Is Portal Inflow Modulation Always Necessary for Successful Utilization of Small Volume Living Donor Liver Grafts?

Portal flow modulation by splenic artery ligation to prevent posthepatectomy liver failure: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Posthepatectomy liver failure is a serious clinical issue with high mortality, similar in pathophysiology to small-for-size syndrome seen in liver transplantation. This study evaluates the efficacy of splenic artery ligation in reducing posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with portal venous pressure >15 mm Hg after hepatectomy.

METHODS

This single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted from May 2019 to November 2023. Eligible participants were patients scheduled for open hepatectomy for any indication. Patients with a portal venous pressure >15 mm Hg were randomized into splenic artery ligation and control groups in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcomes were posthepatectomy liver failure grades B and C (International Study group of Liver Surgery criteria), and secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, comprehensive complication index, and ascites volume.

RESULTS

The study was terminated early, before reaching the calculated sample size, because the primary outcome in the intervention group demonstrated statistically significant results. Of the 92 patients, 36 had elevated portal venous pressure, which was associated with greater rates of posthepatectomy liver failure grades B and C (41.67% vs 3.57%, P < .001), increased ascites volume (5,340 mL vs 1,055 mL, P < .001), and a greater comprehensive complication index (20.90 vs 8.70, P < .001). In the randomized subset, splenic artery ligation significantly reduced portal venous pressure and the portal venous pressure-central venous pressure gradient compared with both presplenic artery ligation values and the control group and significantly lowered the incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure grades B and C (16.67% vs 66.67%, P = .006), comprehensive complication index (8.70 vs 20.90, P = .034). Splenic artery ligation was identified as an independent factor in reducing posthepatectomy liver failure (adjusted relative risk, 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Splenic artery ligation is effective in reducing posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with high portal venous pressure after hepatectomy.

Prediction and management of small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) remains a critical challenge in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), characterized by graft insufficiency due to inadequate liver volume, leading to significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. As the global adoption of LDLT increases, the ability to predict and manage SFSS has become paramount in optimizing recipient outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the pathophysiology, risk factors, and strategies for managing SFSS across the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases. The pathophysiology of SFSS has evolved from being solely volume-based to incorporating portal hemodynamics, now recognized as small-for-flow syndrome. Key risk factors include donor-related parameters like age and graft volume, recipient-related factors such as MELD score and portal hypertension, and intraoperative factors related to venous outflow and portal inflow modulation. Current strategies to mitigate SFSS include careful graft selection based on graft-to-recipient weight ratio and liver volumetry, surgical techniques to optimize portal hemodynamics, and novel interventions such as splenic artery ligation and hemiportocaval shunts. Pharmacological agents like somatostatin and terlipressin have also shown promise in modulating portal pressure. Advances in 3D imaging and artificial intelligence-based volumetry further aid in preoperative planning. This review emphasizes the importance of a multifaceted approach to prevent and manage SFSS, advocating for standardized definitions and grading systems. Through an integrated approach to surgical techniques, hemodynamic monitoring, and perioperative management, significant strides can be made in improving the outcomes of LDLT recipients. Further research is necessary to refine these strategies and expand the application of LDLT, especially in challenging cases involving small-for-size grafts.

International multicenter study of ultralow graft-to-recipient weight ratio grafts in adult living donor liver transplantation

Decreasing the graft size in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) increases the risk of early allograft dysfunction. Graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) of 0.8 is considered the threshold. There is evidence that smaller volume grafts may also provide equally good outcomes, the cut-off of which remains unknown. In this retrospective multicenter study, 92 adult LDLTs with a final GRWR ≤0.6 performed at 12 international liver transplant centers over a 3-year period were included. Perioperative data including preoperative status, portal flow hemodynamics (PFH) and portal flow modulation, development of small for size syndrome (SFSS), morbidity, and mortality was collated and analyzed. Thirty-two (36.7%) patients developed SFSS and this was associated with increased 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. The preoperative model for end-stage liver disease and inpatient status were independent predictors for SFSS (P < .05). Pre-liver transplant renal dysfunction was an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio 3.1; 95% confidence intervals 1.1, 8.9, P = .035). PFH or portal flow modulation were not predictive of SFSS or survival. We report the largest ever multicenter study of LDLT outcomes using ultralow GRWR grafts and for the first time validate the International Liver Transplantation Society-International Living donor liver transplantation study group-Liver Transplantation Society of India consensus definition and grading of SFSS. Preoperative recipient condition rather than GRWR and PFH were independent predictors of SFSS. Algorithms to predict SFSS and LT outcomes should incorporate recipient factors along with GRWR.

