Semi-automated pulmonary nodule interval segmentation using the NLST data

Parameterized Gompertz-Guided Morphological AutoEncoder for Predicting Pulmonary Nodule Growth

The growth rate of pulmonary nodules is a critical clue to the cancerous diagnosis. It is essential to monitor their dynamic progressions during pulmonary nodule management. To facilitate the prosperity of research on nodule growth prediction, we organized and published a temporal dataset called NLSTt with consecutive computed tomography (CT) scans. Based on the self-built dataset, we develop a visual learner to predict the growth for the following CT scan qualitatively and further propose a model to predict the growth rate of pulmonary nodules quantitatively, so that better diagnosis can be achieved with the help of our predicted results. To this end, in this work, we propose a parameterized Gempertz-guided morphological autoencoder (GM-AE) to generate any future-time-span high-quality visual appearances of pulmonary nodules from the baseline CT scan. Specifically, we parameterize a popular mathematical model for tumor growth kinetics, Gompertz, to predict future masses and volumes of pulmonary nodules. Then, we exploit the expected growth rate on the mass and volume to guide decoders generating future shape and texture of pulmonary nodules. We introduce two branches in an autoencoder to encourage shape-aware and textural-aware representation learning and integrate the generated shape into the textural-aware branch to simulate the future morphology of pulmonary nodules. We conduct extensive experiments on the self-built NLSTt dataset to demonstrate the superiority of our GM-AE to its competitive counterparts. Experiment results also reveal the learnable Gompertz function enjoys promising descriptive power in accounting for inter-subject variability of the growth rate for pulmonary nodules. Besides, we evaluate our GM-AE model on an in-house dataset to validate its generalizability and practicality. We make its code publicly available along with the published NLSTt dataset.

Factors influencing the outcome of volumetry tools for pulmonary nodule analysis: a systematic review and attempted meta-analysis

Health systems worldwide are implementing lung cancer screening programmes to identify early-stage lung cancer and maximise patient survival. Volumetry is recommended for follow-up of pulmonary nodules and outperforms other measurement methods. However, volumetry is known to be influenced by multiple factors. The objectives of this systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42022370233) are to summarise the current knowledge regarding factors that influence volumetry tools used in the analysis of pulmonary nodules, assess for significant clinical impact, identify gaps in current knowledge and suggest future research. Five databases (Medline, Scopus, Journals@Ovid, Embase and Emcare) were searched on the 21st of September, 2022, and 137 original research studies were included, explicitly testing the potential impact of influencing factors on the outcome of volumetry tools. The summary of these studies is tabulated, and a narrative review is provided. A subset of studies (n = 16) reporting clinical significance were selected, and their results were combined, if appropriate, using meta-analysis. Factors with clinical significance include the segmentation algorithm, quality of the segmentation, slice thickness, the level of inspiration for solid nodules, and the reconstruction algorithm and kernel in subsolid nodules. Although there is a large body of evidence in this field, it is unclear how to apply the results from these studies in clinical practice as most studies do not test for clinical relevance. The meta-analysis did not improve our understanding due to the small number and heterogeneity of studies testing for clinical significance. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Many studies have investigated the influencing factors of pulmonary nodule volumetry, but only 11% of these questioned their clinical relevance in their management. The heterogeneity among these studies presents a challenge in consolidating results and clinical application of the evidence. KEY POINTS: • Factors influencing the volumetry of pulmonary nodules have been extensively investigated. • Just 11% of studies test clinical significance (wrongly diagnosing growth). • Nodule size interacts with most other influencing factors (especially for smaller nodules). • Heterogeneity among studies makes comparison and consolidation of results challenging. • Future research should focus on clinical applicability, screening, and updated technology.

Benign-malignant classification of pulmonary nodules by low-dose spiral computerized tomography and clinical data with machine learning in opportunistic screening

BACKGROUND

Many people were found with pulmonary nodules during physical examinations. It is of great practical significance to discriminate benign and malignant nodules by using data mining technology.

