1
|
Wang Y, He Y, Shi Y, Qian DC, Gray KJ, Winn R, Martin AR. Aspiring toward equitable benefits from genomic advances to individuals of ancestrally diverse backgrounds. Am J Hum Genet 2024; 111:809-824. [PMID: 38642557 PMCID: PMC11080611 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Advancements in genomic technologies have shown remarkable promise for improving health trajectories. The Human Genome Project has catalyzed the integration of genomic tools into clinical practice, such as disease risk assessment, prenatal testing and reproductive genomics, cancer diagnostics and prognostication, and therapeutic decision making. Despite the promise of genomic technologies, their full potential remains untapped without including individuals of diverse ancestries and integrating social determinants of health (SDOHs). The NHGRI launched the 2020 Strategic Vision with ten bold predictions by 2030, including "individuals from ancestrally diverse backgrounds will benefit equitably from advances in human genomics." Meeting this goal requires a holistic approach that brings together genomic advancements with careful consideration to healthcare access as well as SDOHs to ensure that translation of genetics research is inclusive, affordable, and accessible and ultimately narrows rather than widens health disparities. With this prediction in mind, this review delves into the two paramount applications of genetic testing-reproductive genomics and precision oncology. When discussing these applications of genomic advancements, we evaluate current accessibility limitations, highlight challenges in achieving representativeness, and propose paths forward to realize the ultimate goal of their equitable applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Wang
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Yixuan He
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Yue Shi
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Reproductive Medicine Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
| | - David C Qian
- Department of Thoracic Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kathryn J Gray
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert Winn
- Virginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Alicia R Martin
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sagaser KG, Malinowski J, Westerfield L, Proffitt J, Hicks MA, Toler TL, Blakemore KJ, Stevens BK, Oakes LM. Expanded carrier screening for reproductive risk assessment: An evidence-based practice guideline from the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2023. [PMID: 36756860 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Expanded carrier screening (ECS) intends to broadly screen healthy individuals to determine their reproductive chance for autosomal recessive (AR) and X-linked (XL) conditions with infantile or early-childhood onset, which may impact reproductive management (Committee Opinion 690, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2017, 129, e35). Compared to ethnicity-based screening, which requires accurate knowledge of ancestry for optimal test selection and appropriate risk assessment, ECS panels consist of tens to hundreds of AR and XL conditions that may be individually rare in various ancestries but offer a comprehensive approach to inherited disease screening. As such, the term "equitable carrier screening" may be preferable. This practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for ECS using the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework (Guyatt et al., BMJ, 2008, 336, 995; Guyatt et al., BMJ, 2008, 336, 924). We used evidence from a recent systematic evidence review (Ramdaney et al., Genetics in Medicine, 2022, 20, 374) and compiled data from peer-reviewed literature, scientific meetings, and clinical experience. We defined and prioritized the outcomes of informed consent, change in reproductive plans, yield in identification of at-risk carrier pairs/pregnancies, perceived barriers to ECS, amount of provider time spent, healthcare costs, frequency of severely/profoundly affected offspring, incidental findings, uncertain findings, patient satisfaction, and provider attitudes. Despite the recognized barriers to implementation and change in management strategies, this analysis supported implementation of ECS for these outcomes. Based upon the current level of evidence, we recommend ECS be made available for all individuals considering reproduction and all pregnant reproductive pairs, as ECS presents an ethnicity-based carrier screening alternative which does not rely on race-based medicine. The final decision to pursue carrier screening should be directed by shared decision-making, which takes into account specific features of patients as well as their preferences and values. As a periconceptional reproductive risk assessment tool, ECS is superior compared to ethnicity-based carrier screening in that it both identifies more carriers of AR and XL conditions as well as eliminates a single race-based medical practice. ECS should be offered to all who are currently pregnant, considering pregnancy, or might otherwise biologically contribute to pregnancy. Barriers to the broad implementation of and access to ECS should be identified and addressed so that test performance for carrier screening will not depend on social constructs such as race.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelynn G Sagaser
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Lauren Westerfield
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Pavilion for Women at Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Tomi L Toler
- Division of Genetics & Genomic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Karin J Blakemore
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Blair K Stevens
