Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Predicts Mortality and Graft Failure in Transplantation Patients With Portopulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary Complications of Portal Hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), hepatopulmonary syndrome, and hepatic hydrothorax constitute significant complications of portal hypertension, with important implications for management and liver transplantation (LT) candidacy. POPH is characterized by obstruction and remodeling of the pulmonary resistance arterial bed. Hepatopulmonary syndrome is the most common pulmonary vascular disorder, characterized by intrapulmonary vascular dilatations causing impaired gas exchange. LT may improve prognosis in select patients with POPH. LT is the only effective treatment of hepatopulmonary syndrome. Hepatic hydrothorax is defined as transudative pleural fluid accumulation that is not explained by primary cardiopulmonary or pleural disease. LT is the definitive cure for hepatic hydrothorax.

Portopulmonary hypertension: peculiarities of diagnosis and treatment

Portopulmonary hypertension is defined as the development of pulmonary hypertension secondary to portal one. Its exact prevalence is difficult to determine due to the lack of routine screening in patients with portal hypertension. Hemodynamic changes associated with portal hypertension, including the hyperdynamic state, portosystemic shunts, and splanchnic vasodilation, cause significant disturbances in the pulmonary vasculature and play a key role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Without treatment, portopulmonary hypertension leads to progressive right ventricular failure with a poor prognosis. Although Doppler echocardiography is the best initial screening tool for symptomatic patients and candidates for liver transplant, right heart catheterization remains the gold standard for disease diagnosis. Treatment of patients with portopulmonary hypertension is aimed at improving cardiac function, reducing pulmonary vascular resistance, and optimizing functional capacity. Pulmonary hypertension-specific therapy, which includes prostacyclin and its receptor agonists, endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and guanylate cyclase stimulators, plays a key role in the treatment of patients with portopulmonary hypertension. Small uncontrolled and recent single randomized controlled trials have reported promising results of vasodilator therapy in terms of clinical and hemodynamic improvement in patients, allowing certain patients to undergo liver transplantation. This review discusses the epidemiology, approach to diagnosis and treatment of patients with portopulmonary hypertension. We used MEDLINE database on the PubMed platform and the Cochrane library to search for literature sources using the keywords: portopulmonary hypertension, portal hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, liver cirrhosis, pulmonary complications.

Association of Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamics and Mortality in Veterans With Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH), associated with increased mortality, can limit treatment options for liver diseases. Data on the continuum of clinical risk related to cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in PoPH are lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

As part of the United States national Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with cirrhosis undergoing right heart catheterization between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2022. Pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary arterial pressure [mPAP] >20 mm Hg without PoPH) and PoPH (mPAP >20 mm Hg+pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg+pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 WU) were defined by right heart catheterization hemodynamics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards using natural splines for hemodynamic variables were used to evaluate the association between cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and mortality following right heart catheterization. A total of 4409 patients were included in the final analysis, predominantly men (96.3%), with a mean age of 68.5 years. Pulmonary hypertension and PoPH were observed in 71.6% and 10.2% of the cohort, respectively. Compared with a reference cardiac index of 2.5 L/min per m2, the hazard for mortality increased progressively with decreasing cardiac index, even after adjustment for mPAP and pulmonary vascular resistance. The minority of patients with PoPH (N=65, 14.5%) were prescribed pulmonary vasodilator therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that pulmonary hypertension and PoPH are prevalent in veterans with chronic liver disease, but low use of targeted PoPH therapy persists. Cardiac function discriminated mortality risk across a wide range of mPAP and pulmonary vascular resistance values and may diagnose and clarify prognosis in this patient population.

Current clinical understanding and effectiveness of portopulmonary hypertension treatment

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a rare subtype of Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with a poor prognosis. According to the most up-to-date definition, PoPH is characterized by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) of >20 mmHg at rest, a pulmonary artery wedge pressure of ≤15 mmHg, and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of >2 Wood units with portal hypertension. Like PAH, PoPH is underpinned by an imbalance in vasoactive substances. Therefore, current guidelines recommend PAH-specific therapies for PoPH treatment; however, descriptions of the actual treatment approaches are inconsistent. Given the small patient population, PoPH is often studied in combination with idiopathic PAH; however, recent evidence suggests important differences between PoPH and idiopathic PAH in terms of hemodynamic parameters, treatment approaches, survival, socioeconomic status, and healthcare utilization. Therefore, large, multi-center registry studies are needed to examine PoPH in isolation while obtaining statistically meaningful results. PoPH has conventionally been excluded from clinical drug trials because of concerns over hepatotoxicity. Nevertheless, newer-generation endothelin receptor antagonists have shown great promise in the treatment of PoPH, reducing PVR, PAP, and World Health Organization functional class without causing hepatotoxicity. The role of liver transplantation as a treatment option for PoPH has also been controversial; however, recent evidence shows that this procedure may be beneficial in this patient population. In the future, given the shortage of liver donors, predictors of a favorable response to liver transplantation should be determined to select the most eligible patients. Collectively, advances in these three areas could help to standardize PoPH treatment in the clinic.