Outcomes and Risk Factors for Liver Transplantation Using Graft-to-Recipient Weight Ratio Less Than 0.8 Graft From Living Donors: Multicentric Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare graft survival after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in patients receiving graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.8 versus GRWR≥0.8 grafts and identify risk factors for graft loss using GRWR<0.8 grafts.

BACKGROUND

Favorable outcomes after LDLT using GRWR<0.8 grafts were recently reported; however, these results have not been validated using multicenter data.

METHODS

This multicentric cohort study included 3450 LDLT patients. Graft survival was compared between 1:3 propensity score-matched groups and evaluated using various Cox models in the entire population. Risk factors for graft loss with GRWR<0.8 versus GRWR≥0.8 grafts were explored within various subgroups using interaction analyses, and outcomes were stratified according to the number of risk factors.

RESULTS

In total, 368 patients (10.7%) received GRWR<0.8 grafts (GRWR<0.8 group), whereas 3082 (89.3%) received GRWR≥0.8 grafts (GRWR≥0.8 group). The 5-year graft survival rate was significantly lower with GRWR<0.8 grafts than with GRWR≥0.8 grafts (85.2% vs 90.1%, P =0.013). Adjusted hazard ratio for graft loss using GRWR<0.8 grafts in the entire population was 1.66 (95% CI: 1.17-2.35, P =0.004). Risk factors exhibiting significant interactions with GRWR<0.8 for graft survival were age ≥60 years, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score ≥15, and male donor. When ≥2 risk factors were present, GRWR<0.8 grafts showed a higher risk of graft loss compared with GRWR≥0.8 graft in LDLT (hazard ratio 2.98, 95% CI: 1.79-4.88, P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

GRWR<0.8 graft showed inferior graft survival than controls (85.2% vs 90.1%), especially when ≥2 risk factors for graft loss (among age 60 years or above, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score ≥15, or male donor) were present.

Preventing Small-for-size Syndrome in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-recognized complication following liver transplantation (LT), with up to 20% developing this following living donor LT (LDLT). Preventing SFSS involves consideration of factors before the surgical procedure, including donor and recipient selection, and factors during the surgical procedure, including adequate outflow reconstruction, graft portal inflow modulation, and management of portosystemic shunts. International Liver Transplantation Society, International Living Donor Liver Transplantation Group, and Liver Transplant Society of India Consensus Conference was convened in January 2023 to develop recommendations for the prediction and management of SFSS in LDLT. The format of the conference was based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. International experts in this field were allocated to 4 working groups (diagnosis, prevention, anesthesia, and critical care considerations, and management of established SFSS). The working groups prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. The working group members, independent panel, and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and evidence-based recommendations provided by working group 2 that can be implemented to prevent SFSS in LDLT patients.

Post Living Donor Liver Transplantation Small-for-size Syndrome: Definitions, Timelines, Biochemical, and Clinical Factors for Diagnosis: Guidelines From the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND

When a partial liver graft is unable to meet the demands of the recipient, a clinical phenomenon, small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), may ensue. Clear definition, diagnosis, and management are needed to optimize transplant outcomes.

METHODS

A Consensus Scientific committee (106 members from 21 countries) performed an extensive literature review on specific aspects of SFSS, recommendations underwent blinded review by an independent panel, and discussion/voting on the recommendations occurred at the Consensus Conference.

RESULTS

The ideal graft-to-recipient weight ratio of ≥0.8% (or graft volume standard liver volume ratio of ≥40%) is recommended. It is also recommended to measure portal pressure or portal blood flow during living donor liver transplantation and maintain a postreperfusion portal pressure of <15 mm Hg and/or portal blood flow of <250 mL/min/100 g graft weight to optimize outcomes. The typical time point to diagnose SFSS is the postoperative day 7 to facilitate treatment and intervention. An objective 3-grade stratification of severity for protocolized management of SFSS is proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed grading system based on clinical and biochemical factors will help clinicians in the early identification of patients at risk of developing SFSS and institute timely therapeutic measures. The validity of this newly created grading system should be evaluated in future prospective studies.