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reiner J, Rosenblum LS, Xin W, Zhou Z, Zhu H, Leach N. Incidental molecular diagnoses and heterozygous risk alleles in a carrier screening cohort. Genet Med 2023; 25:100317. [PMID: 36459106 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Expanded pan-ethnic carrier screening is an effective tool for the management of reproductive risk. However, growth in the number of conditions screened, in combination with increasingly more comprehensive test methodologies, can lead to the detection of genetic findings that may affect the health of the tested individual. The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency of pathogenic genotypes in a presumed healthy carrier screening cohort to facilitate broader discussions regarding disclosure of genetic information from carrier screening. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 73,755 targeted carrier screens was performed to identify individuals with pathogenic genotypes and heterozygous risk alleles. RESULTS In this study, we identified 79 individuals (0.11%) with pathogenic genotypes associated with moderate to profound autosomal recessive or X-linked conditions. In addition, 10 cases had chromosome X dosage abnormalities suggestive of a sex chromosome abnormality. Heterozygote risk alleles represented the majority of ancillary findings in this cohort, including 280 female carriers of FMR1 premutation alleles, 15 heterozygous females with pathogenic DMD variants, and 174 heterozygotes with pathogenic variants in genes that may confer increased risk for somatic malignancies in the heterozygous state. CONCLUSION These data suggest that nearly 1% of individuals undergoing carrier screening will have a finding that may require clinical evaluation or surveillance.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hardy MW, Peshkin BN, Rose E, Ladd MK, Binion S, Tynan M, McBride CM, Grinzaid KA, Schwartz MD. Attitudes and interest in incorporating BRCA1/2 cancer susceptibility testing into reproductive carrier screening for Ashkenazi Jewish men and women. J Community Genet 2022; 13:281-292. [PMID: 35486291 PMCID: PMC9051789 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00590-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes are associated with elevated cancer risks in men and women. Due to a founder effect, Ashkenazi Jewish individuals are at higher risk for carrying three specific BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. There have been recent calls for population screening in this population because many carriers do not have family histories suggestive of hereditary cancer. One approach could be to integrate optional BRCA1/2 testing into routinely offered reproductive carrier screening for recessive and X-linked disorders. However, the differing goals of these types of testing (i.e., personal health risks versus family planning) raise questions about the implications for patient education and informed consent. To this end, we aimed to determine interest, attitudes, and preferences regarding integrating such testing by electronically surveying 331 Ashkenazi Jewish participants in JScreen - a national, not-for-profit, at-home carrier screening program focused on genetic risks in Jewish communities. We found that while 41% of participants had plans to pursue BRCA1/2 testing, 93% would have opted for such testing if offered as an add-on to reproductive carrier screening. This was particularly true of those with higher perceived cancer risk and more positive attitudes toward genetic testing. With respect to preferences about delivery of this service, more than 85% of participants preferred remote (telephone, print, or web-based) genetic education rather than traditional genetic counseling. These results suggest that offering optional BRCA1/2 testing within the context of reproductive carrier screening might provide opportunities for cancer prevention without overburdening scarce genetic counseling resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie W Hardy
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Beth N Peshkin
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Esther Rose
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mary Kathleen Ladd
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Savannah Binion
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Mara Tynan
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Colleen M McBride
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Karen A Grinzaid
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 300, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Davidov B, Levon A, Volkov H, Orenstein N, Karo R, Fatal Gazit I, Magal N, Basel-Salmon L, Golan Mashiach M. Pathogenic variant-based preconception carrier screening in the Israeli Jewish population. Clin Genet 2022; 101:517-529. [PMID: 35315053 DOI: 10.1111/cge.14131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Preconception carrier screening allows identification of couples at risk to have offspring with autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders. In a current multiethnic world, screening based on self-reported ancestry has limitations. Here we describe the findings of a comprehensive pan-ethnic variant-based carrier screening, using the Israeli Jewish population as a model. The cohort included 1696 individuals (848 couples) tested with the 'MyScreen' multigene panel. The panel covers 1206 variants spanning 385 genes, known in different Jewish ethnicities and local Arab, Druze and Bedouin populations. Out of these, 205 variants in 143 genes are Jewish founder variants. We identified 859 (50.6%), carriers of at least one variant in 151 genes. Importantly, 569 (66.2%) of carriers could be missed by the current Israeli screening program. In total, 1:40 (2.5%) of carrier couples were identified by the 'MyScreen' panel, compared with 1:144 (0.7%) found by the ethnicity-based screening. Surprisingly, 90 individuals (10.5%) were carriers of variants "unexpected" for their reported origin, and 16 variants were previously unreported in Jewish patients. Our results support the advantages of variant-based comprehensive carrier screening for detection of carriers and at-risk couples in a diverse population with many founder disease-causing variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bella Davidov
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Amit Levon
- Applied Genomics LTD, Ness Ziona, Israel
| | | | - Naama Orenstein
- Genetics Department, Schneiders Children's Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Racheli Karo
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Inbal Fatal Gazit
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Nurit Magal
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Lina Basel-Salmon
