|
1
|
Elstein D, Belmatoug N, Deegan P, Göker-Alpan Ö, Hughes DA, Schwartz IVD, Weinreb N, Bonner N, Panter C, Fountain D, Lenny A, Longworth L, Miller R, Shah K, Schenk J, Sen R, Zimran A. Development and validation of Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1)-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for clinical monitoring and for clinical trials. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17:9. [PMID: 34991656 PMCID: PMC8734239 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-02163-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are fundamental to understanding the impact on, and expectations of, patients with genetic disorders, and can facilitate constructive and educated conversations about treatments and outcomes. However, generic PROMs may fail to capture disease-specific concerns. Here we report the development and validation of a Gaucher disease (GD)-specific PROM for patients with type 1 Gaucher disease (GD1) a lysosomal storage disorder characterized by hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, anemia, bruising, bone disease, and fatigue. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The questionnaire was initially developed with input from 85 patients or parents of patients with GD1 or GD3 in Israel. Owing to few participating patients with GD3, content validity was assessed for patients with GD1 only. Content validity of the revised questionnaire was assessed in 33 patients in the US, France, and Israel according to US Food and Drug Administration standards, with input from a panel of six GD experts and one patient advocate representative. Concept elicitation interviews explored patient experience of symptoms and treatments, and a cognitive debriefing exercise explored patients' understanding and relevance of instructions, items, response scales, and recall period. Two versions of the questionnaire were subsequently developed: a 24-item version for routine monitoring in clinical practice (rmGD1-PROM), and a 17-item version for use in clinical trials (ctGD1-PROM). Psychometric validation of the ctGD1-PROM was assessed in 46 adult patients with GD1 and re-administered two weeks later to examine test-retest reliability. Findings from the psychometric validation study revealed excellent internal consistency and strong evidence of convergent validity of the ctGD1-PROM based on correlations with the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. Most items were found to show moderate, good, or excellent test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS Development of the ctGD1-PROM represents an important step forward for researchers measuring the impact of GD and its respective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Elstein
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Nadia Belmatoug
- Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris Nord, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Patrick Deegan
- Lysosomal Disorders Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - Özlem Göker-Alpan
- Lysosomal Disorders Unit and Center for Clinical Trials, O&O Alpan LLC, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | | | | | - Neal Weinreb
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jörn Schenk
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rohini Sen
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Ari Zimran
- Gaucher Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|