METHODS

The subjects' demographic data, baseline examination results, and annual follow-up low-dose spiral computerized tomography (LDCT) results were recorded. The findings from annual physical examinations of positive nodules, including highly suspicious nodules and clinically tentative benign nodules, was analyzed. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model was constructed and the Grid Search CV method was used to select the super parameters. External unit data were used as an external validation set to evaluate the generalization performance of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 135,503 physical examinees were enrolled. Baseline testing found that 27,636 (20.40%) participants had clinically tentative benign nodules and 611 (0.45%) participants had highly suspicious nodules. The proportion of highly suspicious nodules in participants with negative baseline was about 0.12%-0.46%, which was lower than the baseline level except the follow-up of >5 years. In the 27,636 participants with clinically tentative benign nodules, only in the first year of LDCT re-examination was the proportion of highly suspicious nodules (1.40%) significantly greater than that of baseline screening (0.45%) (p < 0.001), and the proportion of highly suspicious nodules was not different between the baseline screening and other follow-up years (p > 0.05). Furthermore, 322 cases with benign nodules and 196 patients with malignant nodules confirmed by surgery and pathology were compared. A model and the top 15 most important clinical variables were determined by XGBoost algorithm. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.76 [95% CI: 0.67-0.84], and the accuracy was 0.75. The sensitivity and specificity of the model under this threshold were 0.78 and 0.73, respectively. In the validation of model using external data, the AUC was 0.87 and the accuracy was 0.80. The sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 and 0.77, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that pulmonary nodules could be more accurately identified at the first LDCT examination. A model with 15 variables which are routinely measured in the clinic could be helpful to distinguish benign and malignant nodules. It could help the radiological team issue a more accurate report; and it may guide the clinical team regarding LDCT follow-up.

Contextualizing the Role of Volumetric Analysis in Pulmonary Nodule Assessment: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Pulmonary nodules are managed on the basis of their size and morphologic characteristics. Radiologists are familiar with assessing nodule size by measuring diameter using manually deployed electronic calipers. Size may also be assessed with 3D volumetric measurements (referred to as volumetry) obtained with software. Nodule size and growth are more accurately assessed with volumetry than on the basis of diameter, and the evidence supporting clinical use of volumetry has expanded, driven by its use in lung cancer screening nodule management algorithms in Europe. The application of volumetry has the potential to reduce recommendations for imaging follow-up of indeterminate solid nodules without impacting cancer detection. Although changes in scanning conditions and volumetry software packages can lead to variation in volumetry results, ongoing technical advances have improved the reliability of calculated volumes. Volumetry is now the primary method for determining size of solid nodules in the European lung cancer screening position statement and British Thoracic Society recommendations. The purposes of this article are to review technical aspects, advantages, and limitations of volumetry and, by considering specific scenarios, to contextualize the use of volumetry with respect to its importance in morphologic evaluation, its role in predicting malignancy in risk models, and its practical impact on nodule management. Implementation challenges and areas requiring further evidence are also highlighted.

Multivariate Analysis on Development of Lung Adenocarcinoma Lesion from Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

Objective

To analyze multiple factors developing lung adenocarcinoma lesion from solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN).

Methods

A total of 70 patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma after finding SPN by chest CT and treated in our hospital (01, 2018–01, 2021) were selected as the malignant lesion group, and another 70 patients diagnosed with benign lesion after finding SPN by CT in the same period were included in the benign lesion group. All patients had complete medical records. With univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression, the independent risk factors for developing lung adenocarcinoma lesions from SPN were analyzed.