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva, Israel.,Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.,Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ramdaney A, Lichten L, Propst L, Mann C, Lazarin GA, Jones M, Taylor A, Malinowski J. Expanded carrier screening in the United States: A systematic evidence review exploring client and provider experiences. J Genet Couns 2022; 31:937-948. [PMID: 35212439 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The aim of carrier screening is to identify prospective parents at risk of having a pregnancy affected with an autosomal recessive or X-linked disorder. Though minimal guideline-based screening is available, expanded carrier screening (ECS) is quickly becoming a feasible option for the general population due to its growing availability and affordability. However, the impact of ECS on clients and providers remains relatively unexplored. We performed a systematic evidence review to identify publications describing client-, provider-, and test-related outcomes. We searched several biomedical databases for articles published between January 1, 2003 and May 31, 2021. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they described genetic counseling and/or genetic testing for carrier screening (minimal guideline-based or ECS) in a prenatal or preconception setting in the United States. Title and abstract screening were performed using the Raayan web application or customized Google Forms. Full-text review and data extraction of included articles were performed using custom Google Forms. Two researchers performed a multistep selection process independently for validation purposes. Of 5413 unique articles screened, 36 studies were included with several studies contributing to multiple outcomes. Twenty described outcomes relating to patients/clients, 10 described provider-based outcomes, and 16 described test-based outcomes. Findings suggest that client and provider perceptions of ECS and minimal guideline-based carrier screening are multifaceted. Though clients have expressed desire for ECS, clinical uptake and impact on reproductive decision-making varies. Additionally, though genetic counselors seem to be comfortable with ECS, most other reproductive care providers seem to prefer minimal guideline or ancestry-based screening due to perceived barriers, such as time needed for ECS results disclosure and follow-up, as well as the desire to have panels set by professional societies/recommendations. There are limitations within the gathered literature, leading to potential uncertainty in the generalizability of our review. We outline several recommendations for future studies, including the need to examine variant interpretation and use of next-generation sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarti Ramdaney
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren Lichten
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Caitlin Mann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Malorie Jones
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amy Taylor
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Morgenstern-Kaplan D, Raijman-Policar J, Majzner-Aronovich S, Aradhya S, Pineda-Alvarez DE, Aguinaga M, García-Vences EE. Carrier screening in the Mexican Jewish community using a pan-ethnic expanded carrier screening NGS panel. Genet Med 2021; 24:821-830. [PMID: 34961661 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Mexican Jewish community (MJC) is a previously uncharacterized, genetically isolated group composed of Ashkenazi and Sephardi-Mizrahi Jews who migrated in the early 1900s. We aimed to determine the heterozygote frequency of disease-causing variants in 302 genes in this population. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of the MJC involving individuals representing Ashkenazi Jews, Sephardi-Mizrahi Jews, or mixed-ancestry Jews. We offered saliva-based preconception pan-ethnic expanded carrier screening, which examined 302 genes. We analyzed heterozygote frequencies of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and compared them with those in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). RESULTS We recruited 208 participants. The carrier screening results showed that 72.1% were heterozygous for at least 1 severe disease-causing variant in 1 of the genes analyzed. The most common genes with severe disease-causing variants were CFTR (16.8% of participants), MEFV (11.5%), WNT10A (6.7%), and GBA (6.7%). The allele frequencies were compared with those in the gnomAD; 85% of variant frequencies were statistically different from those found in gnomAD (P <.05). Finally, 6% of couples were at risk of having a child with a severe disorder. CONCLUSION The heterozygote frequency of at least 1 severe disease-causing variant in the MJC was 72.1%. The use of carrier screening in the MJC and other understudied populations could help parents make more informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Morgenstern-Kaplan
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), Health Sciences Faculty, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - Jaime Raijman-Policar
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), Health Sciences Faculty, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sore Majzner-Aronovich
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), Health Sciences Faculty, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Mónica Aguinaga
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), Health Sciences Faculty, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico; Sexual and Reproductive Health Department, National Institute of Perinatology, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Edna Elisa García-Vences
- Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (CICSA), Health Sciences Faculty, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Systematic review of outcomes in studies of reproductive genetic carrier screening: Towards development of a core outcome set. Genet Med 2021; 24:1-14. [PMID: 34906455 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Current practice recommendations support the widespread implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). These consensus-based recommendations highlight a research gap, with findings from current studies being insufficient to meet the standard required for more rigorous evidence-based recommendations. This systematic review assessed methodological aspects of studies on RGCS to inform the need for a core outcome set. METHODS We conducted a systematic search to identify peer-reviewed published studies offering population-based RGCS. Study designs, outcomes, and measurement methods were extracted. A narrative synthesis was conducting using an existing outcome taxonomy and criteria used in the evaluation of genetic screening programs as frameworks. RESULTS Sixty-five publications were included. We extracted 120 outcomes representing 24 outcome domains. Heterogeneity in outcome selection, measurement methods and time points of assessment was extensive. Quality appraisal raised concerns for bias. We found that reported outcomes had limited applicability to criteria used to evaluate genetic screening programs. CONCLUSION Despite a large body of literature, diverse approaches to research have limited the conclusions that can be cumulatively drawn from this body of evidence. Consensus regarding meaningful outcomes for evaluation of RGCS would be a valuable first step in working towards evidence-based practice recommendations, supporting the development of a core outcome set.
