellular and molecular nature of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), scarring, and neovascularization is limited. The many interspecies differences prohibit the outcomes of animal model studies from being fully translated into the human system. Thus, the development of more targeted, individualized treatments for burn injuries remains a major challenge in this field. This review focuses on the latest progress in experimental burn models achieved since 2016, and summarizes the outcomes regarding potential methodological improvements, assessments of molecular responses to injury, and therapeutic advances.

Effects of combined Pulsed Dye Laser and Fractional CO2 Laser treatment of burn scars and correlation with plasma levels of collagen type I, MMP-2 and TIMP-1

Hypertrophic burn scars remain a significant burden for patients and a challenge for clinicians.

THE AIM

Assessement of the efficacy of combined Pulsed Dye Laser and Ablative Fractional CO₂ Laser therapy on hyperthophic scars and correlation with plasma levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1 and alpha-1 type I collagen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty five pediatric subjects were enrolled into the study. Control group consisted of age-matched subjects admitted for surgical repair of inguinal hernia. For the assessment of the results of laser treatment we used the Vancouver scar scale (VSS), and Patient-Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). We also correlated clinical results with plasma levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1 and alpha-1 type I collagen.

RESULTS

All subjects reported the laser treatment resulted in improvement and were somewhat satisfied or very satisfied with their experience. No adverse events were reported. The levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1 and alpha-1 type I collagen in our patients with scars before laser threatment were higher in comparison to controls. We also found statistically significant decrease in the levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1 and alpha-1 type I collagen after laser treatment of burn scars CONCLUSIONS: Our study clearly shows that combined CO2-AFL treatment for burn scars improve texture, colour, function and alleviate pruritus. We believe that decrease in the levels of MMP-2, TIMP-1 and alpha-1 type I collagen after laser treatment of burn scars, reflects reduced dynamic of scar.

Fractional CO2 laser ablation of porcine burn scars after grafting: Is deeper better?

INTRODUCTION

Fractional CO₂ lasers have been used in clinical settings to improve scarring following burn injury. Though used with increasing frequency, the appropriate laser settings are not well defined and overall efficacy of this therapy has not been definitively established. As it has been proposed that for thick hypertrophic scars proportionally greater fluence and thus deeper ablation into the scar tissue would be most effective, the goal of this study was to examine the role of ablation depth on scar outcomes in a highly-controlled porcine model for burn scars-after grafting.

METHODS

Properties of laser ablated wells were quantified on ex vivo pig skin as a function of laser energy (20, 70 or 150mJ). Full-thickness burn wounds were created on the dorsum of red Duroc pigs with the eschar excised and grafted with a split-thickness autograft meshed and expanded 1.5:1. After four weeks of healing, sites were treated with either 20, 70, or 150mJ pulse energy from a fractional CO₂ laser at 5% density or left untreated as a control. Sites were treated every four weeks with three total sessions. Scar area, pigmentation, erythema, roughness, histology, and biomechanics were evaluated prior to each laser treatment at day 28, 56, and 83, as well as four weeks after the final laser treatment, day 112. Additional biopsies were collected at day 112 for gene expression analysis.

RESULTS

The depth of the laser ablated wells increased with increasing pulse energy while the width of the wells was smaller in the 20mJ group and not significantly different in the 70 and 150mJ groups. Scar properties (area, color, biomechanics) were not significantly altered by laser therapy at any of the laser energies tested versus controls. Average scar roughness was improved by laser therapy in a dose dependent manner with scars treated with 150mJ of energy having the smoothest surface; however, these changes were not statistically significant. Assessment of matrix metalloproteinase 9 gene expression showed a slight upregulation in scars treated with 70 or 150mJ versus control scars and scars treated with 20mJ pulse energy.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that the properties of the ablative well (depth and width) are not linearly correlated with laser pulse energy, with only a small increase in well depth at energies between 70 and 150mJ. Overall, the study suggests that there is little difference in outcomes as a function of laser energy. Fractional CO₂ laser therapy did not result in any statistically significant benefit to scar properties assessed by quantitative, objective measures, thus highlighting the need for additional clinical investigation of laser therapy efficacy with non-treated controls and objective measures of outcome.

