Feasibility study of macroscopic simulations of nanodosimetric parameters for proton therapy

Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond

This topical review summarizes underlying concepts of nanodosimetry. It describes the development and current status of nanodosimetric detector technology. It also gives an overview of Monte Carlo track structure simulations that can provide nanodosimetric parameters for treatment planning of proton and ion therapy. Classical and modern radiobiological assays that can be used to demonstrate the relationship between the frequency and complexity of DNA lesion clusters and nanodosimetric parameters are reviewed. At the end of the review, existing approaches of treatment planning based on relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models or dose-averaged linear energy transfer are contrasted with an RBE-independent approach based on nandosimetric parameters. Beyond treatment planning, nanodosimetry is also expected to have applications and give new insights into radiation protection dosimetry.

First measurements of ionization cluster-size distributions with a compact nanodosimeter

PURPOSE

A nanodosimeter is a type of detector which measures single ionizations in a small gaseous volume in order to obtain ionization cluster size probability distributions for characterization of radiation types. Working nanodosimeter detectors are usually bulky machines which require a lot of space. In this work, the authors present a compact ceramic nanodosimeter detector and report on first measurements of cluster size distributions of 5 MeV alpha particles.

METHODS

Single ionization measurements are achieved by applying a weak electric field to collect positive ions in a hole in a ceramic plate. Inside the ceramic plate, due to a strong electric field, the ions are accelerated and produce impact-ionizations. The resulting electron avalanche is detected in a read-out electrode. A Bayesian unfolding algorithm is then applied to the experimentally obtained cluster size distributions to reconstruct the true cluster size distributions.

RESULTS

Experimentally obtained cluster size distributions by the compact nanodosimeter detector are presented. The reconstructed cluster size distributions agreed well with Monte Carlo simulated cluster size distributions for small volumes (diameter = 2.5 nm). For larger volumes, discrepancies between the reconstructed cluster size distributions and cluster size distributions from Monte Carlo simulations were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, ionization cluster size probability distributions could be obtained by a small and compact nanodosimeter detector. This signifies the achievement of a critical step toward the wide application of nanodosimetric characterization of radiation types including in clinical environments.