Donor safety of remnant liver volumes of less than 30% in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the acceptability of donor remnant liver volume (RLV) to total liver volume (TLV) ratio (RLV/TLV) being <30% as safe in living donor liver transplantations (LDLTs).

METHODS

Online databases were searched from January 2000 to June 2022. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

One prospective and seven retrospective studies comprising 1935 patients (164 RLV/TLV <30% vs. 1771 RLV/TLV ≥30%) were included. Overall (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002) and minor (OR = 1.88; 95% CI [1.23, 2.88]; p = .004) morbidities were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group (OR = 1.82; 95% CI [1.24, 2.67]; p = .002). No significant differences were noted in the major morbidity, biliary complications, and hepatic dysfunction. Peak levels of bilirubin (SMD = .50; 95% CI [.07, .93]; p = .02) and international normalized ratio (SMD = .68; 95% CI [.04, 1.32]; p = .04) were significantly lower in the RLV/TLV ≥ 30% group than in the RLV/TLV <30% group. No significant differences were noted in the peak alanine transferase and aspartate transaminase levels and hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the safety of the donor as the top priority, the eligibility of a potential liver donor in LDLT whose RLV/TLV is expected to be <30% should not be accepted.

Association between Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence and Graft Size in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review

The aim of this work was to assess the association between graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. A search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed until December 2022 for studies comparing different GRWRs in the prognosis of HCC recipients in LDLT. Data were pooled to evaluate 1- and 3-year survival rates. We identified three studies, including a total of 782 patients (168 GRWR < 0.8 vs. 614 GRWR ≥ 0.8%). The pooled overall survival was 85% and 77% at one year and 90% and 83% at three years for GRWR < 0.8 and GRWR ≥ 0.8, respectively. The largest series found that, in patients within Milan criteria, the GRWR was not associated with lower oncological outcomes. However, patients with HCC outside the Milan criteria with a GRWR < 0.8% had lower survival and higher tumor recurrence rates. The GRWR < 0.8% appears to be associated with lower survival rates in HCC recipients, particularly for candidates with tumors outside established HCC criteria. Although the data are scarce, the results of this study suggest that considering the individual GRWR not only as risk factor for small-for-size-syndrome but also as contributor to HCC recurrence in patients undergoing LDLT would be beneficial. Novel perfusion technologies and pharmacological interventions may contribute to improving outcomes.

Technical challenges in LDLT - Overcoming small for size syndrome and venous outflow reconstruction

Living Donor Liver Transplantation (LDLT) emerged as an alternative treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease waiting for an organ from a deceased donor. In addition to allowing for a faster access to transplantation, LDLT provides improved recipient outcomes when compared to deceased donor LT. However, it represents a more complex and demanding procedure for the transplant surgeon. In addition to a comprehensive preoperative donor assessment and stringent technical considerations during the donor hepatectomy to ensure upmost donor safety, the recipient procedure also comes with intrinsic challenges during LDLT. A proper approach during both procedures will result in favorable donor and recipient's outcomes. Hence, it is critical for the transplant surgeon to know how to overcome such technical challenges and avoid deleterious complications. One of the most feared complications following LDLT is small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Although, surgical advances and deeper understanding of the pathophysiology behind SFSS has allowed for a safer implementation of LDLT, there is currently no consensus on the best strategy to prevent or manage this complication. Therefore, we aim to review current practices in technically challenging situations during LDLT, with a particular focus on management of small grafts and venous outflow reconstructions, as they possess one of the biggest technical challenges faced during LDLT.

The short- and long-term outcomes in living-donor liver transplantation using small-for-size graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A standard graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) ≥0.8% is widely accepted in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, the potential donor pool is expanded to patients adopting small-for-size graft (SFSGs) with GRWR <0.8%. This study aimed to investigate the effect of SFSG on short- and long-term outcomes following LDLT.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from January 1995 to January 2022 for studies comparing short- or long-term outcomes between patients with SFSG (GRWR <0.8%, SFSG group) and sufficient volume graft (GRWR ≥0.8%, non-SFSG group). The primary outcomes were one-, three-, and five-year overall survival (OS) and graft survival (GS), while the secondary outcome was postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies comprising 7996 patients were included. In terms of OS, SFSG group had poor three-year OS (HR: 1.48, 95% CI [1.01, 2.15], p = 0.04), but there were no significant differences between two groups in one-year OS (HR: 1.50, 95% CI [0.98, 2.29], p = 0.06) and five-year OS (HR: 1.40, 95% CI [0.95, 2.08], p = 0.02). In GS, there were no significant differences in one-year (HR 1.31, 95% CI [1.00, 1.72], p = 0.05), three-year (HR 1.33, 95% CI [0.97, 1.82], p = 0.07), and five-year GS (HR 1.17, 95% CI [0.95, 1.44], p = 0.13). The SFSG group had comparable postoperative complications, except for a high incidence of vascular complications and small-for-size syndromes.