Results

By conducting univariate analysis of patients' general information (age, course of disease, BMI, nodule diameter, and gender), smoking status (smoking history and number of cigarettes smoked per year), medical history (family history of lung cancer, history of extrapulmonary malignant tumor, and history of autoimmune diseases), basic complications (hypertension and diabetes), and laboratory examinations (CEA, NSE, CYFRA21-1, SCC-Ag, and CA125), it was concluded that age, course of disease, nodule diameter, CEA positive, CYFRA21-1 positive, and CA125 positive were significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.05); the logistic regression results showed that high age, increased nodule diameter, and CYFRA21-1 positive were the independent risk factors developing lung adenocarcinoma from SPN (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In patients with SPN, higher age, longer course of disease, greater nodule diameter, and CYFRA21-1 positive imply increased risk for triggering lung adenocarcinoma lesion. Therefore, high attention should be paid in the clinic to such SPN patients for early diagnosis and treatment.

A radiomics approach for lung nodule detection in thoracic CT images based on the dynamic patterns of morphological variation

OBJECTIVES

To propose and evaluate a set of radiomic features, called morphological dynamics features, for pulmonary nodule detection, which were rooted in the dynamic patterns of morphological variation and needless precise lesion segmentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two datasets were involved, namely, university hospital (UH) and LIDC datasets, comprising 72 CT scans (360 nodules) and 888 CT scans (2230 nodules), respectively. Each nodule was annotated by multiple radiologists. Denoted the category of nodules identified by at least k radiologists as ALk. A nodule detection algorithm, called CAD-MD algorithm, was proposed based on the morphological dynamics radiomic features, characterizing a lesion by ten sets of the same features with different values extracted from ten different thresholding results. Each nodule candidate was classified by a two-level classifier, including ten decision trees and a random forest, respectively. The CAD-MD algorithm was compared with a deep learning approach, the N-Net, using the UH dataset.

RESULTS

On the AL1 and AL2 of the UH dataset, the AUC of the AFROC curves were 0.777 and 0.851 for the CAD-MD algorithm and 0.478 and 0.472 for the N-Net, respectively. The CAD-MD algorithm achieved the sensitivities of 84.4% and 91.4% with 2.98 and 3.69 FPs/scan and the N-Net 74.4% and 80.7% with 3.90 and 4.49 FPs/scan, respectively. On the LIDC dataset, the CAD-MD algorithm attained the sensitivities of 87.6%, 89.2%, 92.2%, and 95.0% with 4 FPs/scan for AL1-AL4, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The morphological dynamics radiomic features might serve as an effective set of radiomic features for lung nodule detection.

KEY POINTS

• Texture features varied with such CT system settings as reconstruction kernels of CT images, CT scanner models, and parameter settings, and so on. • Shape and first-order statistics were shown to be the most robust features against variation in CT imaging parameters. • The morphological dynamics radiomic features, which mainly characterized the dynamic patterns of morphological variation, were shown to be effective for lung nodule detection.

Water Cycle Bat Algorithm and Dictionary-Based Deformable Model for Lung Tumor Segmentation

Among the different types of cancers, lung cancer is one of the widespread diseases which causes the highest number of deaths every year. The early detection of lung cancer is very essential for increasing the survival rate in patients. Although computed tomography (CT) is the preferred choice for lungs imaging, sometimes CT images may produce less tumor visibility regions and unconstructive rates in tumor portions. Hence, the development of an efficient segmentation technique is necessary. In this paper, water cycle bat algorithm- (WCBA-) based deformable model approach is proposed for lung tumor segmentation. In the preprocessing stage, a median filter is used to remove the noise from the input image and to segment the lung lobe regions, and Bayesian fuzzy clustering is applied. In the proposed method, deformable model is modified by the dictionary-based algorithm to segment the lung tumor accurately. In the dictionary-based algorithm, the update equation is modified by the proposed WCBA and is designed by integrating water cycle algorithm (WCA) and bat algorithm (BA).

