Familial essential tremor with apparent autosomal dominant inheritance: should we also consider other inheritance modes?

Brain structure comparison among Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and healthy controls using 7T MRI

Both Parkinson disease (PD) and Essential tremor (ET) are movement disorders causing tremors in elderly individuals. Although PD and ET are different disease, they often present with similar initial symptoms, making their differentiation challenging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. This study aimed to identify structural brain differences among PD, ET, and health controls (HCs) using 7-Tesla (T) MRI. We assessed the whole-brain parcellation in gray matter volume, thickness, subcortical volume, and small regions of basal ganglia in PD (n = 18), ET (n = 15), and HCs (n = 18), who were matched for age and sex. Brain structure analysis was performed automatic segmentation through Freesurfer software. Small regions of basal ganglia were manually segmented by ITK-SNAP. Additionally, we examined the associations between clinical indicators (symptom duration, unified Parkinson diseases rating scale (UPDRS), and clinical rating scale for tremor (CRST)) and brain structure. PD showed a significant reduction in gray matter volume in the postcentral region compared to ET. ET showed a significant reduction in cerebellum volume compared to HCs. There was a negative correlation between CRST scores (B and C) and gray matter thickness in right superior frontal in ET. This study demonstrated potential of 7T MRI in differentiating brain structure differences among PD, ET, and HCs. Specific findings, such as parietal lobe atrophy in PD compared to ET and cerebellum atrophy in ET compared to HCs, the importance of advanced imaging techniques in accurately diagnosing and distinguishing between movement disorders that present with similar initial symptoms.

Mixed Motor Disorder: Essential Tremor Families With Heterogeneous Motor Phenomenology

Background and Objectives

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most prevalent movement disorders. Because ET is so common, individuals with other neurologic disorders may also have ET. There is evidence, however, that the cooccurrence of ET with Parkinson disease (PD) and/or dystonia is not merely a chance cooccurrence. We have observed combinations of these 3 movement disorders within individuals and across individuals within families containing multiple individuals with ET. This observation has a number of implications. Our objective is to present 4 ET families in whom motor phenomenology was heterogeneous and discuss the implications of this finding.

Methods

ET cases and their relatives were enrolled in the Family Study of Essential Tremor (2015-present). Phenotyping was performed by a senior movement disorders neurologist based on neurologic examination.

Results

We present 4 families, including 14 affected individuals, among whom assigned diagnoses were ET, PD, ET + PD, and ET + dystonia. In those with ET and another movement disorder, the predominant and earliest phenotype was ET.

Discussion

There are assortments of these 3 involuntary motor disorders, ET, dystonia, and PD, both within individuals and in different individuals within ET families. This observation has mechanistic implications. Furthermore, we believe that the concept of the mixed motor disorder should enter into and inform the clinical dialogue. In assigning diagnoses, clinicians are swayed by family history information, and they should be prepared to observe a mix of different motor disorders to manifest within particular families.

Genomic Markers for Essential Tremor

There are many reports suggesting an important role of genetic factors in the etiopathogenesis of essential tremor (ET), encouraging continuing the research for possible genetic markers. Linkage studies in families with ET have identified 4 genes/loci for familial ET, although the responsible gene(s) have not been identified. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) described several variants in LINGO1, SLC1A2, STK32B, PPARGC1A, and CTNNA3, related with ET, but none of them have been confirmed in replication studies. In addition, the case-control association studies performed for candidate variants have not convincingly linked any gene with the risk for ET. Exome studies described the association of several genes with familial ET (FUS, HTRA2, TENM4, SORT1, SCN11A, NOTCH2NLC, NOS3, KCNS2, HAPLN4, USP46, CACNA1G, SLIT3, CCDC183, MMP10, and GPR151), but they were found only in singular families and, again, not found in other families or other populations, suggesting that some can be private polymorphisms. The search for responsible genes for ET is still ongoing.

The Problem of Questionable Dystonia in the Diagnosis of 'Essential Tremor-Plus'

In a recent consensus statement on tremor, the task force of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society proposed a new term, ‘essential tremor-plus (ET-plus)’ which includes patients with the characteristics of essential tremor (ET) and additional soft neurological signs of uncertain significance such as questionable dystonic posturing. The clinical interpretation of questionable dystonia has been left to the investigator. The consensus statement also stated that the ET-plus syndrome does not include other clearly defined syndromes like dystonic tremor. However, the boundary between questionable dystonia and definite dystonia is not distinct leading to diagnostic uncertainty in a clinical setting. A similar case may be classified as ET-plus by one observer and dystonic tremor by another. Following the new definition, many studies have reclassified their ET cohort, and they have highlighted the problem of defining questionable dystonia in the diagnosis of ET plus. ET-plus is likely to be a mixture of patients that actually have dystonia and those that don’t, and clinically all we can do is to be suspicious that there might be dystonia. For example, it is not clear whether we should consider spooning and index finger pointing as a sign of questionable or definite dystonia. There are major research and possible therapeutic implications of questionable dystonia in the diagnosis of ET-plus. The concept of ET-plus is extremely difficult to implement without definite guidelines. The resolution will need a biomarker such as physiology or imaging.