CONCLUSIONS

Expanding the potential donor pool in LDLT to SFSG with GRWR <0.8% can be acceptable in terms of comparable long-term OS and GS, despite the risk for vascular complications and small-for-size syndrome.

The role of graft to recipient weight ratio on enhanced recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation - A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

There continues to be debate about the lower limit of graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for living donor liver transplant (LDLT).

OBJECTIVES

To identify the lower limit of GRWR compatible with enhanced recovery after living donor liver transplant and to provide international expert panel recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Studies assessing how GRWR affects recipient outcomes such as small for size syndrome, other complications, patient and graft survival, and length of stay were included.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

CRD42021260794.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, and all were retrospective observational studies. There was heterogeneity in the definition of study cohorts and key outcome measures such as small-for-size syndrome. Most studies lacked risk adjustment given limited single-center sample size. GRWR of ≥ .8% is associated with enhanced recovery. Recipients of grafts with GRWR < .8%, however, were found to have similar outcomes as those with ≥ .8% when appropriate consideration is made for portal flow modulation and recipient illness severity.

CONCLUSIONS

GRWR ≥ .8% is often compatible with enhanced recovery, but grafts < .8% can be used in selected LDLT recipients with optimal donor-recipient selection, surgical technique, and perioperative management (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong).

Does modification of portal pressure and flow enhance recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation? A systematic review of literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

Portal inflow modulation (PIM) aimed at reducing portal hyperperfusion is commonly used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to reduce the risk of small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Many different techniques, both pharmacological and surgical have been used for this purpose. There is, however, little consensus on the best method of PIM, its exact role in preventing SFSS and on early post-LDLT recovery.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether modifications of portal pressures and flows enhance recovery after LDLT and to provide international expert panel recommendations.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42021260997.

RESULTS

Five hundred and ninety four articles were identified through databases' search. Of the 24 included for a final review by the working group (WG), there were five randomized control trials, four prospective studies and 15 retrospective series. Six outcome measures which were likely to influence early recovery after LDLT, especially in small-for-size grafts (SFSG) were shortlisted. These included acute kidney injury, SFSS, morbidity including sepsis, length of ICU and hospital stay, morbidity of the PIM technique and overall mortality. The WG noted that PIM in this subset of LDLT recipients had a beneficial effect on all the outcomes measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering all decision domains, the panel recommends pre- and intraoperative actual graft weight validation, portal pressure/flow measurements, and a comprehensive donor evaluation for the determination of potentially small-for-size/ small-for-flow grafts as mandatory. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) Pharmacological PIM helps improve early renal function in LDLT recipients. (Quality of Evidence: High | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In selected patients with SFSG, PIM helps reduce SFSS/EAD and sepsis. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) PIM in the form of splenectomy has increased morbidity compared to splenic artery ligation (SAL). (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, PIM may help reduce morbidity/mortality. (Quality of Evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) In LDLT recipients with SFSG, modification of portal pressures and flows enhances recovery after LDLT. (Quality of Evidence: Moderate | Grade of Recommendation: Strong).

Small-For-Size Syndrome and Graft Inflow Modulation Techniques in Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Partial liver transplantation has recently been proposed to alleviate organ shortages. However, transplantation of a small-for-size graft is associated with an increased risk of posttransplant hepatic dysfunction, commonly referred to as small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). This review describes the etiology, pathological features, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic criteria of SFSS. Moreover, we summarize strategies to improve graft function, focusing on graft inflow modulation techniques. Finally, unmet needs and future perspectives are discussed.