Lung Nodule Malignancy Prediction in Sequential CT Scans: Summary of ISBI 2018 Challenge

Lung cancer is by far the leading cause of cancer death in the US. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of screening using low dose CT (LDCT) in reducing lung cancer related mortality. While lung nodules are detected with a high rate of sensitivity, this exam has a low specificity rate and it is still difficult to separate benign and malignant lesions. The ISBI 2018 Lung Nodule Malignancy Prediction Challenge, developed by a team from the Quantitative Imaging Network of the National Cancer Institute, was focused on the prediction of lung nodule malignancy from two sequential LDCT screening exams using automated (non-manual) algorithms. We curated a cohort of 100 subjects who participated in the National Lung Screening Trial and had established pathological diagnoses. Data from 30 subjects were randomly selected for training and the remaining was used for testing. Participants were evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of nodule-wise malignancy scores generated by their algorithms on the test set. The challenge had 17 participants, with 11 teams submitting reports with method description, mandated by the challenge rules. Participants used quantitative methods, resulting in a reporting test AUC ranging from 0.698 to 0.913. The top five contestants used deep learning approaches, reporting an AUC between 0.87 - 0.91. The team's predictor did not achieve significant differences from each other nor from a volume change estimate (p =.05 with Bonferroni-Holm's correction).

Implications of the updated Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS version 1.1) for lung cancer screening

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been proven to aid in early detection of lung cancer and reduce disease specific mortality. In 2014, the American College of Radiology (ACR) released version 1.0 of the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) as a quality tool to standardize the reporting of lung cancer screening LDCT. In 2019, 5 years after the implementation of Lung-RADS version 1.0 the ACR released the updated Lung-RADS version 1.1 which incorporates initial experience with lung cancer screening. In this review, we outline the implications of the changes and additions in Lung-RADS version 1.1 and examine relevant literature for many of the updates. We also highlight several challenges and opportunities as Lung-RADS version 1.1 is implemented in lung cancer screening programs.

Stability and reproducibility of computed tomography radiomic features extracted from peritumoral regions of lung cancer lesions

PURPOSE

Recent efforts have demonstrated that radiomic features extracted from the peritumoral region, the area surrounding the tumor parenchyma, have clinical utility in various cancer types. However, as like any radiomic features, peritumoral features could also be unstable and/or nonreproducible. Hence, the purpose of this study was to assess the stability and reproducibility of computed tomography (CT) radiomic features extracted from the peritumoral regions of lung lesions where stability was defined as the consistency of a feature by different segmentations, and reproducibility was defined as the consistency of a feature to different image acquisitions.

METHODS

Stability was measured utilizing the "moist run" dataset and reproducibility was measured utilizing the Reference Image Database to Evaluate Therapy Response test-retest dataset. Peritumoral radiomic features were extracted from incremental distances of 3-12 mm outside the tumor segmentation. A total of 264 statistical, histogram, and texture radiomic features were assessed from the selected peritumoral region-of-interests (ROIs). All features (except wavelet texture features) were extracted using standardized algorithms defined by the Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative. Stability and reproducibility of features were assessed using the concordance correlation coefficient. The clinical utility of stable and reproducible peritumoral features was tested in three previously published lung cancer datasets using overall survival as the endpoint.

RESULTS

Features found to be stable and reproducible, regardless of the peritumoral distances, included statistical, histogram, and a subset of texture features suggesting that these features are less affected by changes (e.g., size or shape) of the peritumoral region due to different segmentations and image acquisitions. The stability and reproducibility of Laws and wavelet texture features were inconsistent across all peritumoral distances. The analyses also revealed that a subset of features were consistently stable irrespective of the initial parameters (e.g., seed point) for a given segmentation algorithm. No significant differences were found in stability for features that were extracted from ROIs bounded by a lung parenchyma mask versus ROIs that were not bounded by a lung parenchyma mask (i.e., peritumoral regions that extended outside of lung parenchyma). After testing the clinical utility of peritumoral features, stable and reproducible features were shown to be more likely to create repeatable models than unstable and nonreproducible features.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified a subset of stable and reproducible CT radiomic features extracted from the peritumoral region of lung lesions. The stable and reproducible features identified in this study could be applied to a feature selection pipeline for CT radiomic analyses. According to our findings, top performing features in survival models were more likely to be stable and reproducible hence, it may be best practice to utilize them to achieve repeatable studies and reduce the chance of overfitting.