[Essential tremor: genetic update]

Essential tremor (ET) is a neurological movement disorder characterised by bilateral limb kinetic/postural tremor, with or without tremor in other body parts including head, voice and lower limbs. Since no causative genes for ET have been identified, it is likely that the disorder occurs as a result of complex genetic factors interacting with various cellular and environmental factors that can result in abnormal function of circuitry involving the cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway. Genetic analyses have uncovered at least 14 loci and 11 genes that are related to ET, as well as various risk or protective genetic factors. Limitations in ET genetic analyses include inconsistent disease definition, small sample size, varied ethnic backgrounds and many other factors that may contribute to paucity of relevant genetic data in ET. Genetic analyses, coupled with functional and animal studies, have led to better insights into possible pathogenic mechanisms underlying ET. These genetic studies may guide the future development of genetic testing and counselling, and specific, pathogenesis-targeted, therapeutic strategies.

Which disease features run in essential tremor families? A systematic review

Essential tremor is a common and highly heritable movement disorder. It is largely unknown, however, to what extent family members share overlapping symptoms. Such knowledge would be useful, as it may lead to the definition of familial essential tremor phenotypes, which will aid the ongoing search for genotypes. Also, this information can be used by clinicians in patient counselling. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to provide an overview of the evidence on which essential tremor features run in families, to assess the literature's strengths and weaknesses, and to provide recommendations for future studies. PubMed was searched resulting in 460 titles: sixteen articles ultimately proved fit for inclusion. The results are represented in line with the Axis 1 classification of tremor as published in the latest Consensus Statement. In summary, we found varying levels of positive evidence for familial aggregation of age at onset, disease progression, alcohol responsiveness, parkinsonism and dystonia. Evidence on midline tremor was conflicting. The evidence on familial clustering was negative for cerebellar signs and action tremor asymmetry. Although the level of evidence is modest, it seems that some disease features are indeed familial, while other features are not. We discuss complicating factors, such as state-vs-trait dependency of characteristics, the place of familial dystonia, and the development of diagnostic criteria for essential tremor over time. In the future, comprehensive replication studies are needed, with the addition of several characteristics that have not been investigated so far, as the next step towards discovery of essential tremor phenotypes.

Etiologic links between environmental and lifestyle factors and Essential tremor

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common adult movement disorders, characterized by clinical tremor and other nonmotor symptoms. It is a progressive disease that shares features with other neurodegenerative diseases. ET is a complex disease with both genetic and environmental underpinnings. While genetic forms of ET are well recognized, the role of environmental and lifestyle factors in ET has been debated. Studies suggest that exposure to neurotoxic compounds such as β‐carboline alkaloids and ethanol are potential risk factors for ET, while antioxidant intake may be protective. In addition, smoking acts as a protective factor in ET, parallel to its effects in other neurological diseases. New evidence points to pesticide and lead exposure as potential risk factors. There is growing evidence to suggest that environmental and lifestyle factors play a role in ET but additional research is needed in order to completely understand their cause and effect association. There is also a need for larger case‐control and prospective cohort studies across different populations to further evaluate the etiological importance of these factors in ET.

Prevalence of Essential Tremor in the Faroe Islands: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

No studies of the prevalence of one of the most common movement disorders, essential tremor (ET), have been undertaken in the Faroe Islands. Given the potential for founder effects in the Islands, and the highly genetic nature of ET, the Faroe Islands provide a particularly interesting setting in which to study the prevalence of ET.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of ET and study its characteristics.

METHODS

We used a 2-phase, population-based design, screening 1,328 randomly selected Faroese individuals aged ≥40 years. A subsample of 282 individuals who had returned the spirals and questionnaire was selected to participate in an in-person clinical evaluation. Tremor was systematically quantified by a senior movement disorder neurologist with particular specialization in tremor using a reliable and valid clinical rating scale followed by the application of rigorous diagnostic criteria used by tremor investigators internationally.

RESULTS

The overall crude prevalence was 2.9%. The age-adjusted prevalence was 3.1%. There was an age-associated rise in prevalence; by age ≥70, prevalence reached 4.8%. Twenty six of 27 (96.2%) were previously undiagnosed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first population-based study of the prevalence of ET in the Faroe Islands. The estimated prevalence was similar to studies using the same or comparable methodologies.

[Genetics of tremor]

BACKGROUND

Tremor is a symptom of many diseases and can constitute a disease of its own: essential tremor.

OBJECTIVE

The genetics of essential tremor and differential diagnosis of monogenic diseases with the symptom tremor.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature search and search of clinical genetics databases, e.g. OMIM, GeneReviews, MDSGene and the German Neurological Society (DGN) guidelines.

