Driving Impairment in Movement Disorders

Prodromal Parkinson's Disease: A Snapshot of the Landscape

Early observations of specific nonmotor and subtle motor symptoms preceding clinical diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) have paved the way for prodromal PD research, significantly propelling our understanding of early, subclinical stages of neurodegeneration. Prodromal PD has emerged as a complex concept with some researchers suggesting that the period before PD onset is divided into the "at-risk," "preclinical," and "prodromal" phases. Advances in genetic, imaging, laboratory, and digital technologies have enabled the identification of pathophysiological patterns and the potential development of diagnostic, progressive, and therapeutic biomarkers, which could lead to early PD detection and intervention.

Tics emergencies and malignant tourette syndrome: Assessment and management

Tourette syndrome (TS) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by the presence of tics, frequently accompanied by a variety of neuropsychiatric comorbidities. A subset of patients with TS present with severe and disabling symptoms, requiring prompt therapeutic intervention. Some of these manifestations may result in medical emergencies when severe motor or phonic tics lead to damage of anatomical structures closely related to the tic. Examples include myelopathy or radiculopathy following severe neck ("whiplash") jerks or a variety of self-inflicted injuries. In addition to self-aggression or, less commonly, allo-aggression, some patients exhibit highly inappropriate behavior, suicidal tendencies, and rage attacks which increase the burden of the disease and are important components of "malignant TS". This subset of TS is frequently associated with comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder. Therapeutic measures include intensive behavioral therapy, optimization of oral pharmacotherapy, botulinum toxin injections, and deep brain stimulation.

A semi-naturalistic open-label study examining the effect of prescribed medical cannabis use on simulated driving performance

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing medical cannabis use, research has yet to establish whether and to what extent products containing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impact driving performance among patients. Stable doses of prescribed cannabinoid products during long-term treatment may alleviate clinical symptoms affecting cognitive and psychomotor performance.

AIM

To examine the effects of open-label prescribed medical cannabis use on simulated driving performance among patients.

METHODS

In a semi-naturalistic laboratory study, 40 adults (55% male) aged between 23 and 80 years, consumed their own prescribed medical cannabis product. Driving performance outcomes including standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), the standard deviation of speed (SDS), mean speed and steering variability were evaluated using the Forum8 driving simulator at baseline (pre-dosing), 2.5 h and 5 -h (post-dosing). Perceived driving effort (PDE) was self-reported after each drive. Oral fluid and whole blood samples were collected at multiple timepoints and analysed for THC via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

A significant main effect of time was observed for mean speed (p = 0.014) and PDE (p = 0.020), with patients displaying modest stabilisation of vehicle control, increased adherence to speed limits and reductions in PDE post-dosing, relative to baseline. SDLP (p = 0.015) and PDE (p = 0.043) were elevated for those who consumed oil relative to flower-based products. Detectable THC concentrations were observed in oral fluid at 6-h post-dosing (range = 0-24 ng/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

This semi-naturalistic study suggests that the consumption of medical cannabis containing THC (1.13-39.18 mg/dose) has a negligible impact on driving performance when used as prescribed.

Parkinson's Disease and Driving Fitness: A Systematic Review of the Existing Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Motor/nonmotor symptomatology and antiparkinsonian drugs deteriorate the driving ability of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients.

OBJECTIVES

Treating neurologists are frequently asked to evaluate driving fitness of their patients and provide evidence-based consultation. Although several guidelines have been published, the exact procedure along with the neurologist's role in this procedure remains obscure.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed the existing guidelines, regarding driving fitness evaluation of PD patients. We searched MEDLINE and Google Scholar and identified 109 articles. After specified inclusion criteria were applied, 15 articles were included (nine national guidelines, five recommendation papers, and one consensus statement).

RESULTS

The treating physician is proposed as the initial evaluator in 8 of 15 articles (neurologist in 2 articles) and may refer patients for a second-line evaluation. The evaluation should include motor, cognitive, and visual assessment (proposed in 15, 13, and 8 articles, respectively). Specific motor tests are proposed in eight articles (cutoff values in four), whereas specific neuropsychological and visual tests are proposed in seven articles each (cutoff values in four and three articles, respectively). Conditional licenses are proposed in 11 of 15 articles, to facilitate driving for PD patients. We summarized our findings on a graphic of the procedure for driving fitness evaluation of PD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurological aspects of driving fitness evaluation of PD patients are recognized in most of the guidelines. Motor, neuropsychological, visual, and sleep assessment and medication review are key components. Clear-cut instructions regarding motor, neuropsychological, and visual tests and relative cutoff values are lacking. Conditional licenses and periodical reevaluation of driving fitness are important safety measures.