Long-Term Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation in Pediatric Non-Degenerative Dystonia: A Cohort Study and a Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The evidence in the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation in children with medication-refractory non-degenerative monogenic dystonia is heterogeneous and long-term results are sparse.

OBJECTIVES

The objective is to describe long-term outcomes in a single-center cohort and compare our results with a meta-analysis cohort form literature.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study including consecutive pediatric patients with non-degenerative genetic or idiopathic dystonia treated with globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation at our center and a systematic review and individual-patient data meta-analysis with the same inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale-movement (BFMDRS-M) score.

RESULTS

The clinical cohort included 25 patients with a mean study follow-up of 11.4 years. The meta-analysis cohort included 224 patients with a mean follow-up of 3 years. Overall, the BFMDRS-M mean improvements at 1 year and at last follow-up were 41% and 33% in the clinical cohort and 58.9% and 57.2% in the meta-analysis cohort, respectively. TOR1A-dystonia showed the greatest and most stable BFMDRS-M improvement in both cohorts at 1 year and at last follow-up (76.3% and 74.3% in the clinical cohort; 69.6% and 67.3% in the meta-analysis cohort), followed by SGCE-dystonia (63% and 63.9% in the meta-analysis cohort). THAP1-dystonia (70.1% and 29.8% in the clinical cohort; 52.3% and 42.0% in the meta-analysis cohort) and KMT2B-dystonia (33.3% and 41.3% in the clinical cohort; 38.0% and 26.7% in the meta-analysis cohort) showed a less pronounced or sustained response.

CONCLUSION

Globus pallidus deep brain stimulation long-term treatment seems effective with a possible gene-specific differential effect. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Neuromodulation in Dystonia - Harnessing the Network

Adult-onset isolated focal dystonia (AOIFD) is a network disorder characterised by abnormalities of sensory processing and motor control. These network abnormalities give rise to both the phenomenology of dystonia and the epiphenomena of altered plasticity and loss of intracortical inhibition. Existing modalities of deep brain stimulation effectively modulate parts of this network but are limited both in terms of targets and invasiveness. Novel approaches using a variety of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques including transcranial stimulation and peripheral stimulation present an interesting alternative approach and may, in conjunction with rehabilitative strategies, have a role in tailored therapies targeting the underlying network abnormality behind AOIFD.

Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in dystonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Deep brain stimulation is a highly effective treatment of dystonia but is invasive and associated with risks, such as intraoperative bleeding and infections. Previous research has used non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in an attempt to alleviate symptoms of dystonia. The results of these studies, however, have been variable, leaving efficacy unclear.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of NIBS on symptoms of dystonia and determine whether methodological characteristics are associated with variability in effect size.

Methods

Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE Complete databases were searched for articles using any type of NIBS as an intervention in dystonia patients, with changes in dystonia symptoms the primary outcome of interest.

Results

Meta-analysis of 27 studies demonstrated a small effect size for NIBS in reducing symptoms of dystonia (random-effects Hedges' g = 0.21, p = .002). Differences in the type of NIBS, type of dystonia, and brain region stimulated had a significant effect on dystonia symptoms. Meta-regression revealed that 10 sessions of active stimulation and the application of concurrent motor training programs resulted in significantly larger mean effect sizes.

Conclusion

NIBS has yielded small improvements to dystonic symptoms, but effect sizes depended on methodological characteristics, with more sessions of stimulation producing a larger response. Future research should further investigate the application of NIBS parallel to motor training, in addition to providing a greater quantity of sessions, to help define optimal parameters for NIBS protocols in dystonia.

Registration

PROSPERO 2020, CRD42020175944.

