Inter- and intra-fractional stability of rectal gas in pelvic cancer patients during MRIgRT

Daily Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of Postoperative Endometrial and Cervical Cancer With PTV Margin Reduction to 5 mm: Dosimetric Outcomes, Acute Toxicity, and First Clinical Experience

Purpose

This study evaluated the first clinical implementation of daily iterative cone beam computed tomography (iCBCT)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) in the postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer.

Methods and Materials

Seventeen consecutive patients treated with daily iCBCT-guided oART were enrolled in this prospective study, with a reduced uniform 3-dimensional PTV margin of 5 mm. Treatment plans were designed to deliver 45 or 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions to PTV. Pre- and posttreatment ultrasound and iCBCT scans were performed to record intrafractional bladder and rectal volume changes. The accuracy of contouring, oART procedure time, dosimetric outcomes, and acute toxicity were evaluated.

Results

The average time from first iCBCT acquisition to completion of treatment was 22 minutes and 26 seconds. During this period, bladder volume increased by 44 cm3 using iCBCT contouring, whereas rectal volume remained stable (62.9 cm3 pretreatment vs 61.9 cm3 posttreatment). A total of 91.6% of influencers and 88.1% of CTVs required no or minor edits. The adapted plan was selected in all (434) fractions and significantly improved the dosimetry coverage for CTV and PTV, especially the vaginal PTV coverage by nearly 7% (P < .05). The adapted bladder Dmean was 104.61 cGy, and the rectum Dmean was 123.67 cGy, significantly lower than the scheduled plan of 108.24 and 128.19 cGy, respectively. The bone marrow and femur head left and right dosimetry were also improved with adaptation. Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were 24% and 0, respectively. There was a grade 3 acute toxicity of decreased white blood cell count in 1 patient.

Conclusions

Daily oART was associated with favorable dosimetry improvement and low acute toxicity, supporting its safety and efficacy for postoperative treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. These results need to be validated in a larger prospective randomized controlled cohort.

Monitoring Intrafraction Motion of the Prostate During Radiation Therapy: Suggested Practice Points From a Focused Review

PURPOSE

External beam radiation therapy to the prostate is typically delivered after verification of prostatic position with image guidance. Prostate motion can occur during the delivery of each radiation treatment between the time of localization imaging and completion of treatment. The objective of this work is to review the literature on intrafraction motion (IFM) of the prostate during radiation therapy and offer clinical recommendations on management.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted on prostate motion during prostate cancer radiation therapy. Information was organized around 3 key clinical questions, followed by an evidence-based recommendation.

RESULTS

IFM of the prostate during radiation therapy is typically ≤3 mm and is unlikely to compromise prostate dosimetry to a clinically meaningful degree for men treated in a relatively short treatment duration with planning target volume (PTV) margins of ≥3 to 5 mm. IFM of 5 mm or more has been observed in up to ∼10% of treatment fractions, with limited dosimetric effect related to the infrequency of occurrence and longer fractionation of therapy. IFM can be monitored in continuous or discontinuous fashion with a variety of imaging platforms. Correction of IFM may have the greatest value when tighter PTV margins are desired (such as with stereotactic body radiation therapy or intraprostatic nodule boosting), ultrahypofractionated courses, or when treatment time exceeds several minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

This focused review summarizes literature and provides practical recommendations regarding IFM in the treatment of prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy.

Why we should care about gas pockets in online adaptive MRgRT: a dosimetric evaluation

Introduction

Contouring of gas pockets is a time consuming step in the workflow of adaptive radiotherapy. We would like to better understand which gas pockets electronic densitiy should be used and the dosimetric impact on adaptive MRgRT treatment.

Materials and methods

21 CT scans of patients undergoing SBRT were retrospectively evaluated. Anatomical structures were contoured: Gross Tumour Volume (GTV), stomach (ST), small bowel (SB), large bowel (LB), gas pockets (GAS) and gas in each organ respectively STG, SBG, LBG. Average HU in GAS was converted in RED, the obtained value has been named as Gastrointestinal Gas RED (GIGED). Differences of average HU in GAS, STG, SBG and LBG were computed. Three treatment plans were calculated editing the GAS volume RED that was overwritten with: air RED (0.0012), water RED (1.000), GIGED, generating respectively APLAN, WPLAN and the GPLAN. 2-D dose distributions were analyzed by gamma analysis. Parameter called active gas volume (AGV) was calculated as the intersection of GAS with the isodose of 5% of prescription dose.

Results

Average HU value contained in GAS results to be equal to -620. No significative difference was noted between the average HU of gas in different organ at risk. Value of Gamma Passing Rate (GPR) anticorrelates with the AGV for each plan comparison and the threshold value for GPR to fall below 90% is 41, 60 and 139 cc for WPLANvsAPLAN, GPLANvsAPLAN and WPLANvsGPLAN respectively.

Discussions

GIGED is the right RED for Gastrointestinal Gas. Novel AGV is a useful parameter to evaluate the effect of gas pocket on dose distribution.

