Management of portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation with a combined open and endovascular approach

Thrombotic complications post liver transplantation: Etiology and management

Liver transplantation (LT) is the life saving therapeutic option for patients with acute and chronic end stage liver disease. This is a routine procedure with excellent outcomes in terms of patient survival and quality of life post LT. Orthotopic LT (OLT) patients require a critical care as they are prone to variety of post-operative vascular, cardiovascular, biliary, pulmonary and abdominal complications. Thrombotic complications (both arterial and venous) are not uncommon post liver transplant surgery. Such vascular problems lead to increased morbidity and mortality in both donor and graft recipient. Although thromboprophylaxis is recommended in general surgery patients, no such standards exist for liver transplant patients. Drastic advancements of surgical and anesthetic procedures have improvised survival rates of patients post OLT. Despite these, haemostatic imbalance leading to thrombotic events post OLT cause significant graft loss and morbidity and even lead to patient's death. Thus it is extremely important to understand pathophysiology of thrombosis in LT patients and shorten the timing of its diagnosis to avoid morbidity and mortality in both donor and graft recipient. Present review summarizes the current knowledge of vascular complications associated with LT to highlight their impact on short and long-term morbidity and mortality post LT. Also, present report discusses the lacunae existing in the literature regarding the risk factors leading to arterial and venous thrombosis in LT patients.

Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Selection Criteria and Post-transplant Medical Management

Pediatric liver transplantation remains the gold standard for life-threatening acute and chronic liver diseases and multiple liver-based inherited metabolic defects. Advances in surgical techniques, better perioperative care and immunosuppression regimes have resulted in excellent long-term graft and patient survival. The success of pediatric liver transplantation does however bring the additional challenge of long-term patient outcomes including graft hepatitis-related fibrosis and suboptimal biopsychosocial outcomes. In this review, authors will explore the current landscape of pediatric liver transplantation including indications, timing of referral for liver transplantation, surgical techniques and long-term outcomes such as recurrence of pre-transplant liver disease, idiopathic graft hepatitis and biopsychosocial outcomes. Ultimately, early identification and management of potential issues long-term helps ensure our recipients achieve a "meaningful survival".

Vascular complications after liver transplantation: contemporary approaches to detection and treatment. A literature review

Vascular complications (VCs) after liver transplantation (LT) are rare but are one of the most dreaded conditions that can potentially lead to graft loss and recipient death. This paper has analyzed the international experience in the early diagnosis of various VCs that can develop following LT, as well as the optimal timing and methods of treatment of these complications.

The Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis after Adult Liver Transplantation: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after adult liver transplantation (LT) is a rare but serious complication with no consensus on the ideal treatment. We report a case series and a comprehensive review of the literature on PVT after LT to discuss the therapeutic options. Methods: The clinical data of 360 adult patients (≥18 years of age) who underwent LT from January 2017 to January 2020 were reviewed, and a comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted. Patients diagnosed with PVT after LT were identified, and relevant risk factors and therapies were analyzed. Results: Among the 360 patients, 7 (1.94%) developed PVT after LT. Onset of PVT within one week after LT was found in six patients (85.71%). Four of the seven patients with PVT received systemic anticoagulation (low molecular weight heparin and warfarin) therapy. Minimally invasive interventional therapies combined with systemic anticoagulation (heparin and warfarin) were applied for three patients, two of whom died because of severe abdominal hemorrhage and liver failure. Of the 33 cases reported in the literature, minimally invasive interventional therapy combined with systematic anticoagulation or sclerotherapy were the most-used methods (20/33). Systemic anticoagulation was administered to four patients, and surgical operation (thrombectomy; portosystemic shunt and retransplantation) was performed for nine patients. Among these 33 patients, 4 eventually died. Conclusions: Interventional therapy combined with systemic anticoagulation is a good choice for the management of PVT after LT, and in our experience, systemic anticoagulation alone can also have a positive effect for early PVT patients.