Perspectives on the pharmacological management of dystonia

Introduction: Treatment of dystonia is particularly complex due to various etiologies and heterogeneous clinical manifestation, as well as different degrees of disability. In absence of causative treatment, all symptomatic therapy should be predominantly tailored to ameliorate those symptoms (motor and non/motor) that mostly affect patients' daily life and regular activities. Many different treatment options, including oral medications, neurosurgical interventions, physical and occupational therapy are available in treatment of dystonia.Areas covered: The aim of this perspective is to point out different possibilities in pharmacological management of dystonic movements. Due to pure clinical presentation, the authors concentrate mainly on the isolated dystonias, which are presented solely as dystonic movements. Combined and complex dystonias are not instructive due to compound clinical presentation and consequently, complicated treatment. The article is based on a literature search from sources including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PiCarta, and PsycINFO.Expert opinion: Although dystonia therapy should be adapted according to the individual needs, severity, age, type, symptoms distribution and acceptable side-effect profile, certain principles should be followed to reach the optimal result. Furthermore, the authors believe that a better understanding of the pathophysiology of dystonia will bring with it the development of new and improved treatment approaches and medications.

New modalities and directions for dystonia care

Dystonia is an abnormal involuntary movement or posture owing to sustained or intermittent muscle contraction. Standard treatment for dystonia includes medications, such as levodopa, anticholinergic and antiepileptic drugs, botulinum toxin, and baclofen pump, and surgeries, such as lesioning surgery and deep-brain stimulation. New treatment modalities aimed toward improving dystonia care in the future are under investigation. There are two main axes to improve dystonia care; one is non-invasive neuromodulation, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial electrical stimulation, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. The other is a quantitative evaluation of dystonia using a wearable device and motion-capturing system, which can be empowered by artificial intelligence. In this article, the current status of these axes will be reviewed.

Clinical duration of action of different botulinum toxin types in humans

The Botulinum NeuroToxin (BoNT) comprises several serotypes with distinct properties, mechanisms of action, sensitivity and duration of effect in different species. The serotype A (BoNT/A) is the prevalent neurotoxin applied in human's disease. In this paper we present an overview of the current knowledge regarding the duration of effect and the neuromuscular sprouting of different BoNT serotypes in humans. Then, we report the original results of a study in healthy subjects treated with BoNT/A, B, C and F using different neurophysiological techniques. Twelve healthy volunteers (7 men, 5 women) are treated with BoNT/A, B, C and F or placebo in Abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle of the hand. Before and after injections, an extensive neurophysiological study is performed with the CMAP amplitude variation, Multi-Motor Unit Action Potentials (MUAPs) analysis, the Turns/Amplitude ratio of interference pattern (IP) and determination of jitter and Fiber Density (FD) at single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG), at week 2 (w2), 4 (w4), 6 (w6) and 8 (w8). A maximal neuromuscular block is obtained at w2 for all the serotypes. Afterwards, the CMAP trend appear similar for BoNT/A, B, and C while, BoNT/F shows a faster recover. Multi-MUAPs analysis and IP detect mild changes at w2 for all serotypes, except for BoNT/F that shows a greater change since w4. SFEMG have minimal changes in FD while, Jitter increase at w2 with a slower decrease over the time for all BoNTs. In conclusion, BoNT/F has earlier sprouting and complete recovery at w8. Other serotypes present a slower and similar profile. The EMG appear useful to study the functional recovery in humans, and these results should provide new evidence for assessing different serotypes. These findings improve our knowledge regarding the methods to evaluate duration of effects and dose equivalents in different serotypes, that in the future could change the clinicians strategy for disease-tailored BoNT therapies.

New approaches to discovering drugs that treat dystonia

Introduction: Dystonia consists of involuntary movements, abnormal posturing, and pain. In adults, dystonia presents in a particular region of the body and causes significant disability due to pain as well as impairment in activities of daily living and employment. The current gold standard treatment, botulinum toxin (BoNT), has limitations - painful, frequent injections due to 'wearing off' of treatment effect; expense; and expected side effects like swallowing difficulty and weakness. There is a clear therapeutic gap in our current treatment options for dystonia and also a clear need for an effective novel treatment. Testing any novel treatment is complicated because most adults with focal dystonia are treated with BoNT. Areas covered: This review focuses on establishing the need for novel therapeutics. It also suggests potential leads from preclinical studies; and, discusses the issue of clinical trial readiness in the dystonia field. Expert opinion: Identifying a novel therapeutic intervention for dystonia patients faces two major challenges. The first is acknowledging the therapeutic gap that currently exists. Second, shifting some of our research aims in dystonia to clinical trial readiness is imperative if we are to be ready to test novel therapeutic agents.