RESULTS

The genetics of essential tremor remain unresolved in spite of large, adequately powered studies. Tremor is a symptom of differential diagnostic value in many movement disorders. A slight tremor might have been missed or not reported in many descriptions of movement disorders.

CONCLUSION

Progress in the genetics of essential tremor probably requires a more detailed phenotyping allowing stratification into phenotypically defined subgroups. Tremor should always be included in the examination and description of movement disorders even if tremor is not a cardinal symptom. Tremor might be helpful in the differential diagnosis of hereditary dystonia, hereditary ataxia, spastic paraplegia and other movement disorders.

Genetic Testing Preferences of Individuals in Families with Essential Tremor

Background

The search for essential tremor (ET) genes is active, and it is only a matter of time before genetic tests become available. Genetic testing preferences in families have been studied in numerous other neurological disorders but there are no published data about ET.

Methods

We surveyed 34 ET probands and their relatives (43 affected, 28 unaffected) enrolled in our Family Study of Essential Tremor to assess their interest in genetic testing. We examined whether clinical factors influenced their interest in testing. Clinical utility (“Your physician will be able to use the information obtained to improve your care”) and penetrance (“How likely an individual who carries an ET gene is to develop ET”) were defined for participants.

Results

Interest in genetic testing was high in ET families (90/105 [85.7%]). There was a significant difference between affected (including probands and affected relatives) and unaffected relatives in terms of their interest in genetic testing, with the former being more interested (70/77 [90.9%] vs. 20/28 [71.4%] p = 0.04). Participants were more likely to want testing in the scenarios with high clinical utility; disease penetrance was not a determining factor (all p < 0.05). Sixteen hypothetical factors were identified that might influence a participant’s decision to undergo genetic testing for ET.

Discussion

Interest in genetic testing was high in ET families. While genetic testing is not currently available for ET, the hunt for ET genes is ongoing, and this is a highly familial disorder. Understanding genetic testing preferences will greatly aid clinicians once a genetic test becomes available.

A Series of 211 Children with Probable Essential Tremor

Background

The objective of this study was to characterize the clinical features, course, and treatment of essential tremor (ET) in children.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted over 25 years (1984-2011). Inclusion criteria were age <21 years and satisfying the core diagnostic criteria for ET. Primary exclusion criteria included other neurological findings, tremorogenic medications, sudden onset/stepwise progression, primary orthostatic tremor, and isolated task specificity; and secondary exclusion criteria were abnormal neuroimaging or metabolic/thyroid studies. Cases were reviewed for age, sex, family history, tremor characteristics, functional impairment, treatment, and follow-up.

Results

In total, 211 children had ET, including 130 males and 81 females. The mean ± standard deviation age was at diagnosis was 14.09 ± 5.0 years, the age of onset was 9.71 ± 5.62 years, and the age of onset was birth in 7 children. One hundred ninety-nine children had bilateral hand tremor, 34 had asymmetry, 9 had unilateral onset but later became bilateral. Twelve children had voice tremors, 13 had leg tremors, 5 had head tremors, and 7 had trunk tremors. Tremor at rest was present in 20 children. Thirty-five percent of the children had a family history of ET, including in a father (n = 21), mother (n = 13), brother (n = 6), sister (n = 3), and other family member (n = 28). Fifty-five percent of patients had functional disabilities, including writing (n = 66), eating (n = 28) drinking from a cup (n = 13), typing (n = 4), playing instruments (n = 6), buttoning (n = 6), and playing (n = 3). For treatment, 33 patients received propranolol, 1 received atenolol, 13 received primidone, 3 received metoprolol, and 1 received nadolol. In total, 99 patients were followed for a mean ± standard deviation of 1.82 ± 2.21 years.If left untreated, tremor remained unchanged in 33 patients, and 7 had an apparent short-term improvement. On propranolol, 15 of 20 patients significantly improved.

Conclusions

This is the largest series to date of ET in children. The current findings indicate that onset at birth is possible, family history is less common in children than in adults, and tremor at rest is possible. Functional disability was noted in 55% of children, and 29.4% required medication.

Missense mutations in TENM4, a regulator of axon guidance and central myelination, cause essential tremor

Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder with an estimated prevalence of 5% of the population aged over 65 years. In spite of intensive efforts, the genetic architecture of ET remains unknown. We used a combination of whole-exome sequencing and targeted resequencing in three ET families. In vitro and in vivo experiments in oligodendrocyte precursor cells and zebrafish were performed to test our findings. Whole-exome sequencing revealed a missense mutation in TENM4 segregating in an autosomal-dominant fashion in an ET family. Subsequent targeted resequencing of TENM4 led to the discovery of two novel missense mutations. Not only did these two mutations segregate with ET in two additional families, but we also observed significant over transmission of pathogenic TENM4 alleles across the three families. Consistent with a dominant mode of inheritance, in vitro analysis in oligodendrocyte precursor cells showed that mutant proteins mislocalize. Finally, expression of human mRNA harboring any of three patient mutations in zebrafish embryos induced defects in axon guidance, confirming a dominant-negative mode of action for these mutations. Our genetic and functional data, which is corroborated by the existence of a Tenm4 knockout mouse displaying an ET phenotype, implicates TENM4 in ET. Together with previous studies of TENM4 in model organisms, our studies intimate that processes regulating myelination in the central nervous system and axon guidance might be significant contributors to the genetic burden of this disorder.