Collapse
|
9
|
Johansen Taber K, Ben-Shachar R, Torres R, Arjunan A, Muzzey D, Kaseniit KE, Goldberg J, Brown H. A guidelines-consistent carrier screening panel that supports equity across diverse populations. Genet Med 2021; 24:201-213. [PMID: 34906503 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) suggest carrier screening panel design criteria intended to ensure meaningful results. This study used a data-driven approach to interpret the criteria to identify guidelines-consistent panels. METHODS Carrier frequencies in >460,000 individuals across 11 races/ethnicities were used to assess carrier frequency. Other criteria were interpreted on the basis of published data. A total of 176 conditions were then evaluated. Stringency thresholds were set as suggested by ACOG and/or ACMG or by evaluating conditions already recommended by ACOG and ACMG. RESULTS Forty and 75 conditions had carrier frequencies of ≥1 in 100 and ≥1 in 200, respectively; 175 had a well-defined phenotype; and 165 met at least 1 severity criterion and had an onset early in life. Thirty-seven conditions met conservative thresholds, including a carrier frequency of ≥1 in 100, and 74 conditions met permissive thresholds, including a carrier frequency of ≥1 in 200; thus, both were identified as guidelines-consistent panels. CONCLUSION Clear panel design criteria are needed to ensure quality and consistency among carrier screening panels. Evidence-based analyses of criteria resulted in the identification of guidelines-consistent panels of 37 and 74 conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rotem Ben-Shachar
- Department of Clinical Development, Myriad Genetics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Raul Torres
- Department of Clinical Development, Myriad Genetics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Aishwarya Arjunan
- Department of Medical Affairs, Myriad Women's Health, Inc, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Dale Muzzey
- Department of Research and Development, Myriad Genetics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Kristjan E Kaseniit
- Department of Clinical Development, Myriad Genetics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - James Goldberg
- Department of Medical Affairs, Myriad Women's Health, Inc, South San Francisco, CA
| | - Haywood Brown
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kakhlon O, Vaknin H, Mishra K, D’Souza J, Marisat M, Sprecher U, Wald‐Altman S, Dukhovny A, Raviv Y, Da’adoosh B, Engel H, Benhamron S, Nitzan K, Sweetat S, Permyakova A, Mordechai A, Akman HO, Rosenmann H, Lossos A, Tam J, Minassian BA, Weil M. Alleviation of a polyglucosan storage disorder by enhancement of autophagic glycogen catabolism. EMBO Mol Med 2021; 13:e14554. [PMID: 34486811 PMCID: PMC8495453 DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202114554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
This work employs adult polyglucosan body disease (APBD) models to explore the efficacy and mechanism of action of the polyglucosan-reducing compound 144DG11. APBD is a glycogen storage disorder (GSD) caused by glycogen branching enzyme (GBE) deficiency causing accumulation of poorly branched glycogen inclusions called polyglucosans. 144DG11 improved survival and motor parameters in a GBE knockin (Gbeys/ys ) APBD mouse model. 144DG11 reduced polyglucosan and glycogen in brain, liver, heart, and peripheral nerve. Indirect calorimetry experiments revealed that 144DG11 increases carbohydrate burn at the expense of fat burn, suggesting metabolic mobilization of pathogenic polyglucosan. At the cellular level, 144DG11 increased glycolytic, mitochondrial, and total ATP production. The molecular target of 144DG11 is the lysosomal membrane protein LAMP1, whose interaction with the compound, similar to LAMP1 knockdown, enhanced autolysosomal degradation of glycogen and lysosomal acidification. 144DG11 also enhanced mitochondrial activity and modulated lysosomal features as revealed by bioenergetic, image-based phenotyping and proteomics analyses. As an effective lysosomal targeting therapy in a GSD model, 144DG11 could be developed into a safe and efficacious glycogen and lysosomal storage disease therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Or Kakhlon
- Department of NeurologyHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Hilla Vaknin
- Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Personalized MedicineThe Cell Screening Facility for Personalized MedicineThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer ResearchThe George S. Wise Faculty for Life SciencesSagol School of NeurosciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - Kumudesh Mishra
- Department of NeurologyHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Jeevitha D’Souza
- Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Personalized MedicineThe Cell Screening Facility for Personalized MedicineThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer ResearchThe George S. Wise Faculty for Life SciencesSagol School of NeurosciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - Monzer Marisat
- Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Personalized MedicineThe Cell Screening Facility for Personalized MedicineThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer ResearchThe George S. Wise Faculty for Life SciencesSagol School of NeurosciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - Uri Sprecher
- Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Personalized MedicineThe Cell Screening Facility for Personalized MedicineThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer ResearchThe George S. Wise Faculty for Life SciencesSagol School of NeurosciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - Shane Wald‐Altman
- Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Personalized MedicineThe Cell Screening Facility for Personalized MedicineThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer ResearchThe George S. Wise Faculty for Life SciencesSagol School of NeurosciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - Anna Dukhovny
- Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Personalized MedicineThe Cell Screening Facility for Personalized MedicineThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer ResearchThe George S. Wise Faculty for Life SciencesSagol School of NeurosciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - Yuval Raviv
- Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Personalized MedicineThe Cell Screening Facility for Personalized MedicineThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer ResearchThe George S. Wise Faculty for Life SciencesSagol School of NeurosciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - Benny Da’adoosh
- Blavatnik Center for Drug DiscoveryTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - Hamutal Engel
- Blavatnik Center for Drug DiscoveryTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| | - Sandrine Benhamron
- Department of NeurologyHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
- Hadassah BrainLabs – National Knowledge Center for Research on Brain DiseasesHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Keren Nitzan
- Department of NeurologyHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
- Hadassah BrainLabs – National Knowledge Center for Research on Brain DiseasesHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Sahar Sweetat
- Department of NeurologyHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
- Hadassah BrainLabs – National Knowledge Center for Research on Brain DiseasesHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Anna Permyakova
- Obesity and Metabolism LaboratoryInstitute for Drug ResearchSchool of PharmacyFaculty of MedicineThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Anat Mordechai
- Department of NeurologyHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Hasan Orhan Akman
- Department of NeurologyColumbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Hanna Rosenmann
- Department of NeurologyHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
- Hadassah BrainLabs – National Knowledge Center for Research on Brain DiseasesHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Alexander Lossos
- Department of NeurologyHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Joseph Tam
- Obesity and Metabolism LaboratoryInstitute for Drug ResearchSchool of PharmacyFaculty of MedicineThe Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
| | - Berge A. Minassian
- Division of NeurologyDepartment of PediatricsUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTXUSA
| | - Miguel Weil
- Laboratory for Neurodegenerative Diseases and Personalized MedicineThe Cell Screening Facility for Personalized MedicineThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer ResearchThe George S. Wise Faculty for Life SciencesSagol School of NeurosciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zeevi DA, Chung WK, Levi C, Scher SY, Bringer R, Kahan Y, Muallem H, Benel R, Hirsch Y, Weiden T, Ekstein A, Ekstein J. Recommendation of premarital genetic screening in the Syrian Jewish community based on mutation carrier frequencies within Syrian Jewish cohorts. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2021; 9:e1756. [PMID: 34288589 PMCID: PMC8404236 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is a paucity of information available regarding the carrier frequency for autosomal recessive pathogenic variants among Syrian Jews. This report provides data to support carrier screening for a group of autosomal recessive conditions among Syrian Jews based on the population frequency of 40 different pathogenic variants in a cohort of over 3800 individuals with Syrian Jewish ancestry. Methods High throughput PCR amplicon sequencing was used to genotype 40 disease‐causing variants in 3840 and 5279 individuals of Syrian and Iranian Jewish ancestry, respectively. These data were compared with Ashkenazi Jewish carrier frequencies for the same variants, based on roughly 370,000 Ashkenazi Jewish individuals in the Dor Yeshorim database. Results Carrier screening identified pathogenic variants shared among Syrian, Iranian, and Ashkenazi Jewish groups. In addition, alleles unique to each group were identified. Importantly, 8.2% of 3401 individuals of mixed Syrian Jewish ancestry were carriers for at least one pathogenic variant. Conclusion The findings of this study support the clinical usefulness of premarital genetic screening for individuals with Syrian Jewish ancestry to reduce the incidence of autosomal recessive disease among persons with Syrian Jewish heritage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Zeevi