Incorporation of 3D stereophotogrammetry as a reliable method for assessing scar volume in standard clinical practice

Significant disfigurement and dysfunction is caused by hypertrophic scarring, a prevalent complication of burn wounds. A lack of objective tools in the assessment of scar parameters makes evaluation of scar treatment modalities difficult. 3D stereophotogrammetry, obtaining measurements from 3D photographs, represents a method to quantitate scar volume, and a 3D camera may have use in clinical practice. To validate this method, scar models were created and photographed with a 3D camera. Measurements from 3D image analysis of these scar models were compared to physical measurements of scar model volume. Reliability of 3D image analysis was assessed with both scar models and burn patient scars. Measurements of scar models by two independent observers were compared to determine inter-rater reliability, and measurements from 3D images of burn patient hypertrophic scars were compared to determine the consistency of the method between observers. The time taken for patient photography was recorded. No significant differences were found between the two methods of volume calculation (p = 0.89), and a plot of the differences showed agreement between the methods. The correlation coefficient between the two observers' measurements of scar model volume was 0.92, and the intra-class correlation coefficient for patient scar volume was 0.998, showing good reliability. The time required to capture 3D photographs ranged from 2 to 6 min per patient, showing the potential for this tool to be efficiently incorporated into clinical practice. 3D stereophotogrammetry is a valid method to reliably measure scar volume and may be used to objectively measure efficacy of scar treatment modalities to track scar development and resolution.

Role of Early Application of Pressure Garments following Burn Injury and Autografting

BACKGROUND

Pressure garment therapy, used for reduction of postburn scarring, is commonly initiated after complete healing of the wound or autograft. Although some clinicians have suggested that earlier treatment may improve outcomes, the effect of early initiation of therapy has not been studied in a controlled environment.

METHODS

Full-thickness burns were created on red Duroc pigs, burn eschar was excised, and the wound bed was grafted with split-thickness autografts. Grafts were treated with pressure garments immediately, 1 week (early), or 5 weeks (delayed) after grafting with nontreated grafts as controls. Scar morphology, biomechanics, and gene expression were measured at multiple time points up to 17 weeks after grafting.

RESULTS

Grafts that received pressure within 1 week after grafting exhibited no reduction in engraftment rates. Immediate and early application of pressure resulted in scars with decreased contraction, reduced scar thickness, and improved biomechanics compared with controls. Pressure garment therapy did not alter expression of collagen I, collagen III, or transforming growth factor β1 at the time points investigated; however, expression of matrix metalloproteinase 1 was significantly elevated in the immediate pressure garment therapy group at week 3, whereas the delayed pressure garment therapy and control groups approached baseline levels at this time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Early application of pressure garments is safe and effective for reducing scar thickness and contraction and improving biomechanics. This preclinical study suggests that garments should be applied as soon as possible after grafting to achieve greatest benefit, although clinical studies are needed to validate the findings in humans.

Beneath the Surface: A Review of Laser Remodeling of Hypertrophic Scars and Burns

Significance: Hypertrophic scars, keloids, and burn injuries of the skin have a significant impact on patients' lives and impact the health care system tremendously. Treating skin wounds and lesions can be challenging, with a variety of choices available for treatment. Scar and burn managements range from invasive, surgical options such as scar excision to less invasive, nonsurgical alternatives such as laser therapy or topical drug application. Recent Advances: Laser treatment has become increasingly popular, with a growing body of research supporting its use for scars and burns. Numerous methods are available for the treatment of these skin diseases, including different nonsurgical laser therapies. Critical Issues: To date, the optimal treatment method for scars, keloids, and burn injuries of the skin has not yet been established, although it is an area of increasing clinical concern. Future Directions: This review provides an updated summary of the treatment of scars and burn wounds of the skin using different laser treatments, including the most recent technologies. It addresses their indications, mechanisms of action, differences, efficacies, and complications.