SUMMARY

In fact, posttransplant SFSS can be attributed to various factors such as preoperative status of the recipients, surgical techniques, donor age, and graft quality, except for graft size. With targeted improvement measures, satisfactory clinical outcomes can be achieved in recipients at increased risk of SFSS. Given the critical role of relative portal hyperperfusion in the pathogenesis of SFSS, various pharmacological and surgical treatments have been established to reduce or partially divert excessive portal inflow, and recipients will benefit from individualized therapeutic regimens after careful evaluation of benefits against potential risks. However, there remain unmet needs for further research into different aspects of SFSS to better understand the correlation between portal hemodynamics and patient outcomes.

KEY MESSAGES

Contemporary transplant surgeons should consider various donor and recipient factors and develop case-specific prevention and treatment strategies to improve graft and recipient survival rates.

Minimizing the risk of small-for-size syndrome after liver surgery

BACKGROUND

Primary and secondary liver tumors are not always amenable to resection due to location and size. Inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) may prevent patients from having a curative resection or may result in increased postoperative morbidity and mortality from complications related to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS).

DATA SOURCES

This comprehensive review analyzed the principles, mechanism and risk factors associated with SFSS and presented current available options in the evaluation of FLR when planning liver surgery. In addition, it provided a detailed description of specific modalities that can be used before, during or after surgery, in order to optimize the conditions for a safe resection and minimize the risk of SFSS.

RESULTS

Several methods which aim to reduce tumor burden, preserve healthy liver parenchyma, induce hypertrophy of FLR or prevent postoperative complications help minimize the risk of SFSS.

CONCLUSIONS

With those techniques the indications of radical treatment for patients with liver tumors have significantly expanded. The successful outcome depends on appropriate patient selection, the individualization and modification of interventions and the right timing of surgery.

HPi: A Novel Parameter to Predict Graft-related Outcome in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplant

BACKGROUND

Portal hyperperfusion is frequently associated with early allograft dysfunction (EAD). It is imperative to identify patients who would require portal inflow modulation. We aimed to identify factors associated with hyperperfusion-related graft injury and develop a predictive index for the same.

METHODS

Prospectively maintained database was queried to identify 135 adult living donor liver transplant recipients between September 2016 and July 2020. According to the calculated sample size, 96 patients were randomly selected for "test cohort". The remaining 39 patients made the "validation cohort." EAD was defined according to the A2ALL study. "Hyperperfusion index (HPi)," defined as posttransplant portal pressure gradient (ΔPpost)/graft-to-recipient splenic volume ratio (GRSVR), was devised on the basis of laws of flow dynamics and regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 40 patients (29.6%) had EAD, six 90-d mortalities (4.4%) were attributable to EAD. In the test cohort, EAD patients (n = 29, 30.2%) had lower GRSVR (1.00 versus 2.22, P < 0.001), higher ΔPpost (14.8 versus 11.9, P = 0.004), and HPi (20.89 versus 8.67, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed GRSVR, ΔPpost, and HPi as significant factors to predict EAD. Receiver operating characteristic determined cutoff of HPi ≥9.97 could predict EAD with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 73% (F-score = 0.712). HPi ≥16.25 predicted 90-d mortality with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 78.9%. Patients with higher HPi had delayed graft-related recovery. Non-EAD patients had a higher 1-y (96% versus 79%) and 2-y (88% versus 79%) survival. The cutoff of HPi was validated well in the validation cohort (F-score = 0.645) (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

While predicted GRSVR may help identify at-risk patients preoperatively, intraoperatively calculated HPi is more accurate in identifying patients who would require portal inflow modulation. Achieving an HPi below target cutoff significantly decreases the risk of EAD even in low-GRSVR patients.

Auxiliary Liver Transplantation for Cirrhosis: From APOLT to RAPID: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

To survey the available literature regarding the use of auxiliary liver transplantation (ALT) in the setting of cirrhosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

ALT is a type of liver transplantation (LT) procedure in which part of the cirrhotic liver is resected and part of the liver graft is transplanted. The cirrhotic liver left in situ acts as an auxiliary liver until the graft has reached sufficient volume. Recently, a 2-stage concept named RAPID (Resection and Partial Liver segment 2/3 transplantation with Delayed total hepatectomy) was developed, which combines hypertrophy of the small graft followed by delayed removal of the native liver.

METHODS

A scoping review of the literature on ALT for cirrhosis was performed, focusing on the historical background of RAPID and the status of RAPID for this indication. The new comprehensive nomenclature for hepatectomy ("New World" terminology) was used in this review.