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Chaim Levi
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sholem Y Scher
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Bringer
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yael Kahan
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Hagit Muallem
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Rinat Benel
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yoel Hirsch
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Tzvi Weiden
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ahron Ekstein
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Josef Ekstein
- Dor Yeshorim, The Committee for Prevention of Jewish Genetic Diseases, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fabiani M, Cogo F, Poli M, Capalbo A. Technical factors to consider when developing an Expanded Carrier Screening platform. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 33:178-183. [PMID: 33741771 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Expanded Carrier Screening (ECS) is a genetic test able to detect carriers for a large number of autosomal recessive and X-linked diseases. Its clinical utilization is increasing but some technical aspects for its implementation are still controversial. RECENT FINDINGS In the current literature, several aspects of ECS panel implementation have been addressed. One of the most relevant topics involves which genes/pathologies should be included in an optimized ECS panel and which variants should be reported. SUMMARY Here, we review the best practice criteria to refine and improve clinical utility and validity of an ECS panel. The criteria for optimal ECS panel implementation include the severity of pathologies, the prevalence of diseases in general population and a definitive or strong gene/disease association. Moreover, we discuss the main complications associated with the reporting of Variant of Uncertain Significance and the need for periodic reassessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Antonio Capalbo
- Igenomix Italia, Marostica, Vicenza, Italy.,Igenomix Foundation, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Akler G, Birch AH, Schreiber-Agus N, Cai X, Cai G, Shi L, Yu C, Larmore AM, Mendiratta-Vij G, Elkhoury L, Dillon MW, Zhu J, Mclellan AS, Suer FE, Webb BD, Schadt EE, Kornreich R, Edelmann L. Lessons learned from expanded reproductive carrier screening in self-reported Ashkenazi, Sephardi, and Mizrahi Jewish patients. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019; 8:e1053. [PMID: 31880409 PMCID: PMC7005669 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based panels have gained traction as a strategy for reproductive carrier screening. Their value for screening Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) individuals, who have benefited greatly from population‐wide targeted testing, as well as Sephardi/Mizrahi Jewish (SMJ) individuals (an underserved population), has not been fully explored. Methods The clinical utilization by 6,805 self‐reported Jewish individuals of an expanded NGS panel, along with several ancillary assays, was assessed retrospectively. Data were extracted for a subset of 96 diseases that, during the panel design phase, were classified as being AJ‐, SMJ‐, or pan‐Jewish/pan‐ethnic‐relevant. Results 64.6% of individuals were identified as carriers of one or more of these 96 diseases. Over 80% of the reported variants would have been missed by following recommended AJ screening guidelines. 10.7% of variants reported for AJs were in “SMJ‐relevant genes,” and 31.2% reported for SMJs were in “AJ‐relevant genes.” Roughly 2.5% of individuals carried a novel, likely pathogenic variant. One in 16 linked cohort couples was identified as a carrier couple for at least one of these 96 diseases. Conclusion For maximal carrier identification, this study supports using expanded NGS panels for individuals of all Jewish backgrounds. This approach can better empower at‐risk couples for reproductive decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gidon Akler
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,TOVANA Health, Houston, TX, USA.,Precision Medicine Insights, P.C., Great Neck, NY, USA
| | - Ashley H Birch
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | | | - Xiaoqiang Cai
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Guiqing Cai
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Lisong Shi
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Chunli Yu
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Anastasia M Larmore
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Geetu Mendiratta-Vij
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Lama Elkhoury
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Mitchell W Dillon
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jun Zhu
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Andrew S Mclellan
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Funda E Suer
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Bryn D Webb
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Eric E Schadt
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Ruth Kornreich
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Lisa Edelmann
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|