Evaluating Familial Essential Tremor with Novel Genetic Approaches: Is it a Genotyping or Phenotyping Issue?

Background

Essential tremor is a common movement disorder with a strong heritable component. Large families with inherited forms of essential tremor have undergone genetic analyses by different approaches. However, our knowledge of genetic variants unequivocally linked to essential tremor is remarkably limited. Several explanations have been put forth to explain this challenge, including the possibility of mutations in non-coding areas of the genome.

Methods

We encountered a family with highly penetrant, autosomal dominant tremor. We hypothesized that, if a single coding gene mutation was responsible for the phenotype, novel genetic tools would allow us to identify it. We employed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays in 17 members of this family followed by next generation whole-exome sequencing in five affected subjects.

Results

We did not identify any copy number variant or mutation that segregated with the disease phenotype.

Discussion

This study emphasizes the remarkably challenging field of tremor genetics and indicates that future studies should perhaps shift to analysis of the non-coding genome.

Clinical classification of borderline cases in the family study of essential tremor: an analysis of phenotypic features

Background

In genetic research on essential tremor (ET), certain individuals may be particularly challenging to categorize diagnostically.

Methods

In the Family Study of Essential Tremor (>200 enrollees), 28 participants with borderline clinical findings who did not meet strict criteria for ET were assigned final diagnoses of ET. We scrutinized the clinical features of these cases and the sensitivity/specificity of certain features that best separated them from 19 unaffected individuals.

Results

Borderline ET cases differed from unaffected individuals in eight features: total tremor score, at least one kinetic tremor rating ≥1.5, at least one kinetic tremor rating ≥1.5 in the dominant arm, tremor rating during spiral drawing ≥1.5, higher spiral axis score, head tremor, complaint of tremor, and comment on tremor by others. The combination of at least one kinetic tremor rating ≥1.5 in the dominant arm and the presence of at least three of the remaining seven features predicted the clinician-assigned diagnosis in 88.6% of borderline ET vs. unaffected individuals (sensitivity 84.6%, specificity 94.4%).

Discussion

In a family study, a small number of clinical features characterized borderline ET, and a particular combination of these separated the majority of these borderline cases from normals. These analyses may help researchers minimize diagnostic misclassification.

Update on genetics of essential tremor

Despite the research, few advances in the etiopathogenesis on essential tremor (ET) have been made to date. The high frequency of positive family history of ET and the observed high concordance rates in monozygotic compared with dizygotic twins support a major role of genetic factors in the development of ET. In addition, a possible role of environmental factors has been suggested in the etiology of ET (at least in non-familial forms). Although several gene variants in the LINGO1 gene may increase the risk of ET, to date no causative mutated genes have been identified. In this review, we summarize the studies performed on families with tremor, twin studies, linkage studies, case-control association studies, and exome sequencing in familial ET.

What is essential tremor?

Classic essential tremor is a clinical syndrome of action tremor in the upper limbs (at least 95 % of patients) and less commonly the head, face/jaw, voice, tongue, trunk, and lower limbs, in the absence of other neurologic signs. However, the longstanding notion that essential tremor is a monosymptomatic tremor disorder is being challenged by a growing literature describing associated disturbances of tandem walking, personality, mood, hearing, and cognition. There is also epidemiologic, pathologic, and genetic evidence that essential tremor is pathophysiologically heterogeneous. Misdiagnosis of essential tremor is common because clinicians frequently overlook other neurologic signs and because action tremor in the hands is caused by many conditions, including dystonia, Parkinson disease, and drug-induced tremor. Thus, essential tremor is nothing more than a syndrome of idiopathic tremulousness, and the challenge for researchers and clinicians is to find specific etiologies of this syndrome.

Meta-analysis of the influence of DRD3 Ser9Gly variant on susceptibility for essential tremor

The dopamine D3 receptor (DRD3) Ser9Gly variant has attracted more attention since the variant was observed to be associated with risk of essential tremor (ET). A number of association studies concerning the DRD3 Ser9Gly variant and ET susceptibility have been conducted in various populations. However, some results were contradictory. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between the DRD3 Ser9Gly variant and the genetic risk of ET, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis which included seven case-control studies. The meta-analysis was conducted in four genetic models: dominant, recessive, heterozygous, and homozygous. The odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals were used as the measure of association. The combined results of overall analysis showed a lack of association of the DRD3 Ser9Gly variant and ET, regardless of the genetic model of Ser9Gly. Publication bias and heterogeneity were absent in most analyses. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis does not support the notion that the DRD3 Ser9Gly variant is a genetic risk factor for ET.