The correlation in echocardiogram to right heart catheterization in identifying pulmonary hypertension as a barrier to liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) can be limitations towards listing for liver transplantation (LT). Our study evaluates the correlation of right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) compared to mPAP on right heart catheterization (RHC).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 723 patients who underwent LT evaluation at our institution between 2012 and 2020. Our cohort consisted of patients with RVSP and mPAP measured on TTE. A Wald t-test and area under the curve analysis were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with higher mPAP values on TTE (N=33) did not correlate with mPAP ≥ 35 mmHg on RHC, while patients with higher RVSP values (N=147) on TTE were associated with mPAP ≥ 35 mmHg on RHC. The cutoff value of RVSP ≥ 48 mmHg on TTE was associated with mPAP ≥ 35 mmHg on RHC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that RVSP compared to mPAP on TTE is a better indicator for mPAP ≥ 35 mmHg on RHC. RVSP can be used as a marker on echocardiography for identifying patients with a higher likelihood of PH being a barrier to LT listing.

Portopulmonary Hypertension

PoPH is a well-recognized complication of portal hypertension with or without cirrhosis and is classified as a subset of PAH. Identification of PoPH is crucial as it has a major impact on prognosis and liver transplant candidacy. Echocardiogram is the initial screening tool of choice and the patient should proceed to RHC for confirmation. PAH-directed therapy is the treatment of choice, allowing the patient to achieve a hemodynamic threshold to undergo a liver transplant safely.

Portopulmonary Hypertension: Management and Liver Transplantation Evaluation

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) affects 5% to 6% of patients with advanced liver disease and accounts for 5% to 15% of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) cases. Compared with idiopathic PAH, POPH is associated with significantly worse survival. Recent studies have improved our understanding of the role of both PAH therapy and liver transplantation (LT) in the management of POPH and their impact on overall prognosis. We performed a review of the published literature to summarize the available evidence and guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management of POPH. POPH is defined by the presence of precapillary PH in the context of portal hypertension. POPH is associated with increased perioperative risk at the time of LT, which can be stratified by mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. Screening with echocardiography is recommended in all LT candidates to facilitate detection and treatment of POPH. Despite a paucity of evidence, POPH is treated similarly to idiopathic PAH with PAH therapy. These therapies are associated with improved pulmonary hemodynamics and facilitation of safe LT. LT can result in improvement or resolution of POPH in half of patients and has been associated with improved survival in highly selected patients. The prognosis in POPH is poor and is impacted by the severity of both PH and liver disease. Management with a combination of PAH therapy and LT in selected patients has been associated with improved pulmonary hemodynamics and survival.

The predictive value of revised diastolic dysfunction in outcomes of liver transplantation: A propensity score matching analysis

Background

Diastolic dysfunction (DD), one of the earliest signs of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM), is included in the revised 2019 CCM criteria. Nonetheless, relevant research regarding the effects of revised DD on post-liver transplantation (LT) outcomes remains limited.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent LT for decompensated cirrhosis, from January 2018 to March 2021. Patients were divided into DD and non-DD groups. Clinical data were collected. Patients were followed up with, for at least 1 year post-LT; cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) and survival status were recorded. Risk factors were identified using 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), after adjusting for confounding factors. The caliper value was set to 0.02.

Results

Of 231 patients, 153 were diagnosed with DD (male, 81.8%; mean age, 51.5 ± 9.5 years). Nineteen patients with DD died within 1 year, post-LT. After PSM, 97 and 60 patients were diagnosed with and without DD, respectively. Patients with DD had longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays, higher perioperative cardiovascular AEs, and higher mortality rates than those without DD. In a multivariate analysis, interventricular septum (IVS), left atrial volume index (LAVI), and potassium levels were independent prognostic factors of perioperative cardiovascular AEs, while a decreased early diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity (e'), increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and tumor markers were predictors of mortality within 1 year post-LT after PSM (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Cardiac DD may contribute to perioperative cardiovascular AEs and mortality post-LT. Clinicians should be aware of decompensated cirrhosis in patients with DD.