Despite dystonia: natural history of delayed-onset pediatric secondary dystonia

Background: Dystonia is a movement disorder involving involuntary movements and/or postures of the limbs, trunk, neck or face. Secondary dystonia following brain injury is uncommon, with unfavorable long-term consequences. Given the limited evidence regarding pediatric secondary dystonia, this study's aim was to document the natural history of the condition and the effect of interventions on its symptomatology. Methods: We describe three cases of girls (age 8 to 11 y) who developed dystonia secondary to an acquired brain injury, received intensive rehabilitation treatments and were followed for 8-33 months post-injury. In all three cases, secondary dystonia appeared 1-3 months post-insult. Results: In none of the cases was there alleviation of dystonic symptoms over time despite physical and pharmacological interventions; in two cases the dystonic hand is now used as an assisting hand only, whereas in the third it is completely non-functional. However, despite their impairment, two girls achieved basic functional independence and one is partly independent in activities of daily living. Conclusions: Rehabilitation professionals who work with pediatric patients susceptible to developing secondary dystonia should be aware of its possible consequences and inform families and staff. Intensive task-specific training during rehabilitation may be key to regaining overall functional capabilities despite residual impairment.

Longitudinal studies of botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia: Why do patients discontinue therapy?

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have established botulinum toxin (BoNT) to be safe and effective for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD). Despite its well-documented efficacy, there has been growing awareness that a significant proportion of CD patients discontinue therapy. The reasons for discontinuation are only partly understood.

METHODS

This summary describes longitudinal studies that provided information regarding the proportions of patients discontinuing BoNT therapy, and the reasons for discontinuing therapy. The data come predominantly from un-blinded long-term follow-up studies, registry studies, and patient-based surveys.

RESULTS

All types of longitudinal studies provide strong evidence that BoNT is both safe and effective in the treatment of CD for many years. Overall, approximately one third of CD patients discontinue BoNT. The most common reason for discontinuing therapy is lack of benefit, often described as primary or secondary non-response. The apparent lack of response is only rarely related to true immune-mediated resistance to BoNT. Other reasons for discontinuing include side effects, inconvenience, cost, or other reasons.

DISCUSSION

Although BoNT is safe and effective in the treatment of the majority of patients with CD, approximately one third discontinue. The increasing awareness of a significant proportion of patients who discontinue should encourage further efforts to optimize administration of BoNT, to improve BoNT preparations to extend duration or reduce side effects, to develop add-on therapies that may mitigate swings in symptom severity, or develop entirely novel treatment approaches.

Personalized botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia based on kinematic guidance

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections is the accepted first-line therapy for cervical dystonia (CD), however, numerous patients discontinue treatment early due to perceived sub-optimal relief. To improve BoNT-A therapy for CD, proper assessment of neck motion and selection of relevant muscles and dosing must be met. Kinematic technology may improve treatment outcomes by guiding physicians to better tailor muscle selection and BoNT-A dosing for CD therapy.

METHODS

28 CD participants were placed into either group: expert injector determined injection patterns by visual assessment ("vb") versus injection patterns based on kinematics interpreted by an expert injector ("kb"). Injections occurred at weeks 0, 16 and 32 with follow-ups at weeks 6, 22 and 38. Kinematics utilized four sensors to capture the severity of multiaxial, static neck posturing (e.g., torticollis) and dynamic, spasmodic/tremor movements while participants were seated. Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) score changes were evaluated over 38 weeks.