Key issues in essential tremor genetics research: Where are we now and how can we move forward?

Background

Genetics research is an avenue towards understanding essential tremor (ET). Advances have been made in genetic linkage and association: there are three reported ET susceptibility loci, and mixed but growing data on risk associations. However, causal mutations have not been forthcoming. This disappointing lack of progress has opened productive discussions on challenges in ET and specifically ET genetics research, including fundamental assumptions in the field.

Methods

This article reviews the ET genetics literature, results to date, the open questions in ET genetics and the current challenges in addressing them.

Results

Several inherent ET features complicate genetic linkage and association studies: high potential phenocopy rates, inaccurate tremor self-reporting, and ET misdiagnoses are examples. Increasing use of direct examination data for subjects, family members, and controls is one current response. Smaller moves towards expanding ET phenotype research concepts into non-tremor features, clinically disputed ET subsets, and testing phenotype features instead of clinical diagnosis against genetic data are gradually occurring. The field has already moved to considering complex trait mechanisms requiring detection of combinations of rare genetic variants. Hypotheses may move further to consider novel mechanisms of inheritance, such as epigenetics.

Discussion

It is an exciting time in ET genetics as investigators start moving past assumptions underlying both phenotype and genetics experimental contributions, overcoming challenges to collaboration, and engaging the ET community. Multicenter collaborative efforts comprising rich longitudinal prospective phenotype data and neuropathologic analysis combined with the latest in genetics experimental design and technology will be the next wave in the field.

Prevalence and features of unreported dystonia in a family study of "pure" essential tremor

BACKGROUND

Essential tremor (ET) is considered to be a highly heritable disorder, yet no susceptibility genes have been identified. The search for ET genes is severely hampered by clinical and genetic heterogeneity; the existence of this heterogeneity complicates the genetic analyses. We sought to determine the prevalence and clinical features of unreported dystonia in a family study of "pure" ET.

METHODS

ET probands and their reportedly affected first-and second-degree relatives were enrolled in a genetics study, the Family Study of Essential Tremor (FASET) at Columbia University Medical Center. The goal was to enroll cases with "pure" ET (i.e., ET without dystonia or other neurological problems). Each enrollee underwent a detailed neurological evaluation.

RESULTS

There were 100 enrollees (28 probands, 72 relatives). Dystonia (primarily torticollis) occurred in 9 (32.1%) of 28 families, with 5 cases in one family, 2 cases in two families, and 1 case in six families. Those affected with dystonia included 3 (10.7%) probands and 12 (16.7%) relatives. There was a gender predilection: 14/15 (93.3%) with dystonia vs. 41/85 (48.2%) without dystonia were women (p = 0.001). Dystonia was previously undiagnosed in 14/15 (93.3%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Dystonia (esp. torticollis in women) was present in nearly one-third of the ET families in a genetics study, including 10.7% of ET probands. Dystonia was unreported and previously undiagnosed in nearly all of these individuals. The overarching biological issue is whether ET and dystonia should be regarded as one disease or two; this has obvious implications for the structuring of analyses in genetic studies.

Phenocopies in families with essential tremor and restless legs syndrome challenge Mendelian laws. Epigenetics might provide answers

Essential Tremor (ET) and Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) are both highly heritable neurological disorders. The frequent occurrence of multi-incident families suggests the existence of highly penetrant alleles. However, linkage analyses and positional cloning approaches performed within the last 10 years essentially failed to identify responsible mutations. Several loci were found, but their relevance was questioned given the occurrence of suspected phenocopies in many of those families. Remarkably, in some ET and RLS families with an apparent autosomal dominant mode of transmission, the proportion of affected individuals was higher than the expected 50% and therefore suggests a non-mendelian inheritance in some cases. In fact, there is increasing evidence that epigenetic modifications, which refer to changes in gene expression without changes in DNA sequence, can be transmitted to the next generation. Moreover, epigenetic information can be transferred from one allele of a gene to the other allele of the same gene; if then inherited to the next generation, the offspring consequently presents phenotypic properties related to the untransmitted allele. This phenomenon known as paramutation is well documented in plants and has recently been shown to occur also in mammals. Here, I explore the possibility that it is the epigenetic and not only the genetic state which confers disease risk in families. Inheritance of epigenetic mutations along with paramutational events have the potential to explain the non-mendelian features in the genetics of both diseases.

