Combined intraflap and extraflap microvascular anastomoses to facilitate bipedicled DIEP/SIEA free flap for unilateral breast reconstruction

The Use of the Bipedicled Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The use of abdominal flaps is recognized as a very advantageous approach for breast reconstruction with gradual refinements leading from the pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap to the criterion standard deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap and its several variations. A systematic review with meta-analysis attempts to investigate the safety of the bipedicled DIEP flap for unilateral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

The literature search used "PubMed" database, and a relevant study conducted at the Queen Victoria Hospital was also included. The extraction of data included study type, follow-up, patients' age, body mass index, preexisting abdominal scars, timing of reconstruction, operating time, flap inset, pedicles' configuration, flap failure, revision, and complication rates. Proportions were pooled with Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation, and meta-regression was performed to evaluate whether complication rates were modified by different variables.

RESULTS

Fourteen eligible articles provided an overall sample of 486 flaps, with a median follow-up of 18.5 months. In most cases, immediate reconstruction with undivided flap was performed, with equal use of extraflap and intraflap pedicles' configuration. Only 4 cases of flap failure (0.82%) were documented, with 18% overall complications and 3% fat necrosis rate. The forest plot showed significant between-study heterogeneity, and meta-regression revealed marginal positive association between older patient and complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipedicled DIEP flap for unilateral breast reconstruction is a technique that maintains the complications rate relatively low in challenging postmastectomy cases. Further comparative studies are needed to substantiate the findings of this study.

Comparing outcomes between stacked/conjoined and non-stacked/conjoined abdominal microvascular unilateral breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Stacked and conjoined free flaps are increasingly utilized in autologous breast reconstruction to augment tissue transfer volume. However, there is a paucity of comparative data on abdominally-based stacked/conjoined versus non-stacked/conjoined flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare ability to match native breast size, complications, recovery, and symmetrizing procedures between these two cohorts in unilateral breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all stacked (two separate hemiabdominal)/conjoined (bipedicled full abdominal) flaps and non-stacked/conjoined (unipedicled hemiabdominal) flaps in unilateral abdominally-based autologous breast reconstructions was performed from 2011 to 2018. Variables including demographics, operative characteristics, complications, and revisions were compared in 36 stacked/conjoined patients versus 146 non-stacked/conjoined patients.

RESULTS

The stacked/conjoined cohort had more DIEP flaps (91.7 vs. 65.1%) and the non-stacked/conjoined group more MS-TRAMs (34.2 vs. 6.9%, p = .000). Additionally, non-stacked/conjoined flaps had greater utilization of combined medial and lateral row perforators (p = .000). Mean flap weight was significantly higher than mastectomy weight in stacked/conjoined flaps (+110.7 g) when compared to non-stacked/conjoined flaps (-40.2) (p = .023). Average follow-up was 54.7 ± 27.5 and 54.6 ± 29.3 months, respectively. Stacked/conjoined flaps had lower fat necrosis rates (8.3 vs. 25.4%, p = .039) and had a decreased risk of fat necrosis on multivariable regression analysis (OR 0.278, p = 0.045). There were otherwise no differences in flap, breast, or donor-site complications. Stacked/conjoined flaps also had a lower rate of contralateral breast reduction (p = .041).

CONCLUSION

Stacked/conjoined flaps were associated with a lower risk of fat necrosis compared with non-stacked/conjoined flaps and had a lower rate of contralateral symmetrizing reductions in patients undergoing unilateral abdominally-based breast reconstruction.