A split-body study evaluating the efficacy of a conformable surface cryolipolysis applicator for the treatment of male pseudogynecomastia

Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Simultaneous Bilateral Cryolipolysis Using a Rapid Cycling Contoured Cup Applicator for Noninvasive Fat Reduction in the Enlarged Male Breast: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

A previous study using a parallel cooling plate cryolipolysis applicator demonstrated the efficacy of cryolipolysis for pseudogynecomastia. Although the procedure was safe and effective, treatment times were prolonged and anesthetic was needed to reduce treatment discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of a short cycle, reduced vacuum contoured cup cryolipolysis applicator for the treatment of pseudogynecomastia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve male subjects received simultaneous bilateral treatment consisting of a 35-minute cryolipolysis cycle, followed by a short manual massage, and a second 35-minute cycle with 50% treatment area overlap in a single treatment visit. At the 6-week follow-up, a second treatment was performed with up to 2 overlapping cycles per side. Efficacy was assessed after the second treatment using transcutaneous ultrasound, standardized clinical photography, and subject surveys.

RESULTS

Ultrasound analysis showed a mean fat layer reduction of 5.1 ± 2.3 mm (p < .001). Blinded, independent reviewers correctly identified 97% of baseline/treatment photography results. Surveys revealed 100% subject satisfaction with 91% reporting visible fat reduction and 100% stating they would recommend treatment. Transient side effects included mild intratreatment discomfort, paresthesia, and tenderness.

CONCLUSION

A rapid cycling, reduced vacuum cryolipolysis applicator provides rapid, safe, effective, and tolerable treatment of pseudogynecomastia.

Feasibility Study of Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation and Cryolipolysis for Abdominal Contouring

BACKGROUND

In addition to reducing subcutaneous fat for body contouring, some patients are interested in toning the underlying muscle layer.

OBJECTIVE

This feasibility study evaluated the safety and efficacy of electromagnetic muscle stimulation (EMMS) alone, cryolipolysis alone, and cryolipolysis with EMMS for noninvasive contouring of abdomen.

METHODS

Abdomens of 50 subjects were treated in a study with 3 cohorts: EMMS alone, Cryolipolysis alone, and Cryolipolysis + EMMS in combination. Electromagnetic muscle stimulation treatments were delivered in 4 sessions over 2 weeks. Cryolipolysis treatments were delivered in one session. Combination treatments consisted of one cryolipolysis and 4 EMMS visits. Efficacy was assessed by independent physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), circumferential measurement, Subject GAIS (SGAIS), and Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ).

RESULTS

Safety was demonstrated for all study cohorts with no device- or procedure-related adverse events. Independent photo review showed greatest mean GAIS score for the Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, then EMMS only cohort. BSQ showed greatest average score increase for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only cohort, then EMMS only cohort. Mean circumferential reduction measurements were greatest for Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohort followed by Cryolipolysis only, and then EMMS only cohort. The mean SGAIS improvement score was equal for the Cryolipolysis only and Cryolipolysis + EMMS cohorts, followed by the EMMS only cohort.

CONCLUSION

A multimodal approach using cryolipolysis and EMMS was safe and demonstrated enhanced body contouring efficacy for this feasibility study.

Cryolipolysis (CLL) for Reduction of Localized Subcutaneous Fat: Review of the Literature and an Evidence-Based Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, cryolipolysis (CLL), a noninvasive approach based upon the inherent sensitivity of adipocytes to cold injury, has emerged. However, it is not clear whether available evidence to date about its efficacy justifies aggressive marketing and extensive widespread application by many practitioners without well-defined indications or objectives of treatment. The current review is intended to evaluate available evidence regarding CLL mechanisms of action and its efficacy not only in fat reducing but also in its ability to result in an aesthetically optimal outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus computerized medical bibliographic database was conducted with the search terms "cryolipolysis," "lipocryolysis," and "cool sculpting." Selection criteria included all matched reports with the search terms in their titles.

RESULTS

Thirty-two reports matched the inclusion criteria of this review. Five experimental studies were identified and included to further supplement the discussion.

CONCLUSION

Most reports about CLL included in this review lacked rigorous scientific methodology in study design or in outcome measurement. Serious concerns about integrity of many of these reports, particularly with respect to validity of photographic outcome documentation in addition to objectivity, conflict of interest issues, and commercial bias, have been expressed. Further research should be encouraged to prove with methodological rigor positive effects of this treatment modality and to determine categories of patients in whom most favorable outcomes might be expected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Cryolipolysis for local fat reduction in adults from Brazil: A single-arm intervention study

BACKGROUND

Localized fat is a matter of great concern among individuals from today's society. Cryolipolysis is a noninvasive technique that have shown great results in reducing localized fat.

AIMS

To analyze the efficacy of cryoplipolysis on visible local fat reduction in submental region, arms, or male breast (pseudogynecomastia) in Brazilian subjects, and to assess possible factors associated with treatment success.

METHODS

Single-arm, nonrandomized trial, with volunteers from both genders with visible excess fat in the arms or submental region or men presenting pseudogynecomastia. Eligible subjects were submitted to physical, photographic, and ultrasound analysis before and three months after intervention. A single cryolipolysis session was performed using specific methods for each region, followed by a local massage for two minutes. Data were described as measures of central tendency and dispersion and measures of frequency. Reduction in measurements and factors associated with treatment success was analyzed using appropriate statistical tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects underwent one session of cryolipolysis in each area (22 subjects treated the arms, 20 the submental region and 9 the breast). In general, a mean reduction of 19.1% was observed. Significant differences were observed for almost all body parts analyzed. Body mass index was the only variable showing a significant relationship with intervention results.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryolipolysis is a useful noninvasive tool in reduction of visible localized fat in arms and submental region and of pseudogynecomastia. Obese subjects are not benefited by the treatment.