1
|
Shingina A, Mukhtar N, Wakim-Fleming J, Alqahtani S, Wong RJ, Limketkai BN, Larson AM, Grant L. Acute Liver Failure Guidelines. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1128-1153. [PMID: 37377263 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare, acute, potentially reversible condition resulting in severe liver impairment and rapid clinical deterioration in patients without preexisting liver disease. Due to the rarity of this condition, published studies are limited by the use of retrospective or prospective cohorts and lack of randomized controlled trials. Current guidelines represent the suggested approach to the identification, treatment, and management of ALF and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence was reviewed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation process to develop recommendations. When no robust evidence was available, expert opinions were summarized using Key Concepts. Considering the variety of clinical presentations of ALF, individualization of care should be applied in specific clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Shingina
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nizar Mukhtar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jamilé Wakim-Fleming
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Ohio, USA
| | - Saleh Alqahtani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Liver Transplantation Unit, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Robert J Wong
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, Gastroenterology Section, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | - Anne M Larson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lafaine Grant
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kathawate RG, Ibeabuchi T, Abt PL, Bittermann T. Utilization and outcomes of rescue hepatectomy among U.S. liver retransplant candidates. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14890. [PMID: 36544328 PMCID: PMC9911400 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The frequency and outcomes of anhepatic patients listed for transplantation in the United States have not been studied. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) records anhepatic status for patients listed as Status 1A for hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) or primary non-function (PNF). METHODS Using the UNOS database from 2005 to 2020, demographics and waitlist outcomes of anhepatic candidates relisted as Status 1A for HAT or PNF were assessed. RESULTS Among 1364 adult Status 1A patients relisted for PNF or HAT across 120 distinct transplant centres, 75 (5.5%) patients were anhepatic and 1289 (94.5%) were non-anhepatic. A substantial number of centres (n = 51) had experience with ≥1 anhepatic patient relisted for either PNF or HAT, with individual centre rates ranging from 0% to 11.4%. Waitlist mortality was more than twice as high for anhepatic patients: 42.5% versus 17.0% non-anhepatic patients (p < .001). The post-transplant outcomes of anhepatic patients were markedly inferior to non-anhepatic patients. For example, 41.9% of anhepatic patients died during the index admission versus 23.4% of the non-anhepatic group (p = .006). Patient survival for the anhepatic and non-anhepatic groups was 48.3% versus 66.2% at 1-year and 29.3% versus 46.2% at 5-years, respectively (log-rank test for overall survival p = .014). CONCLUSIONS Rescue hepatectomy after initial liver transplantation is not only associated with high waitlist mortality, but also markedly worse post-transplant outcomes. With less than half of anhepatic patients surviving to the first year post-LT, further research is warranted to better delineate which patients should be considered for rescue hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranganath G. Kathawate
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Tobenna Ibeabuchi
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter L. Abt
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Therese Bittermann
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Severe allograft dysfunction, as opposed to the expected immediate function, following liver transplantation is a major complication, and the clinical manifestations of such that lead to either immediate retransplant or death are the catastrophic end of the spectrum. Primary nonfunction (PNF) has declined in incidence over the years, yet the impact on patient and healthcare teams, and the burden on the organ pool in case of the need for retransplant should not be underestimated. There is no universal test to define the diagnosis of PNF, and current criteria are based on various biochemical parameters surrogate of liver function; moreover, a disparity remains within different healthcare systems on selecting candidates eligible for urgent retransplantation. The impact on PNF from traditionally accepted risk factors has changed somewhat, mainly driven by the rising demand for organs, combined with the concerted approach by clinicians on the in-depth understanding of PNF, optimal graft recipient selection, mitigation of the clinical environment in which a marginal graft is reperfused, and postoperative management. Regardless of the mode, available data suggest machine perfusion strategies help reduce the incidence further but do not completely avert the risk of PNF. The mainstay of management relies on identifying severe allograft dysfunction at a very early stage and aggressive management, while excluding other identifiable causes that mimic severe organ dysfunction. This approach may help salvage some grafts by preventing total graft failure and also maintaining a patient in an optimal physiological state if retransplantation is considered the ultimate patient salvage strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermien Hartog