Biomedical advances and future prospects of high-precision three-dimensional radiotherapy and four-dimensional radiotherapy

Biomedical advances of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with improvements in physical accuracy are reviewed. High-precision (±1 mm) three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DRT) can utilize respective therapeutic open doors in the tumor control probability curve and in the normal tissue complication probability curve instead of the one single therapeutic window in two-dimensional EBRT. High-precision 3DRT achieved higher tumor control and probable survival rates for patients with small peripheral lung and liver cancers. Four-dimensional radiotherapy (4DRT), which can reduce uncertainties in 3DRT due to organ motion by real-time (every 0.1-1 s) tumor-tracking and immediate (0.1-1 s) irradiation, have achieved reduced adverse effects for prostate and pancreatic tumors near the digestive tract and with similar or better tumor control. Particle beam therapy improved tumor control and probable survival for patients with large liver tumors. The clinical outcomes of locally advanced or multiple tumors located near serial-type organs can theoretically be improved further by integrating the 4DRT concept with particle beams.

Adaptive radiotherapy of locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer with intra‑fractional motion using the MRIdian system: A case report

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, when combined with radiotherapy, serves as an optional treatment for patients with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer and is usually performed in conjunction with complete mesocolic excision. The substantial movement of surrounding organs in cases of sigmoid colon cancer frequently leads to toxicity in normal tissues. The present report details the case of a 76-year-old man diagnosed with locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer. Initially, treatment using the Tomotherapy Hi-Art system was selected; however, during image guidance from the first to the sixth fractions, the tumor location underwent a marked change, exceeding the range of the planning target volume. Efforts to recapture the image were unsuccessful, leading to a decision to transition the patient to the MRIdian system for daily treatment with online adaptive radiotherapy. The positional variations in the tumor were evident in each treatment using the MRIdian system, with mean shifts of 2.58 cm in the right-left direction, 1.24 cm in the cranial-caudal direction and 0.40 cm in the anterior-posterior direction. The mean time from the entry of the patient to treatment completion was 41 min. Adaptive treatment plans were performed for all 19 fractions, with two treatments repeated due to the tumor moving out of tracking range. Following irradiation using the MRIdian system, the gross tumor volume decreased by 62%. Notably, the patient experienced no side effects during treatment. A CT scan conducted 3 months after radiotherapy revealed a marked reduction in the tumor size, consistent with a partial response, leading to the scheduling of surgery. Following surgery, a CT scan after 6 months revealed no local recurrence in the surgical bed region. The findings in the present case support the feasibility of implementing an adaptive treatment plan using the MRIdian system for locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer in the context of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Fan beam CT-guided online adaptive external radiotherapy of uterine cervical cancer: a dosimetric evaluation

PURPOSE

To discuss the dosimetric advantages and reliability of the accurate delivery of online adaptive radiotherapy(online ART) for uterine cervical cancer(UCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Six UCC patients were enrolled in this study. 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) reached 100% of the prescription dose (50.4 Gy/28fractions/6weeks) was required. The patients were scanned with uRT-Linac 506c KV-FBCT then the target volume (TV) and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated by doctors. The dosimeters designed and obtained a routine plan (Plan0). KV-FBCT was used for image guidance before subsequent fractional treatment. The online ART was processed after registration, which acquired a virtual nonadaptive radiotherapy plan (VPlan) and an adaptive plan (APlan). VPlan was the direct calculation of Plan0 on the fractional image, while APlan required adaptive optimization and calculation. In vivo dose monitoring and three-dimensional dose reconstruction were required during the implementation of APlan.

RESULTS

The inter-fractional volumes of the bladder and rectum changed greatly among the treatments. These changes influenced the primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and the position deviation of GTVp and PTV and positively affected the prescription dose coverage of TV. GTVp decreased gradually along with dose accumulation. The Dmax, D98, D95, D50, and D2 of APlan were superior to those of VPlan in target dose distribution. APlan had good conformal index, homogeneity index and target coverage. The rectum V40 and Dmax, bladder V40, the small bowel V40 and Dmax of APlan were better than that of VPlan. The APlan's fractional mean γ passing rate was significantly higher than the international standard and the mean γ passing rate of all cases after the three-dimensional reconstruction was higher than 97.0%.

CONCLUSION

Online ART in external radiotherapy of UCC significantly improved the dose distribution and can become an ideal technology to achieve individualized precise radiotherapy.

Dose outside of the prostate is associated with improved outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy boost

Background

One in three high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy recur. Detection of lymph node metastasis and microscopic disease spread using conventional imaging is poor, and many patients are under-treated due to suboptimal seminal vesicle or lymph node irradiation. We use Image Based Data Mining (IBDM) to investigate association between dose distributions, and prognostic variables and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. We further test whether including dose information in risk-stratification models improves performance.

Method

Planning CTs, dose distributions and clinical information were collected for 612 high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with conformal hypo-fractionated radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), or IMRT plus a single fraction high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost. Dose distributions (including HDR boost) of all studied patients were mapped to a reference anatomy using the prostate delineations. Regions where dose distributions significantly differed between patients that did and did-not experience BCR were assessed voxel-wise using 1) a binary endpoint of BCR at four-years (dose only) and 2) Cox-IBDM (dose and prognostic variables). Regions where dose was associated with outcome were identified. Cox proportional-hazard models with and without region dose information were produced and the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was used to assess model performance.