Essential tremor

Essential tremor (ET) is among the most common neurological disorders. This chapter reviews the epidemiology, clinical features, and pathophysiology of ET. The defining feature is a kinetic tremor of the arms. Patients often have a postural tremor as well. Other body regions may also be involved (especially the head). The severity of tremor may range from mild cases in population settings to more severe cases in treatment settings. Motor features aside from tremor have been described in ET, including tandem gait difficulty. Mild cognitive changes (especially executive dysfunction) have been documented in many studies as well. Despite being regarded as one of the most common hyperkinetic movement disorders, establishing a precise prevalence has been difficult, yet the prevalence among persons aged 40 and older seems to be 4% or higher. There are numerous examples of families in which the disease appears to be inherited yet genetic studies have not progressed to the point where ET genes have been identified. There is also a growing understanding that environmental factors are likely to contribute to the etiology of ET. More recent postmortem studies have helped localize the possible source of ET to structural alterations in the cerebellum and its connecting pathways.

Positive family history of essential tremor influences the motor phenotype of Parkinson's disease

Previous reports have suggested that essential tremor (ET) represents a risk factor for the development of Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients with long-standing ET who develop PD tend to have a tremor-dominant subtype. To further clarify this association, we examined patients from kindreds with autosomal dominant ET who had signs of isolated PD but did not meet criteria for overlapping ET. We identified 22 patients with PD meeting these diagnostic criteria, and 90% (20 of 22) had tremor-predominant subtype of PD. Unilateral rest tremor was the presenting symptom in 15 of 22 patients, bradykinesia or rigidity in 5 of 22, and gait problems in 2 of 22. Postural tremor was relatively mild, and the severity of kinetic tremor tightly correlated with rest tremor (r = 0.83, P < 0.001). Tremor-dominant subtype of PD in patients with a positive family history of ET suggests that these patients have inherited a genetic susceptibility factor for tremor, which affects the motor phenotype of PD.

Dopamine receptor D3 (DRD3) genotype and allelic variants and risk for essential tremor

To investigate the possible association between dopamine receptor D3 genotype (DRD3) and allelic variants and the risk for developing essential tremor (ET). Leukocytary DNA from 201 patients with ET and 282 healthy controls was studied for the genotype DRD3 and the occurrence of DRD3 allelic variants by using allele-specific PCR amplification and MslI-RFLP's analyses. A meta-analysis of previous studies was performed. The frequencies of the DRD3Ser/Gly genotype and of the allelic variant DRDGly were significantly higher in patients with ET than in controls (P < 0.017 and <0.005, respectively), These findings were especially relevant in women (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.15-2.59, P = 0.008), and in patients with earlier onset of the disease with (P = 0.014). The frequencies of the DRD3Ser/Gly and DRD3Gly/Gly genotypes and of the allelic variant DRD3Gly in patients were significantly higher in patients with voice tremor, but not with head, tongue, or chin tremor, than in controls. The meta-analysis indicated association of variant genotypes with ET risk (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.38). These results suggest that DRD3 genotype and the variant DRD3Gly allelic variant is associated with the risk for and age at onset of ET, and with the risk for voice tremor, in Caucasian Spanish people.