Struggling Between Liver Transplantation and Portopulmonary Hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a progressive, ultimately fatal cardiopulmonary disease that occurs exclusively in patients with underlying portal hypertensive liver disease. PoPH outcomes are driven by both the severity of underlying liver disease and the degree of cardiac adaptation to elevated pulmonary pressures. The mainstay of treatment in PoPH is targeted pulmonary vascular therapy. Liver transplantation (LT) can be beneficial in some patients, but is associated with considerable risks in the PoPH population, and outcomes are variable. The optimal management strategy for PoPH, LT, or medical therapy alone, is unclear, and further research is needed to help guide clinical decision-making.

Mending the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease: An in-depth review of the past, present, and future portopulmonary hypertension Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exception

Patients with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) have an increased cardiovascular and overall mortality risk when undergoing liver transplantation (LT). However, such risk is not captured in their Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) laboratory score. POPH MELD exception criteria were established in 2006 with the aim of prioritizing these patients for LT prior to pulmonary hypertension (PH) progression and eventual right heart failure. The original criteria emphasized a posttreatment, pre-LT mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of <35 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) <400 dynes-s-cm^-5 or <5 Wood units (WU). Since 2006, there have been important advances in the treatment of POPH with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies and newer evidence regarding LT outcomes and risk factors for perioperative mortality. Specifically, PVR rather than mPAP has been shown to be more strongly associated with outcomes, including mortality. In addition, among treated patients with POPH, mPAP may be persistently elevated related to an elevated cardiac output or other factors that do not necessarily reflect POPH disease severity. Thus, in February 2021, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network approved proposed modifications to POPH MELD exception criteria, now allowing either of the following posttreatment, pre-LT hemodynamic profiles: mPAP less than 35 mm Hg and posttreatment PVR less than 400 dynes-s-cm^-5 (or less than 5 WU) or mPAP greater than or equal to 35 mm Hg and less than 45 mm Hg and posttreatment PVR less than 240 dynes-s-cm^-5 (or less than 3 WU). This article reviews the history of the POPH MELD exception criteria, describes the recent modifications to the exception criteria and the evidence supporting them, and highlights unanswered questions and areas for future research.

The Different Effects of Direct Bilirubin on Portopulmonary Hypertension and Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

To observe different roles of direct bilirubin (Dbil) on portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) and idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH).

METHODS

Thirty incident patients with POPH and 180 with IPAH (matched by the WHO functional classification in a 1 : 6 ratio) between March 2010 and December 2020 were included. The receiver operating curve and Kaplan-Meier method were applied to estimate the ability to distinguish between the two and survival, respectively. Univariate and forward multiple stepwise regression analyses were performed to access the relationship between pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and clinical indices.

RESULTS

Compared to IPAH, the POPH group had better hemodynamics including PVR (7.08 ± 3.95 vs. 14.89 ± 7.11, P < 0.001) and higher total bilirubin (Tbil) and Dbil. Tbil and Dbil had a negative correlation with PVR in the POPH group (r = -0.394, P=0.031; r = -0.364, P=0.048, respectively) but positive correlation in the IPAH group (r = 0.218, P=0.003; r = 0.178, P=0.018, respectively). Increased neutrophil counts (r = 0.394, P=0.031) and elevated NT-proBNP (r = 0.433, P < 0.001) would help predict the elevation of PVR in POPH and IPAH groups independent of Dbil, respectively. Dbil could distinguish POPH from IPAH (AUC = 0.799, P=0.009), and the ability was elevated when taking aspartate aminotransferase together (AUC = 0.835, P < 0.001). The overall survival was better in POPH than in IPAH (7 dead cases of POPH and 96 of IPAH, P=0.002). Survival was better in POPH than in IPAH in the group of Dbil ≥7 μmol/L (P=0.001) but showed no significant difference between POPH and IPAH in the group of Dbil <7 μmol/L (P=0.192).

CONCLUSIONS

The POPH group had a better hemodynamic profile than IPAH. Dbil was associated oppositely with the elevation of PVR in POPH and IPAH. Patients with POPH had better survival than those with IPAH in the total cohort and in the group of Dbil ≥7 μmol/L, but limited dead cases of POPH should be noted.