Results

No significant regions were observed for patients treated with hypo-fractionated radiotherapy or IMRT. Regions outside the target where higher dose was associated with lower BCR were observed for patients treated with brachytherapy boost. Cox-IBDM revealed that dose response was influenced by age and T-stage. A region at the seminal vesicle tips was identified in binary- and Cox-IBDM. Including the mean dose in this region in a risk-stratification model (hazard ratio=0.84, p=0.005) significantly reduced AIC values (p=0.019), indicating superior performance, compared with prognostic variables only. The region dose was lower in the brachytherapy boost patients compared with the external beam cohorts supporting the occurrence of marginal misses.

Conclusion

Association was identified between BCR and dose outside of the target region in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with IMRT plus brachytherapy boost. We show, for the first-time, that the importance of irradiating this region is linked to prognostic variables.

Evaluation of internal margins for prostate for step and shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy using different margin formulas

PURPOSE

This feasibility study evaluated the intra-fractional prostate motion using an ultrasound image-guided system during step and shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SS-IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Moreover, the internal margins (IMs) using different margin formulas were calculated.

METHODS

Fourteen consecutive patients with prostate cancer who underwent SS-IMRT (n = 5) or VMAT (n = 9) between March 2019 and April 2020 were considered. The intra-fractional prostate motion was observed in the superior-inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP), and left-right (LR) directions. The displacement of the prostate was defined as the displacement from the initial position at the scanning start time, which was evaluated using the mean ± standard deviation (SD). IMs were calculated using the van Herk and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) formulas for SS-IMRT and VMAT.

RESULTS

For SS-IMRT, the maximum displacements of the prostate motion were 0.17 ± 0.18, 0.56 ± 0.86, and 0.18 ± 0.59 mm in the SI, AP, and LR directions, respectively. For VMAT, the maximum displacements of the prostate motion were 0.19 ± 0.64, 0.22 ± 0.35, and 0.14 ± 0.37 mm in the SI, AP, and LR directions, respectively. The IMs obtained for SS-IMRT and VMAT were within 2.3 mm and 1.2 mm using the van Herk formula and within 1.2 mm and 0.8 mm using the REML formula.

CONCLUSIONS

This feasibility study confirmed that intra-fractional prostate motion was observed with SS-IMRT and VMAT using different margin formulas. The IMs should be determined according to each irradiation technique using the REML margin.

Dosimetric Effects of Air Cavities for MRI-Guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (MRgART) of Prostate Bed after Radical Prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate dosimetric impact of air cavities and their corresponding electron density correction for 0.35 tesla (T) Magnetic Resonance-guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (MRgART) of prostate bed patients.

METHODS

Three 0.35 T MRgRT plans (anterior-posterior (AP) beam, AP-PA beams, and clinical intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)) were generated on a prostate bed patient's (Patient A) planning computed tomography (CT) with artificial rectal air cavities of various sizes (0-3 cm, 0.5 cm increments). Furthermore, two 0.35 T MRgART plans ('Deformed' and 'Override') were generated on a prostate bed patient's (Patient B) daily magnetic resonance image (MRI) with artificial rectal air cavities of various sizes (0-3 cm, 0.5 cm increments) and on five prostate bed patient's (Patient 1-5) daily MRIs (2 MRIs: Fraction A and B) with real air cavities. For each MRgART plan, daily MRI electron density map was obtained by deformable registration with simulation CT. In the 'Deformed' plan, a clinical IMRT plan is calculated on the daily MRI with electron density map obtained from deformable registration only. In the 'Override' plan, daily MRI and simulation CT air cavities are manually corrected and bulk assigned air and water density on the registered electron density map, respectively. Afterwards, the clinical IMRT plan is calculated.

RESULTS

For the MRgRT plans, AP and AP-PA plans' rectum/rectal wall max dose increased with increasing air cavity size, where the 3 cm air cavity resulted in a 20%/17% and 13%/13% increase, relative to no air cavity, respectively. Clinical IMRT plan was robust to air cavity size, where dose change remained less than 1%. For the MRgART plans, daily MRI electron density maps, obtained from deformable registration with simulation CT, was unable to accurately produce electron densities reflecting the air cavities. However, for the artificial daily MRI air cavities, dosimetric change between 'Deformed' and 'Override' plan was small (<4%). Similarly, for the real daily MRI air cavities, clinical constraint changes between 'Deformed' and 'Override' plan was negligible and did not lead to change in clinical decision for adaptive planning except for two fractions. In these fractions, the 'Override' plan indicated that the bladder max dose and rectum V35.7 exceeded the constraint, while the 'Deformed' plan showed acceptable dose, although the absolute difference was only 0.3 Gy and 0.03 cc, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Clinical 0.35 T IMRT prostate bed plans are dosimetrically robust to air cavities. MRgART air cavity electron density correction shows clinically insignificant change and is not warranted on low-field systems.