Chapter 33: the history of movement disorders

Role of basal ganglia: Vesalius and Piccolomini distinguished subcortical nuclei from cortex and white matter in the 16th century. Willis' mistaken concept in the late 17th century that the corpus striatum was the seat of motor power persisted for 200 years and formed the basis of mid-19th-century localizations of movement disorders to the striatum (chorea by Broadbent and Jackson, and athetosis by Hammond). By the late 19th century, many movement disorders were described but for most no pathologic correlate was known. Tremor: Descriptions of tremors progressed from Galen's definition in the 2nd century; to Galileo's physiologic tremor in 1610; separation of involuntary movements during action and at rest in the 17th and 18th centuries by de la Boë Sylvius and van Sweiten; description of Parkinson's disease by Parkinson, discrimination of the rest tremor of Parkinson's disease from the intention tremor of multiple sclerosis by Charcot, and recognition of familial action tremors by Dana and others in the late 19th century; and recognition of autosomal dominant essential tremor in the mid-20th century. Parkinsonism: Pathologic changes in Parkinson's disease were recognized in the substantia nigra by Blocq and Marinescu in the late 19th century, and around 1920 Trértiakoff established Lewy bodies in the substantia nigra as a pathologic hallmark while the Vogts instead emphasized pathologic changes in the striatum; it was only in the mid-1960s that a nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway was demonstrated and found to be critical to pathogenesis. Early treatment approaches with anticholinergic medications or crude neurosurgical ablation procedures were eclipsed in the 1960s by the advent of L-DOPA therapy due to the work of Carlsson and colleagues, Birkmayer and Hornykiewicz, Barbeau, and Cotzias. Later progress in understanding and treating Parkinson's disease included recognition of neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism beginning in the 1950s, development of dopamine agonists and elaboration of different dopamine receptors beginning in the 1960s, recognition of MPTP-induced parkinsonism in 1982 and subsequent development of experimental models of MPTP-induced parkinsonism. Since the 1980s, stereotactic neurosurgical ablation procedures such as stereotactic pallidotomy were revisited and improved, and stimulation or ablation procedures that modulate subthalamic nucleus activity were developed. Since 1990, rare genetic forms of Parkinson's disease were discovered, which accelerated progress in understanding pathogenesis, and established roles for alpha synuclein and the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic system. Separation of atypical forms of parkinsonism (e.g. Wilson's disease, multisystem atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, and corticobasal degeneration) from Parkinson's disease in the 20th century also led to important discoveries of basal ganglia function, and in the case of Wilson's disease to recognition of genetic mutations and effective treatments. Choreoathetosis: Since the middle ages, the term chorea has been used to describe both organic and psychological disorders of motor control. Paracelcus introduced the concept of chorea as an organic medical condition in the 16th century. Sydenham's description of childhood chorea (1686) was followed by recognition in the 19th and 20th centuries that Sydenham's chorea was a manifestation of rheumatic fever; by the 1930s, rheumatic fever was recognized as a sequel of group A streptococcal pharyngitis, which could be effectively prevented with sulfonamides. Athetosis was described by Hammond (1871) and later linked by him to a malignant growth in the contralateral corpus striatum; nevertheless, athetosis has been controversial and often dismissed as a form of post-hemiplegic chorea or part of a continuum between chorea and dystonia. Huntington's classic description of adult-onset hereditary chorea (1872) was followed a century later by demonstration that Huntington's disease is caused by an unstable CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in the Huntington disease gene on chromosome 4; this triggered a surge in research, development of various animal models, and numerous important discoveries of cell function and disease pathogenesis. Hemiballismus and the subthalamic nucleus: The relationship between a lesion of the subthalamic nucleus of Luys and contralateral hemiballismus was first convincingly demonstrated by Martin in 1927; this led 20 years later to development of an animal model by Whittier and Mettler, who produced experimental hemichorea-hemiballismus in monkeys by lesioning the contralateral subthalamic nucleus. Since the late 1980s, the neurochemistry and neurophysiology of the subthalamic nucleus have been substantially revised with the demonstration that the subthalamic nucleus is not fundamentally inhibitory but instead provides excitatory glutaminergic inputs to the globus pallidus, and appreciation that the subthalamic nucleus serves an important role in both hyperkinetic and hypokinetic movement disorders. Dystonia: Dystonias were often interpreted in psychological or psychiatric terms since the original descriptions of generalized dystonia by Barraquer Roviralta (1897), and familial forms of generalized primary tortion dystonia by Schwalbe (1908) and Oppenheim (1911). Although Oppenheim had first insisted that dystonia was an organic disease, it was only in the late-20th century that an organic framework was firmly established with the identification of genetic mutations in some families with dystonia and with the demonstration that the basal ganglia were often damaged contralateral to acquired hemidystonia. Focal and segmental forms of dystonia, including writer's cramp, other occupational dystonias, and torticollis, were also recognized in the 19th century. Writer's cramp was clearly described in the 1830s by Bell and Kopp, and increasingly recognized in the late 19th century due in part to Solly's influential lectures on "scriviner's palsy" in the 1860s, and to increasing prevalence because of the increase in writing using primitive writing instruments. Myoclonus: In 1903, Lundborg proposed a classification of myoclonus that remains in use, with primary (essential), epileptic, and secondary or symptomatic categories: essential myoclonus was described by Friedrich in 1881; forms of myoclonic epilepsy were described beginning in the late 19th century by West (1861), Unverricht (1891), and Lundberg (1903); and secondary multifocal myoclonus was recognized in a wide variety of disorders beginning in the 1920s. Asterixis was described in patients with hepatic encephalopathy by Adams and Foley in 1949 and found to result from electrically silent pauses in muscle activity, which led to the concept of negative myoclonus in the 1980s. Posthypoxic action myoclonus (Lance-Adams syndrome) was described by Lance and Adams in 1963 and found to incorporate both positive and negative components. Startle syndromes: Early descriptions of pathologic startle syndromes included Beard's description of the jumping Frenchmen of Maine (1878) and Hammond's description of miryachit (1884), both of which may have had psychological origins. In contrast, hyperekplexia or "startle disease" was described in the late 1950s and early 1960s, and genetic forms were later found to result from various mutations affecting glycinergic synapses. Tics: Tic disorders were described by Itard (1825) and Trousseau (1873), but only gained wider recognition in the late 19th century after Charcot presented cases before his classroom audiences and after Gilles de la Tourette's classic description in 1885. Gilles de la Tourette and Charcot initially considered tic disorders and startle syndromes to be similar if not identical, but these disorders were later recognized as distinct. Psychodynamic and psychological theories or etiology gave way in the 1960s to biological theories supporting an important role for dopamine in pathogenesis, particularly with the discovery that neuroleptic medications could be useful in treatment.

CONCLUSION

In the last two centuries, neuroscientists and clinicians contributed greatly to our understanding of basal ganglia anatomy and physiology, as well as to movement disorder semiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention. The development of animal models, and the increasing use of genetic and molecular biological techniques will lead to further advances in the coming years.