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Krawczyk M, Grąt M, Adam R, Polak WG, Klempnauer J, Pinna A, Di Benedetto F, Filipponi F, Senninger N, Foss A, Rufián-Peña S, Bennet W, Pratschke J, Paul A, Settmacher U, Rossi G, Salizzoni M, Fernandez-Selles C, Martínez de Rituerto ST, Gómez-Bravo MA, Pirenne J, Detry O, Majno PE, Nemec P, Bechstein WO, Bartels M, Nadalin S, Pruvot FR, Mirza DF, Lupo L, Colledan M, Tisone G, Ringers J, Daniel J, Charco Torra R, Moreno González E, Bañares Cañizares R, Cuervas-Mons Martinez V, San Juan Rodríguez F, Yilmaz S, Remiszewski P. Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Trauma: A Study From the European Liver Transplant Registry. Transplantation 2016; 100:2372-2381. [PMID: 27780185 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000001398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation is the most extreme form of surgical management of patients with hepatic trauma, with very limited literature data supporting its use. The aim of this study was to assess the results of liver transplantation for hepatic trauma. METHODS This retrospective analysis based on European Liver Transplant Registry comprised data of 73 recipients of liver transplantation for hepatic trauma performed in 37 centers in the period between 1987 and 2013. Mortality and graft loss rates at 90 days were set as primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively. RESULTS Mortality and graft loss rates at 90 days were 42.5% and 46.6%, respectively. Regarding general variables, cross-clamping without extracorporeal veno-venous bypass was the only independent risk factor for both mortality (P = 0.031) and graft loss (P = 0.034). Regarding more detailed factors, grade of liver trauma exceeding IV increased the risk of mortality (P = 0.005) and graft loss (P = 0.018). Moreover, a tendency above the level of significance was observed for the negative impact of injury severity score (ISS) on mortality (P = 0.071). The optimal cut-off for ISS was 33, with sensitivity of 60.0%, specificity of 80.0%, positive predictive value of 75.0%, and negative predictive value of 66.7%. CONCLUSIONS Liver transplantation seems to be justified in selected patients with otherwise fatal severe liver injuries, particularly in whom cross-clamping without extracorporeal bypass can be omitted. The ISS cutoff less than 33 may be useful in the selection process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Krawczyk
- 1 Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.2 Hepato-Biliary Center, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, University Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France.3 Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.4 Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.5 Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.6 Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.7 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Pisa, Italy.8 Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.9 Department of Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.10 Unit of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Córdoba, Spain.11 Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.12 Department of Abdominal, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany.13 Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.14 Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.15 Unità Operativa Chirurgia Generale e Trapianti di Fegato, Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Milan, Italy.16 Liver Transplant Center, General Surgery Unit, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Molinette Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.17 Liver Transplant Unit, Hospital Juan Canalejo, La Coruna, Spain.18 Abdominal Trasplant Unit, Universitary Clinical Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.19 Hepatic-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío of Seville, Seville, Spain.20 Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.21 Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.22 Department of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.23 Center of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantations, Brno, Czech Republic.24 Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Goethe University Hospital and Clinics, Frankfurt, Germany.25 Department of Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.26 Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.27 Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Transplantation, University Lille Nord de France, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France.28 The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.29 Institute of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.30 Department of Surgery, Pope John XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.31 Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy.32 Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.33 Department of Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Porto, Portugal.34 Department of HBP Surgery and Transplant, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebro'n, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.35 Service of General and Digestive Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre", University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.36 Liver Unit, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.37 Unidad de Trasplante Hepatico, Hospital Universitarro Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.38 Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery and Transplantation Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.39 Inonu University, Liver Transplantation Institute, Malatya, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|