Radiomics for Classification of Lung Cancer Histological Subtypes Based on Nonenhanced Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of using radiomics method to classify lung cancer histological subtypes based on nonenhanced computed tomography images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

278 patients with pathologically confirmed lung cancer were collected, including 181 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 97 small cell lung cancers (SCLC) patients. Among the NSCLC patients, 88 patients were adenocarcinomas (AD) and 93 patients were squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). In total, 1695 quantitative radiomic features (QRF) were calculated from the primary lung cancer tumor in each patient. To build radiomic classification model based on the extracted QRFs, several machine-learning algorithms were applied sequentially. First, unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to exclude highly correlated QRFs; second, the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance feature selection algorithm was employed to select informative and nonredundant QRFs; finally, the Incremental Forward Search and Support Vector Machine classification algorithms were used to combine the selected QRFs and build the model. In our work, to study the phenotypic differences among lung cancer histological subtypes, four classification models were built. They were models of SCLC vs NSCLC, SCLC vs AD, SCLC vs SCC, and AD vs SCC. The performance of the classification models was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) estimated by three-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

The AUC (95% confidence interval) for the model of SCLC vs NSCLC was 0.741(0.678, 0.795). For the models of SCLC vs AD and SCLC vs SCC, the AUCs were 0.822(0.755, 0.875) and 0.665(0.583, 0.738), respectively. The AUC for the model of AD vs SCC was 0.655(0.570, 0.731). Several QRFs ("Law_15," "LoG_Uniformity," "GLCM_Contrast," and "Compactness Factor") that characterize tumor heterogeneity and shape were selected as the significant features to build the models.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that phenotypic differences exist among different lung cancer histological subtypes on nonenhanced computed tomography image.

QIN Benchmarks for Clinical Translation of Quantitative Imaging Tools

The Quantitative Imaging Network of the National Cancer Institute is in its 10th year of operation, and research teams within the network are developing and validating clinical decision support software tools to measure or predict the response of cancers to various therapies. As projects progress from development activities to validation of quantitative imaging tools and methods, it is important to evaluate the performance and clinical readiness of the tools before committing them to prospective clinical trials. A variety of tests, including special challenges and tool benchmarking, have been instituted within the network to prepare the quantitative imaging tools for service in clinical trials. This article highlights the benchmarking process and provides a current evaluation of several tools in their transition from development to validation.

Multiple Resolution Residually Connected Feature Streams for Automatic Lung Tumor Segmentation From CT Images

Volumetric lung tumor segmentation and accurate longitudinal tracking of tumor volume changes from computed tomography images are essential for monitoring tumor response to therapy. Hence, we developed two multiple resolution residually connected network (MRRN) formulations called incremental-MRRN and dense-MRRN. Our networks simultaneously combine features across multiple image resolution and feature levels through residual connections to detect and segment the lung tumors. We evaluated our method on a total of 1210 non-small cell (NSCLC) lung tumors and nodules from three data sets consisting of 377 tumors from the open-source Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA), 304 advanced stage NSCLC treated with anti- PD-1 checkpoint immunotherapy from internal institution MSKCC data set, and 529 lung nodules from the Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC). The algorithm was trained using 377 tumors from the TCIA data set and validated on the MSKCC and tested on LIDC data sets. The segmentation accuracy compared to expert delineations was evaluated by computing the dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distances, sensitivity, and precision metrics. Our best performing incremental-MRRN method produced the highest DSC of 0.74 ± 0.13 for TCIA, 0.75±0.12 for MSKCC, and 0.68±0.23 for the LIDC data sets. There was no significant difference in the estimations of volumetric tumor changes computed using the incremental-MRRN method compared with the expert segmentation. In summary, we have developed a multi-scale CNN approach for volumetrically segmenting lung tumors which enables accurate, automated identification of and serial measurement of tumor volumes in the lung.