RESULTS

For the "kb" participants, there was a significant 28.8% (- 11.25 points) reduction in TWSTRS total score at week 6, as well as significant reduction in severity and disability TWSTRS sub-scores (parts I and II) with maintained improvement at subsequent visits. As for the "vb" participants had a significant reduction in total TWSTRS score by 28.5% (- 9.84 points) after week 22. Disability score for the "vb" group trended towards improvement over 38 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Clinical judgement guided by kinematic analysis of CD biomechanics can result in faster optimal muscle selections and minimize use of higher BoNT-A doses as compared to visual determination, thereby achieving comparable and potentially better treatment outcomes.

Therapeutic Use of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Dystonia

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive methods for stimulating cortical neurons that have been increasingly used in the neurology realm and in the neurosciences applied to movement disorders. In addition, these tools have the potential to be delivered as clinically therapeutic approach. Despite several studies support this hypothesis, there are several limitations related to the extreme variability of the stimulation protocols, clinical enrolment and variability of rTMS and tDCS after effects that make clinical interpretation very difficult. Aim of the present study will be to critically discuss the state of art therapeutically applications of rTMS and tDCS in dystonia.

Genetic silencing of olivocerebellar synapses causes dystonia-like behaviour in mice

Theories of cerebellar function place the inferior olive to cerebellum connection at the centre of motor behaviour. One possible implication of this is that disruption of olivocerebellar signalling could play a major role in initiating motor disease. To test this, we devised a mouse genetics approach to silence glutamatergic signalling only at olivocerebellar synapses. The resulting mice had a severe neurological condition that mimicked the early-onset twisting, stiff limbs and tremor that is observed in dystonia, a debilitating movement disease. By blocking olivocerebellar excitatory neurotransmission, we eliminated Purkinje cell complex spikes and induced aberrant cerebellar nuclear activity. Pharmacologically inhibiting the erratic output of the cerebellar nuclei in the mutant mice improved movement. Furthermore, deep brain stimulation directed to the interposed cerebellar nuclei reduced dystonia-like postures in these mice. Collectively, our data uncover a neural mechanism by which olivocerebellar dysfunction promotes motor disease phenotypes and identify the cerebellar nuclei as a therapeutic target for surgical intervention.

Dystonia is thought to be driven by impairments in cerebellar signalling. The authors use a mouse genetic approach to silence excitatory transmission in the inferior olive to cerebellum pathway, resulting in dystonia-like signs in the animals which can be alleviated using DBS stimulation of the pathway.

Dystonia treatment: Patterns of medication use in an international cohort

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of medication use in patients with dystonia enrolled in an international biorepository study.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis, we included 2,026 participants enrolled at 37 sites in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia through Project 1 of the Dystonia Coalition, an international biorepository study. The primary aim was to assess the frequency of medication classes recommended for treating patients with dystonia, and the secondary aim was to compare characteristics (disease type, age, sex, duration of disease, comorbid conditions, severity).

RESULTS

Querying the database for the presence of any medication for dystonia used (includes both injectable and oral therapy), we found 73% using medications (n = 1,488) and 27% using no dystonia medications (n = 538). Furthermore, 61% of the total sample used botulinum toxin (BoNT) therapy alone or in combination. Differences were found in medication use patterns by dystonia type, with the lowest oral medication use in focal dystonia and highest use in generalized dystonia; by region, with highest BoNT therapy rate reported in Italy and the lowest in the Northeast region of the United States; and by focal dystonia subtype, with highest BoNT therapy alone in blepharospasm and spasmodic dysphonia (49%) and lowest in other cranial dystonia (32%).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with dystonia enrolled in the Dystonia Coalition Project 1 were using medications to treat their dystonia. Overall, a complex picture of medication use patterns emerged, with factors such as region, disease duration, type of dystonia, disease severity, and psychiatric comorbidities all playing a significant role.