Dopamine receptor D3 gene and essential tremor in large series of German, Danish and French patients

The genetic causes of essential tremor (ET) seem to be heterogeneous. Recently, ET has been found associated with a functional variant (Ser9Gly) of the dopamine D(3) receptor (DRD3), located in the ETM1 locus on chromosome 3q13.3 described for the first time in 1997. We examined this variant in three different populations from Germany, Denmark and France. We undertook an association study of the Ser9Gly variant in 202 cases with a familial history from unrelated families with ET, 97 cases with isolated non-familial ET and 528 healthy controls. In addition, linkage and segregation analyses were carried out in 22 ET families. The distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies showed no significant differences in the whole sample and in a subanalysis of familial and sporadic cases. Age at onset of tremor, tremor duration and tremor severity did not show an association with the genotype. In addition, the DRD3 variant was not found linked to the disease in a subset of informative ET families. We did not find a significant association of the DRD3 variant with ET nor linkage to the DRD3 receptor in German, Danish and French ET patients and families, suggesting that it is unlikely to be a causal factor for ET.

Environmental epidemiology of essential tremor

BACKGROUND

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurological disorders. Despite this, the disease mechanisms and etiology are not well understood. While susceptibility genotypes undoubtedly underlie many ET cases, no ET genes have been identified thus far. As with many other progressive, degenerative neurological disorders, it is likely that environmental factors contribute to the etiology of ET. Environmental epidemiology is the study in specific populations or communities of the effect on human health of physical, biologic and chemical factors in the external environment. The purpose of this article is to review current knowledge with regards to the environmental epidemiology of ET.

RESULTS

As will be discussed, a series of preliminary case-control studies in recent years has begun to explore several candidate toxins/exposures, including harmane (1-methyl-9H-pyrido[3,4-b]indole), lead and agricultural exposures/pesticides.

CONCLUSIONS

While several initial results are promising, as will be discussed, additional studies are needed to more definitively establish whether these exposures are associated with ET and if they are of etiological importance.

Evaluation of SCN8A as a candidate gene for autosomal dominant essential tremor

OBJECTIVES

Essential tremor (ET) is a common inherited movement disorder whose causes remain unknown. The presence of spontaneous tremor in murine mutants may provide clues into the pathogenesis of ET. SCN8A encodes the neuronal voltage gated sodium channel Na(v)1.6 that is widely expressed in the central nervous system. Several mutations of Scn8a in the mouse result in congenital postural tremor of the extremities and head.

METHODS

We screened SCN8A as a candidate gene in a cohort of 95 Caucasian patients with ET and a positive family history, including 48 patients with early onset in the first two decades of life. Early and adult onset ET subgroups did not differ in disease severity, but early onset patients had longer disease duration. Observed sequence variants were also screened in an ethnically matched control group.

RESULTS

We did not detect SCN8A mutations affecting amino acid sequence or splice sites in our cohort of ET patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although mutations of Scn8a cause congenital tremor in mice, mutations in the sequence of the exons and splice sites of human SCN8A do not appear to be a common cause of autosomal dominant essential tremor in Caucasian patients.

Reappraisal of the role of the DRD3 gene in essential tremor

OBJECTIVES

Analyze the distribution of polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D3 (DRD3) gene, which was previously reported as a susceptibility risk for essential tremor (ET), in a large cohort of ET.

METHODS

The role of 312G>A DRD3 polymorphism was analyzed using linkage analysis, association study and transmission disequilibrium test in a group of 433 ET patients, and two unrelated control groups with 121 and 151 individuals.

RESULTS

Allelic frequencies of glycine and serine forms of the DRD3 gene did not differ between patients and both control groups, and were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Linkage analysis identified obligatory recombinants in every large pedigree, even in those with relatively high frequency of glycine allele, thus excluding the linkage to this locus. Both alleles were transmitted with an equal likelihood to affected offspring. We also failed to replicate the relationship between glycine homozygosity and an earlier age of onset or more severe tremor course.

CONCLUSIONS

Our comprehensive genetic analysis in a large ET cohort strongly argues against the role of the DRD3 gene in ET pathogenesis.

Essential tremor: emerging views of a common disorder

Essential tremor (ET) is the most prevalent tremor disorder. ET has traditionally been viewed as a monosymptomatic disorder characterized by a kinetic arm tremor, but this definition is gradually being replaced. The clinical spectrum has come to include several motor features, including tremor and ataxia, and several non-motor features, including possible cognitive impairment and personality disturbances. Postmortem studies are revealing several different patterns of pathology. The emerging view is that ET might be a family of diseases, unified by the presence of kinetic tremor, but further characterized by etiological, clinical and pathological heterogeneity. Effective pharmacological treatments for the disorder remain limited, although new insights into disease mechanisms might result in more-effective therapies. In addition, recent investigations of environmental toxicants that might be linked to ET open the way towards primary disease prevention through a reduction in exposure to these factors.