2
|
Bergquist F, Ehrnebo M, Nyholm D, Johansson A, Lundin F, Odin P, Svenningsson P, Hansson F, Bring L, Eriksson E, Dizdar N. Pharmacokinetics of Intravenously (DIZ101), Subcutaneously (DIZ102), and Intestinally (LCIG) Infused Levodopa in Advanced Parkinson Disease. Neurology 2022; 99:e965-e976. [PMID: 35705502 PMCID: PMC9519246 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Intestinal levodopa/carbidopa gel infusion (LCIG) is superior to oral treatment in advanced Parkinson disease. The primary objective of this trial was to investigate whether continuous subcutaneous or intravenous infusion with a continuously buffered acidic levodopa/carbidopa solution yields steady-state plasma concentrations of levodopa that are equivalent in magnitude, and noninferior in variability, to those obtained with LCIG in patients with advanced Parkinson disease. METHODS A concentrated acidic levodopa/carbidopa (8:1) solution buffered continuously and administered intravenously (DIZ101) or subcutaneously (DIZ102) was compared with an approved LCIG in a randomized, 3-period crossover, open-label, multicenter trial. Formulations were infused for 16 hours to patients with Parkinson disease who were using LCIG as their regular treatment. Patients were recruited from several university neurology clinics but came to the same phase I unit for treatment. Pharmacokinetic variables and safety including dermal tolerance are reported. The primary outcomes were bioequivalence and noninferior variability of DIZ101 and DIZ102 vs LCIG with respect to levodopa plasma concentrations. RESULTS With dosing adjusted to estimated bioavailability, DIZ101 and DIZ102 produced levodopa plasma levels within standard bioequivalence limits compared with LCIG in the 18 participants who received all treatments. Although the levodopa bioavailability for DIZ102 was complete, it was 80% for LCIG. Therapeutic concentrations of levodopa were reached as quickly with subcutaneous administration of DIZ102 as with LCIG and remained stable throughout the infusions. Owing to poor uptake of LCIG, carbidopa levels in plasma were higher with DIZ101 and DIZ102 than with the former. All individuals receiving any of the treatments (n = 20) were included in the evaluation of safety and tolerability. Reactions at the infusion sites were mild and transient. DISCUSSION It is feasible to rapidly achieve high and stable levodopa concentrations by means of continuous buffering of a subcutaneously administered acidic levodopa/carbidopa-containing solution. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03419806. Registration first posted on February 5, 2018, first patient enrolled on February 16, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filip Bergquist
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Mats Ehrnebo
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dag Nyholm
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anders Johansson
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Lundin
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Odin
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Svenningsson
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Hansson
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Leif Bring
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Elias Eriksson
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nil Dizdar
- From the Department of Pharmacology (F.B., E.E.), University of Gothenburg; Neurology (F.B.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences (M.E.), Uppsala University; Pharm Assist Sweden AB (M.E.), Uppsala; Department of Neuroscience (D.N.), Uppsala University; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (A.J., P.S.), Karolinska Institutet (A.J., P.S.), Solna; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (F.L., N.D.), Linköping University (F.L., N.D.); Neurology (P.O.), Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University; CTC Clinical Trial Consultants AB (F.H.), Uppsala; and Dizlin Pharmaceuticals (L.B.) Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kolmančič K, Zupančič NK, Trošt M, Flisar D, Kramberger MG, Pirtošek Z, Kojović M. Continuous Dopaminergic Stimulation Improves Cortical Maladaptive Changes in Advanced Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord 2022; 37:1465-1473. [PMID: 35436354 DOI: 10.1002/mds.29028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD), pulsatile treatment with oral levodopa causes maladaptive changes within basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuits, which are clinically expressed as motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. At the level of the motor cortex, these changes may be detected using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as abnormal corticospinal and intracortical excitability and absent response to plasticity protocols. OBJECTIVE We investigated the effect of continuous dopaminergic stimulation on cortical maladaptive changes related to oral levodopa treatment. METHODS Twenty patients with advanced PD were tested using TMS within 1 week before and again 6 months after the introduction of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel. We measured resting and active motor thresholds, input/output curve, short interval intracortical inhibition curve, cortical silent period, and response to intermittent theta burst stimulation. Patients were clinically assessed with Part III and Part IV of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. RESULTS Six months after the introduction of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, motor fluctuations scores (P = 0.001) and dyskinesias scores (P < 0.001) were reduced. Resting and active motor threshold (P = 0.012 and P = 0.015) and x-intercept of input/output curve (P = 0.005) were also decreased, while short-interval intracortical inhibition and response to intermittent theta bust stimulation were improved (P = 0.026 and P = 0.031, respectively). Changes in these parameters correlated with clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced PD, switching from intermittent to continuous levodopa delivery increased corticospinal excitability and improved deficient intracortical inhibition and abnormal motor cortex plasticity, along with amelioration of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation ameliorates maladaptive changes inflicted by chronic pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaja Kolmančič
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nina K Zupančič
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Trošt
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dušan Flisar
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Milica G Kramberger
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Zvezdan Pirtošek
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maja Kojović
- Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|