Contribution of TMS and rTMS in the Understanding of the Pathophysiology and in the Treatment of Dystonia

Dystonias represent a heterogeneous group of movement disorders responsible for sustained muscle contraction, abnormal postures, and muscle twists. It can affect focal or segmental body parts or be generalized. Primary dystonia is the most common form of dystonia but it can also be secondary to metabolic or structural dysfunction, the consequence of a drug's side-effect or of genetic origin. The pathophysiology is still not elucidated. Based on lesion studies, dystonia has been regarded as a pure motor dysfunction of the basal ganglia loop. However, basal ganglia lesions do not consistently produce dystonia and lesions outside basal ganglia can lead to dystonia; mild sensory abnormalities have been reported in the dystonic limb and imaging studies have shown involvement of multiple other brain regions including the cerebellum and the cerebral motor, premotor and sensorimotor cortices. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive technique of brain stimulation with a magnetic field applied over the cortex allowing investigation of cortical excitability. Hyperexcitability of contralateral motor cortex has been suggested to be the trigger of focal dystonia. High or low frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) can induce excitatory or inhibitory lasting effects beyond the time of stimulation and protocols have been developed having either a positive or a negative effect on cortical excitability and associated with prevention of cell death, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) interneurons mediated inhibition and brain-derived neurotrophic factor modulation. rTMS studies as a therapeutic strategy of dystonia have been conducted to modulate the cerebral areas involved in the disease. Especially, when applied on the contralateral (pre)-motor cortex or supplementary motor area of brains of small cohorts of dystonic patients, rTMS has shown a beneficial transient clinical effect in association with restrained motor cortex excitability. TMS is currently a valuable tool to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of dystonia but large controlled studies using sham stimulation are still necessary to delineate the place of rTMS in the therapeutic strategy of dystonia. In this review, we will focus successively on the use of TMS as a tool to better understand pathophysiology, and the use of rTMS as a therapeutic strategy.

Botulinum neurotoxins for the treatment of focal dystonias: Review of rating tools used in clinical trials

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are used to achieve therapeutic benefit in focal dystonia. An expert panel recently reviewed published evidence on the efficacy of BoNTs for the treatment of focal dystonias and produced recommendations for clinical practice. Another panel reviewed the clinimetric properties of rating scales for dystonia and produced recommendations for current usage and future directions. Considering that the strength of evidence derives not only from the quality of the study design, but also from usage of validated outcome measures, we combined the information provided by these two recent reviews and assessed the appropriateness of the rating instruments used in clinical trials on BoNT treatment in focal dystonia. Data sources included all the publications on BoNT treatment for focal dystonias reviewed by the recent evidence-based analysis. We reviewed all rating instruments used to assess primary and secondary outcome following BoNT treatment. The publications were allocated into five topics according to the focal dystonia type reviewed in the meta-analysis: blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, cervical dystonia, upper limb dystonia, and laryngeal dystonia. For each topic, papers were divided, according to the terminology used in the meta-analysis, into placebo-controlled, active comparator and methodological or uncontrolled. For each topic we identified the rating tools used in each study class and annotated which were the mostly used in each focal dystonia type. Outcome measures included tools related to motor and non-motor features, such as pain and depression, and functional as well as health-related quality of life features. Patient- and investigator-reported outcomes were also included. Rating instruments were classified as recommended, suggested, listed or not included, based on recommendations produced by the rating scale task force. Both primary and secondary outcome measures were assessed. As a final step we compared current practice, as summarized by the meta-analysis, with the recommendations of the rating scales panel. For blepharospasm, three placebo-controlled trials used suggested scales, one active-comparator study used a recommended scale and three active-comparator studies used suggested scales. For oromandibular dystonia, one placebo-controlled study used a suggested scale. For cervical dystonia, six placebo-controlled trials used a recommended scale, four active-comparator trials used a recommended scale and one active-comparator study used a suggested scale. For upper limb and laryngeal dystonia, no trial used validated instruments. Appropriately designed studies should be based on recommended rating instruments. Therapeutic trials not using clinimetrically tested rating measures do not provide sufficient information on efficacy of BoNT treatment, even if the study design is robust. Further research is needed to develop and validate new tools to assess all types of focal dystonia and to apply them in prospective placebo-controlled clinical trials.