Feasibility and mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis after living-donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate mid- to long-term results of endovascular treatment for portal vein thrombosis (PVT) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHODS

Thirty cases (14 males, 16 females; age range, 0.67-65 years) who underwent endovascular treatment including thrombolysis, angioplasty, stent placement, and/or collateral embolization for PVT after LDLT from 2001 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and procedural data were collected and analyzed regarding the patency of the PVT site at the last follow-up date (PVT-free persistency) using Log-rank test. Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 120 months. The technical success rate was 80% (n=24). Patency rates at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months were 73%, 59%, 55%, 51%, 51%, 51%, and 51% for primary patency and 80%, 70%, 66%, 66%, 66%, 61%, and 61% for assisted patency after secondary endovascular treatment. PVT-free persistency rates regarding the subgroups were as follows: children under 12 years vs. adults, 50% vs. 68% (P = 0.42); acute vs. nonacute, 76% vs. 46% (P = 0.10); localized vs. extensive, 90% vs. 50% (P = 0.035); transileocolic approach vs. percutaneous-transhepatic approach, 71% vs. 54% (P = 0.39); and thrombolysis-based treatment vs. non-thrombolysis-based treatment, 71% vs. 44% (P = 0.12), respectively. Among technically successful cases, PVT-free persistency rate was 94% for those with hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein vs. 17% for those without hepatopetal flow (P < 0.001). The only major complication occurring was pleural hemorrhage (n=1). Minor complications (i.e., fever) occurred in 18 patients (60%).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, mid- to long-term portal patency following endovascular treatment was approximately 50%-60% in PVT patients after LDLT. PVT site patency over three months after the first endovascular treatment, localized PVT, and hepatopetal flow in the peripheral portal vein were identified as key prognostic factors for mid- to long-term portal patency.

Venous Thrombosis and Hypercoagulability in the Abdomen and Pelvis: Causes and Imaging Findings

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent decades, US, CT, and MRI have surpassed catheter-based angiography as the imaging examinations of choice for evaluation of vascular structures and identification of thrombus owing to their ready availability, noninvasive nature, and, in the cases of US and MRI, lack of exposure to ionizing radiation. As a result, VTE and associated complications are commonly identified in day-to-day radiologic practice across a variety of clinical settings. A wide range of hereditary and acquired conditions can increase the risk for development of venous thrombosis, and many patients with these conditions may undergo imaging for unrelated reasons, leading to the incidental detection of VTE or one of the associated complications. Although the development of VTE may be an isolated occurrence, the imaging findings, in conjunction with the clinical history and vascular risk factors, may indicate a predisposing condition or underlying diagnosis. Furthermore, awareness of the many clinical conditions that result in an increased risk of venous thrombosis may aid in detection of thrombus and any concomitant complications. For these reasons, it is important that practicing radiologists be familiar with the multimodality imaging findings of thrombosis, understand the spectrum of diseases that contribute to the development of thrombosis, and recognize the potential complications of hypercoagulable states and venous thrombosis. Online DICOM image stacks and supplemental material are available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2020.

Acute allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients: Incidence, risk factors, treatment success, and impact on graft failure

Objective This study was performed to identify risk factors for acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation (LT). Methods Consecutive LT recipients who underwent surgery in our institution from 2002 to 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. Results In total, 176 patients were eligible for statistical analysis. During a mean observation period of 61.1 ± 36.3 months, 43 episodes of acute rejection were evident. Of these, 34 (79.0%) were responsive to methylprednisolone, 3 (7.0%) were treated by adjusting the dosage of immunosuppressive agents, and 6 (14.0%) were methylprednisolone-resistant and treated using anti-thymocyte globulin. Biliary complications (odds ratio [OR] = 4.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.00-11.98); donor-negative, recipient-positive CMV mismatch (OR = 9.88, 95% CI = 1.18-82.36); sex mismatch (OR = 3.16, 95% CI = 1.31-8.10); and sex mismatch with a female donor (OR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.10-7.58) were identified as significant risk factors for acute graft rejection after LT. Conclusion In patients who develop acute cellular rejection after LT, biliary complications should be evaluated as a potential cause. Most acute rejections after LT respond to bolus corticosteroid therapy.

Vascular complications following liver transplantation: A literature review of advances in 2015

Although vascular complications (VCs) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) seldom occur, they are the most feared complications with a high incidence of both graft loss and mortality, as they compromise the blood flow of the transplant (either inflow or outflow). Diagnosis and therapeutic management of VCs constitute a major challenge in terms of increasing the success rate of liver transplantation. While surgical treatment used to be considered the first choice for management, advances in endovascular intervention have increased to make this a viable therapeutic option. Considering VC as a rare but a major and dreadful issue in OLT history, and in view of the continuing and rapid progress in recent years, an update on these uncommon conditions seemed necessary. In this sense, this review comprehensively discusses the important features (epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical, prognostic and therapeutic) of VCs following OLT.