1
|
Pros and Cons of the Safety Net Rule for Prioritization of Liver Transplant Recipients Who Receive Liver Alone Transplant but Develop End-Stage Renal Disease. Clin Liver Dis 2022; 26:269-281. [PMID: 35487610 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The number of patients presenting with cirrhosis with kidney injury and the potential need for SLKT is increasing. In 2017, standardized criteria were implemented to identify candidates for SLKT as well as criteria for prioritizing LTA recipients for kidney transplant if they developed kidney failure, which is referred to as the 'safety net rule.' Goal of the safety net rule is to provide a pathway that provides increased priority to LTA recipients with renal failure who may have previously undergone SLKT. This article reviews the pros and cons of the safety net rule for liver transplant recipients who develop ESRD.
Collapse
|
2
|
Teo VXY, Heng RRY, Tay PWL, Ng CH, Tan DJH, Ong Y, Tan EY, Huang D, Vathsala A, Muthiah M, Tan EXX. A meta-analysis on the prevalence of chronic kidney disease in liver transplant candidates and its associated risk factors and outcomes. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2515-2523. [PMID: 34773291 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Pre-liver transplant (LT) chronic kidney disease (CKD) has emerged as a leading cause of post-operative morbidity. We aimed to report the prevalence, associated risk factors, and clinical outcomes in patients with pre-LT CKD. Meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted for included cohort and cross-sectional studies. Studies comparing healthy and patients with s pre-LT CKD were included. Outcomes were assessed with pooled hazard ratios. 15 studies were included, consisting of 82,432 LT patients and 26,754 with pre-LT CKD. Pooled prevalence of pre-LT CKD was 22.35% (CI: 15.30%-32.71%). Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, viral hepatitis, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and older age were associated with increased risk of pre-LT CKD: (OR 1.72 CI: 1.15-2.56, P = 0.01), (OR 2.23 CI: 1.76-2.83, P < 0.01), (OR 1.09; CI: 1.05-1.13, P < 0.01), (OR 1.73; CI: 1.10-2.71 P = 0.03), and (MD: 2.92 years; CI: 1.29-4.55years; P < 0.01) respectively. Pre-LT CKD was significantly associated with increased mortality (HR 1.38; CI: 1.2-1.59; P < 0.01), post-LT end-stage renal disease and post-LT CKD. Almost a quarter of pre-LT patients have CKD and it is significantly associated with post-operative morbidity and mortality. However, long-term outcomes remain unclear due to a lack of studies reporting such outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa Xin Yi Teo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ryan Rui Yang Heng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Phoebe Wen Lin Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Darren Jun Hao Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yuki Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore
| | - En Ying Tan
- Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Daniel Huang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.,Liver Transplantation, National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Anantharaman Vathsala
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.,Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Mark Muthiah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.,Liver Transplantation, National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Eunice Xiang Xuan Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore.,Liver Transplantation, National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Westphal SG, Langewisch ED, Miles CD. Current State of Multiorgan Transplantation and Implications for Future Practice and Policy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2021; 28:561-569. [PMID: 35367024 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2021.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of kidney dysfunction has increased in liver transplant and heart transplant candidates, reflecting a changing patient population and allocation policies that prioritize the most urgent candidates. A higher burden of pretransplant kidney dysfunction has resulted in a substantial rise in the utilization of multiorgan transplantation (MOT). Owing to a shortage of available deceased donor kidneys, the increased use of MOT has the potential to disadvantage kidney-alone transplant candidates, as current allocation policies generally provide priority for MOT candidates above all kidney-alone transplant candidates. In this review, the implications of kidney disease in liver transplant and heart transplant candidates is reviewed, and current policies used to allocate organs are discussed. Important ethical considerations pertaining to MOT allocation are examined, and future policy modifications that may improve both equity and utility in MOT policy are considered.
Collapse
|