RESULTS

A total of 72 cirrhotic patients underwent ALT [heterotopic (n = 34), orthotopic (Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation, n = 34 including 5 followed by resection of the native liver at the second stage) and RAPID (n = 4)]. Among the 9 2-stage LTs (APOLT, n = 5; RAPID, n = 4), portal blood flow modulation was performed in 6 patients by deportalization of the native liver (n = 4), portosystemic shunt creation (n = 1), splenic artery ligation (n = 3) or splenectomy (n = 1). The delay between the first and second stages ranged from 18 to 90 days. This procedure led to an increase in the graft-to-recipient weight ratio between 33% and 156%. Eight patients were alive at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-stage LT and, more recently, the RAPID procedure are viable options for increasing the number of transplantations for cirrhotic patients by using small grafts.

Successful Simultaneous Subtotal Splenectomy During Left Lobe Auxiliary Liver Transplantation for Portal Inflow Modulation and Severe Hypersplenism Correction: A Case Report

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation with small partial liver grafts often requires intraoperative portal inflow modulation to prevent portal hyperperfusion and subsequent small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). However, there are concerns about the specific morbidity of these modulation techniques. This study aims to lower post-perfusion portal venous pressure and correct severe hypersplenism in a patient with end-stage liver cirrhosis by simultaneous subtotal splenectomy during auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT). A 29-year-old man was diagnosed with cryptogenic cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension suffered recurrent acute variceal bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, and massive ascites before admission to our hospital. After the recipient's left liver was resected, we performed APOLT using his 51-year-old father's left lobe graft with a graft-to-recipient weight ratio of 0.55%. Intraoperatively, simultaneous subtotal splenectomy was performed to lower graft post-perfusion portal vein pressure below 15 mmHg and correct severe hypersplenism-related pancytopenia. The recipient's postoperative hospital course was uneventful with no occurrence of SFSS and procedure-related complications. Platelet and leukocyte counts remained in the normal ranges postoperatively. The living donor was discharged 6 days after the operation and recovered well-with no complications. After a follow-up period of 35.3 months, both the recipient and donor live with good liver function and overall condition. This is the first case report of simultaneous subtotal splenectomy during APOLT using small-for-size living-donated left liver lobes, which is demonstrated to be a viable procedure for modulating portal inflow and correcting severe hypersplenism in selected adult patients with end-stage liver cirrhosis. APOLT using a small-for-size liver graft may be a safe and feasible treatment option for selected adult patients with end-stage liver cirrhosis.

Liver Transplant Outcomes in India

Content available: Audio Recording.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in a Cohort of Recipients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Data on feasibility, management, and outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) in patients with pre-existing left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), severe coronary artery disease (CAD) or cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is scarce.

METHODS

We reviewed outcomes of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in recipients with LVSD (ejection fraction [EF] < 50%) from our series of 1946 LDLT's performed between July 2010 and July 2018.

RESULTS

LVSD was detected in 12 male patients with a mean age, BMI and MELD of 52 ± 9 years, 25 ± 5 kg/m², and 19 ± 4 respectively. Out of these, 6 patients had CAD (2 with previous coronary artery bypass graft, 1 following recent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, 2 post myocardial infarction, 1 noncritical CAD), and 6 had CCM. The EF ranged from 25% to 45%. Ethanol was the predominant underlying etiology for cirrhosis (50%). During LDLT, 2 patients developed ventricular ectopic rhythm and were managed successfully with intravenous lidocaine. Stress cardiomyopathy manifested in 3 patients post operatively with decreased EF, of which 2 improved, while 1 needed IABP support and succumbed to multiorgan failure on 8th postoperative day (POD). Another patient died on POD30 due to septic shock. Both these patients had higher MELD scores (actual MELD), extremes of BMI (17.3and 35.8 kg/m2) and were diabetic. There were no long-term cardiac deaths. The 1-year, and 5-year survival were 75%, and 66%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among potential LT recipients with LVSD, those with stable CAD and good performance status, and well optimized CCM patients may be considered for LDLT after careful risk stratification in experienced centers.

Incorporating Tumor Biology to Predict Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Expanded Selection Criteria

Conventional selection criteria for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are based on tumour size/number only, and do not consider vital surrogates of tumor biology such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and tumor [¹⁸ F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([¹⁸ F]FDG PET) avidity. We analyzed survival outcomes, and predictors of HCC recurrence in 405 patients with cirrhosis and HCC (HCC-cirr) who underwent living donor LT (LDLT) using our expanded selection criteria: no extrahepatic disease or major vascular invasion, irrespective of tumor size/number. Fifty-one percent patients had tumours beyond Milan, and 43% beyond the University of California San Francisco [UCSF] criteria. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 64% and 70%, respectively. Three preoperatively available factors predicted recurrence: pre-LT AFP ≥100 ng/mL (P = 0.005; hazard ratio [HR], 2.190), tumor burden beyond the UCSF criteria (P = 0.001; HR, 2.640), and [¹⁸ F]FDG PET avidity (P = 0.004; HR, 2.442). A prognostic model based on the number and combination of the aforementioned preoperative risk factors was developed using a competing-risk RFS model. Three risk groups were identified: low (none or a single risk factor present, 9.3% recurrence), moderate (AFP ≥100 ng/mL and [¹⁸ F]FDG PET avidity, or beyond UCSF tumor and [¹⁸ F]FDG PET avidity, 25% recurrence), and high (AFP ≥100 ng/mL and beyond UCSF, or presence of all 3 risk factors, 46% recurrence). Acceptable long-term outcomes were achieved using our expanded selection criteria. Our prognostic model to predict recurrence based on preoperative biological and morphological factors could guide pretransplant management (downstaging versus upfront LDLT) with the aim of reducing post-LDLT recurrence.

Recurrent Hepatic Encephalopathy Due to Surgically Created Shunt During Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Hepatic encephalopathy due to portosystemic shunts is a well-defined entity in patients with cirrhosis. Rarely, liver transplant recipients develop hepatic encephalopathy owing to persistence or surgically created portosystemic shunts. We present a case of post-transplant recurrent hepatic encephalopathy due to a surgically created portocaval shunt. The patient was managed by a covered metal stent placement in the inferior vena cava, thus causing functional closure of the shunt.

Current status of liver transplantation in Asia

In spite of early adoption of the brain death legislation, and all efforts at promoting deceased donation, various social, economic and cultural factors have acted as road blocks to the furthering of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in most Asian societies. On the other hand, Asian liver transplant centers have been the pioneers, innovators, and technical advancement catalysts for the world to follow, especially with regards to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). With some high volume centers performing more than 200 LDLTs a year with good outcomes in the donor and recipient, techniques to expand the living donor pool have also been adopted like ABO-incompatible, paired exchange and dual lobe living donor liver transplants. Although large multicenter, and registry data as regards safety and outcomes of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy are awaited, expert centers have pioneered, and now regularly perform purely laparoscopic and robotic living donor hepatectomies, especially in Korea.

Small-for-size graft, small-for-size syndrome and inflow modulation in living donor liver transplantation

The extended application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revealed the problem of graft size mismatching called "small-for-size syndrome (SFSS)." The initial trials to resolve this problem involved increasing the procured graft size, from left to right, and even extending to include a right lobe graft. Clinical cases of living right lobe donations have been reported since then, drawing attention to the risks of increasing the liver volume procured from a living donor. However, not only other modes of increasing graft volume (GV) such as auxiliary or dual liver transplantation, but also control of the increased portal pressure caused by a small-for-size graft (SFSG), such as a porto-systemic shunt or splenectomy and optimal outflow reconstruction, have been trialed with some positive results. To establish an effective strategy for transplanting SFSG and preventing SFSS, it is essential to have precise knowledge and tactics to evaluate graft quality and GV, when performing these LDLTs with portal pressure control and good venous outflow. Thus, we reviewed the updated literature on the pathogenesis of and strategies for using SFSG.

Living donor liver transplantation in small-for-size setting

Small-for-Size Syndrome (SFSS) is one of the most feared complication of adult split liver and living donor liver transplantation. SFSS stems from a disproportionate/excessive portal vein flow relative to the volume of the implanted liver graft, and is currently one of the major practical limits to partial liver grafts' transplantation. In the last few decades many graft inflow modulation (GIM) techniques have been proposed to curtail the portal vein flow, allowing for successful transplantation of small partial liver grafts. Graft inflow modulation techniques span from Splenic Artery Ligation (SAL), to Splenectomy, Porto-Systemic Shunts and the lately proposed Splenic Devascularization. A patient tailored approach balancing the risk of SFSS with GIM specific morbidity, is more important than identifying the ideal GIM technique. Here we summarize the most recently published data to provide general indications in the challenging preoperative choice of a GIM techniques.